Search

Given positive integers $p \ge k$, and a non-negative integer $d$, we say a graph $G$ is $(k,d,p)$-choosable if for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)|\geq k$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and $|\bigcup_{v\in V(G)}L(v)| \leq p$, there exists an $L$-coloring of $G$ such that each monochromatic subgraph has maximum degree at most $d$. In particular, $(k,0,k)$-choosable means $k$-colorable, $(k,0,+\infty)$-choosable means $k$-choosable and $(k,d,+\infty)$-choosable means $d$-defective $k$-choosable. This paper proves that there are 1-defective 3-choosable graphs that are not 4-choosable, and for any positive integers $\ell \geq k \geq 3$, and non-negative integer $d$, there are $(k,d, \ell)$-choosable graphs that are not $(k,d , \ell+1)$-choosable. These results answer questions asked by Wang and Xu [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27, 4(2013), 2020-2037], and Kang [J. Graph Theory 73, 3(2013), 342-353], respectively. Our construction of $(k,d, \ell)$-choosable but not $(k,d , \ell+1)$-choosable graphs generalizes the construction of Kr\'{a}l' and Sgall in [J. Graph Theory 49, 3(2005), 177-186] for the case $d=0$., Comment: 12 pages, 4 figures

This paper proves that every planar graph without cycles of length 4, 7, or 9 is DP-3-colorable., 12 pages, 2 figures

This paper studies two variants of defective acyclic coloring of planar graphs. For a graph $G$ and a coloring $\varphi$ of $G$, a 2CC transversal is a subset $E'$ of $E(G)$ that intersects every 2-colored cycle. Let $k$ be a positive integer. We denote by $m_k(G)$ the minimum integer $m$ such that $G$ has a proper $k$-coloring which has a 2CC transerval of size $m$, and by $m'_k(G)$ the minimum size of a subset $E'$ of $E(G)$ such that $G-E'$ is acyclic $k$-colorable. We prove that for any $n$-vertex $3$-colorable planar graph $G$, $m_3(G) \le n - 3$ and for any planar graph $G$, $m_4(G) \le n - 5$ provided that $n \ge 5$. We show that these upper bounds are sharp: there are infinitely many planar graphs attaining these upper bounds. Moreover, the minimum 2CC transversal $E'$ can be chosen in such a way that $E'$ induces a forest. We also prove that for any planar graph $G$, $m'_3(G) \le (13n - 42) / 10$ and $m'_4(G) \le (3n - 12) / 5$.

A graph is $\ell$-reconstructible if it is determined by its multiset of induced subgraphs obtained by deleting $\ell$ vertices. We prove that strongly regular graphs with at least six vertices are $2$-reconstructible., 5 pages

A decomposition of a graph $G$ is a family of subgraphs of $G$ whose edge sets form a partition of $E(G)$. In this paper, we prove that every triangle-free planar graph $G$ can be decomposed into a $2$-degenerate graph and a matching. Consequently, every triangle-free planar graph $G$ has a matching $M$ such that $G-M$ is online 3-DP-colorable. This strengthens an earlier result in [R. \v{S}krekovski, {\em A Gr\"{o}tzsch-Type Theorem for List Colourings with Impropriety One}, Combin. Prob. Comput. 8 (1999), 493-507] that every triangle-free planar graph is $1$-defective $3$-choosable.

It was conjectured by Ohba, and proved by Noel, Reed and Wu that $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2k+1$ are chromatic-choosable. This upper bound on $|V(G)|$ is tight: if $k$ is even, then $K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ and $K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ are $k$-chromatic graphs with $2 k+2$ vertices that are not chromatic-choosable. It was proved in [arXiv:2201.02060] that these are the only non-$k$-choosable complete $k$-partite graphs with $2k+2$ vertices. For $G =K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ or $K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$, a bad list assignment of $G$ is a $k$-list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that $G$ is not $L$-colourable. Bad list assignments for $G=K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ were characterized in [Discrete Mathematics 244 (2002), 55-66]. In this paper, we first give a simpler proof of this result, and then we characterize bad list assignments for $G=K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$. Using these results, we characterize all non-$k$-choosable (non-complete) $k$-partite graphs with $2k+2$ vertices., 13 pages, 1 figure

This paper gives a simple proof of the result that every planar graph $G$ has Alon-Tarsi number at most 5, and has a matching $M$ such that $G-M$ has Alon-Tarsi number at most 4., Comment: 4 pages

