Search

Background: Contextual factors such as an intervention’s setting are key to understanding how interventions to change behaviour have their effects and patterns of generalisation across contexts. The intervention’s setting is not consistently reported in published reports of evaluations. Using ontologies to specify and classify intervention setting characteristics enables clear and reproducible reporting, thus aiding replication, implementation and evidence synthesis. This paper reports the development of a Setting Ontology for behaviour change interventions as part of a Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology, currently being developed in the Wellcome Trust funded Human Behaviour-Change Project. Methods: The Intervention Setting Ontology was developed following methods for ontology development used in the Human Behaviour-Change Project: 1) Defining the ontology’s scope, 2) Identifying key entities by reviewing existing classification systems (top-down) and 100 published behaviour change intervention reports (bottom-up), 3) Refining the preliminary ontology by literature annotation of 100 reports, 4) Stakeholder reviewing by 23 behavioural science and public health experts to refine the ontology, 5) Assessing inter-rater reliability of using the ontology by two annotators familiar with the ontology and two annotators unfamiliar with it, 6) Specifying ontological relationships between setting entities and 7) Making the Intervention Setting Ontology machine-readable using Web Ontology Language (OWL) and publishing online. Results: The Intervention Setting Ontology consists of 72 entities structured hierarchically with two upper-level classes: Physical setting including Geographic location, Attribute of location (including Area social and economic condition, Population and resource density sub-levels) and Intervention site (including Facility, Transportation and Outdoor environment sub-levels), as well as Social setting. Inter-rater reliability was found to be 0.73 (good) for those familiar with the ontology and 0.61 (acceptable) for those unfamiliar with it. Conclusion: The Intervention Setting Ontology can be used to code information from diverse sources, annotate the setting characteristics of existing intervention evaluation reports and guide future reporting.

A wealth of biospecimen samples are stored in modern globally distributed biobanks. Biomedical researchers worldwide need to be able to combine the available resources to improve the power of large-scale studies. A prerequisite for this effort is to be able to search and access phenotypic, clinical and other information about samples that are currently stored at biobanks in an integrated manner. However, privacy issues together with heterogeneous information systems and the lack of agreed-upon vocabularies have made specimen searching across multiple biobanks extremely challenging. We describe three case studies where we have linked samples and sample descriptions in order to facilitate global searching of available samples for research. The use cases include the ENGAGE (European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology) consortium comprising at least 39 cohorts, the SUMMIT (surrogate markers for micro- and macro-vascular hard endpoints for innovative diabetes tools) consortium and a pilot for data integration between a Swedish clinical health registry and a biobank. We used the Sample avAILability (SAIL) method for data linking: first, created harmonised variables and then annotated and made searchable information on the number of specimens available in individual biobanks for various phenotypic categories. By operating on this categorised availability data we sidestep many obstacles related to privacy that arise when handling real values and show that harmonised and annotated records about data availability across disparate biomedical archives provide a key methodological advance in pre-analysis exchange of information between biobanks, that is, during the project planning phase. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques can provide an interesting way to mine the growing biomedical literature, and a promising approach for new knowledge discovery. However, the major bottleneck in this area is that these systems rely on specific resources providing the domain knowledge. Domain ontologies provide a contextual framework and a semantic representation of the domain, and they can contribute to a better performance of current NLP systems. However, their contribution to information extraction has not been well studied yet. The aim of this paper is to provide insights into the potential role that domain ontologies can play in NLP. To do this, the authors apply the drug-drug interactions ontology (DINTO) to named entity recognition and relation extraction from pharmacological texts. The authors use the DDI corpus, a gold-standard for the development and evaluation of IE systems in this domain, and evaluate their results in the framework of the last SemEval-2013 DDI Extraction task.

