Search

Background: This study aimed to assess the preferred operative treatment for patients over the age of 60 with end-stage ankle arthritis and perspectives on total ankle replacement (TAR) among American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) members. Associated factors were analyzed for potential contraindications among members with different levels of experience. Method: A questionnaire containing 6 questions was designed and sent to 2056 members of the AOFAS. Responses were received from 467 orthopaedic surgeons practicing in the United States (76%), Canada (5%), and 26 other countries (20%). Participants were grouped for response comparisons according to country as well as experience level. Differences in contraindications were compared using χ2 tests or exact tests. Results: Respondents practicing in the United States and surgeons who perform 11 or more TARs per year tended to recommend operative treatments favoring TAR and displayed recognition of its increasing role (P < .05). Overall, respondents felt that 41% of typical patients over 60 years old with end-stage arthritis would be best treated with TAR. Talus avascular necrosis, morbid obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m2), and poorly controlled diabetes with neuropathy were most recognized as the absolute contraindications to TAR. Surgeon's experience affected the consideration of these clinical factors as contraindications. Conclusions: Total ankle replacement has a substantial and increasing role in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis in patients over the age of 60. Absolute and potential contraindications of the procedures were indicated from a crosssectional survey of AOFAS members. Surgeons more experienced with total ankle replacement felt more comfortable employing it in a wider range of clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Various implant materials have been used in medial, opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) including traditional metal and modern polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal and PEEK implants and determine safety, varus deformity correction, as well as short- to mid-term hardware removal and arthroplasty rates.Methods: HTO performed with metal and PEEK implants were reviewed between 2000 and 2015 at two institutions with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Postoperative complications, radiographic measures, and osteotomy union were compared between groups using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact testing. Survival free of hardware removal and arthroplasty was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier testing. Risk factors for HTO conversion to arthroplasty were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression.Results: Ninety-five HTOs were performed in 90 patients (59 M, 31 F) using 50 metal and 45 PEEK implants. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range 2.0-16.5). Two metal and two PEEK HTO patients experienced nonunions, resulting in revision HTO at a mean of 1.0 years postoperatively (range 0.4-1.4 years). Both implant groups demonstrated similar, significant improvements in coronal deformity, with mean angulation improving from 6.0° and 5.4° varus preoperatively to 1.1° and 1.0° valgus postoperatively for the metal (p < 0.01) and PEEK groups (p < 0.01), respectively. 2- and 5-year hardware removal-free survival was 94% and 94% for PEEK, which was significantly superior to 80% and 73% observed for metal (p = 0.02). 2- and 5-year arthroplasty-free survival was similar for the metal (98% and 94%) and PEEK groups (100% and 78%) (n.s.). HTO performed for focal cartilage defects was observed to demonstrate decreased arthroplasty risk (HR 0.36, p = 0.03) when compared to HTO performed for osteoarthritis.Conclusions: Both metal and PEEK implants were found to be effective in obtaining and maintaining coronal varus deformity correction, with 88% overall arthroplasty-free survival at 5 years. Metal fixation demonstrated a higher rate of hardware removal while HTO performed for medial compartment osteoarthritis predicted conversation to arthroplasty.Level Of Evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear relies on clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Direct and indirect signs of ACL tear have been described with MRI evaluation. Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) buckling has been described as an indirect radiographic sign of an ACL tear. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the variations in PCL buckling angles in patients with ACL tears and in patients with isolated lesions in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In addition, the influence of different patterns of medial meniscus tears in ACL-deficient knees was investigated. Finally, the influences of risk factors such as tibial slope, delay from injury to surgery, absence of medial meniscus tear, degree of Lachman and pivot shift testing were also assessed. Study design: This was a cohort study. Methods: A total of 154 patients (78 in the group with ACL tear and 76 in the control group) were assessed with MRI and lateral weight-bearing X-ray to assess PCL buckling angle and tibial slope by two independent observers. The presence of a medial meniscus bucket handle or ramp lesion of the medial meniscus was assessed and recorded at the time of surgery. Results: PCL buckling angle measurement was highly reliable, with an ICC of 0.866 and 0.894, respectively, in