Search

Rationale: Fibrosing mediastinitis (FM) is an uncommon fibroinflammatory condition without established or effective medical therapies. Infiltrating B lymphocytes are commonly present, and progressive fibrosis compromises mediastinal structures, including blood vessels and airways, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objective: To evaluate the benefits and side effects of rituximab in patients with progressive and symptomatic FM. Methods: We treated 22 patients (median age, 35 yr; range, 15–68 yr; 45% female) with metabolically active, progressive FM with rituximab on an off-label basis. Additionally, patients were administered pneumocystis and antifungal prophylaxis when immunosuppressed with rituximab. Modeling of longitudinal treatment response based on changes in relative lesion volume from baseline was performed retrospectively using functional data analysis, and time-to-event modeling was performed to estimate treatment response rates based on a >30% reduction in pretreatment volume. The primary endpoints were lack of disease progression and change in mediastinal lesion volume on computed tomography (evaluated retrospectively). Results: No patient experienced disease progression after rituximab therapy. Median clinical follow-up was 42 months (range, 7–94 mo) and imaging follow-up 21 months (range, 7–62 mo). A total of 82% of patients had confirmed histoplasmosis-associated FM. After rituximab treatment, a 49.6% (95% confidence interval, 17.5–64.4%) mean estimated decrease in pretreatment lesion volume was observed at 24 months. The estimated objective treatment response rate was 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.7–70.3%). Conclusions: This observational study suggests that rituximab is a well tolerated and potentially effective therapy in a cohort of patients with symptomatic and progressive FM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Subsolid nodules (SSN), including ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and part-solid nodules (PSNs), are slow-growing but have a higher risk for malignancy. Therefore, timely diagnosis is imperative. Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) has emerged as reliable diagnostic procedure, but data on SSN and how ssRAB compares to other diagnostic interventions such as CT-guided transthoracic biopsy (CTTB) are scarce. In this study, we compared diagnostic yield of ssRAB versus CTTB for evaluating SSN. Methods: A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent either ssRAB or CTTB for evaluating GGN and PSN with a solid component less than 6 mm from February 2020 to April 2023 at Mayo Clinic Florida and Rochester. Clinicodemographic information, nodule characteristics, diagnostic yield, and complications were compared between ssRAB and CTTB. Results: A total of 66 nodules from 65 patients were evaluated: 37 PSN and 29 GGN. Median size of PSN solid component was 5 mm (IQR: 4.5, 6). Patients were divided into two groups: 27 in the ssRAB group and 38 in the CTTB group. Diagnostic yield was 85.7% for ssRAB and 89.5% for CTTB (p = 0.646). Sensitivity for malignancy was similar between ssRAB and CTTB (86.4% vs. 88.5%; p = 0.828), with no statistical difference. Complications were more frequent in CTTB with no significant difference (8 vs. 2; p = 0.135). Conclusion: Diagnostic yield for SSN was similarly high for ssRAB and CTTB, with ssRAB presenting less complications and allowing mediastinal staging within the same procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the use of shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy (ssRAB) for diagnosing pulmonary nodules, particularly in challenging cases where lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) coexist. It case report highlights a successful ssRAB procedure in a patient with advanced emphysema, demonstrating the feasibility of this technology in diagnosing peripheral pulmonary nodules even in challenging scenarios.

Background: Support for early detection of lung cancer has emerged from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), in which low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduced lung cancer mortality by 20 % relative to chest x-ray. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently recommended annual screening for the high-risk population, concluding that the benefits (life years gained) outweighed harms (false positive findings, abortive biopsy/surgery, radiation exposure). In making their recommendation, the USPSTF noted that the moderate net benefit of screening was dependent on the resolution of most false-positive results without invasive procedures. Circulating biomarkers may serve as a valuable adjunctive tool to imaging. Results: We developed a broad-based proteomics discovery program, integrating liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analyses of freshly resected lung tumor specimens (n = 13), lung cancer cell lines (n = 17), and conditioned media collected from tumor cell lines (n = 7). To enrich for biomarkers likely to be found at elevated levels in the peripheral circulation of lung cancer patients, proteins were prioritized based on predicted subcellular localization (secreted, cell-membrane associated) and differential expression in disease samples. 179 candidate biomarkers were identified. Several markers selected for further validation showed elevated levels in serum collected from subjects with stage I NSCLC (n = 94), relative to healthy smoker controls (n = 189). An 8-marker model was developed (TFPI, MDK, OPN, MMP2, TIMP1, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, SCC) which accurately distinguished subjects with lung cancer (n = 50) from high risk smokers (n = 50) in an independent validation study (AUC = 0.775). Conclusions: Integrating biomarker discovery from multiple sample types (fresh tissue, cell lines and conditioned medium) has resulted in a diverse repertoire of candidate biomarkers. This unique collection of biomarkers may have clinical utility in lung cancer detection and diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]