Summary: The Web Ontology Language (OWL) provides a sophisticated language for building complex domain ontologies and is widely used in bio-ontologies such as the Gene Ontology. The Protégé-OWL ontology editing tool provides a query facility that allows composition and execution of queries with the human-readable Manchester OWL syntax, with syntax checking and entity label lookup. No equivalent query facility such as the Protégé Description Logics (DL) query yet exists in web form. However, many users interact with bio-ontologies such as chemical entities of biological interest and the Gene Ontology using their online Web sites, within which DL-based querying functionality is not available. To address this gap, we introduce the OntoQuery web-based query utility. Availability and implementation: The source code for this implementation together with instructions for installation is available at http://github.com/IlincaTudose/OntoQuery. OntoQuery software is fully compatible with all OWL-based ontologies and is available for download (CC-0 license). The ChEBI installation, ChEBI OntoQuery, is available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/tools/ontoquery. Contact: hastings@ebi.ac.uk

In many disciplines, data is highly decentralized across thousands of online databases (repositories, registries, and knowledgebases). Wringing value from such databases depends on the discipline of data science and on the humble bricks and mortar that make integration possible; identifiers are a core component of this integration infrastructure. Drawing on our experience and on work by other groups, we outline ten lessons we have learned about the identifier qualities and best practices that facilitate large-scale data integration. Specifically, we propose actions that identifier practitioners (database providers) should take in the design, provision and reuse of identifiers; we also outline important considerations for those referencing identifiers in various circumstances, including by authors and data generators. While the importance and relevance of each lesson will vary by context, there is a need for increased awareness about how to avoid and manage common identifier problems, especially those related to persistence and web-accessibility/resolvability. We focus strongly on web-based identifiers in the life sciences; however, the principles are broadly relevant to other disciplines.

Background Scientists have long been driven by the desire to describe, organize, classify, and compare objects using taxonomies and/or ontologies. In contrast to biology, geology, and many other scientific disciplines, the world of chemistry still lacks a standardized chemical ontology or taxonomy. Several attempts at chemical classification have been made; but they have mostly been limited to either manual, or semi-automated proof-of-principle applications. This is regrettable as comprehensive chemical classification and description tools could not only improve our understanding of chemistry but also improve the linkage between chemistry and many other fields. For instance, the chemical classification of a compound could help predict its metabolic fate in humans, its druggability or potential hazards associated with it, among others. However, the sheer number (tens of millions of compounds) and complexity of chemical structures is such that any manual classification effort would prove to be near impossible. Results We have developed a comprehensive, flexible, and computable, purely structure-based chemical taxonomy (ChemOnt), along with a computer program (ClassyFire) that uses only chemical structures and structural features to automatically assign all known chemical compounds to a taxonomy consisting of >4800 different categories. This new chemical taxonomy consists of up to 11 different levels (Kingdom, SuperClass, Class, SubClass, etc.) with each of the categories defined by unambiguous, computable structural rules. Furthermore each category is named using a consensus-based nomenclature and described (in English) based on the characteristic common structural properties of the compounds it contains. The ClassyFire webserver is freely accessible at http://classyfire.wishartlab.com/. Moreover, a Ruby API version is available at https://bitbucket.org/wishartlab/classyfire_api, which provides programmatic access to the ClassyFire server and database. ClassyFire has been used to annotate over 77 million compounds and has already been integrated into other software packages to automatically generate textual descriptions for, and/or infer biological properties of over 100,000 compounds. Additional examples and applications are provided in this paper. Conclusion ClassyFire, in combination with ChemOnt (ClassyFire’s comprehensive chemical taxonomy), now allows chemists and cheminformaticians to perform large-scale, rapid and automated chemical classification. Moreover, a freely accessible API allows easy access to more than 77 million “ClassyFire” classified compounds. The results can be used to help annotate well studied, as well as lesser-known compounds. In addition, these chemical classifications can be used as input for data integration, and many other cheminformatics-related tasks. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0174-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ChEBI (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi) is a database and ontology of chemical entities of biological interest. Over the past few years, ChEBI has continued to grow steadily in content, and has added several new features. In addition to incorporating all user-requested compounds, our annotation efforts have emphasized immunology, natural products and metabolites in many species. All database entries are now ‘is_a’ classified within the ontology, meaning that all of the chemicals are available to semantic reasoning tools that harness the classification hierarchy. We have completely aligned the ontology with the Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry-recommended upper level Basic Formal Ontology. Furthermore, we have aligned our chemical classification with the classification of chemical-involving processes in the Gene Ontology (GO), and as a result of this effort, the majority of chemical-involving processes in GO are now defined in terms of the ChEBI entities that participate in them. This effort necessitated incorporating many additional biologically relevant compounds. We have incorporated additional data types including reference citations, and the species and component for metabolites. Finally, our website and web services have had several enhancements, most notably the provision of a dynamic new interactive graph-based ontology visualization.

