Search

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan has shown encouraging activity in patients with treatment-refractory HER2-positive, RAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Dose optimisation and further antitumour assessments in patients with RAS mutations and those with previous anti-HER2 therapy are warranted. We aimed to evaluate two doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan (5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg) to establish the recommended dose in patients with pretreated HER2-positive, RAS wild-type or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: DESTINY-CRC02 was a multicentre, randomised, two-stage, two-arm, phase 2 study done in 53 research hospitals and medical centres in Australia, Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older or 20 years and older (depending on region) with pretreated pathologically documented, unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic HER2-positive, and RAS wild-type or mutant colorectal cancer. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and have received previous chemotherapy, and anti-EGFR, anti-VEGF, or anti-PD-L1 therapy, if clinically indicated. In stage 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a secure interactive response technology system, to receive 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan administered intravenously every 21 days. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status, HER2 status, and RAS status. In stage 2, patients were assigned into the 5·4 mg/kg treatment group only. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review, assessed in all patients for whom treatment was assigned (full analysis set). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04744831, and is ongoing (not recruiting)., Findings: Between March 5, 2021, and March 29, 2022, 135 patients were centrally screened, 122 of whom were enrolled. In stage 1, 40 patients each were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg. In stage 2, an additional 42 patients were enrolled in the 5·4 mg/kg group. 64 (52%) participants were male and 58 (48%) were female. The median duration of follow-up was 8·9 months (IQR 6·7-10·5) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 10·3 months (5·9-12·7) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 37·8% (31/82 [95% CI 27·3-49·2]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 27·5% (11/40 [14·6-43·9]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. 34 (41%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 19 (49%) of 39 in the 6·4 mg/kg group had grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (13 [16%] of 83 patients), anaemia (six [7%]), nausea (six [7%]), and white blood cell count decreased (five [6%]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group; and were neutrophil count decreased (10 [26%] of 39 patients), anaemia (eight [21%]), platelet count decreased (four [10%]), and white blood cell count decreased (four [10%]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in 11 (13%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and six (15%) of 39 patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group; the most common in the 5·4 mg/kg group was nausea (three [4%] patients) and the most common in the 6·4 mg/kg group were fatigue (two [5%] patients), neutropenia (two [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [5%]). A drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event related to death occurred in one (1%) patient in the 5·4 mg/kg group (due to hepatic failure). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis events were observed in seven (8%) patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group (all grade 1 or 2) and in five (13%) patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group (four grade 1 or 2; one grade 5)., Interpretation: The promising antitumour activity and favourable safety profile support trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg as the optimal single-agent dose for patients with pretreated HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, including those with RAS mutations, previous anti-HER2 therapy, or both., Funding: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KR has received research grants from Bayer, UCB BioSciences, Hibercell, Eisai, Merck, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Guardant Health, Innovent Biologics, and Xencor; has received payment or honoraria from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Seagen; and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bayer, Eisai/Merck, SAGA Diagnostics, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. SS has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Agenus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, CheckmAb, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, and T-One Therapeutics. AT has received research grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dome, Isofol Medical, Incyte Corporation, and Hutchison Medipharma; and has received payment or honoraria from Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Merck Serono, and Takeda. TKat has received payment or honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Eli Lilly. FP has received payment or honoraria from Amgen, Merck-Serono, MSD, BMS, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Bayer, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Ipsen, GSK, and Rottapharm. YK has received royalties or licenses from Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Nippon, Kayaku, Daiichi Sankyo, IQVIA Services Japan, MSD, Astellas Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Eisai, National Cancer Center Japan, Syneos Health Clinical, ShiftZero, Parexel International, Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization, EPS Holdings, Sysmex Corporation, Public Health Research Foundation, Aichi Cancer Center, and Kyushu Study group of Clinical Cancer; and has received payment or honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, TAIHO Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma, EA Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon, Kayaku, Pfizer, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, NIPRO, MOROO, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hakodate National Hospital, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, Eli Lilly, Yakult Honsha, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Merck Biopharma, The Japanese Gastroenterological Association, Sapporo Minami Tokushukai Hospital, and Pancan Japan. HK has received consulting or advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, and AbbVie; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer Yakuhin, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Biopharma, Teijin Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Yakult Pharmaceutical Industry, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, and Nippon Kayaku; and research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical, and Eisai. MP has received research grants from Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Novartis, and Roche; has received payment or honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Sirtex; has received consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Qurin, Remedus, Sanofi, Sirtex, and Terumo; and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Basilea. TA has received payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gritstone Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, and Servier Transgéne; has received support for attending meetings or travel from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck; has received consulting fees from Aptitude Health, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gritstone Oncology, GamaMabs Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Kaleido Oncology, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Servier, and Transgène; and is president of the ARCAD Foundation. SL has received research grants from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Hutchinson, Incyte, Merck Serono, Mirati, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Servier; has received payment or honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Servier; and has received consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Incyte, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Takeda, and Servier. KY has received research grants from Taiho Pharm; and has received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Merck. JT has received honoraria from Servier and Pierre Fabre; has received consulting fees from Haystack Oncology; has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Gilead, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, and Daiichi Sankyo; and has participated with leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid for Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group and European Society for Medical Oncology. CGC has received honoraria from Amgen, Merck, Servier, Pierre Fabre, and Incyte; has received support for attending meetings or travel from Merck, Servier, and Pierre Fabre; and is the Secretary of the Spanish Group for Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumours (TTD). JHS has received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, AStar D3, Bayer, Curegenix, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Erasca, Gossamer Bio, Leap Therapeutics, Nektar, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seagen, and Silverback Therapeutics; has received payment or honoraria from Seagen, Bayer, and Natera; has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Natera, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Seagen, Silverback Therapeutics, Takeda, and Viatris; has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Pionyr Immunotherapeutics, and Beigene; and has received support for attending meetings or travel from Seagen. YC has received consulting fees from IMBdx, Ono Pharmaceutical, Boryung Pharmaceutical, Interpark Bioconvergence, and GC Genome Corporation; and has received honoraria from Roche and MSD Korea. DB is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. QY has received employee benefits (stocks or other financial or non-financial interests) from Daiichi Sankyo. TKam has received employee benefits (financial or non-financial interests) from Daiichi Sankyo. KK is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. AB has received employee benefits (stocks or other financial or non-financial interests) from Daiichi Sankyo; and has received support for attending meetings or travel from Daiichi Sankyo. MK is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. JDA has received employee benefits (stocks or other financial or non-financial interests) from Daiichi Sankyo. TY has received research grants from Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, FALCO Biosystems, Genomedia, Molecular Health, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Sysmex, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, Bayer Yakuhin, Ono Pharmaceutical, and MSD; and has received consulting fees from Sumitomo Corporation. MVdE, H-CH, and T-YK declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose: To investigate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS mutant (MT) incidence before salvage-line treatment and the clinicopathological features and molecular biological factors associated with the efficacy of anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) rechallenge for tissue RAS/BRAF wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective observational study included 74 patients with mCRC with tissue RAS/BRAF WT refractory to first-line chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR mAb. ctDNA RAS status was assessed using the OncoBEAM™ RAS CRC Kit. We explored the clinicopathological features associated with ctDNA RAS status and the factors related to anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge efficacy in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression., Results: The incidence of RAS MT in ctDNA was 40.5% (30/74), which was associated with primary tumor resection (P = 0.016), liver metastasis (P < 0.001), and high tumor marker levels (P < 0.001). Among the 39 patients treated with anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge, those with ctDNA RAS WT showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with ctDNA RAS MT (median 4.1 vs. 2.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, P = 0.045). Patients who responded to first-line anti-EGFR mAb showed significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.21, P = 0.0026) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.23, P = 0.026) than those with stable disease., Conclusions: The incidence of ctDNA RAS MT mCRC was 40.5%, which was associated with liver metastases and high tumor volumes. Anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge may be effective for patients with mCRC who responded to first-line chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR mAb. No patients with RAS MT in ctDNA responded to anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

