Search

Background & Aims: Second forward view (SFV) examination of the right colon (RC) in colonoscopy was suggested to improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR), but multicenter data to inform its routine use remain limited. We performed an international multicenter randomized trial comparing SFV vs a standard single forward view examination of the RC on adenoma detection., Methods: Asymptomatic individuals undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopies from 6 Asia Pacific regions were invited for study. A forward view examination of the RC was first performed in all patients, followed by randomization at the hepatic flexure to either SFV examination of the RC and standard withdrawal examination from the hepatic flexure to rectum, or a standard withdrawal colonoscopy (SWC) examination from the hepatic flexure to rectum. The primary outcome was RC ADR., Results: Between 2016 and 2019, there were 1011 patients randomized (SFV group, 502 patients; SWC group, 509 patients). Forty-five endoscopists performed the colonoscopies. The RC ADR was significantly higher in the SFV group than in the SWC group (27.1% vs 21.6%; P = .042). The whole-colon ADR was high in both groups (49.0% vs 45.0%; P =.201). The SFV examination identified 58 additional adenomas in 49 patients (9.8%), leading to a change in surveillance recommendations in 15 patients (3.0%). The median overall withdrawal time was 1.5 minutes longer in the SFV group (12.0 vs 10.5 min; P < .001). Older age, male sex, ever smoking, and longer RC withdrawal time were independent predictors of right-sided adenoma detection., Conclusions: In this multicenter trial, SFV examination significantly increased the RC ADR in screening and surveillance colonoscopies. Routine RC SFV examination should be considered. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03121495., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) increase the risk of colorectal cancer. Surveillance colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy is recommended, but conventional forward-viewing colonoscopy (FVC) detects dysplasia with low levels of sensitivity. Full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) incorporates 2 additional lateral cameras to the forward camera of the colonoscope, allowing endoscopists to view behind folds and in blind spots, which might increase dysplasia detection. We compared FUSE vs FVC in the detection of dysplasia in patients with IBDs., Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, cross-over, tandem colonoscopy study comparing FVC vs FUSE in 52 subjects with IBD undergoing surveillance for neoplasia in Australia (23 with Crohn's colitis, 29 with ulcerative colitis; median age, 45.0 y; 60% male; mean IBD duration, 16.4 y). All subjects met national IBD surveillance inclusion criteria; 27 were assigned randomly to groups that underwent FVC followed by FUSE, and 25 were assigned to groups that underwent FUSE followed by FVC. All procedures were performed from February 2014 through December 2015. Random biopsy specimens were collected and visible lesions were collected; all were analyzed histologically. The primary end point was dysplasia missed by the first colonoscopy detected by the second colonoscopy. Dysplasia was diagnosed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist blinded to the colonoscope allocation in consensus with a second expert pathologist., Results: FVC missed 71.4% of dysplastic lesions per lesion whereas FUSE missed 25.0% per lesion (P = .0001); FVC missed 75.0% of dysplastic lesions per subject and FUSE missed 25.0% per subject (P = .046). FUSE identified a mean of 0.37 dysplastic lesions and FVC identified a mean of 0.13 dysplastic lesions (P = .044). The total colonoscopy times were similar (21.2 min for FUSE vs 19.1 min for FVC; P = .32), but withdrawal time was significantly longer for FUSE (15.8 min) than for FVC (12.0 min) (P = .03). Correcting for per-unit withdrawal time, the mean dysplasia miss rate per subject was significantly lower for FUSE (0.19) than for FVC (0.83; P < .0001). Targeted tissue acquisition identified significantly more dysplastic lesions than random biopsies (P < .0001)., Conclusions: In a prospective cross-over study of IBD patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy, we found panoramic views obtained by full-spectrum endoscopy increased the number of dysplastic lesions detected, compared with conventional forward-viewing colonoscopy. Trial no: ACTRN12616000047493., (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dysplasia surveillance is recognized as an integral component in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The adherence to surveillance guidelines is variable, and understanding of quality indicators and predictors of behavior is currently limited., Objective: To perform a nationwide evaluation of the quality of IBD surveillance practiced by Australian endoscopists and to determine the predictors of quality practice., Design: Cross-sectional nationwide survey., Setting: Survey distributed through the gastroenterology and colorectal surgery societies covering knowledge and practice of IBD surveillance., Main Outcome Measurements: Adherence to indicators of high-quality surveillance and median score of IBD surveillance guideline knowledge., Results: A total of 264 responses were received, comprising 240 respondents who perform surveillance screening (218 gastroenterologists, 46 colorectal