Search

Objectives: To develop a U‐Net–based deep learning approach (U‐DL) for bladder segmentation in computed tomography urography (CTU) as a part of a computer‐assisted bladder cancer detection and treatment response assessment pipeline. Materials and methods: A dataset of 173 cases including 81 cases in the training/validation set (42 masses, 21 with wall thickening, 18 normal bladders), and 92 cases in the test set (43 masses, 36 with wall thickening, 13 normal bladders) were used with Institutional Review Board approval. An experienced radiologist provided three‐dimensional (3D) hand outlines for all cases as the reference standard. We previously developed a bladder segmentation method that used a deep learning convolution neural network and level sets (DCNN‐LS) within a user‐input bounding box. However, some cases with poor image quality or with advanced bladder cancer spreading into the neighboring organs caused inaccurate segmentation. We have newly developed an automated U‐DL method to estimate a likelihood map of the bladder in CTU. The U‐DL did not require a user‐input box and the level sets for postprocessing. To identify the best model for this task, we compared the following models: (a) two‐dimensional (2D) U‐DL and 3D U‐DL using 2D CT slices and 3D CT volumes, respectively, as input, (b) U‐DLs using CT images of different resolutions as input, and (c) U‐DLs with and without automated cropping of the bladder as an image preprocessing step. The segmentation accuracy relative to the reference standard was quantified by six measures: average volume intersection ratio (AVI), average percent volume error (AVE), average absolute volume error (AAVE), average minimum distance (AMD), average Hausdorff distance (AHD), and the average Jaccard index (AJI). As a baseline, the results from our previous DCNN‐LS method were used. Results: In the test set, the best 2D U‐DL model achieved AVI, AVE, AAVE, AMD, AHD, and AJI values of 93.4 ± 9.5%, −4.2 ± 14.2%, 9.2 ± 11.5%, 2.7 ± 2.5 mm, 9.7 ± 7.6 mm, 85.0 ± 11.3%, respectively, while the corresponding measures by the best 3D U‐DL were 90.6 ± 11.9%, −2.3 ± 21.7%, 11.5 ± 18.5%, 3.1 ± 3.2 mm, 11.4 ± 10.0 mm, and 82.6 ± 14.2%, respectively. For comparison, the corresponding values obtained with the baseline method were 81.9 ± 12.1%, 10.2 ± 16.2%, 14.0 ± 13.0%, 3.6 ± 2.0 mm, 12.8 ± 6.1 mm, and 76.2 ± 11.8%, respectively, for the same test set. The improvement for all measures between the best U‐DL and the DCNN‐LS were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to a previous DCNN‐LS method, which depended on a user‐input bounding box, the U‐DL provided more accurate bladder segmentation and was more automated than the previous approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of using an objective computer-aided system to assess bladder cancer stage in CT Urography ( CTU). Materials and methods A dataset consisting of 84 bladder cancer lesions from 76 CTU cases was used to develop the computerized system for bladder cancer staging based on machine learning approaches. The cases were grouped into two classes based on pathological stage ≥ T2 or below T2, which is the decision threshold for neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment clinically. There were 43 cancers below stage T2 and 41 cancers at stage T2 or above. All 84 lesions were automatically segmented using our previously developed auto-initialized cascaded level sets ( AI- CALS) method. Morphological and texture features were extracted. The features were divided into subspaces of morphological features only, texture features only, and a combined set of both morphological and texture features. The dataset was split into Set 1 and Set 2 for two-fold cross-validation. Stepwise feature selection was used to select the most effective features. A linear discriminant analysis ( LDA), a neural network ( NN), a support vector machine ( SVM), and a random forest ( RAF) classifier were used to combine the features into a single score. The classification accuracy of the four classifiers was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic ( ROC) curve (Az). Results Based on the texture features only, the LDA classifier achieved a test Az of 0.91 on Set 1 and a test Az of 0.88 on Set 2. The test Az of the NN classifier for Set 1 and Set 2 were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. The SVM classifier achieved test Az of 0.91 on Set 1 and test Az of 0.89 on Set 2. The test Az of the RAF classifier for Set 1 and Set 2 was 0.89 and 0.97, respectively. The morphological features alone, the texture features alone, and the combined feature set achieved comparable classification performance. Conclusion The predictive model developed in this study shows promise as a classification tool for stratifying bladder cancer into two staging categories: greater than or equal to stage T2 and below stage T2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The authors are developing a computerized system for bladder segmentation in CT urography (CTU) as a critical component for computer-aided detection of bladder cancer. Methods: A deep-learning convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) was trained to distinguish between the inside and the outside of the bladder using 160?000 regions of interest (ROI) from CTU images. The trained DL-CNN was used to estimate the likelihood of an ROI being inside the bladder for ROIs centered at each voxel in a CTU case, resulting in a likelihood map. Thresholding and hole-filling were applied to the map to generate the initial contour for the bladder, which was then refined by 3D and 2D level sets. The segmentation performance was evaluated using 173 cases: 81 cases in the training set (42 lesions, 21 wall thickenings, and 18 normal bladders) and 92 cases in the test set (43 lesions, 36 wall thickenings, and 13 normal bladders). The computerized segmentation accuracy using the DL likelihood map was compared to that using a likelihood map generated by Haar features and a random forest classifier, and that using our previous conjoint level set analysis and segmentation system (CLASS) without using a likelihood map. All methods were evaluated relative to the 3D hand-segmented reference contours. Results: With DL-CNN-based likelihood map and level sets, the average volume intersection ratio, average percent volume error, average absolute volume error, average minimum distance, and the Jaccard index for the test set were 81.9% ± 12.1%, 10.2% ± 16.2%, 14.0% ± 13.0%, 3.6 ± 2.0 mm, and 76.2% ± 11.8%, respectively. With the Haar-feature-based likelihood map and level sets, the corresponding values were 74.3% ± 12.7%, 13.0% ± 22.3%, 20.5% ± 15.7%, 5.7 ± 2.6 mm, and 66.7% ± 12.6%, respectively. With our previous CLASS with local contour refinement (LCR) method, the corresponding values were 78.0% ± 14.7%, 16.5% ± 16.8%, 18.2% ± 15.0%, 3.8 ± 2.3 mm, and 73.9% ± 13.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The authors demonstrated that the DL-CNN can overcome the strong boundary between two regions that have large difference in gray levels and provides a seamless mask to guide level set segmentation, which has been a problem for many gradient-based segmentation methods. Compared to our previous CLASS with LCR method, which required two user inputs to initialize the segmentation, DL-CNN with level sets achieved better segmentation performance while using a single user input. Compared to the Haar-feature-based likelihood map, the DL-CNN-based likelihood map could guide the level sets to achieve better segmentation. The results demonstrate the feasibility of our new approach of using DL-CNN in combination with level sets for segmentation of the bladder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]