"NeoRAS WT" refers to the loss of RAS mutations (MTs) following first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluate the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of NeoRAS WT mCRC using next-generation sequencing of plasma circulating tumor DNA. Patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA study initially diagnosed with tissue RAS MT mCRC and received subsequent systemic therapy are eligible. NeoRAS WT is defined as the absence of detectable RAS MT in plasma and assessed in all eligible patients (Group A) and in a subgroup with at least one somatic alteration detected in plasma (Group B). Overall, 478 patients are included. NeoRAS WT prevalence is 19.0% (91/478) in Group A and 9.8% (42/429) in Group B. Absence of liver or lymph node metastasis and tissue RAS MTs other than KRAS exon 2 MTs are significantly associated with NeoRAS WT emergence. Overall, 1/6 and 2/6 patients with NeoRAS WT treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) show partial response and stable disease for ≥6 months, respectively. NeoRAS WT mCRC is observed at a meaningful prevalence, and anti-EGFR mAb-based therapy may be effective., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study aimed to extract prognostic factors in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for borderline resectable colorectal liver metastasis (BR-CRLM) (tumor size ≥5 cm, number of tumors ≥4, or resectable extrahepatic diseases) and assess validity of this strategy., Materials and Methods: Since 2010, patients with BR-CRLM were treated with hepatectomy after six cycles of NAC. Prognostic factors of these patients were evaluated using clinicopathological data., Results: Of 650 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM from 2010 to 2018, 246 BR-CRLM cases underwent hepatectomy after NAC (BR-NAC). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 16.7% and the 5-year overall survival rate (5y-OS) was 52.9%. Number of tumors ≥6, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥25 ng/mL, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and progressive disease (PD) after NAC were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for OS. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number of risk factors, and prognoses of the four groups were well stratified., Conclusion: In patients with BR-NAC, number of tumors ≥6, CEA ≥25 ng/mL, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and PD after NAC were independent poor prognostic factors. Patients with three or four risk factors showed poor prognosis and may need to switch chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Aberrant WNT/β-catenin signaling drives carcinogenesis. Tankyrases poly(ADP-ribosyl)ate and destabilize AXINs, β-catenin repressors. Tankyrase inhibitors block WNT/β-catenin signaling and colorectal cancer (CRC) growth. We previously reported that 'short' APC mutations, lacking all seven β-catenin-binding 20-amino acid repeats (20-AARs), are potential predictive biomarkers for CRC cell sensitivity to tankyrase inhibitors. Meanwhile, 'Long' APC mutations, which possess more than one 20-AAR, do not predict inhibitor-resistant cells. Thus, additional biomarkers are needed to precisely predict the inhibitor sensitivity., Methods: Using 47 CRC patient-derived cells (PDCs), we examined correlations between the sensitivity to tankyrase inhibitors (G007-LK and RK-582), driver mutations, and the expressions of signaling factors. NOD.CB17-Prkdc scid /J and BALB/c-nu/nu xenograft mice were treated with RK-582., Results: Short APC mutant CRC cells exhibited high/intermediate sensitivities to tankyrase inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. Active β-catenin levels correlated with inhibitor sensitivity in both short and long APC mutant PDCs. PIK3CA mutations, but not KRAS/BRAF mutations, were more frequent in inhibitor-resistant PDCs. Some wild-type APC PDCs showed inhibitor sensitivity in a β-catenin-independent manner., Conclusions: APC/PIK3CA mutations and β-catenin predict the sensitivity of APC-mutated CRC PDCs to tankyrase inhibitors. These observations may help inform the strategy of patient selection in future clinical trials of tankyrase inhibitors., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Although patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CLM), a population with good prognosis, have been treated with upfront surgery, some patients have had a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate biologic prognostic factors in patients with resectable CLMs., Methods: This single-center retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for initial CLMs at the Cancer Institute Hospital between 2010 and 2020. The study defined CLMs as resectable (tumor size < 5 cm; < 4 tumors; no extrahepatic metastasis) or borderline resectable (BR). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to patients with BR CLMs., Results: During the study period, 309 CLMs were classified as resectable without preoperative chemotherapy and 345 as BR with preoperative chemotherapy. For the 309 patients with resectable CLMs, the independent poor prognostic factors associated with overall survival in the multivariable analysis were high tumor marker levels (CEA ≥ 25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥ 50 U/mL; (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; p = 0.0007), no adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.69; p = 0.043), and age of 75 years or older (HR, 2.09; p = 0.012). The 5-year survival rates for the patients with high tumor marker (TM) levels (CEA ≥25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥50 U/mL) were significantly worse than for those with low TM levels (CEA < 25 ng/mL and CA19-9 < 50 U/mL) (55.3% vs. 81.1%; p <0.0001) and similar to the rate for those with BR CLMs (52.1%; p = 0.864). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy had an impact on prognosis only in the high-TM group (HR, 2.65; p = 0.007)., Conclusions: High TM levels have a prognostic impact on patients with resectable CLMs stratified by tumor number and size. Perioperative chemotherapy improves long-term outcomes for patients with CLM and high TM levels., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Morphologic response (MR) is a novel chemotherapeutic efficacy predictor of solid tumors, especially those treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies. Nevertheless, the importance of systemic chemotherapy MR for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MR as a factor associated with the therapeutic effects of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for initially unresectable CLM cases., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the associations between MR and/or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients who received first-line capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab treatment for initially unresectable CLM using multivariate analysis. Patients who showed a complete or partial response based on the RECIST, or an optimal response based on MR, were defined as "responders.", Results: Ninety-two patients were examined, including 31 (33%) patients who responded optimally. PFS and OS estimates were comparable in MR responders and non-responders (13.6 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.47; 26.6 vs. 24.6 months, p = 0.21, respectively). RECIST responders showed better PFS and OS than non-responders (14.8 vs. 8.6 months, p < 0.01; 30.7 vs. 17.8 months, p < 0.01, respectively). The median PFS and OS estimates of MR and RECIST responders were better than those of single responders or non-responders (p < 0.01). Histological type and RECIST response were independently associated with PFS and OS., Conclusion: MR predicts neither PFS nor OS; nevertheless, it may be useful when combined with the RECIST. The Ethics Committee of The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR approved this study in 2017 (No. 2017-GA-1123): retrospectively registered., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Few studies have focused on the impact of single-organ pulmonary metastases on progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recognizing differences in prognosis and chemotherapeutic efficacy based on metastasized organs may help in optimizing treatment strategies. The exploratory study was conducted to evaluate the comparative clinical outcomes and prognoses of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer presenting with single-organ pulmonary metastases and treated with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy., Methods: This retrospective study included 289 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with second-line folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. The response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed in the participants., Results: Among the 289 patients enrolled, 26 (9.0%) had single-organ pulmonary metastasis with left-sided primary locations, lower levels of tumor markers at the initiation point of chemotherapy, a significantly higher disease control rate (96.2% vs. 76.7%, P = .02), and a longer progression-free survival (median 29.6 months vs. 6.1 months, P < .001) and overall survival (median 41.1 months vs. 18.7 months, P < .001) than patients with other forms of metastatic colorectal cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that single-organ pulmonary metastasis was an independent predictor of longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.35, P = .00075) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, P = .006)., Conclusion: Single-organ pulmonary metastasis was a strong predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy; this provides preliminary evidence for medical guidelines and clinical decision-making on novel therapeutic strategies for these patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping on the basis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) may guide targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the validity of NGS-based ctDNA genotyping for RAS/BRAF V600E mutation assessment and the efficacy of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies on the basis of ctDNA results remains unclear., Patients and Methods: The performance of NGS-based ctDNA genotyping for RAS/BRAF V600E mutation assessment was compared with that of a validated polymerase chain reaction-based tissue testing in patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA study, a nationwide plasma genotyping study. The primary end points were concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity. The efficacy of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies on the basis of ctDNA were also evaluated., Results: In 212 eligible patients, the concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity were 92.9% (95% CI, 88.6 to 96.0), 88.7% (95% CI, 81.1 to 94.0), and 97.2% (95% CI, 92.0 to 99.4) for RAS and 96.2% (95% CI, 92.7 to 98.4), 88.0% (95% CI, 68.8 to 97.5), and 97.3% (95% CI, 93.9 to 99.1) for BRAF V600E, respectively. In patients with a ctDNA fraction of ≥1.0%, sensitivity rose to 97.5% (95% CI, 91.2 to 99.7) and 100% (95% CI, 80.5 to 100.0) for RAS and BRAF V600E mutations, respectively. In addition to a low ctDNA fraction, previous chemotherapy, lung and peritoneal metastases, and interval between dates of tissue and blood collection were associated with discordance. The progression-free survival of anti-EGFR therapy and BRAF-targeted treatment was 12.9 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 18.5) and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to not evaluated) months, respectively, for matched patients with RAS/BRAF V600E results by ctDNA., Conclusion: ctDNA genotyping effectively detected RAS/BRAF mutations, especially with sufficient ctDNA shedding. Clinical outcomes support ctDNA genotyping for determining the use of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies in patients with mCRC.