the study group and the control group for interobserver reliability. The intrarater reliability was found to be high in PCL buckling angle for the study group [ICC = 0.955] and the control group [ICC = 0.943]. The mean angle in patients with ACL tear was 110.7 ± 15.2° and 115.3 ± 16.2° (for the two examiners) and 111.4 ± 12° and 114 ± 14.5° (for the two examiners) in patients with an intact, healthy ACL. An association emerged between bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus (p = 0.010) and a decreased PCL buckling angle and between ramp lesions of the medial meniscus and increased PCL buckling angle both (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Good inter- and intraobserver reliability for the measurement of the PCL buckling angle was observed. Increased PCL buckling angle values were observed in patients with concomitant ACL and bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus, while decreased angle values were observed in those who had ACL tear and ramp lesion of the medial meniscus. No statistically significant difference in the PCL buckling angle emerged between patients with ACL tears and those who had a healthy, intact ACL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mechanoreceptors in the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) can produce proprioception, which is an important reason why patients choose cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The number of mechanoreceptors in the PCL of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is unknown. Purpose: To provide a theoretical basis for estimating the number of mechanoreceptors in the PCL by evaluating the relationship between this number and patient age or OA severity. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An overall 28 PCLs from patients with knee OA were collected at the time of TKA and grouped according to patient age (group A, 60-69 years [n = 8]; group B, 70-79 years [n = 12]; group C, ≥80 years [n = 8]) and OA based on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (group I, ≤80 [n = 8]; group II, 81-120 [n = 10]; group III, >120 [n = 10]). Hematoxylin and eosin and S-100 immunohistochemical staining were performed on the slices near the tibial attachment of the PCL, and the number of mechanoreceptors in each slice was counted. Multifactor analysis of variance was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of mechanoreceptors and patient age or WOMAC score. Results: The number of mechanoreceptors (mean ± SD) in groups A, B, and C was 24.00 ± 15.19, 30.92 ± 11.41, and 23.38 ± 11.39, respectively, with no significant between-group differences. The number of mechanoreceptors in groups I, II, and III was 43.50 ± 4.99, 25.00 ± 5.27, and 15.20 ± 5.61, with significant differences between groups I and II, groups I and III, and groups II and III (P <.001 for all). Conclusion: In patients with knee OA, age had no significant effect on mechanoreceptor count, but the number of mechanoreceptors in the PCL decreased significantly with higher (worse) WOMAC score. These findings suggest that in patients of any age with high WOMAC scores, there may be little value as it relates to knee proprioception in performing a PCL-retaining TKA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The docking technique is widely used to perform ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstructions because of its high failure torque and reliable clinical outcomes. A double–cortical button technique was recently described, with advantages including the ability to tension the graft at the ulnar and humeral attachments and the creation of single bone tunnels. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare the biomechanics between the docking and double-button UCL reconstruction techniques using cadaveric specimens. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in postoperative stiffness or maximum strength between the techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight matched pairs of cadaveric elbow joints underwent controlled humeral valgus torsion cycles in a test frame. Toe region stiffness, elastic region stiffness, and maximum torque were measured during a 4-step protocol: intact, injured, reconstructed (10 and 1000 cycles), and ramp to failure. Graft strains were calculated using 3-dimensional motion capture. Results: After 10 cycles, intact ligaments from the docking and double-button groups exhibited mean ± SD elastic torsional stiffness of 1.60 ± 0.49 and 1.64 ± 0.35 N·m/deg (P =.827), while docking (1.10 ± 0.39 N·m/deg) and double-button (1.05 ± 0.29 N·m/deg) reconstructions were lower (P =.754). There were no significant differences in maximum torque between the docking (3.45 ± 1.35 N·m) and double-button (3.25 ± 1.31 N·m) groups (P =.777). Similarly, differences in maximum graft strains were not significant between the docking (8.1% ± 7.2%) and double-button (5.5% ± 3.1%) groups (P =.645). The groups demonstrated similar decreases in these measures after cyclic loading. Ramp-to-failure testing showed no significant differences in ultimate torque between the docking (8.93 ± 3.9 N·m) and double-button (9.56 ± 3.5 N·m) groups (P =.739). Conclusion: The biomechanical behavior of the double-button technique was not significantly different from that of the docking technique. Both reconstruction techniques restored joint stability, but neither fully recapitulated preinjury joint stiffness. Clinical Relevance: With its procedural advantages, results preliminarily support the use of the double-button reconstruction technique for UCL reconstruction as a reliable single-tunnel technique for primary or revision cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osteochondral allograft transplant (OCA) and osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) replace damaged cartilage with a plug of bone and overlying articular cartilage; however, limited research is available regarding the survival of these osteoarticular grafting procedures. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that patients who underwent OCA would have a higher rate of subsequent surgery over the course of 5 years compared with patients who underwent OAT. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The PearlDiver Mariner administrative database was used to identify patients 10 to 59 years old who had undergone OCA or OAT between 2010 and 2018. All included patients were assessed for subsequent knee surgeries, defined by the occurrence of a subsequent osteochondral procedure (OCA or OAT) or any type of knee arthroplasty for the duration of the time they were included in the data set (maximum of 10 years). Analyses were performed for the total population and those with allograft versus autograft (compared using the Fisher exact test). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves for operation-free survival were compared using a Mantel-Cox log-rank test. Results: In total, 2598 patients were identified: 1631 patients who underwent OCA (34.5 ± 12.1 years old; 51.6% female) and 967 patients who underwent OAT (32.1 ± 12.9 years old; 51.0% female). Both groups had similarly high rates of subsequent knee surgeries (23.9% vs 21.9%, respectively; P =.249), with no statistical differences in rates of subsequent surgery between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing operation-free survival at 5 years indicated no significant difference between the groups (OCA, 88.0% vs OAT, 89.5%; P =.235). Conclusion: Both osteochondral grafting procedures carried a relatively high rate of secondary surgery, which increased with time. The 5-year survival analysis revealed similarly high rates of subsequent surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of a customised, individually made (CIM) bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA).Methods: A prospectively recruited cohort of 79 patients was implanted with a CIM-BKA (patello-femoral plus either medial or lateral tibio-femoral, iDuo G2 system, Conformis, Billerica MA) at eight centres in the US and Germany. Patients were assessed for the 2011 KSS, KOOS, and ROM pre-operatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years post-operatively.Results: The objective KSS score significantly improved from 69 at the pre-operative visit, to 94 at the 2-year post-operative time-point. Similar improvements were observed for the KSS function and satisfaction domains. Significant improvements from pre-operative levels were observed across all five domains of the KOOS. Two patients have undergone surgery to revise their CIM-BKA implant to total knees, resulting in a survivorship rate of 97.5% at an average follow-up of 2.6 years.Conclusions: CIM-BKA compares favourably to published scores as well as revision rates for previously available monolithic OTS-BKA implants. CIM-BKA implants provide surgeons with a viable and patient-specific monolithic implant solution as an option for patients presenting with bi-compartmental disease, who might, otherwise, be treated by performing uni-condylar + patello-femoral joint or bicruciate sparing TKA surgeries. Longer follow-up and higher numbers have to be awaited for further validation of these encouraging early results.Level Of Evidence: 3b (individual case-controlled study). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 1995, the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Society for Engineering Education received a grant from the National Science Foundation to undertake a project aimed both at assisting Russian philosophers in developing curriculum on engineering ethics and learning how context affects the teaching of engineering ethics. The project began with three Russian philosophers visiting the U.S. to observe how we teach engineering ethics. The American members of the project then made three visits to Russia to be part of three different workshops that brought together Russian professors from a variety of disciplines to exchange ideas about teaching ethics among themselves and with the Americans. During these visits, three of the Russians asked if we thought American philosophers would be interested in hearing about the Russian situation. We were delighted by the question (especially since we had become fascinated with the differences in Russian ideas about ethics), and responded with enthusiasm for the idea of their writing such an article. The article that follows is the result of their endeavor to explain how business ethics issues arise in Russia. Among other things, the article reveals how Russia's history and the experiences of Russians under the U.S.S.R create a context extremely different from our own, for thinking about (and teaching) business ethics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pitching is a common mechanism of injury in baseball, with known risk factors for elbow injuries among adolescent pitchers.Hypothesis: Elbow injury rates and mechanisms will differ between high school baseball and softball players.Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study.Level Of Evidence: Level 3.Methods: Baseball- and softball-related injury data from the 2005-2006 through 2014-2015 academic years were collected from the High School Reporting Information Online (RIO) Internet-based data collection tool. Athlete-exposure (AE) and injury data were collected by certified athletic trainers. Rate ratios (RRs) were calculated comparing injury rates in the 2 populations. Injury proportion ratios (IPRs) comparing elbow injuries in pitchers and nonpitchers were calculated as the proportion of all elbow injuries in pitchers divided by the proportion of all elbow injuries in nonpitchers.Results: A total of 214 elbow injuries in male baseball players occurred over 2,327,774 AEs, for an overall elbow injury rate of 0.92 per 10,000 AEs. A total of 75 elbow injuries were reported in female softball players over 1,731,644 AEs, for an overall rate of 0.43 per 10,000 AEs. The rate of elbow injury was significantly higher for baseball than softball (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.64-2.77). A significantly greater proportion of elbow injuries in baseball were pitching-related compared with those from softball, with 50.2% occurring while pitching in baseball versus 11.0% in softball (IPR, 4.58; 95% CI, 2.35-8.93). If all injuries occurring during pitching were removed from both sports, the difference in elbow injury rate for baseball and softball would no longer be significant (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.88-1.62).Conclusion: The rate of elbow injuries is significantly higher in baseball than softball. This is attributable to differences in rates of pitching-related injuries between these 2 groups.Clinical Relevance: These results demonstrate that overhand pitching increases risk of elbow injury in high school athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Several tasks have been used to examine landing biomechanics for evaluation and rehabilitation, especially as related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries. However, comparing results among studies in which different tasks were used can be difficult, and it is unclear which task may be most appropriate. Objective: To compare lower extremity biomechanics across 5 commonly used landing tasks. Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Setting: University-operated US Air Force Special Operations Forces human performance research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 65 US Air Force Special Tactics Operators (age ± 27.7 6 5.0 years, height ± 176.5 6 5.7 cm, mass ± 83.1 6 9.1 kg). Intervention(s): Kinematic and kinetic analysis of doubleand single-legged drop landing, double- and single-legged stop jump, and forward jump to single-legged landing. Main Outcome Measure(s): Hip-, knee-, and ankle-joint kinematics; knee-joint forces and moments; and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were the dependent measures. We used repeated-measures analyses of variance or Friedman tests, as appropriate, to assess within-subject differences across tasks. Results: Peak vertical GRF and peak knee-flexion angle were different among all tasks (P , .001). Single-legged landings generated higher vertical GRF (v2 ± 244.68, P , .001) and lower peak knee-flexion values (F4,64 ± 209.33, P , .001) except for forward jump to single-legged landing, which had the second highest peak vertical GRF and the lowest peak knee-flexion value. The single-legged drop landing generated the highest vertical (v2 ± 244.68, P , .001) and posterior (v2 ± 164.46, P , .001) GRFs. Peak knee-valgus moment was higher during the double-legged drop landing (v2 ± 239.63, P , .001) but similar for all others. Conclusions: Different landing tasks elicited different biomechanical responses; no single task was best for assessing a wide range of biomechanical variables related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Therefore, depending on the goals of the study, using multiple assessment tasks should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coaches teach proper mechanics at a young age in an effort to increase pitching efficiency (i.e., proper pitching mechanics). Unfortunately, the mechanics taught to beginning pitchers are based on the findings from adult pitchers and may result in techniques that are detrimental to younger pitchers. The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics published for pitchers across various ages in an effort to determine whether the pitching techniques vary across developmental periods. A meta-analysis of papers published describing pitching kinematics for youth and adult pitchers was conducted. Maximal rotational velocity of the trunk and maximum external rotation of the shoulder were observed during the arm cocking phase. Peak magnitudes for abduction, horizontal adduction, and shoulder internal rotation were observed during the deceleration phase of the movement. In addition, by comparing previously published data across youth and adult pitchers, valuable insight into the differences in mechanics was gained. The results demonstrated that there are some distinct differences between youth and adult pitching mechanics. This finding may allow increased focus to be applied to those parameters observed to differ across age, increasing the knowledge base available for coaches to properly instruct youth pitchers. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of International Orthopaedics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)