The early detection of drug drug interactions (DDIs) is limited by the diffuse spread of DDI information in heterogeneous sources. Computational methods promise to play a key role in the identification and explanation of DDIs on a large scale. However, such methods rely on the availability of computable representations describing the relevant domain knowledge. Current modeling efforts have focused on partial and shallow representations of the DDI domain, failing to adequately support computational inference and discovery applications. In this paper, we describe a comprehensive ontology for DDI knowledge (DINTO), which is the first formal representation of different types of DDIs and their mechanisms and its application in the prediction of DDIs. This project has been developed using currently available semantic web technologies, standards, and tools, and we have demonstrated that the combination of drug-related facts in DINTO and Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rules can be used to infer DDIs and their different mechanisms on a large scale.< This work was supported by the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme under the TrendMiner project [FP7-ICT287863].

Background: The NanoSafety Cluster, a cluster of projects funded by the European Commision, identified the need for a computational infrastructure for toxicological data management of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Ontologies, open standards, and interoperable designs were envisioned to empower a harmonized approach to European research in nanotechnology. This setting provides a number of opportunities and challenges in the representation of nanomaterials data and the integration of ENM information originating from diverse systems. Within this cluster, eNanoMapper works towards supporting the collaborative safety assessment for ENMs by creating a modular and extensible infrastructure for data sharing, data analysis, and building computational toxicology models for ENMs.Results: The eNanoMapper database solution builds on the previous experience of the consortium partners in supporting diverse data through flexible data storage, open source components and web services. We have recently described the design of the eNanoMapper prototype database along with a summary of challenges in the representation of ENM data and an extensive review of existing nano-related data models, databases, and nanomaterials-related entries in chemical and toxicogenomic databases. This paper continues with a focus on the database functionality exposed through its application programming interface (API), and its use in visualisation and modelling. Considering the preferred community practice of using spreadsheet templates, we developed a configurable spreadsheet parser facilitating user friendly data preparation and data upload. We further present a web application able to retrieve the experimental data via the API and analyze it with multiple data preprocessing and machine learning algorithms.Conclusion: We demonstrate how the eNanoMapper database is used to import and publish online ENM and assay data from several data sources, how the “representational state transfer” (REST) API enables building user friendly interfaces and graphical summaries of the data, and how these resources facilitate the modelling of reproducible quantitative structure–activity relationships for nanomaterials (NanoQSAR).

The EU-funded eNanoMapper project proposes a computational infrastructure for toxicological data management of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) based on open standards, ontologies and an interoperable design to enable a more effective, integrated approach to European research in nanotechnology. eNanoMapper's goal is to support the collaborative safety assessment for ENMs by creating a modular, extensible infrastructure for transparent data sharing, data analysis, and the creation of computational toxicology models for ENMs. The eNanoMapper database solution builds on previous experience of the consortium partners in supporting diverse data through flexible data storage, semantic web technologies, open source components and web services. A number of opportunities and challenges exist in nanomaterials representation and integration of ENM information, originating from diverse systems. A short summary, highlighting the pros and cons of the existing integration approaches and data models is presented. We demonstrate the approach of adopting an ontology-supported data model, describing the materials and measurements. The data sources supported include diverse formats (ISA-Tab, OECD Harmonized Templates, custom spreadsheet templates, various databases provided by consortia members). Besides retaining the data provenance, the focus on measurements provides insights into how to reuse the chemical structure database tools for nanomaterials characterization and safety.

Motivation: Representing domain knowledge in biology has traditionally been accomplished by creating simple hierarchies of classes with textual annotations. Recently, expressive ontology languages, such as Web Ontology Language, have become more widely adopted, supporting axioms that express logical relationships other than class–subclass, e.g. disjointness. This is improving the coverage and validity of the knowledge contained in biological ontologies. However, current semantic tools still need to adapt to this more expressive information. In this article, we propose a method to integrate disjointness axioms, which are being incorporated in real-world ontologies, such as the Gene Ontology and the chemical entities of biological interest ontology, into semantic similarity, the measure that estimates the closeness in meaning between classes. Results: We present a modification of the measure of shared information content, which extends the base measure to allow the incorporation of disjointness information. To evaluate our approach, we applied it to several randomly selected datasets extracted from the chemical entities of biological interest ontology. In 93.8% of these datasets, our measure performed better than the base measure of shared information content. This supports the idea that semantic similarity is more accurate if it extends beyond the hierarchy of classes of the ontology. Contact: joao.ferreira@lasige.di.fc.ul.pt Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