To improve treatment outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), the Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on CRLM was established by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate transition in the characteristics and treatment strategy in CRLM patients and analyze prognostic factors using large-scale data. The present study summarizes the data of patients newly diagnosed between 2015 and 2017 and presents prognostic data of patients newly diagnosed in 2013 and 2014. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were carried out using Cox proportional hazard modeling. The data of 4502 patients newly diagnosed with CRLM between 2015 and 2017 and the prognostic data of 2427 patients diagnosed in 2013 and 2014 are included. Regarding the 2013 and 2014 prognostic data, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients who underwent hepatectomy alone was 59.8%. Multivariate analyses identified age at diagnosis of CRLM ≥70 years, concomitant extrahepatic metastasis at diagnosis of CRLM, tumor depth of primary lesion ≥subserosa/pericolic or perirectal tissue, mutant KRAS status, number of CRLM ≥5, maximum diameter of CRLM >5 cm, and surgical curability R1/R2 as independent predictors of OS. Analysis of the latest nationwide database of patients diagnosed with CRLM revealed changes in patients and oncological characteristics, a transition in treatment strategy, and different independent prognosticators to those reported previously., (© 2022 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) nomogram was developed to predict disease-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing upfront hepatectomy. However, the utility of the nomogram in patients with resected CRLM remains unknown in the current situation in which treatment strategies are changing with advances in drugs., Methods: Patients in the initial nomogram cohort (n = 727) and validation cohort (n = 2225) were divided into the upfront hepatectomy and preoperative chemotherapy groups. The nomogram was validated by measuring calibration and discrimination in the two cohorts. Calibration curves were plotted, and survival probabilities were compared. Finally, to quantify the discrimination power, we estimated the concordance index (C-index)., Results: In the upfront hepatectomy group, the C-index was 0.63, the suitable cutoff value of the Beppu score was 7, and adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly effective limited to high-risk patients (Beppu score ≥7). The C-index was 0.56 in the preoperative chemotherapy group., Conclusions: The JSHBPS nomogram remains beneficial for patients undergoing upfront hepatectomy in the recent era but is less effective for patients undergoing hepatectomy after chemotherapy. Patients with a Beppu score ≥7 showed high-risk recurrence, and adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for these patients., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: In Japan, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing for solid tumors was introduced in clinical practice in December 2018. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are established standards of care for patients with MSI-high tumors, the status of implementing MSI testing in clinical practice remains unclear., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with solid tumors who underwent MSI testing between January 2019 and December 2020 at our institution., Results: In total, 1,052 MSI tests were performed in 1,047 patients. Regardless of specimen volume and condition, the MSI status was successfully determined in 1,041 (99.0%) tests, encompassing 27 tumor types (microsatellite stable [MSS] or MSI-low: n = 991 [95.2%] and MSI-high: n = 50 [4.8%]). Patients whose specimens were fixed with 20% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) and who had specimens with prolonged storage (98.4% and 95.4%) showed lower success rates than those whose specimens were fixed with 10% NBF and who had specimens with nonprolonged storage (100.0% and 99.6%), respectively. The prolonged turnaround time (TAT) in MSI-high cases (median TAT: 24 days) was a critical issue that directly resulted in treatment delay. Of the 50 patients with MSI-high tumors, 24 (48.0%) received ICIs and 34 (68.0%) were referred to the Department of Clinical Genetic Oncology where 6 (12.0%) patients were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome., Conclusions: MSI testing was successfully performed for various types of tumors and specimens in clinical practice. Our study results identified certain issues associated with the clinical implementation of MSI testing, including optimal specimen selection, extended TAT in MSI-high cases, and awareness of hereditary tumors., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Although RAS and PIK3CA mutations have been associated with resistance to anti-EGFR antibody in colorectal cancer or trastuzumab in breast cancer, their implications for trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between trastuzumab efficacy and mutation status in the HER family signaling pathway., Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with HER2-positive AGC who received first-line trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy between March 2011 and November 2015. Multiplex genotyping, including KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF, was then performed using the Luminex Assay, after which KRAS amplification was measured using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Thereafter, the association between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes were evaluated., Results: KRAS mutation (MT) was detected in 6 of 77 patients (7.8%), whereas KRAS amplification was found in 15 of 67 patients (22%). No mutations in NRAS, PIK3CA, or BRAF were identified. The KRAS MT group showed significantly worse response rates (16.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.016), progression-free survival [median, 4.8 vs. 11.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 3.95; 95% CI, 1.60-9.76; P = 0.0029], and overall survival (11.5 vs. 23.6 months; HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 1.56-9.28; P = 0.033) compared to the KRAS wild-type group. KRAS amplification had no effect on clinical outcomes., Conclusion: KRAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival and might predict insufficient trastuzumab efficacy, whereas KRAS amplification showed no prognostic significance during trastuzumab treatment. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the predictive value of KRAS status in HER2-positive AGC., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Genomic profiling programs have been implemented to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) for facilitating trial enrollment. SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN is a large-scale genomic profiling program in advanced gastrointestinal cancers using a validated genomic assay with the goal of facilitating enrollment in targeted clinical trials, generating real-world data, and performing clinicogenomic analysis for biomarker discovery., Patients and Methods: Genotyping of tumor tissue samples from 5,743 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers enrolled in GI-SCREEN was centrally performed with NGS. Patients were enrolled in matched trials of targeted agents affiliated with GI-SCREEN on the basis of genotyping results., Results: A total of 11 gastrointestinal cancers were included, with colorectal cancer being the most common. The median age ranged from 59 to 70.5 years across cancer types. Patients enrolled after initiation of first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than that before treatment initiation with a median survival time difference of 8.9 months and a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.25 to 0.73 across cancer types, demonstrating an immortal time bias. One hundred and forty-nine patients received matched therapies in clinical trials on the basis of their identified alterations. Among patients with colorectal cancer harboring actionable alterations, the median OS was significantly longer in patients who received matched therapies in trials than in those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.01; P = .049). Cancer-specific pathway alterations were significantly associated with shorter survival and related to primary resistance to matched trial therapies., Conclusion: Our genomic profiling program led to patient enrollment in targeted clinical trials and improved survival of patients with colorectal cancer who received matched therapies in clinical trials. To avoid immortal time bias, precautions are needed when using data from patients who have undergone NGS testing after initiation of the evaluated treatment line.