In this paper the concept of circular $r$-flows in a mono-directed signed graph $(G, \sigma)$ is introduced. That is a pair $(D, f)$, where $D$ is an orientation on $G$ and $f: E(G)\to (-r,r)$ satisfies that $|f(e)|\in [1, r-1]$ for each positive edge $e$ and $|f(e)|\in [0, \frac{r}{2}-1]\cup [\frac{r}{2}+1, r)$ for each negative edge $e$, and the total in-flow equals the total out-flow at each vertex. The circular flow index of a signed graph $(G, \sigma)$ with no positive bridge, denoted $\Phi_c(G,\sigma)$, is the minimum $r$ such that $(G, \sigma)$ admits a circular $r$-flow. This is the dual notion of circular colorings and circular chromatic numbers of signed graphs recently introduced in [Circular chromatic number of signed graphs. R. Naserasr, Z. Wang, and X. Zhu. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 28(2)(2021), \#P2.44], and is distinct from the concept of circular flows in bi-directed graphs associated to signed graphs studied in the literature. We give several equivalent definitions, study basic properties of circular flows in mono-directed signed graphs, explore relations with flows in graphs, and focus on upper bounds on $\Phi_c(G,\sigma)$ in terms of the edge-connectivity of $G$. Meanwhile, we note that for the particular values of $r_{_k}=\frac{2k}{k-1}$, and when restricted to two natural subclasses of signed graphs, the existence of a circular $r_{_k} $-flow is strongly connected with the existence of a modulo $k$-orientation, and in case of planar graphs, based on duality, with the homomorphisms to $C_{-k}$.

Assume $\lambda=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ is a partition of $k_{\lambda} = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $\lambda$-list assignment of $G$ is a $k_\lambda$-list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that the colour set $\bigcup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into $|\lambda|= q$ sets $C_1,C_2,\ldots,C_q$ such that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is \emph{$\lambda$-choosable} if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $\lambda$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. The concept of $\lambda$-choosability is a refinement of choosability that puts $k$-choosability and $k$-colourability in the same framework. If $|\lambda|$ is close to $k_\lambda$, then $\lambda$-choosability is close to $k_\lambda$-colourability; if $|\lambda|$ is close to $1$, then $\lambda$-choosability is close to $k_\lambda$-choosability. This paper studies Hadwiger's Conjecture in the context of $\lambda$-choosability. Hadwiger's Conjecture is equivalent to saying that every $K_t$-minor-free graph is $\{1 \star (t-1)\}$-choosable for any positive integer $t$. We prove that for $t \ge 5$, for any partition $\lambda$ of $t-1$ other than $\{1 \star (t-1)\}$, there is a $K_t$-minor-free graph $G$ that is not $\lambda$-choosable. We then construct several types of $K_t$-minor-free graphs that are not $\lambda$-choosable, where $k_\lambda - (t-1)$ gets larger as $k_\lambda-|\lambda|$ gets larger. In partcular, for any $q$ and any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $t_0$ such that for any $t \ge t_0$, for any partition $\lambda$ of $\lfloor (2-\epsilon)t \rfloor$ with $|\lambda| =q$, there is a $K_t$-minor-free graph that is not $\lambda$-choosable. The $q=1$ case of this result was recently proved by Steiner, and our proof uses a similar argument. We also generalize this result to $(a,b)$-list colouring.

For a multi-set $λ=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ of positive integers, let $k_λ = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $λ$-list assignment of $G$ is a list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that the colour set $\bigcup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into the disjoint union $C_1 \cup C_2 \cup \ldots \cup C_q$ of $q$ sets so that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is $λ$-choosable if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. The concept of $λ$-choosability puts $k$-colourability and $k$-choosability in the same framework: If $λ= \{k\}$, then $λ$-choosability is equivalent to $k$-choosability; if $λ$ consists of $k $ copies of $1$, then $λ$-choosability is equivalent to $k $-colourability. If $G$ is $λ$-choosable, then $G$ is $k_λ$-colourable. On the other hand, there are $k_λ$-colourable graphs that are not $λ$-choosable, provided that $λ$ contains an integer larger than $1$. Let $ϕ(λ)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a $k_λ$-colourable non-$λ$-choosable graph. This paper determines the value of $ϕ(λ)$ for all $λ$., 13 pages