BACKGROUND: Making data available as Linked Data using Resource Description Framework (RDF) promotes integration with other web resources. RDF documents can natively link to related data, and others can link back using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). RDF makes the data machine-readable and uses extensible vocabularies for additional information, making it easier to scale up inference and data analysis. RESULTS: This paper describes recent developments in an ongoing project converting data from the ChEMBL database into RDF triples. Relative to earlier versions, this updated version of ChEMBL-RDF uses recently introduced ontologies, including CHEMINF and CiTO; exposes more information from the database; and is now available as dereferencable, linked data. To demonstrate these new features, we present novel use cases showing further integration with other web resources, including Bio2RDF, Chem2Bio2RDF, and ChemSpider, and showing the use of standard ontologies for querying. CONCLUSIONS: We have illustrated the advantages of using open standards and ontologies to link the ChEMBL database to other databases. Using those links and the knowledge encoded in standards and ontologies, the ChEMBL-RDF resource creates a foundation for integrated semantic web cheminformatics applications, such as the presented decision support.

Natural products are of substantial interest in drug discovery and metabolism research, since they represent molecules that have been shaped by natural selection to be bioactive in ways that are useful for a range of applications including as therapeutics, cosmetics and pesticides. The ChEBI database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi) and the MetaboLights database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/) aim to offer a comprehensive public resource suite for capturing and describing natural product chemistry. ChEBI has recently added over 2,700 natural products, of which more than 100 have been fully curated. Together with the pre-existing metabolites in ChEBI, the total collection of metabolites (both primary and secondary) is approaching 3,500 entries (October 2012). In addition, we have added the species, strain, and component (e.g tissue type) from which the metabolite has been isolated, linked to the appropriate taxonomies and ontologies, together with supporting citations to the primary literature. The MetaboLights database provides a general-purpose, open-access repository for metabolomics studies, their raw experimental data, and associated metadata [1]. Released in June 2012, the repository includes 15 submitted studies, encompassing 93 protocols for 714 assays over 8 different species. These include species such as H. sapiens, C. elegans, M. musculus and A. thaliana, and techniques such as NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Finally, we have recently released an open-source, open-data natural product likeness implementation [2], bringing a well-known metric -- useful in compound library screening and lead design - - to a wider community.

Ontologies encode the knowledge of human experts in order to allow computers to automate common tasks in a domain. They are hierarchically organised and backed by computational logic which allows automated inferences of the implicit consequences of explicitly stated knowledge. ChEBI is a database and ontology of chemical entities of biological interest [1]. Within the ontology, chemical entities are classified based on shared structural features and also based on their roles and activities in biological systems. For example, the chemical class ‘aminopyridine’ is defined as ‘Compounds containing a pyridine skeleton substituted by one or more amine groups’, while an example of a role based class is ‘antiviral drug’, which groups together chemical entities that are used as antiviral drugs, regardless of their chemical structure. We have developed a novel semi-automated system for creating structure-based chemical class definitions. Our tool allows curators to draw and visually define shared structural features for classes of chemicals, which definitions are then used to automatically detect class membership across the full chemical database. The front end is based on an extended JChemPaint [2] and the Google Web Toolkit, and the back-end on a custom extension of the Chemistry Development Kit [3]. With this tool, it is possible to define chemical classes based on molecular skeletons, substitute groups, arbitrary parts including cycles of arbitrary length, formulae and overall properties, and these features can be combined using nested logical operators. Matching these definitions to candidate structures from the database is accomplished by means of an in-memory matching procedure, validated against the existing manually curated classification in ChEBI, allowing us to iteratively refine both the definitions of classes as well as to evolve the quality of the classification in ChEBI.