Purpose: Napabucasin is an investigational, orally administered reactive oxygen species generator bioactivated by intracellular antioxidant NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 that has been evaluated in various solid tumors, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) is hypothesized to predict response in napabucasin-treated patients with mCRC., Patient and Methods: In the multi-center, open-label, phase III CanStem303C (NCT02753127) study, adults with histologically confirmed mCRC that progressed on first-line fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab were randomized to twice-daily napabucasin plus FOLFIRI (napabucasin) or FOLFIRI alone (control). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the general study population and in patients with pSTAT3-positive tumors (biomarker-positive)., Results: In the general study population (napabucasin, n = 624; control, n = 629), median OS was 14.3 months for napabucasin and 13.8 months for control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.976, one-sided P = .74). Overall, 44% of patients were biomarker-positive (napabucasin, n = 275; control, n = 272). In the biomarker-positive population, median OS was 13.2 months for napabucasin and 12.1 months for control (HR, 0.969; one-sided P > .99). In the control arm, median OS was shorter for biomarker-positive versus biomarker negative patients (12.1 vs. 18.5 months; HR, 1.518; nominal 2-sided P = .0002). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (napabucasin, 84.6%; control, 53.9%), nausea (60.5%, 50.5%), vomiting (41.2%, 29.3%), and abdominal pain (41.0%, 25.2%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 73.8% of napabucasin-treated and 66.7% of control-treated patients, most commonly diarrhea (21.2%, 7.0%), neutrophil count decreased (13.7%, 19.2%), and neutropenia (13.3%, 15.2%). Safety was similar in biomarker-positive patients., Conclusion: In patients with previously treated mCRC, adding napabucasin to FOLFIRI did not improve OS. Results from the control arm indicate that pSTAT3 is an adverse prognostic factor in mCRC., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Triplet and doublet regimens of encorafenib plus cetuximab with and without binimetinib, respectively, were approved in Japan for unresectable, metastatic, BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer (mCRC) that had progressed after 1-2 prior chemotherapies. This early post-marketing phase vigilance (EPPV) study collected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from Japanese patients to ensure safety measures as appropriate., Methods: Patients with BRAF V600E mCRC who received the triplet or doublet regimens in Japan were selected for this study. ADRs were collected as spontaneous reports between November 27, 2020 and May 26, 2021. Serious ADRs were evaluated according to guidelines of the International Council for Harmonisation and the EudraVigilance list of Important Medical Event Terms., Results: An estimated 550 Japanese patients with mCRC received the triplet or doublet regimens during the 6-month EPPV period. Overall, 101 and 42 patients reported ADRs and serious ADRs, respectively. No ADRs leading to death were reported. The most frequently reported ADRs were nausea (17 patients), serous retinal detachment (16), decreased appetite (12), diarrhea (11), and vomiting (11). Among the important identified/potential risks that are defined in the risk management plans for encorafenib and binimetinib, eye disorder-related ADRs were observed in 32 patients, rhabdomyolysis-related ADRs in 12, hemorrhage-related ADRs in 7, and hepatic dysfunction-related ADRs in 7. Of 22 patients with serious eye disorders, 20 recovered or were recovering during the EPPV period., Conclusion: The safety profile in this EPPV study was similar to that from the phase III BEACON CRC study and no new safety concerns were identified., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CLM) has high postoperative recurrence rates; therefore, optimizing perioperative treatment is imperative. Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can aid in detecting minimal residual disease in colon cancer following curative resection. This study aimed to identify the potential role of serum CEA following liver resection in patients with CLM., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2004 to 2018 and enrolled patients with CLM who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and CLM. Associations between perioperative CEA levels and characteristics of recurrence were investigated., Results: Recurrence was detected during a median follow-up period of 90.1 months in 343 (54.2%) out of 633 analyzed patients. Patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (75.7% versus 50.0%, p < 0.01) and shorter time until recurrence (4.4 versus 36.9 months, p < 0.01) than those in the postoperative CEA level ≤ 5 ng/ml group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml was an independent predictor, with hazard ratios of 2.77 (p < 0.01) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3.18 (p < 0.01) for overall survival (OS). Additionally, RFS was significantly shorter among patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group who did not have normalized CEA levels following adjuvant chemotherapy than among those in the normalized CEA group., Conclusions: The postoperative and post-adjuvant chemotherapy CEA levels in the CEA level > 5 ng/ml group may be predictors of RFS and OS., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Introduction: A new concept of 'NeoRAS wild-type (WT)', which means conversion of RAS status from RAS mutant to RAS WT after treatment, has been reported. Previous observational and proof-of-concept studies have demonstrated the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in patients with NeoRAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Moreover, posthoc biomarker analyses of these studies have suggested that not only the RAS status in the circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) but also other gene mutational status may be useful as biomarkers of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors for NeoRAS WT mCRC., Methods and Analysis: This trial is a multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus irinotecan therapy for patients with NeoRAS mCRC. The key eligibility criteria include RAS mutant mCRC initially proven in tumour tissue refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan; RAS WT in ctDNA (defined as plasma mutant allele frequencies of all RAS ≤0.1%) within 28 days before enrolment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. The primary endpoint is the response rate. The target sample size is 30 patients. Biomarker analyses are planned to be performed using next-generation sequencing-based ctDNA analysis., Ethics and Dissemination: This study was approved by the certified review board of National Cancer Center Hospital. The main results of the trial will be presented in international meetings and in medical journals., Trial Registration Number: s031210565., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KY has received honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Although early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a predictor of improved overall survival (OS), the association between ETS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy., Methods: The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed HRQOL using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The impact of ETS on HRQOL was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures., Results: ETS was achieved in 82 (64.1%) of 128 mCRC patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy, and these patients had a significantly longer OS than those without ETS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.72; P = .002). Asymptomatic patients with ETS had a favorable OS, while symptomatic patients without ETS had a worse OS (2-year OS rates, 77.8% vs. 42.5%). Symptomatic patients with ETS had similar outcomes as asymptomatic patients without ETS (2-year OS rates, 64.1% vs. 67.0%). For symptomatic patients, ETS was associated with improved HRQOL scores between baseline and 8 weeks: the mean changes for patients with and without ETS were 5.86 and -4.94 for global health status (GHS)/QOL, 26.73 and 3.79 for physical functioning, and 13.58 and -3.10 for social functioning, respectively. The improved HRQOL was comparable to that of asymptomatic patients without ETS. For asymptomatic patients, ETS showed a decreased deterioration in HRQOL., Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of ETS for HRQOL and prognostic estimates, and assessing ETS may provide clinically useful information for physicians and patients to make more informed decisions., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To clarify the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for the patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), we conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare surgery followed by postoperative FOLFOX regimen with perioperative FOLFOX regimen plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable CLM., Methods: Patients who had KRAS wild-type resectable CLM having one to eight liver nodules without extrahepatic disease were randomly assigned to the postoperative chemotherapy group, wherein up-front hepatectomy was performed followed by 12 cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6, and the perioperative chemotherapy group (experimental), wherein six cycles of preoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab were performed followed by hepatectomy and six cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: There were 37 patients in postoperative chemotherapy group and 40 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group who were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The PFS and overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference (PFS, hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 0.69-2.01], P = 0.539: OS, 1.03 [0.46-2.29], P = 0.950). In the postoperative chemotherapy group, 35.1% had a 3-year PFS, and 86.5% had a 3-year OS. Meanwhile, in the perioperative chemotherapy group, 30.0% had a 3-year PFS, and 74.4% had a 3-year OS., Conclusion: There was no difference in survival found between the group of the perioperative chemotherapy plus cetuximab and that of the postoperative chemotherapy in the cohort of our study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000007787)., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), important for carcinogenesis, is a predictor of prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is a lack of consensus on CIMP markers, and thus, more comprehensive methylation markers are required to reliably predict the clinical outcomes. This study aimed to clarify the effects of genome-wide DNA methylation status on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors., Methods: We enrolled 241 patients with mCRC, who received chemotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors as a first-line treatment. We analyzed the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of highly methylated CRC (HMCC) and associations between genome-wide DNA methylation status and response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: In total, 169 patients were included in the final analyses. The frequency of HMCC was 8.9% (15/169). The characteristics of patients with HMCC included right-sided primary tumor location (P = 0.042), undifferentiated histology (P = 0.047), and BRAF V600E mutation (P < 0.0001). Patients with HMCC showed worse clinical outcomes than those with low-methylated CRC in terms of RR (P = 0.017), PFS (P = 0.004), and OS (P = 0.019). In the multivariate analysis, peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.017), methylation status (P = 0.037), and BRAF V600E mutations (P = 0.0001) were independent factors for shorter PFS., Conclusions: Genome-wide DNA methylation status is an independent factor associated with PFS in patients with mCRC treated with first-line EGFR inhibitors., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a biomarker with potential to reflect comprehensive genomic information and overcome intratumor heterogeneity. In contrast, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a conventional tumor marker for predicting recurrence, survival, and chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the relationship between them remains unclear. Here, the relationship between plasma ctDNA and CEA levels was evaluated to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of their clinical use., Methods: A total of 110 patients with mCRC underwent chemotherapy were enrolled. Amplicon-based plasma genomic profiling of 14 genes that are commonly mutated in CRC by next-generation sequencing was compared to the CEA level and tumor diameter using Spearman's correlation coefficient., Results: The overall concordance rate between the ctDNA and CEA levels was 75.5% (83/110). The correlation coefficient between the ctDNA and CEA levels was lower in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.18, p = 0.44) than in the group of patients with liver metastasis (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Although the correlation coefficients between tumor diameter and both ctDNA and CEA levels were high in the group of patients with liver metastasis, only the CEA correlation coefficient was maintained in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.53, p = 0.01). The characteristics that influenced discordance were liver metastasis and the sum of tumor diameter., Conclusions: The status of ctDNA and CEA may not be consistent in patients with mCRC without liver metastasis or with a low tumor volume; both results should be considered when deciding a treatment strategy., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D was identified as a potential predictive biomarker for ramucirumab efficacy in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer using a research use only (RUO) assay. We describe results with a new assay for detecting VEGF-D in human plasma., Methods: In RAISE (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01183780), 1072 patients were randomized 1:1 to ramucirumab or placebo plus FOLFIRI. All patients were then randomized 1:2 to marker exploratory (ME) and marker confirmatory (MC) groups, and those with plasma samples were analyzed accordingly. A new assay validated for investigational use only (IUO) was used to measure VEGF-D levels in plasma, which were analyzed for correlation with overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS). IUO assay data were compared with historical RUO assay data., Results: ME subset analyses determined the optimal cutpoint of 5.4 ng/mL for defining high/low VEGF-D subgroups. In the combined ME/MC placebo arms, OS/PFS were numerically greater for patients with low vs high VEGF-D (OS: 12.8 vs 11.1 months; PFS: 5.6 vs 4.2 months). In patients with high VEGF-D, ramucirumab vs placebo demonstrated a numerically greater improvement in OS and PFS. Differential efficacy by VEGF-D level was statistically significant for PFS, but not OS., Conclusion: In patients with high VEGF-D, ramucirumab demonstrated a greater improvement in OS and PFS vs placebo; however, baseline VEGF-D level was not predictive of ramucirumab OS benefit using VEGF-D assay for IUO. The RAISE intent-to-treat results remain valid.