Assume $n, m$ are positive integers and $G$ is a graph. Let $P_{n,m}$ be the graph obtained from the path with vertices $\{-m, -(m-1), \ldots, 0, \ldots, n\}$ by adding a loop at vertex $ 0$. The double cone $\Delta_{n,m}(G)$ over a graph $G$ is obtained from the direct product $G \times P_{n,m}$ by identifying $V(G) \times \{n\}$ into a single vertex $(\star, n)$, identifying $V(G) \times \{-m\}$ into a single vertex $(\star, -m)$, and adding an edge connecting $(\star, -m)$ and $(\star, n)$. This paper determines the fractional chromatic number of $\Delta_{n,m}(G)$. In particular, if $n < m$ or $n=m$ is even, then $\chi_f(\Delta_{n,m}(G)) = \chi_f(\Delta_n(G))$, where $\Delta_n(G)$ is the $n$th cone over $G$. If $n=m$ is odd, then $\chi_f(\Delta_{n,m}(G)) > \chi_f(\Delta_n(G))$. The chromatic number of $\Delta_{n,m}(G)$ is also discussed., Comment: 23 pages

A graph $G$ is called $3$-choice critical if $G$ is not $2$-choosable but any proper subgraph is $2$-choosable. A characterization of $3$-choice critical graphs was given by Voigt in [On list Colourings and Choosability of Graphs, Habilitationsschrift, Tu Ilmenau(1998)]. Voigt conjectured that if $G$ is a bipartite $3$-choice critical graph, then $G$ is $(4m, 2m)$-choosable for every integer $m$. This conjecture was disproved by Meng, Puleo and Zhu in [On (4, 2)-Choosable Graphs, Journal of Graph Theory 85(2):412-428(2017)]. They showed that if $G=\Theta_{r,s,t}$ where $r,s,t$ have the same parity and $\min\{r,s,t\} \ge 3$, or $G=\Theta_{2,2,2,2p}$ with $p \ge 2$, then $G$ is bipartite $3$-choice critical, but not $(4,2)$-choosable. On the other hand, all the other bipartite 3-choice critical graphs are $(4,2)$-choosable. This paper strengthens the result of Meng, Puleo and Zhu and shows that all the other bipartite $3$-choice critical graphs are $(4m,2m)$-choosable for every integer $m$., Comment: 18 pages, 2 figures

A graph $G$ is called $3$-choice critical if $G$ is not $2$-choosable but any proper subgraph is $2$-choosable. A graph $G$ is strongly fractional $r$-choosable if $G$ is $(a,b)$-choosable for all positive integers $a,b$ for which $a/b \ge r$. The strong fractional choice number of $G$ is $ch_f^s(G) = \inf \{r: G $ is strongly fractional $r$-choosable$\}$. This paper determines the strong fractional choice number of all $3$-choice critical graphs., Comment: 29 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2006.15614

The strong fractional choice number of a graph $G$ is the infimum of those real numbers $r$ such that $G$ is $(\lceil rm \rceil, m)$-choosable for every positive integer $m$. The strong fractional choice number of a family ${\cal G}$ of graphs is the supremum of the strong fractional choice number of graphs in ${\cal G}$. We denote by ${\cal{Q}}_k$ the class of series-parallel graphs with girth at least $k$. This paper proves that for $k=4q-1, 4q,4q+1, 4q+2$, the strong fractional number of ${\cal{Q}}_k$ is exactly $2+ \frac{1}{q}$., Comment: 7 pages

We prove that it is always possible to color online nonrepetitively any (partial) $k$-tree (that is, graphs with tree-width at most $k$) with $4^k$ colors. This implies that it is always possible to color online nonrepetitively cycles, trees and series-parallel graphs with $16$ colors. Our results generalize the respective (offline) nonrepetitive coloring results.