Chemical compounds participate in all the processes of life. Understanding the complex interactions of small molecules such as metabolites and drugs and the biological macromolecules that consume and produce them is key to gaining a wider understanding in a systemic context. Chemical property databases collect information on the biological effects and physicochemical properties of chemical entities. Accessing and using such databases is key to understanding the chemistry of toxic molecules. In this chapter, we present methods to search, understand, download, and manipulate the wealth of information available in public chemical property databases, with particular focus on the database of Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI).

Chemical proteomics is concerned with the identification of protein targets interacting with small molecules. Hence, the availability of a high quality and free resource storing small molecules is essential for the future development of the field. The Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) database is one such database. The scope of ChEBI includes any constitutionally or isotopically distinct atom, molecule, ion, ion pair, radical, radical ion, complex, conformer, etc., identifiable as a separately distinguishable entity. These entities in question are either products of nature or synthetic products used to intervene in the processes of living organisms. In addition, ChEBI contains a chemical ontology which relates the small molecules with each other thereby making it easier for users to discover data. The ontology also describes the biological roles that the small molecules are active in. The ChEBI database also provides a central reference point in which to access a variety of bioinformatics data points such as pathways and their biochemical reactions; expression data; protein sequence and structures.

The bioinformatics community has developed a policy of open access and open data since its inception. This is contrary to chemoinformatics which has traditionally been a closed-access area. In 2004, two complementary open access databases were initiated by the bioinformatics community, ChEBI [1] and PubChem. PubChem serves as automated repository on the biological activities of small molecules and ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) as a manually annotated database of molecular entities focused on 'small' chemical compounds. Although ChEBI is reasonably compact containing just over 18,000 entities, it provides a wide range of data items such as chemical nomenclature, an ontology and chemical structures. The ChEBI database has a strong focus on quality with exceptional efforts afforded to IUPAC nomenclature rules, classification within the ontology and best IUPAC practices when drawing chemical structures. ChEBI is currently undergoing a period of restructuring which will allow it to incorporate the small molecule structures from (and link to) EBI's new chemogenomics database ChEMBL [2], increasing its small molecules coverage to over 500,000 entities. We have restructured the chemical structure search facility to use Orchem [3] an Oracle chemistry plug-in using the Chemistry Development Kit [4]. The facility allows a user to draw a chemical structure or load one from a file and then execute either a substructure or similarity search. Furthermore the ChEBI text search will have extensive facilities for querying based on not only names but formula, a range of charges and molecular weight. The ability to query the ChEBI ontology and retrieve all children for a given entity will also be included. In order to aid the distribution of ChEBI to the chemoinformatics community we have extended our export formats to include an MDL sdf format with a lighter version consisting only of compound structure, name and identifier. A complete version is available with all the ChEBI data properties such as synonyms, cross-references, SMILES and InChI. Furthermore cross-references in ChEBI have been extended to include BRENDA the enzyme database, NMRShiftDB the database for organic structures and their nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) spectra, Rhea the biochemical reaction database and IntEnz the enzyme nomenclature database. ChEBI is available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi.