Background/aim: Primary tumor location and RAS and BRAF V600E mutations are predictors of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. However, there are limited reports on their effects on the outcomes of third-line chemotherapy with EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of KRAS exon 2 wild type (WT) mCRC patients treated with EGFR inhibitor monotherapy or EGFR inhibitor plus irinotecan as third-line chemotherapy. The association between primary tumor location, RAS (KRAS exon 3, 4 or NRAS), BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA mutational status, and treatment outcome was evaluated., Results: A total of 72 patients were included in this study. In multivariate analysis, RAS (p=0.004) and BRAF mutations (p=0.00008) were independent factors for shorter PFS. Poor performance status (p=0.01) and BRAF mutation (p=0.00002) were independent factors for shorter OS, whereas primary tumor location and PIK3CA mutation did not influence survival., Conclusion: Additional analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations could contribute to the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from third-line EGFR inhibitors, regardless of primary tumor location., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy., Methods: APOLLON was an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 trial. In the phase 1 part, 3 + 3 de-escalation design was used to investigate the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D); all patients in the phase 2 part received the RP2D. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety., Results: Fifty-six patients were enrolled (phase 1, n = 7; phase 2, n = 49) at 25 Japanese centres. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in patients receiving panitumumab (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus FTD/TPI (35 mg/m 2 twice daily; days 1-5 and 8-12 in a 28-day cycle), which became RP2D. PFS rate at 6 months was 33.3% (90% confidence interval [CI] 22.8-45.3). Median PFS, OS, ORR, DCR, and TTF were 5.8 months (95% CI 4.5-6.5), 14.1 months (95% CI 12.2-19.3), 37.0% (95% CI 24.3-51.3), 81.5% (95% CI 68.6-90.8), and 5.8 months (95% CI 4.29-6.21), respectively. Neutrophil count decreased (47.3%) was the most common Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event. No treatment-related deaths occurred., Conclusion: Panitumumab plus FTD/TPI exhibited favourable anti-tumour activity with a manageable safety profile and may be a therapeutic option for pre-treated mCRC patients.

Purpose: The association between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of regorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, remains unclear. This study assessed the trough plasma concentrations (C trough ) of regorafenib and its N-oxide (M2) and N-oxide/desmethyl (M5) metabolites, and evaluated the associations among these levels, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic-related genetic polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: The C trough levels of regorafenib and its metabolites were assessed in a single-center, prospective, observational study, 7 days after the initial treatment. The correlation between those values and adverse events was then examined. In addition, the genetic polymorphisms of ABCG2, SLCO1B1, and UGT1A9 were determined and evaluated for associations with the levels of regorafenib, M2, and M5., Results: We analyzed 43 patients who received regorafenib 40-120 mg/day; among them, 35 patients started at 120 mg/day. With regard to bilirubin increase, the C trough values of regorafenib were significantly higher in the group with grade ≥ 2 than in groups with grades 0 and 1 (p = 0.010). The M5 C trough levels were significantly associated with the severity of hypertension or rash (p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, the M5 C trough values and age were significant predictors of severe rash. Lastly, significant differences were noted in the M5 concentration-to-dose ratio values between the patients with ABCG2 421A/A and ABCG2 421C/A or C/C polymorphisms (p = 0.035)., Conclusion: This study showed that the C trough of regorafenib was associated with bilirubin increase, and also clarified for the first time that the C trough of M5 was significantly correlated with hypertension and severe rash.

Background: HER2 amplification has been identified in 2-3% of patients with colorectal cancer, although there are currently no approved HER2-targeted therapies for colorectal cancer. We aimed to study the antitumour activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (an antibody-drug conjugate of humanised anti-HER2 antibody with topoisomerase I inhibitor payloads) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: DESTINY-CRC01 is an open-label, phase 2 study that recruited patients from 25 clinics and hospitals in Italy, Japan, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients had centrally confirmed HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer that had progressed on two or more previous regimens (HER2-targeted therapies other than trastuzumab deruxtecan permitted), were aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, and had RAS and BRAF V600E wild-type tumours. Patients were enrolled into one of three cohorts by HER2 expression level: cohort A (HER2-positive, immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC2+ and in-situ hybridisation [ISH]-positive), cohort B (IHC2+ and ISH-negative), or cohort C (IHC1+). Patients received 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate in cohort A by independent central review which was assessed in the full analysis set and safety was assessed in the safety analysis set. Both the full analysis set and the safety analysis set included all patients who received one or more doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03384940., Findings: Between Feb 23, 2018, and July 3, 2019, 78 patients were enrolled in the study (53 in cohort A, seven in cohort B, and 18 in cohort C), all of whom received at least one dose of study drug. For the 53 (68%) patients with HER2-positive tumours (cohort A), a confirmed objective response was reported in 24 (45·3%, 95% CI 31·6-59·6) patients after a median follow-up of 27·1 weeks (IQR 19·3-40·1). Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in at least 10% of all participants were decreased neutrophil count (17 [22%] of 78) and anaemia (11 [14%]). Five patients (6%) had adjudicated interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (two grade 2; one grade 3; two grade 5, the only treatment-related deaths)., Interpretation: Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed promising and durable activity in HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard treatment, with a safety profile consistent with that reported in previous trastuzumab deruxtecan trials. Interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis are important risks requiring careful monitoring and prompt intervention., Funding: Daiichi Sankyo., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SS reports personal fees from and is an advisory board member for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, CheckmAb, Merck, Roche-Genentech, and Seattle Genetics. KR is an advisor and speaker for Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo, and an advisor for AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. MDB reports grants from Eli Lilly Italia and personal fees from Eli Lilly Italia and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work and is a consultant for Myland Italy and speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and Eli Lilly Italia. TM reports personal fees from Takeda, Chugai, Merck, Taiho, Bayer, Lilly Japan, Yakult Honsha, and Sanofi, and grants from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, and Ono, outside the submitted work. HK reports non-financial support from Daiichi Sankyo, during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees, and support for advisory role and honoraria (speeches) from Taiho, personal fees and support for advisory role and honoraria (speeches) from Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, Ono, and Lilly Japan, grants, personal fees, and upport for advisory role and honoraria (speeches) from Daiichi Sankyo, grants and personal fees from Chugai/Roche, personal fees from Yakult Pharmaceutical, Takeda, MSD KK, Merck Serono, Bayer, and AstraZeneca, and grants from Eisai, outside the submitted work. KY reports a grant from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study, and grants from Taiho, Sanofi, Ono, and Yakurt Honsha, and is a speaker for Taiho, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Chugai, Ono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Merck, outside the submitted work. TN reports a grant from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study, and grants from Taiho, Chugai, MSD, Ono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, and Dainippon Sumitomo. MF reports personal fees from Amgen, Array, Bayer, Guardant360, and Pfizer, and grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. EE reports grants and personal fees from Hoffman-La Roche, Amgen, Merck Serono, and Servier, personal fees from Sanofi Aventis, and Array, honoraria institution support from MSD, and grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, during the conduct of the study. FC has served as an advisor and speaker for Roche, Amgen, Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, and Eli Lilly, and received institutional research grants from Bayer, Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Takeda. YK reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo, during the conduct of the study, grants from A2 Healthcare, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, EP – CRSU, EPS, Linical, NanoCarrier, QuintilesIMS, Sysmex, Astellas, Incyte, IQVIA, and Syneos Health Clinical KK, grants and personal fees from Bayer Yakuhin, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly Japan, Linical, MSD KK, Taiho, Kyowa Kirin, Ono, Sanofi-Aventis, and Yakult Honsha, and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, EA Pharma, Takeda, Merck, Nipro, Pfizer Japan, Sawai, Shiseido, Asahi Kasei, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Merck, Shire Japan, Nippon Kayaku, Otsuka, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. TE reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Ono, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Taiho, Lilly, Merck Serono, Nihon Kayaku, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Shionogi, Chugai, and Takeda, grants from Novartis, Dainippon Sumitomo, Astellas, Amgen, BeiGene, Array, Shionogi, and Yakult, and personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. ZW reports grants from Plexxikon and Novartis outside the submitted work, and is a consultant for Array, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Ono, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Incyte, Merck, and EMD Serono. AS-B reports personal fees from Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, and Servier, outside the submitted work. KS, EY, EB, YO, and JS are full-time employees of Daiichi Sankyo. AG reports grants from Daiichi Sanyko, during the conduct of the study, grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Bayer, Merck, and Array/ Pfizer, and grants from OBI, outside the submitted work. TY reports grants from Novartis, MSD, Sumitomo Dainippon, Chugai, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Parexel, Ono, and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. FL, JR, and KC declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The conventional H category-based classification for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) was created by equal weighting of tumor number and tumor size; however, our previous nomogram to predict postoperative disease-free survival demonstrated that CRLM ≥5 as a parameter provided 4.5 times greater impact compared with a largest CRLM size >5 cm., Methods: A total of 3815 patients newly diagnosed with CRLM between 2005 and 2007, including 2220 resectable cases, were investigated. Six groups were created based on largest lesion size (≤ 5 vs >5 cm) and lesion number (1, 2-4, and ≥5)., Results: The novel (n) H1, nH2, and nH3 categories were defined as solitary lesions with a size ≤5 cm; lesions other than nH1 or nH3; and ≥5 lesions with any lesion size, respectively. In the resectable cohort, the 5-year cumulative overall survival rates were 64.0%, 53.5%, and 42.6% in the nH1, nH2, and nH3 groups, respectively (P < .001), and no significant differences were observed between the conventional H2 and H3 categories. In the overall cohort, the discrimination ability of the two classifications were comparable., Conclusion: The novel H category-based classification might be beneficial in predicting overall survival in patients with CRLM independent of their resectability., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Purpose: Liver metastasis (LM) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, we investigated the prognostic utility of several serum factors in mCRC patients with or without LM who were treated with anti-angiogenic agents in first-line (FL) or salvage-line (SL) settings., Methods: A combined cohort of 125 patients was analyzed in this single institute pooled analysis: FL cohort receiving bevacizumab (n = 71) and SL cohort receiving regorafenib (n = 54). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL) and during treatment, and serum factors were measured by ELISA. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression methods., Results: In univariate analysis of the combined cohort, right-sided CRC, primary unresected tumor, wild-type KRAS, LM, ≥ 2 metastatic sites, and SL were associated with shorter OS; in multivariable analysis, LM and SL remained significant. Serum angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) levels ≥ 2190.3 pg/ml and interleukin (IL)-8 levels ≥ 15.1 pg/ml at BL were significantly associated with LM. Using these cut-off values, patients with higher Ang-2 or IL-8 levels at BL had shorter OS than those with lower BL levels (Ang-2: hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-4.51, P = 0.001; IL-8: HR 4.31, 95%CI 2.11-8.79, P < 0.001). High serum IL-8 level remained a significant predictor of shorter OS in multivariable analysis (HR 3.24, 95%CI 1.47-7.16, P = 0.004)., Conclusion: Circulating IL-8 and Ang-2 levels are associated with LM in mCRC patients. IL-8 may be a prognostic marker of response to anti-angiogenic therapy, regardless of the treatment timing.