Hedetniemi conjectured in 1966 that $\chi(G \times H) = \min\{\chi(G), \chi(H)\}$ for any graphs G and H. Here $G\times H$ is the graph with vertex set $ V(G)\times V(H)$ defined by putting $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$ adjacent if and only if $xx'\in E(G)$ and $yy'\in V(H)$. This conjecture received a lot of attention in the past half century. It was disproved recently by Shitov. The Poljak-R\"{o}dl function is defined as $f(n) = \min\{\chi(G \times H): \chi(G)=\chi(H)=n\}$. Hedetniemi's conjecture is equivalent to saying $f(n)=n$ for all integer $n$. Shitov's result shows that $f(n), Comment: 12 pages

This paper constructs a planar graph $G_1$ such that for any subgraph $H$ of $G_1$ with maximum degree $\Delta(H) \le 3$, $G_1-E(H)$ is not $3$-choosable, and a planar graph $G_2$ such that for any star forest $F$ in $G_2$, $G_2-E(F)$ contains a copy of $K_4$ and hence $G_2-E(F)$ is not $3$-colourable. On the other hand, we prove that every planar graph $G$ contains a forest $F$ such that the Alon-Tarsi number of $G - E(F)$ is at most $3$, and hence $G - E(F)$ is 3-paintable and 3-choosable., Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures

This paper proves the following result: Assume $G$ is a triangle free planar graph, $X$ is an independent set of $G$. If $L$ is a list assignment of $G$ such that $\mid L(v)\mid = 4$ for each vertex $v \in V(G)-X$ and $\mid L(v)\mid = 3$ for each vertex $v \in X$, then $G$ is $L$-colourable., Comment: 24 pages, 4 figures

Let $��(k)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a non-$k$-choosable $k$-chromatic graph. The Ohba conjecture, confirmed by Noel, Reed and Wu, asserts that $��(k) \ge 2k+2$. This bound is tight if $k$ is even. If $k$ is odd, then it is known that $��(k) \le 2k+3$ and it is conjectured by Noel that $��(k) = 2k+3$. For a multi-set $��=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ of positive integers, let $k_�� = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $��$-list assignment of $G$ is a $k_��$-list assignment $L$ for which the colour set $\cup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into the disjoint union $C_1 \cup C_2 \cup \ldots \cup C_q$ of $q$ sets so that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is $��$-choosable if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $��$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. Let $��(��)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a non-$��$-choosable $k_��$-chromatic graph. Let $1_��$ be the multiplicity of $1$ in $��$, and let $o_��$ be the number of elements in $��$ that are odd integers. We prove that if $1_�� \ne k_��$, then $2k_��+1_��+2 \leqslant ��(��) \leqslant 2k_��+ o_��+2$. In particular, if $1_��=o_��=t$, i.e. $��$ contains no odd integer greater than $1$, then $��(��) = 2k_��+t+2$. We also prove that $��(��) \leqslant 2k_��+5 1_��+3$. In particular, if $1_��=0$, then $2k_��+2 \leqslant ��(��) \leqslant 2k_��+3$., 11 pages

This paper proves that if $G$ is a planar graph without 4-cycles and $l$-cycles for some $l\in\{5, 6, 7\}$, then there exists a matching $M$ such that $AT(G-M)\leq 3$. This implies that every planar graph without 4-cycles and $l$-cycles for some $l\in\{5, 6, 7\}$ is 1-defective 3-paintable., Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures

This paper proves that for each positive integer $m$, there is a triangle-free planar graph $G$ which is not $(3m+ \lceil \frac m{17} \rceil-1, m)$-choosable., 6 pages, 1 figure

DP-coloring (also known as correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring developed recently by Dvo\v{r}\'{a}k and Postle. In this paper we introduce and study the fractional DP-chromatic number $\chi_{DP}^\ast(G)$. We characterize all connected graphs $G$ such that $\chi_{DP}^\ast(G) \leqslant 2$: they are precisely the graphs with no odd cycles and at most one even cycle. By a theorem of Alon, Tuza, and Voigt, the fractional list-chromatic number $\chi_\ell^\ast(G)$ of any graph $G$ equals its fractional chromatic number $\chi^\ast(G)$. This equality does not extend to fractional DP-colorings. Moreover, we show that the difference $\chi^\ast_{DP}(G) - \chi^\ast(G)$ can be arbitrarily large, and, furthermore, $\chi^\ast_{DP}(G) \geq d/(2 \ln d)$ for every graph $G$ of maximum average degree $d \geq 4$. On the other hand, we show that this asymptotic lower bound is tight for a large class of graphs that includes all bipartite graphs as well as many graphs of high girth and high chromatic number., Comment: 13 pages, 1 figure