*Background* Appearing in a wide variety of contexts, biochemical 'small molecules' are a core element of biomedical data. Chemical ontologies, which provide stable identifiers and a shared vocabulary for use in referring to such biochemical small molecules, are crucial to enable the interoperation of such data. One such chemical ontology is ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest), a candidate member ontology of the OBO Foundry. ChEBI is a publicly available, manually annotated database of chemical entities and contains around 18000 annotated entities as of the last release (May 2009). ChEBI provides stable unique identifiers for chemical entities; a controlled vocabulary in the form of recommended names (which are unique and unambiguous), common synonyms, and systematic chemical names; cross-references to other databases; and a structural and role-based classification within the ontology. ChEBI is widely used for annotation of chemicals within biological databases, text-mining, and data integration. ChEBI can be accessed online at "http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/":http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/ and the full dataset is available for download in various formats including SDF and OBO.*Automated Classification*The selection of chemical entities for inclusion in the ChEBI database is user-driven. As the use of ChEBI has grown, so too has the backlog of user-requested entries. Inevitably, the annotation backlog creates a bottleneck, and to speed up the annotation process, ChEBI has recently released a submission tool which allows community submissions of chemical entities, groups, and classes. However, classification of chemical entities within the ontology is a difficult and niche activity, and it is unlikely that the community as a whole will be able or willing to correctly and consistently classify each submitted entity, creating required classes where they are missing. As a result, it is likely that while the size of the database grows, the ontological classification will become less sophisticated, unless the classification of new entities is assisted computationally. In addition, the ChEBI database is expecting substantial size growth in the next year, so automatic classification, which has up till now not been possible, is urgently required. Automatic classification would also enable the ChEBI ontology classes to be applied to other compound databases such as PubChem. *Description Logic Reasoning*Description logic based reasoning technology is a prime candidate for development of such an automatic classification system as it allows the rules of the classification system to be encoded within the knowledgebase. Already at 18000 entities, ChEBI is a fair size for a real-world application of description logic reasoning technology, and as the ontology is enhanced with a richer density of asserted relationships, the classification will become more complex and challenging. We have successfully tested a description logic-based classification of chemical entities based on specified structural properties using the hypertableaux-based HermiT reasoner, and found it to be sufficiently efficient to be feasible for use in a production environment on a database of the size that ChEBI is now. However, much work still remains to enrich the ChEBI knowledgebase itself with the properties needed to provide the formal class definitions for use in the automated classification, and to assess the efficiency of the available description logic reasoning technology on a database the size of ChEBI's forecast future growth.*Acknowledgements*ChEBI is funded by the European Commission under SLING, grant agreement number 226073 (Integrating Activity) within Research Infrastructures of the FP7 Capacities Specific Programme, and by the BBSRC, grant agreement number BB/G022747/1 within the “Bioinformatics and biological resources” fund.

Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) is a freely available dictionary of molecular entities focused on “small” chemical compounds. This unit provides a detailed guide to browsing, searching, downloading, and programmatic access to the ChEBI database. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 26:14.9.1-14.9.20. © 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Keywords: chemical compound; chemical nomenclature; InChI; InChIKey; IUPAC; molecular entity; ontology; substructure search; similarity search; Web Services

Background PubChem is an open repository for chemical structures, biological activities and biomedical annotations. Semantic Web technologies are emerging as an increasingly important approach to distribute and integrate scientific data. Exposing PubChem data to Semantic Web services may help enable automated data integration and management, as well as facilitate interoperable web applications. Description This work, one of a series covering the PubChemRDF project, describes an approach to translate PubChem Substance and Compound information into Resource Description Framework (RDF) format. Basic examples are provided to demonstrate its use. The aim of this effort is to provide two new primary benefits to researchers in a cost-effective manner. Firstly, we aim to remove the inherent limitations of using the web-based resource PubChem by allowing a researcher to use readily available semantic technologies (namely, RDF triple stores and their corresponding SPARQL query engines) to query and analyze PubChem data on local computing resources. Secondly, this work intends to help improve data sharing, analysis, and integration of PubChem data to resources external to NCBI and across scientific domains, by means of the association of PubChem data to existing ontological frameworks, including CHEMical INFormation ontology, Semanticscience Integrated Ontology, and others. Conclusions With the goal of semantically describing information available in the PubChem archive, pre-existing ontological frameworks were used, rather than creating new ones. Semantic relationships between compounds and substances, chemical descriptors associated with compounds and substances, interrelationships between chemicals, as well as provenance and attribute metadata of substances are described. Graphical abstract: Schematic representation of the semantic links for PubChem compounds and substances. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13321-015-0084-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The field of predictive toxicology requires the development of open, public, computable, standardized toxicology vocabularies and ontologies to support the applications required by in silico, in vitro, and in vivo toxicology methods and related analysis and reporting activities. In this article we review ontology developments based on a set of perspectives showing how ontologies are being used in predictive toxicology initiatives and applications. Perspectives on resources and initiatives reviewed include OpenTox, eTOX, Pistoia Alliance, ToxWiz, Virtual Liver, EU-ADR, BEL, ToxML, and Bioclipse. We also review existing ontology developments in neighboring fields that can contribute to establishing an ontological framework for predictive toxicology. A significant set of resources is already available to provide a foundation for an ontological framework for 21st century mechanistic-based toxicology research. Ontologies such as ToxWiz provide a basis for application to toxi cology investigations, whereas other ontologies under development in the biological, chemical, and biomedical communities could be incorporated in an extended future framework. OpenTox has provided a semantic web framework for the implementation of such ontologies into software applications and linked data resources. Bioclipse developers have shown the benefit of interoperability obtained through ontology by being able to link their workbench application with remote OpenTox web services. Although these developments are promising, an increased international coordination of efforts is greatly needed to develop a more unified, standardized, and open toxicology ontology framework.