Background: Three vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, Bevacizumab (BEV), ramucirumab (RAM), and aflibercept (AFL), are widely used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who are treated with second-line chemotherapy. The difference in outcome between the three drugs has not been evaluated. In contrast to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors have few candidate predictors of efficacy., Methods: Consecutive mCRC patients who were treated with second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were assessed. Subgroup analyses of prognostic and predictive efficacy markers were performed., Results: A total of 119 (41.2%), 107 (37.0%), and 63 patients (21.8%) were treated with FOLFIRI +BEV, RAM, or AFL, respectively. ORR, PFS, and OS showed no significant differences between three groups. However, the frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) in the FOLFIRI +AFL group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p < 0.001). Patients with grade 3 or 4 AEs, especially hypertension and neutropenia within the first four cycles of treatment had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without AEs, irrespective of treatment with VEGF inhibitors (p < 0.001). PFS in patients without prior BEV exposure was also significantly longer than that in patients with prior BEV exposure (p = 0.003)., Conclusions: Chemotherapeutic efficacy did not differ between the groups. Grade 3 or 4 AEs within the first four cycles of treatment and prior BEV exposure may be an effective predictor of treatment efficacy in mCRC patients administered VEGF inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The status and prognostic value of the disagreement between physician and patient assessments of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) remain unclear for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Paired data on patient-reported outcomes using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and physician-reported outcomes using the NCI-CTCAE for eight symptomatic AEs (fatigue, pain, insomnia, dyspnea, constipation, appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea) were collected from a prospective trial assessing the relationships between treatment efficacy, AEs, and quality of life. The overall agreement rates between patient and physician reporting at 4 weeks ranged from 40.2% to 76.5% for 129 patients. The level of agreement based on Cohen's κ statistics was slight to poor for dyspnea, pain, fatigue, and insomnia, while it was moderate to fair for the remaining AEs. No clinicopathological characteristics of disagreement were found. The underreporting by physicians ranged from 12.5% (nausea/vomiting) to 56.7% (fatigue). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was more favorable for patients with high agreement than for those with low agreement (71.2% vs. 46.5%, p = .016), and the agreement status was an independent factor of OS (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.13-4.71; p = .022). For patients who were reported as asymptomatic by the physician, the presence of patient-reported symptoms resulted in a trend toward poor prognostic outcomes for appetite loss, dyspnea, diarrhea, and constipation. These findings provide the clinical importance of the monitoring of patient-reported symptoms that can be complementary to physician-reported data to ensure more accurate clinical outcomes., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/purpose: The purpose of the present study was to assess long-term outcomes following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with concurrent extrahepatic disease and to identify the preoperative prognostic factors for selection of operative candidates., Methods: In this retrospective, multi-institutional study, 3820 patients diagnosed with CRLM during 2005-2007 were identified using nationwide survey data. Data of identified patients with concurrent extrahepatic lesions were analyzed to estimate the impact of liver resection on overall survival (OS) and to identify preoperative, prognostic indicators., Results: Three- and 5-year OS rates after liver resection in 251 CRLM patients with extrahepatic disease (lung, n = 116; lymph node, n = 51; peritoneal, n = 37; multiple sites, n = 23) were 50.2% and 32.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a primary tumor in the right colon, lymph node metastasis from the primary tumor, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level >37 UI/mL, the site of extrahepatic disease, and residual liver tumor after hepatectomy were associated with higher mortality. We proposed a preoperative risk scoring system based on these factors that adequately discriminated 5-year OS after liver resection in training and validation datasets., Conclusions: Performing R0 liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with treatable extrahepatic disease may prolong survival. Our proposed scoring system may help select appropriate candidates for liver resection., (© 2020 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

RAS signaling is a promising target for colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy, and a variety of selective inhibitors have been developed. However, their use has often failed to demonstrate a significant benefit in CRC patients. Here, we used patient-derived organoids (PDOs) derived from a familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patient to analyze the response to chemotherapeutic agents targeting EGFR, BRAF and MEK. We found that PDOs carrying KRAS mutations were resistant to MEK inhibition, while those harboring the BRAF class 3 mutation were hypersensitive. We used a systematic approach to examine the phosphorylation of RAS effectors using reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) and found increased phosphorylation of MEK induced by binimetinib. A high basal level of ERK phosphorylation and its rebound activation after MEK inhibition were detected in KRAS-mutant PDOs. Notably, the phosphorylation of EGFR and AKT was more closely correlated with that of MEK than that of ERK. Transcriptome analysis identified MYC-mediated transcription and IFN signaling as significantly correlated gene sets in MEK inhibition. Our experiments demonstrated that RPPA analysis of PDOs, in combination with the genome and transcriptome, is a useful preclinical research platform to understand RAS signaling and provides clues for the development of chemotherapeutic strategies.

Background: To collect large-scale data for further research to improve treatment outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), the Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on CRLM was established by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and the Japanese society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. The joint committee was initiated to collect data since 2014 and has already reported data including the prognostic data of 3820 patients newly diagnosed with CRLM between 2005 and 2007., Methods: The data of patients newly diagnosed with CRLM after 2013 are continuously being registered prospectively, and herein, we report the data of the patients newly diagnosed with CRLM in 2013 and 2014., Results: The data of 3839 patients newly diagnosed with CRLM in 2013 and 2014 were registered from 156 departments (75%) of 152 institutions among 209 departments (from 201 institutions) that agreed to participate in this database system at its initiation. Finally, 3525 patients were enrolled in this study after a quality management process conducted by the joint committee. We report the comprehensive data obtained from 3525 patients, including clinicopathological findings, treatment strategies, and implementation status of chemotherapy., Conclusion: The joint committee will provide these raw data while updating prognostic data to researchers who will conduct meaningful studies that meet the aim of the joint committee., (© 2020 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients that received fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) in clinical practice., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus Bev between December 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated the efficacy of PEG-G-CSF as preventing or treating grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, the overall response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events of FOLFOXIRI plus Bev based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0., Results: A total of 26 patients (median age 53.5 years) were included. The ORR rate was 65.3%, the median PFS was 9.6 months (7.2-16.9), and the median OS was 24.2 months (13.6-NA). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 53.8% of the patients, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.7%. PEG-G-CSF was given to 77.0% of the patients, including prophylactically (n = 9) and after the development of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (n = 11). No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia after the administration of PEG-G-CSF. In seven of the nine patients who received PEG-G-CSF prophylactically (77.8%), no dose adjustment was required., Conclusions: PEG-G-CSF is useful in preventing severe neutropenia in mCRC patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus Bev.