Assume $G$ is a graph. We view $G$ as a symmetric digraph, in which each edge $uv$ of $G$ is replaced by a pair of opposite arcs $e=(u,v)$ and $e^{-1}=(v,u)$. Assume $S$ is an inverse closed subset of permutations of positive integers. We say $G$ is $S$-$k$-colourable if for any mapping $\sigma: E(G) \to S$ with $\sigma (x,y) = (\sigma (y,x))^{-1}$, there is a mapping $f: V(G) \to [k]=\{1,2, \ldots, k\}$ such that for each arc $e=(x,y)$, $\sigma_e(f(x)) \ne f(y)$. The concept of $S$-$k$-colouring is a common generalization of many colouring concepts, including $k$-colouring, signed $k$-colouring defined by M\'{a}\v{c}ajov\'{a}, Raspaud and \v{S}koviera, signed $k$-colouring defined by Kang and Steffen, correspondence $k$-colouring defined by Dvo\v{r}\'{a}k and Postle, and group colouring defined by Jaeger, Linial, Payan and Tarsi. We are interested in the problem as for which subset $S$ of $S_4$, every planar graph is $S$-colourable. Such a subset $S$ is called good. The famous four colour theorem is equivalent to say that $S=\{id\}$ is good. There are two conjectures on signed graph colouring, one is equivalent to $S=\{id, (12)(34)\}$ be good and the other is equivalent to $S=\{id, (12)\}$ be good. We say two subsets $S$ and $S'$ of $S_k$ are conjugate if there is a permutation $\pi \in S_k$ such that $S'= \{\pi \sigma\pi^{-1}: \sigma \in S\}$. This paper proves that if $S$ is a good subset of $S_4$ containing $id$, then $S$ is conjugate to a subset of $\{id, (12), (34), (12)(34)\}$. However, it remains an open problem if there is any good subset $S$ which contains $id$ and has cardinality $|S| \ge 2$. We also prove that $S=\{(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)\}$ is not good., Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures

This paper proves that the Alon-Tarsi number of any planar graph is at most $5$, which gives an alternate proof of the $5$-choosability as well as the $5$-paintability of planar graphs., 0 figures, 7 pages

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of graphs. A graph $G$ is $\mathcal{F}$-saturated if $G$ contains no member of $\mathcal{F}$ as a subgraph but $G+e$ contains some member of $\mathcal{F}$ whenever $e\in E(\overline{G})$. The saturation number and extremal number of $\mathcal{F}$, denoted $sat(n,\mathcal{F})$ and $ex(n,\mathcal{F})$ respectively, are the minimum and maximum numbers of edges among $n$-vertex $\mathcal{F}$-saturated graphs. For $k\in\mathbb{N}$, let $\mathcal{F}_k$ and $\mathcal{F}'_k$ be the families of $k$-connected and $k$-edge-connected graphs, respectively. Wenger proved $sat(n,\mathcal{F}_k)=(k-1)n-{k\choose2}$, we prove $sat(n,\mathcal{F}'_k)=(k-1)(n-1)-\lfloor{\frac {n}{k+1}}\rfloor{k-1 \choose 2}$. We also prove $ex(n,\mathcal{F}'_k)=(k-1)n-{k\choose2}$ and characterize when equality holds. Finally, we give a lower bound on the spectral radius for $\mathcal{F}_k$-saturated and $\mathcal{F}'_k$-saturated graphs., 9 pages, we welcome any comments and suggestions

Assume $L$ is a $k$-list assignment of a graph $G$. A $d$-defective $m$-fold $L$-colouring $\phi$ of $G$ assigns to each vertex $v$ a set $\phi(v)$ of $m$ colours, so that $\phi(v) \subseteq L(v)$ for each vertex $v$, and for each colour $i$, the set $\{v: i \in \phi(v)\}$ induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most $d$. In this paper, we consider on-line list $d$-defective $m$-fold colouring of graphs, where the list assignment $L$ is given on-line, and the colouring is constructed on-line. To be precise, the $d$-defective $(k,m)$-painting game on a graph $G$ is played by two players: Lister and Painter. Initially, each vertex has $k$ tokens and is uncoloured. In each round, Lister chooses a set $M$ of vertices and removes one token from each chosen vertex. Painter colours a subset $X$ of $M$ which induces a subgraph $G[X]$ of maximum degree at most $d$. A vertex $v$ is fully coloured if $v$ has received $m$ colours. Lister wins if at the end of some round, there is a vertex with no more tokens left and is not fully coloured. Otherwise, at some round, all vertices are fully coloured and Painter wins. We say $G$ is $d$-defective $(k,m)$-paintable if Painter has a winning strategy in this game. This paper proves that every planar graph is $1$-defective $(9,2)$-paintable., Comment: 13 pages, 5 figures