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are being developed to meet specific application needs in diverse domains across the engineering and biomedical sciences (e.g. drug delivery). However, accompanying the exciting proliferation of novel nanomaterials is a challenging race to understand and predict their possibly detrimental effects on human health and the environment. The eNanoMapper project (www.enanomapper.net) is creating a pan-European computational infrastructure for toxicological data management for ENMs, based on semantic web standards and ontologies. Here, we describe the development of the eNanoMapper ontology based on adopting and extending existing ontologies of relevance for the nanosafety domain. The resulting eNanoMapper ontology is available at http://purl.enanomapper.net/onto/enanomapper.owl. We aim to make the re-use of external ontology content seamless and thus we have developed a library to automate the extraction of subsets of ontology content and the assembly of the subsets into an integrated whole. The library is available (open source) at http://github.com/enanomapper/slimmer/. Finally, we give a comprehensive survey of the domain content and identify gap areas. ENM safety is at the boundary between engineering and the life sciences, and at the boundary between molecular granularity and bulk granularity. This creates challenges for the definition of key entities in the domain, which we also discuss.

Ontologies encode human knowledge in computationally accessible forms. They are designed to narrow the gap between the knowledge of human experts and the functionality available in computer systems, by expressing expert knowledge in a manner computers can manipulate and reason over. With the ever-growing deluge of data in modern scientific domains, researchers need intelligent tools able to filter out irrelevant and automatically organise relevant information into meaningful categories. The Chemoinformatics and Metabolism team at the EBI is developing chemical ontologies for structure-based chemical classification, role or bioactivity-based chemical classification, and chemical information entities such as descriptors and algorithms. Our ontologies provide collections of names and synonyms which are useful for text mining, stable identifiers which are essential to semantic integration of data, and a semantically rich encoding of many aspects of the chemical domain. But for such ontologies to be maximally useful for diverse users and interoperable with other ontologies in the scientific domain, similar-sounding things have to be disentangled in our language and our ontology. Recent work addresses the distinguishing of structures from chemicals [1], and of bioactivity from drug uses [2]. Ontologies are backed by logical formalisms such as the Web Ontology Language, OWL. One of the challenges of chemical ontology is representing complex chemical structures in the underlying formalism. Cyclic structures prove particularly challenging for logicbased representation. Recent research in our group investigated the inclusion of chemical graphs in OWL [3]. Integrating chemoinformatics tools with chemical ontology is the subject of ongoing research.

Clustering and classification of large-scale chemical data are essential for navigation, analysis and knowledge discovery in a wide variety of chemical application domains. The maximum common structure (MCS) for a group of compounds is an important element of such classification, providing insight into activity patterns and enabling scaffold alignment for a more consistent 2D depiction. Most modern, exact MCS implementations use back-tracking [1] or clique detection [2], and handle the multiple MCS problem by recursive reduction to successive pairwise maximal common substructure searches [3]. We present fmcs, which implements a novel multiple MCS algorithm based on subgraph enumeration and subgraph isomorphism testing [4,5] and with algorithm improvements and heuristics which make it competitive to the standard methods. MCS performance evaluation is very sensitive to the test set, so we have developed several reference benchmarks based on ChEMBL-13, including randomly selected pairs of structures, and randomly selected structures with their k = 2, k = 10, and k = 100 nearest neighbors. We use these benchmarks to compare fmcs to SMSD [6] and Indigo’s scaffold detector [7]. Most differences are due to chemistry perception and timeout errors. The fmcs performance, written in Python using the RDKit C++ toolkit [8], is currently between 0.3x and 1.2x the performance of the Indigo implementation in C++. We also cross-validated the fmcs algorithm with the manually curated ChEBI structure ontology classification [9] and characterized the differences. We identified limitations with fmcs, such as with tautomer perception and structural classes that fmcs cannot handle, and problems with ChEBI, such as misclassifications and classifications that are not, structurally speaking, strictly hierarchical.