Background: It remains unclear whether patients' self-perceptions of symptoms at baseline clinically impact the prognostic relevance, treatment efficacy, or toxicity profiles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with the first-line cetuximab and standard chemotherapy., Methods: The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed the relationships between quality of life (QOL), treatment efficacy, and adverse events (AEs)., Results: The analysis of 137 mCRC patients revealed a significant association between the presence of baseline tumor-related symptoms and a lower overall survival (OS) compared to the absence of symptoms (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.37-4.62; P = .003). The asymptomatic responders had favorable outcomes compared to the symptomatic nonresponders (2-year OS rates: 83.6% and 35.9%, respectively), while the symptomatic responders had similar outcomes to the asymptomatic nonresponders. The median postprogression survival differed significantly: 10.2 months for the symptomatic patients and 15.9 months for the asymptomatic patients (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.25-4.29, P = .008). The objective response rates and patient toxicity profiles were similar irrespective of the severity of baseline symptoms., Conclusion: Baseline symptoms were associated with worse OS but not with impaired treatment efficacy or more frequent AEs in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background The effectiveness of reintroducing oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to both oxaliplatin and irinotecan was previously reported in a phase II study (RE-OPEN). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with refractory mCRC. Patients and Methods Three dosages of intravenous oxaliplatin (50, 65 and 85 mg/m 2 ) on days 1 and 15 and a fixed dose of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m 2 twice daily (bid) on days 1-5 and 15-19 every 4 weeks were investigated in patients with refractory mCRC using a 3 + 3 design. Eligible patients had received prior oxaliplatin-based treatment that achieved a response or stable disease followed by confirmed disease progression at least 6 months before entering the study. Results Twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Three of six patients in the oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 cohort had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with treatment delays during the second cycle at ≥8 days due to grade ≥ 2 neutropenia or grade 2 AST/ALT increased. No DLTs were observed in the other cohorts. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), anorexia (n = 1), and nausea (n = 1). There was no evidence of allergic reaction to oxaliplatin or severe peripheral sensory neuropathy. Conclusions A combination of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m 2 bid on days 1-5 and 15-19 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks could be a suitable regimen for the recommended dose of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin in patients with refractory mCRC.

Background: While the BRAF V600E mutation occurs in 5%-15% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), BRAF non-V600E mutations were recently reported to range from 1.6% to 5.1%. We have previously reported that BRAF non-V600E mutations could have a negative impact on efficacy outcomes as well as BRAF V600E mutation for antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody treatment for pretreated patients with mCRC. Recently, simultaneous inhibitions of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), BRAF and EGFR exhibited relevant antitumour activities in patients with BRAF V600E mutant and also in BRAF non-V600E mutant but only in the preclinical model., Trial Design: The BIG BANG (study is a multicentre, phase II study to assess the efficacy, safety and proof of concept of the combinations of binimetinib+encorafenib+cetuximab in patients with BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC, identified by either tumour tissue (tumour tissue group) or blood samples (liquid biopsy group). Key eligibility criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of ≤1, mCRC with BRAF non-V600E mutant and RAS wild type, refractory or intolerant to at least one fluoropyrimidine-based regimen and no prior history of regorafenib, and no prior history of anti-EGFR antibody treatment (primary analysis cohort and liquid biopsy cohort) or refractory to prior anti-EGFR antibody treatment in patients with class 3 BRAF mutations (anti-EGFR antibody refractory class three cohort). Enrolled patients receive binimetinib (45 mg, two times per day), encorafenib (300 mg, once a day) and cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m 2 and subsequently 250 mg/m 2 , once per week). The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate in the primary analysis cohort., Trial Registration Numbers: UMIN000031857 and 000031860., (© 2020 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology.)

The impact of ctDNA changes after chemotherapy on the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. The present study evaluated the clinical implications of the early change in ctDNA levels as a predictor of objective response and clinical outcome in mCRC patients who received chemotherapy. We investigated the effects of after/before ratio of ctDNA levels 2 and 8 weeks after initiation of second-line chemotherapy, on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). ctDNA was detected using amplicon-based deep sequencing with a molecular barcode encompassing >240 hotspot mutations in 14 colon cancer-related genes. In multivariate analysis, as compared to baseline, patients with lower ctDNA level (≤50%) 8 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy showed significantly longer PFS and OS than the patients with higher (>50%) ctDNA level. In patients achieving a partial response or stable disease, the after/before ratio of ctDNA level 8 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy was significantly lower than those in patients with progressive disease. The present study suggests that an early change in the ctDNA level might serve as a biomarker to predict the chemotherapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

The Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF V600E ) mutation (MT) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is a well-known prognostic indicator and a negative predictive biomarker for antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment. However, the clinical characteristics and significance of BRAF non-V600E MTs remain unclear. Here, we evaluated the clinical characteristics of BRAF non-V600E MTs vs. those of other MTs in the EGFR signaling pathway, including BRAF V600E . Consecutive CRC patients in our institute from June 2012 to November 2013 were enrolled in our study. Multiplex genotyping of the EGFR pathway was performed with archival samples using a Luminex Assay for BRAF V600E /BRAF non-V600E , KRAS/NRAS exons 2-4, and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). We analyzed correlations among the MT profiles, clinical data and primary tumor locations in CRC. All statistical analyses were performed using R software. CRC samples (824) from 374 (45.4%) male and 450 (54.6%) female patients were analyzed, of which 154 (18.7%), 202 (24.5%), 270 (32.8%) or 198 (24.0%) had Stages I, II, III or IV or recurrent CRC, respectively. The frequencies of BRAF V600E /BRAF non-V600E , KRAS (including exons 2-4), NRAS and PIK3CA MTs were 5.3/1.7, 41.4, 3.3 and 9.6%, respectively. The characteristics of patients with the BRAF V600E MT were an age of ≥65 years old, a right-sided primary tumor location, poorly differentiated histology and an advanced disease stage. In contrast, the characteristics of patients with BRAF non-V600E MTs were a left-sided primary tumor location and well-differentiated histology. BRAF non-V600E MTs were relatively rare and showed different characteristics compared to the BRAF V600E MT. These results may contribute to future precision medicine., (© 2019 UICC.)

Purpose: Few data of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) obtained in bevacizumab-naïve patients in clinical trials or routine clinical practice are available. The purpose of this retrospective study was to report the results of FOLFIRI plus RAM treatment as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: Seventy-four patients with mCRC who received second-line FOLFIRI + RAM mCRC therapy were stratified by previous first-line therapy to groups that had (PB) or had not (NPB) been given bevacizumab. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response were evaluated., Results: The overall median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.6-9.3) and median OS was 17.0 months (95% CI 11.6-NA). Median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI 4.9-11.2) in NPB patients and 5.0 months (95% CI 3.1-7.3) in PB patients (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% CI 0.40-1.30, p = 0.28). The response rates were 23% and 3% in NPB and PB patients, respectively. The disease control rates were 85% and 69% in NPB and PB patients, respectively., Conclusions: The effectiveness of FOLFIRI + RAM as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with mCRC was in line with that reported in the previous RAISE phase III trial. The response was better in bevacizumab-naïve patients than those with first-line treatment that had included bevacizumab.