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is antimagic if there is a one-to-one correspondence $f: E \to \{1,2,\ldots, |E|\}$ such that for any two vertices $u,v$, $\sum_{e \in E(u)}f(e) \ne \sum_{e\in E(v)}f(e)$. It is known that bipartite regular graphs are antimagic and non-bipartite regular graphs of odd degree at least three are antimagic. Whether all non-bipartite regular graphs of even degree are antimagic remained an open problem. In this paper, we solve this problem and prove that all even degree regular graphs are antimagic. The paper was submitted to December 2014 by Journal of Graph Theory., 13 pages, 3 figures

A graph $G$ is $(k,k')$-choosable if the following holds: For any list assignment $L$ which assigns to each vertex $v$ a set $L(v)$ of $k$ real numbers, and assigns to each edge $e$ a set $L(e)$ of $k'$ real numbers, there is a total weighting $\phi: V(G) \cup E(G) \to R$ such that $\phi(z) \in L(z)$ for $z \in V \cup E$, and $\sum_{e \in E(u)}\phi(e)+\phi(u) \ne \sum_{e \in E(v)}\phi(e)+\phi(v)$ for every edge $uv$. This paper proves the following results: (1) If $G$ is a connected $d$-degenerate graph, and $k>d$ is a prime number, and $G$ is either non-bipartite or has two non-adjacent vertices $u,v$ with $d(u)+d(v) < k$, then $G$ is $(1,k)$-choosable. As a consequence, every planar graph with no isolated edges is $(1,7)$-choosable, and every connected $2$-degenerate non-bipartite graph other than $K_2$ is $(1,3)$-choosable. (2) If $d+1$ is a prime number, $v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_n$ is an ordering of the vertices of $G$ such that each vertex $v_i$ has back degree $d^-(v_i) \le d$, then there is a graph $G'$ obtained from $G$ by adding at most $d-d^-(v_i)$ leaf neighbours to $v_i$ (for each $i$) and $G'$ is $(1,2)$-choosable. (3) If $G$ is $d$-degenerate and $d+1$ a prime, then $G$ is $(d,2)$-choosable. In particular, $2$-degenerate graphs are $(2,2)$-choosable. (4) Every graph is $(\lceil\frac{{\rm mad}(G)}{2}\rceil+1, 2)$ -choosable. In particular, planar graphs are $(4,2)$-choosable, planar bipartite graphs are $(3,2)$-choosable., Comment: 16 pages, 1 figures

For a loopless multigraph $G$, the fractional arboricity $Arb(G)$ is the maximum of $\frac{|E(H)|}{|V(H)|-1}$ over all subgraphs $H$ with at least two vertices. Generalizing the Nash-Williams Arboricity Theorem, the Nine Dragon Tree Conjecture asserts that if $Arb(G)\le k+\frac{d}{k+d+1}$, then $G$ decomposes into $k+1$ forests with one having maximum degree at most $d$. The conjecture was previously proved for $d=k+1$ and for $k=1$ when $d \le 6$. We prove it for all $d$ when $k \le 2$, except for $(k,d)=(2,1)$., Comment: 15 pages

This paper introduces a new variant of hypercubes, which we call Z-cubes. The n-dimensional Z-cube $H_n$ is obtained from two copies of the (n-1)-dimensional Z-cube $H_{n-1}$ by adding a special perfect matching between the vertices of these two copies of $H_{n-1}$. We prove that the n-dimensional Z-cubes $H_n$ has diameter $(1+o(1))n/\log_2 n$. This greatly improves on the previous known variants of hypercube of dimension n, whose diameters are all larger than n/3. Moreover, any hypercube variant of dimension $n$ is an n-regular graph on $2^n$ vertices, and hence has diameter greater than $n/\log_2 n$. So the Z-cubes are optimal with respect to diameters, up to an error of order $o(n/\log_2n)$. Another type of Z-cubes $Z_{n,k}$ which have similar structure and properties as $H_n$ are also discussed in the last section., Comment: 9 pages, 1 figure

A graph $G$ is called $(a,b)$-choosable if for any list assignment $L$ which assigns to each vertex $v$ a set $L(v)$ of $a$ permissible colours, there is a $b$-tuple $L$-colouring of $G$. An $(a,1)$-choosable graph is also called $a$-choosable. In the pioneering paper on list colouring of graphs by Erd\H{o}s, Rubin and Taylor, $2$-choosable graphs are characterized. Confirming a special case of a conjecture of Erd\H{o}s--Rubin--Taylor, Tuza and Voigt proved that $2$-choosable graphs are $(2m,m)$-choosable for any positive integer $m$. On the other hand, Voigt proved that if $m$ is an odd integer, then these are the only $(2m,m)$-choosable graphs; however, when $m$ is even, there are $(2m,m)$-choosable graphs that are not $2$-choosable. A graph is called $3$-choosable-critical if it is not $2$-choosable, but all its proper subgraphs are $2$-choosable. Voigt conjectured that for every positive integer $m$, all bipartite $3$-choosable-critical graphs are $(4m,2m)$-choosable. In this paper, we determine which $3$-choosable-critical graphs are $(4,2)$-choosable, refuting Voigt's conjecture in the process. Nevertheless, a weaker version of the conjecture is true: we prove that there is an even integer $k$ such that for any positive integer $m$, every bipartite $3$-choosable-critical graph is $(2km,km)$-choosable. Moving beyond $3$-choosable-critical graphs, we present an infinite family of non-$3$-choosable-critical graphs which have been shown by computer analysis to be $(4,2)$-choosable. This shows that the family of all $(4,2)$-choosable graphs has rich structure., Comment: 18 pages, 8 figures. Now includes source code in ancillary files

An $r$-augmented tree is a rooted tree plus $r$ edges added from each leaf to ancestors. For $d,g,r\in\mathbb{N}$, we construct a bipartite $r$-augmented complete $d$-ary tree having girth at least $g$. The height of such trees must grow extremely rapidly in terms of the girth. Using the resulting graphs, we construct sparse non-$k$-choosable bipartite graphs, showing that maximum average degree at most $2(k-1)$ is a sharp sufficient condition for $k$-choosability in bipartite graphs, even when requiring large girth. We also give a new simple construction of non-$k$-colorable graphs and hypergraphs with any girth $g$., Comment: Slight adjustments, including simplifying the proofs of Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 and the arguments for large girth

Let $\text{ch}(G)$ denote the choice number of a graph $G$ (also called "list chromatic number" or "choosability" of $G$). Noel, Reed, and Wu proved the conjecture of Ohba that $\text{ch}(G)=\chi(G)$ when $|V(G)|\le 2\chi(G)+1$. We extend this to a general upper bound: $\text{ch}(G)\le \max\{\chi(G),\lceil({|V(G)|+\chi(G)-1})/{3}\rceil\}$. Our result is sharp for $|V(G)|\le 3\chi(G)$ using Ohba's examples, and it improves the best-known upper bound for $\text{ch}(K_{4,\dots,4})$., Comment: 14 pages

The on-line choice number of a graph is a variation of the choice number defined through a two person game. It is at least as large as the choice number for all graphs and is strictly larger for some graphs. In particular, there are graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| = 2 \chi(G)+1$ whose on-line choice numbers are larger than their chromatic numbers, in contrast to a recently confirmed conjecture of Ohba that every graph $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2 \chi(G)+1$ has its choice number equal its chromatic number. Nevertheless, an on-line version of Ohba conjecture was proposed in [P. Huang, T. Wong and X. Zhu, Application of polynomial method to on-line colouring of graphs, European J. Combin., 2011]: Every graph $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2 \chi(G)$ has its on-line choice number equal its chromatic number. This paper confirms the on-line version of Ohba conjecture for graphs $G$ with independence number at most 3. We also study list colouring of complete multipartite graphs $K_{3\star k}$ with all parts of size 3. We prove that the on-line choice number of $K_{3 \star k}$ is at most $3/2k$, and present an alternate proof of Kierstead's result that its choice number is $\lceil (4k-1)/3 \rceil$. For general graphs $G$, we prove that if $|V(G)| \le \chi(G)+\sqrt{\chi(G)}$ then its on-line choice number equals chromatic number., Comment: new abstract and introduction