Search

To characterize the volume dependence of both facilities and surgeons on postoperative complications after lumbar fusion and characterize the role of socioeconomic status. Adults who underwent lumbar fusion from 2011 to 2015 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for lumbar disc degeneration or spondylolisthesis and procedure codes for lumbar fusion in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Complications were compared across surgeon and facility volumes using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for patient demographic and clinical factors. Surgeon and facility volumes were compared between the lowest and highest 20%. Of the 26,211 patients identified with a lumbar fusion, 16,377 patients were treated at a high-volume or low-volume facility or by a high-volume or low-volume surgeon. Low-volume facilities had higher 3-month and 12-month rates of readmission, pneumonia, and cellulitis; lower 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month rates of deep vein thrombosis; and lower 1-month rates of wound complications. Low-volume surgeons had higher 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month rates of readmission, acute renal failure, surgical site infection, and wound complications; high 1-month and 3-month rates of urinary tract infection and pulmonary embolism; and a lower 12-month rate of revision. Patients who were treated by low-volume surgeons and had complications were more concentrated to ZIP codes with high social deprivation. Both high-volume facilities and high-volume surgeons show lower rates of complications and readmission. There are significant socioeconomic disparities regarding which patients can access high-volume surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ankle arthroplasty has emerged as a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis due in large part to recent advancements in both surgical technique and implant design. This study seeks to document trends of arthroplasty and arthrodesis for ankle osteoarthritis in New York State from 2009-2018 in order to determine if patient demographics play a role in procedure selection and to ascertain the utilization of each procedure and rates of complications. Methods: Patients 40 years and older from 2009-2018 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions (ICD-9 and ICD-10), Clinical Modification (CM) diagnosis and procedure codes for ankle osteoarthritis, ankle arthrodesis, and ankle arthroplasty in the New York statewide planning and research cooperative system database. A trend analysis for both inpatient and outpatient procedures was performed to evaluate the changing trends in utilization of ankle arthrodesis and ankle arthroplasty over time. A multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the odds of receiving ankle arthrodesis relative to ankle arthroplasty. Complications were compared between inpatient ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 3735 cases were included. Ankle arthrodesis increased by 25%, whereas arthroplasty increased by 757%. African American race, federal insurance, workers compensation, presence of comorbidities, and higher social deprivation were associated with increased odds of having an ankle arthrodesis vs an ankle arthroplasty. Compared with ankle arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis was associated with increased rates of readmission, surgical site infection, acute renal failure, cellulitis, urinary tract infection, and deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Ankle arthroplasty volume has grown substantially without a decrease in ankle arthrodesis volume, suggesting that ankle arthroplasty may be selectively used for a different population of patients than ankle arthrodesis patients. Despite the increased growth of ankle arthroplasty, certain patient demographics including patients from minority populations, federal insurance, and from areas of high social deprivation have higher odds of receiving arthrodesis. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study is to further characterize the volume dependence of facilities and surgeons on morbidity and mortality after total hip arthroplasty (THA).Methods: Adults who underwent THA from 2009 to 2014 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and Procedural codes in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Complication rates were compared across surgeon and facility volumes using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression controlling for factors such as the Social Deprivation Index. Surgeon and facility volumes were compared between the low and high volume using cutoffs established by prior research.Results: In total, 99,832 patients were included. Low volume facilities had higher rates of readmission, urinary tract infection (UTI), acute renal failure, pneumonia, surgical site infection (SSI), cellulitis, wound complications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in-hospital mortality, and revision. Low volume surgeons had higher rates of readmission, UTI, acute renal failure, pneumonia, SSI, acute respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, cellulitis, wound complications, in-hospital mortality, cardiorespiratory arrest, DVT, and revision. African Americans, Hispanics, and those with federal insurance had increased rates of readmission. Those with ≥1 Charlson comorbidities or from areas of higher social deprivation had increased incidence of treatment by low volume surgeons and facilities.Conclusion: Both low volume facilities and surgeons performing primary THA have higher rates of readmission, UTI, acute renal failure, pneumonia, SSI, cellulitis, wound complications, DVT, in-hospital mortality, and revision. Demographic disparities exist between who is treated at low vs high volume surgeons and facilities placing those groups at higher risks for complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]