Background: Regorafenib improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progress after standard therapies in two phase III trials. The present large-scale prospective observational study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib administered to Japanese patients with mCRC in real-life setting., Materials and Methods: Patients with mCRC were prospectively registered and initially received ≤160 mg oral regorafenib daily, at the investigator's discretion, for weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. The study's primary aim was to assess safety, particularly unexpected clinically significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs). A Cox's proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between OS, hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), and baseline characteristics., Results: We evaluated 1,227 of 1,301 patients (enrolled from March 2013 to May 2015). ADRs occurred in 89.3% of patients (mostly within the first 4 weeks) and were a major reason for discontinuing treatment. The most frequent ADRs were HFSR, liver injury, and hypertension. The cumulative incidence of HFSR and liver injury was higher in patients who initially received 160 mg than in those who received ≤120 mg. The incidence of hypertension and fatigue was similar between groups. Median OS was 6.9 months (95% confidential interval, 6.4-7.4). OS was associated with early onset of HFSR and good performance status (PS) but not with the initial dose., Conclusion: The outcomes of this study were consistent with those of clinical trials. There were no new safety concerns. Regorafenib treatment would not be recommended for patients with higher PS., Implications for Practice: Previous clinical trials demonstrated regorafenib improved overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progress after standard chemotherapies. Because the eligibility criteria of the trials were restricted compared with a real-world setting, the data from the trials may not fully represent the profiles of regorafenib in clinical practice. This large-scale observational study showed that the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in clinical practice were generally consistent with previous trials. The majority of patients reported adverse drug reactions within the first 4 weeks, most commonly hand-foot skin reaction. Regorafenib treatment would not be recommended for patients with higher performance status., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Background: There are no optimal indication criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the survival benefit of selective NAC administration in this patient population based on tumor characteristics., Methods: Borderline resectable CLM (BR-CLM) were defined as four or more liver metastases, CLM larger than 5 cm, or CLM with concomitant resectable extrahepatic metastases. From 2010 to 2015, NAC was administered to BR-CLM patients. Upfront surgery without NAC was performed to patients having clearly resectable CLM (less than 3 lesions, smaller than 5 cm, and no extrahepatic metastases: CR-US group). Survival outcomes of the two groups were assessed., Results: The BR-NAC group comprised 73 patients and the CR-US group 172. All patients in the BR-NAC group underwent subsequent resection, as none showed disease progression or chemotherapy-associated liver damage. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of the CR-US group were 83.0% and 74.0%, while patients in the BR-NAC group had comparable 3-year and 5-year overall survivals (80.5% and 66.6%, P = 0.397)., Conclusion: Defining BR-CLM based on tumor characteristics optimizes patient selection for NAC. Favorable overall survival can be achieved by upfront surgery in patients with clearly resectable CLM and by NAC in patients with BR-CLM.

Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Regorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common side effect during treatment. The reported frequency of HFSR was 80% (grade 3: 28%) in the Japanese subpopulation in the CORRECT trial; however, more detailed data regarding HFSR in terms of onset and sites of susceptibility are unclear. Additionally, the risk factors for regorafenib-induced severe HFSR are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare HFSR between the hands and feet and identify preexisting risk factors for severe HFSR in Japanese patients receiving regorafenib. We retrospectively examined the onset and severity of HFSR on the hands and feet of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib from May 2013 to October 2015 in the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. In addition, we examined the possible association between preexisting clinical factors and severe HFSR. Our results showed that no significant difference in the incidence of HFSR of any grade was observed between the hands (71%) and feet (74%) ( p  = 0.63). The incidence of grade 3 HFSR was more frequent on the feet (33%) than on the hands (8%) ( p  < 0.01). The onset of grade 3 HFSR was earlier on the feet than on the hands ( p  < 0.001). No preexisting risk factor was identified. Our findings indicate that severe HFSR was more prevalent on the feet than on the hands, suggesting the need for appropriate screening for early detection and treatment of regorafenib-induced HSFR.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently the most common type of cancer in Japan, and its prognosis has improved because of development of diagnosis and advancement in treatments including surgery and chemotherapy. However, because of intratumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution, tumors often develop resistance to treatment. Genotyping tumor tissue in search of somatic genetic alterations for actionable information has become routine examination in clinical practice. However, the inherent molecular heterogeneity of metastatic tumors and the ability of cancer genomes to dynamically evolve are not properly captured by tissue specimens only. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) carrying tumor-specific genetic or epigenetic alterations is released into the circulation from tumor cells undergoing apoptosis or necrosis. Analysis of ctDNA has the potential to change clinical practice by exploiting blood rather than tissue, as a source of information. Here, we provide an overview of the characteristics of ctDNA and focus on detection methods for ctDNA, and the feasibility of use of ctDNA to monitor tumor dynamics for patients with colorectal cancer., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

An increasing number of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are able to receive 3 or more lines of therapy. Treatments in this setting can include regorafenib (an oral multikinase inhibitor), trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102), antibodies that target epidermal growth factor receptor for patients with RAS wild-type tumors (if no prior exposure), and, where approved, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors for patients with microsatellite instability-high mCRC. Although guidelines describe the available treatment options, few insights are provided to guide selection and sequencing. In this article, we share expert opinion from diverse geographic regions, to offer guidance for best practice when selecting and managing third-line treatment for mCRC. Various factors, including performance status, age, and tumor sidedness, can be used to guide treatment selection. Biomarkers, such as RAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability, can be useful for treatment stratification. Management of adverse events, to maintain quality of life, is a key consideration and is crucial to best practice in this setting. Common toxicities associated with third-line treatments are hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, diarrhea, and cytopenias. Patients who receive third-line and later-line treatments should be monitored for these events, especially during the first 2 cycles. Dose modifications can also be used to manage toxicities and to minimize the effect on quality of life, while maximizing treatment benefit. Clinical trials of emerging agents, new treatment combinations, and novel therapies continue the efforts to improve outcomes for patients with mCRC. Sharing expert opinions on best practice for treatment selection and management can ultimately improve outcomes for patients with mCRC., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Because circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) studies focusing on only one or a few genes to monitor the disease progress or treatment response are unlikely to find its clinical significance, the development of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) panel covering hundreds of mutation hot spots is important for the establishment of clinically practical ctDNA detection system. We enrolled 101 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received chemotherapy. Amplicon-based genomic profiling of 14 genes, which are commonly mutated in CRC, in plasma by next-generation sequencing (NGS) was carried out to evaluate the feasibility of this assay and was compared with their clinical parameters and RAS status in matched tissue samples. Somatic mutations of the 14 genes in plasma cfDNA were detected in 88 patients (87.1%) with mCRC. Mutations in TP53, KRAS, and APC genes were detected in 70 (69.3%), 39 (38.6%), and 24 (23.7%) patients, respectively. Mutant allele frequencies in plasma were significantly associated with metastasis (liver, P = 0.00004, lymph node, P = 0.008, number of metastatic organs, P = 0.0006), tumor markers (CEA, P = 0.000007, CA19-9, P = 0.006, LDH, P = 0.00001), and tumor diameter (maximum, P = 0.00002, sum of diameter, P = 0.00009). The overall concordance rate of RAS status between ctDNA and matched tissue was 77.2% (78/101). Our data confirmed that mutant allele in cfDNA can be sensitively detected by amplicon-based NGS system. These results suggest that ctDNA could be a novel diagnostic biomarker to monitor changes in mutational status and tumor burden in patients with mCRC., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) can deteriorate quality of life in patients receiving regorafenib. Cutaneous toxicity is a main adverse effect of multikinase inhibitors and has also been associated with clinical outcome. This study assessed the association between the antitumor efficacy of regorafenib and HFSR in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: Patients who received regorafenib at 160 mg/day during the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle were divided into subgroups based on whether they developed HFSR between May 2013 and October 2015. Estimates of overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Ninety-seven patients received at least one dose of regorafenib in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 81.4% (n = 79) experienced HFSR of any grade, and 34.0% (n = 33) had grade 3 HFSR. Among those patients with HFSR at any time during the study, 68.0% (n = 66) underwent the first HFSR event (any grade) during cycle 1. Both overall survival and progression-free survival were improved in patients who had HFSR grade ≥2 at any time compared with those who had HFSR grade ≤1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a history of HFSR grade ≥2 induced by capecitabine as a significant risk factor for severe HFSR (grade ≥2)., Conclusions: Patients with mCRC treated using regorafenib who experienced severe HFSR showed better overall survival than patients without severe HFSR. Severe HFSR may offer an early surrogate marker for the efficacy of regorafenib in patients with mCRC., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: NK012 is a polymeric micelle formulation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of NK012 in Japanese patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: We conducted a multicenter open-label phase II trial of NK012 monotherapy in 58 patients who had been treated with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen (group A: 53 patients with UGT1A1 genotype -/-, *6/-, or *28/-; group B: 5 patients with UGT1A1 genotype *6/*28 or *6/*6). The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). Initial doses of 28 and 18 mg/m 2 for group A and group B, respectively, were administered intravenously over 30 min, and these doses were subsequently administered every 3 weeks. Group A was evaluated as the primary efficacy population, while group B was evaluated for reference., Results: In group A, the RR was 3.8%, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.30 months and 15.03 months, respectively. In both groups, the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse drug reaction (ADR) was neutropenia and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was low or zero. In group A, 17 serious ADRs were observed in 10 patients (17%); all improved or recovered. In group B, no serious ADRs were observed. No treatment-related deaths were reported in either group., Conclusions: NK012 monotherapy yielded an RR similar to the RR of irinotecan monotherapy that was reported in the phase III EPIC trial (4.2%), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was low. Based on the incidence and severity of febrile neutropenia and grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, the initial dose of NK012 28 mg/m 2 may be too high for colorectal cancer patients who have previously been treated with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen.