Search

Lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning is useful to diagnose and assess the severity of pulmonary lesions during COVID-19-related ARDS (CoARDS). A conventional LUS score is proposed to measure the loss of aeration during CoARDS. However, this score was validated during the pre-COVID-19 era in patients with ARDS in the ICU and does not consider the differences with CoARDS. An alternative LUS method is based on grading the percentage of extension of the typical signs of COVID-19 pneumonia on the lung surface (LUSext). Is LUSext feasible in patients with COVID-19 at the onset of disease, and does it correlate with the volumetric measure of severity of COVID-19 pneumonia lesions at CT scan (CTvol)? This observational study enrolled a convenience sampling of patients in the ED with confirmed COVID-19 whose condition demonstrated pneumonia at bedside LUS and CT scan. LUSext was visually quantified. All CT scan studies were analyzed retrospectively by a specifically designed software to calculate the CTvol. The correlation between LUSext and CTvol, and the correlations of each score with Pa o 2 /F io 2 ratio were calculated. We analyzed data from 179 patients. Feasibility of LUSext was 100%. Time to perform LUS scan was 5 ± 1.5 mins. LUSext and CTvol were correlated positively (R = 0.67; P <.0001). Both LUSext and CTvol showed negative correlation with Pa o 2 /F io 2 ratio (R = −0.66 and R = −0.54; P <.0001, respectively). LUSext is a valid measure of the severity of the lesions when compared with the CT scan. Not only are LUSext and CTvol correlated, but they also have similar inverse correlation with the severity of respiratory failure. LUSext is a practical and simple bedside measure of the severity of pneumonia in CoARDS, whose clinical and prognostic impact need to be investigated further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To prospectively assess reproducibility, safety, and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of unresectable primary and secondary pulmonary tumors. Methods: Patients with unresectable primary and metastatic lung tumors up to 4 cm were enrolled in a multicenter prospective clinical trial and underwent CT-guided MWA. Treatments were delivered using pre-defined MW power and duration settings, based on target tumor size and histology classifications. Patients were followed for up to 24 months. Treatment safety, efficacy, and reproducibility were assessed. Ablation volumes were measured at CT scan and compared with ablation volumes obtained on ex vivo bovine liver using equal treatment settings. Results: From September 2015 to September 2017, 69 MWAs were performed in 54 patients, achieving technical success in all cases and treatment completion without deviations from the standardized protocol in 61 procedures (88.4%). Immediate post-MWA CT scans showed ablation dimensions smaller by about 25% than in the ex vivo model; however, a remarkable volumetric increase (40%) of the treated area was observed at 1 month post-ablation. No treatment-related deaths nor complications were recorded. Treatments of equal power and duration yielded fairly reproducible ablation dimensions at 48-h post-MWA scans. In comparison with the ex vivo liver model, in vivo ablation sizes were systematically smaller, by about 25%. Overall LPR was 24.7%, with an average TLP of 8.1 months. OS rates at 12 and 24 months were 98.0% and 71.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Percutaneous CT-guided MWA is a reproducible, safe, and effective treatment for malignant lung tumors up to 4 cm in size. Key Points: • Percutaneous MWA treatment of primary and secondary lung tumors is a repeatable, safe, and effective therapeutic option. • It provides a fairly reproducible performance on both the long and short axis of the ablation zone. • When using pre-defined treatment duration and power settings according to tumor histology and size, LPR does not increase with increasing tumor size (up to 4 cm) for both primary and metastatic tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]