Search

Purpose: Although RAS and PIK3CA mutations have been associated with resistance to anti-EGFR antibody in colorectal cancer or trastuzumab in breast cancer, their implications for trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between trastuzumab efficacy and mutation status in the HER family signaling pathway., Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated patients with HER2-positive AGC who received first-line trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy between March 2011 and November 2015. Multiplex genotyping, including KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF, was then performed using the Luminex Assay, after which KRAS amplification was measured using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Thereafter, the association between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes were evaluated., Results: KRAS mutation (MT) was detected in 6 of 77 patients (7.8%), whereas KRAS amplification was found in 15 of 67 patients (22%). No mutations in NRAS, PIK3CA, or BRAF were identified. The KRAS MT group showed significantly worse response rates (16.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.016), progression-free survival [median, 4.8 vs. 11.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 3.95; 95% CI, 1.60-9.76; P = 0.0029], and overall survival (11.5 vs. 23.6 months; HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 1.56-9.28; P = 0.033) compared to the KRAS wild-type group. KRAS amplification had no effect on clinical outcomes., Conclusion: KRAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival and might predict insufficient trastuzumab efficacy, whereas KRAS amplification showed no prognostic significance during trastuzumab treatment. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the predictive value of KRAS status in HER2-positive AGC., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CLM) has high postoperative recurrence rates; therefore, optimizing perioperative treatment is imperative. Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can aid in detecting minimal residual disease in colon cancer following curative resection. This study aimed to identify the potential role of serum CEA following liver resection in patients with CLM., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2004 to 2018 and enrolled patients with CLM who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and CLM. Associations between perioperative CEA levels and characteristics of recurrence were investigated., Results: Recurrence was detected during a median follow-up period of 90.1 months in 343 (54.2%) out of 633 analyzed patients. Patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (75.7% versus 50.0%, p < 0.01) and shorter time until recurrence (4.4 versus 36.9 months, p < 0.01) than those in the postoperative CEA level ≤ 5 ng/ml group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml was an independent predictor, with hazard ratios of 2.77 (p < 0.01) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3.18 (p < 0.01) for overall survival (OS). Additionally, RFS was significantly shorter among patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group who did not have normalized CEA levels following adjuvant chemotherapy than among those in the normalized CEA group., Conclusions: The postoperative and post-adjuvant chemotherapy CEA levels in the CEA level > 5 ng/ml group may be predictors of RFS and OS., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The real-world survival benefit of FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus anti-VEGF therapy (Triplet) over doublet chemotherapy (Doublet) remains controversial in patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Patients and Methods: WJOG13219G was a multicenter, retrospective, registry-based study of patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC who received first-line triplet or doublet chemotherapy from January 2014 to December 2019 in Japan. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for patient background., Results: The analysis included 79 and 91 patients in the Triplet and Doublet groups, respectively. The Triplet group was significantly younger and had better performance status. No statistical difference was noted in progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.13; P = .22) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62-1.25; P = .48) between both groups. IPTW analysis also showed no difference between the 2 groups in PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08; P = .20) and OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.20; P = .59). The Triplet and Doublet groups had an objective response rate of 53% and 41%, respectively (P = .10). At least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event was seen in 51 (65%) and 43 (47%) patients in the Triplet and Doublet groups, respectively, with the incidence of neutropenia being significantly higher in the former., Conclusion: Triplet therapy had no survival benefit versus doublet therapy in the overall and IPTW cohorts or specific subgroups for real-world patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a biomarker with potential to reflect comprehensive genomic information and overcome intratumor heterogeneity. In contrast, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a conventional tumor marker for predicting recurrence, survival, and chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the relationship between them remains unclear. Here, the relationship between plasma ctDNA and CEA levels was evaluated to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of their clinical use., Methods: A total of 110 patients with mCRC underwent chemotherapy were enrolled. Amplicon-based plasma genomic profiling of 14 genes that are commonly mutated in CRC by next-generation sequencing was compared to the CEA level and tumor diameter using Spearman's correlation coefficient., Results: The overall concordance rate between the ctDNA and CEA levels was 75.5% (83/110). The correlation coefficient between the ctDNA and CEA levels was lower in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.18, p = 0.44) than in the group of patients with liver metastasis (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Although the correlation coefficients between tumor diameter and both ctDNA and CEA levels were high in the group of patients with liver metastasis, only the CEA correlation coefficient was maintained in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.53, p = 0.01). The characteristics that influenced discordance were liver metastasis and the sum of tumor diameter., Conclusions: The status of ctDNA and CEA may not be consistent in patients with mCRC without liver metastasis or with a low tumor volume; both results should be considered when deciding a treatment strategy., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/aim: Primary tumor location and RAS and BRAF V600E mutations are predictors of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. However, there are limited reports on their effects on the outcomes of third-line chemotherapy with EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of KRAS exon 2 wild type (WT) mCRC patients treated with EGFR inhibitor monotherapy or EGFR inhibitor plus irinotecan as third-line chemotherapy. The association between primary tumor location, RAS (KRAS exon 3, 4 or NRAS), BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA mutational status, and treatment outcome was evaluated., Results: A total of 72 patients were included in this study. In multivariate analysis, RAS (p=0.004) and BRAF mutations (p=0.00008) were independent factors for shorter PFS. Poor performance status (p=0.01) and BRAF mutation (p=0.00002) were independent factors for shorter OS, whereas primary tumor location and PIK3CA mutation did not influence survival., Conclusion: Additional analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations could contribute to the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from third-line EGFR inhibitors, regardless of primary tumor location., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)