surgeons). Gastroenterologists were significantly more likely to undertake surveillance (P < .001), adhere to guidelines (P = .02), use advanced imaging modalities (P = .04), and have greater surveillance knowledge than colorectal surgeons (P < .001). Knowledge score and gastroenterologists were independent predictors of dysplasia screening (odds ratio [OR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-1.96 and OR 11.2; 95% CI, 4.53-27.87), guideline adherence (OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31 and OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.11-5.30), and advanced endoscopic imaging technique use (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35 and OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.02-4.74)., Limitations: Potential responder bias results appear, however, aligned with those of previous studies., Conclusions: IBD dysplasia surveillance in Australia is being performed at a high standard. Gastroenterology specialization and knowledge score have been demonstrated to be strong predictors of high-quality surveillance practice. This is the first study to determine predictors of screening behavior and quantify surveillance quality. These results further emphasize that gastroenterologists should play a key role in IBD surveillance., (Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To examine and evaluate recent evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) development in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Using the PubMed database, a literature search was conducted for relevant articles in English from the past 10 years. Relevant studies investigating PSC as a risk factor for CRC in IBD in the context of incidence and prevalence, pathogenesis, prevention and prognosis were included in this review. Recent evidence increasingly points to PSC as a significant risk factor in the development of CRC in patients with concomitant IBD. PSC may be an important risk factor for CRC in different populations worldwide. The mechanism for this increase in risk is still unclear. The efficacy of UDCA as a chemopreventive agent remains controversial. Liver transplantation does not halt the development of CRC, although there is not enough evidence to suggest that it is associated with increased incidence of CRC. While routine colonoscopic surveillance should be performed in patients with concurrent PSC and IBD, more high-level evidence is required to support the benefits of the procedure. While many new developments have taken place in the last decade, the pathogenesis and optimal management of CRC development in IBD-PSC patients remain unclear.

Enhanced surveillance colonoscopy techniques for dysplasia detection in ulcerative colitis have successfully been implemented into group and solo practices. Chromoendoscopy (CE), in particular, has been shown to significantly increase dysplasia detection in surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. CE can be learned and is reproducible, with an associated modest increase in procedure time., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Inflammatory bowel disease can require surgical resection and also lead to colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the cumulative incidence of resection surgeries and CRC among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: We analyzed data from a cohort of patients who participated in an inflammatory bowel disease study (504 with UC and 377 with CD) at 2 academic medical centers in Sydney, Australia from 1977 to 1992 (before the development of biologic therapies). We collected follow-up data on surgeries and development of CRC from hospital and community medical records or via direct contact with patients during a median time period of 14 years. Cumulative incidences of resection surgeries and CRC were calculated by competing risk survival analysis., Results: Among patients with UC, CRC developed in 24, for a cumulative incidence of 1% at 10 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-2%), 3% at 20 years (95% CI, 1%-5%), and 7% at 30 years (95% CI, 4%-10%). Their cumulative incidence of colectomy was 15% at 10 years (95% CI, 11%-19%), 26% at 20 years (95% CI, 21%-30%), and 31% at 30 years (95% CI, 25%-36%). Among patients with CD, 5 of 327 with colon disease developed CRC, with a cumulative incidence of CRC of 1% at 10 years (95% CI, 0%-2%), 1% at 20 years (95% CI, 0%-2%), and 2% at 30 years (95% CI, 0%-4%). Among all patients with CD, the cumulative incidence of resection was 32% at 5 years (95% CI, 27%-37%), 43% at 10 years (95% CI, 37%-49%), and 53% at 15 years (95% CI, 46%-58%). Of these 168 subjects, 42% required a second resection within 15 years of the first surgery (95% CI, 33%-50%)., Conclusions: Patients with UC have a low incidence of CRC during a 30-year period (7% or less); the incidence among patients with CD is even lower. However, almost one-third of patients with UC and about 50% of those with CD will require surgery., (Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The rapid increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Asia-Pacific region in the past decade has resulted in recommendations to implement mass CRC screening programs. However, the knowledge of screening and population screening behaviors between countries is largely lacking., Objective: This multicenter, international study investigated the association of screening test participation with knowledge of, attitudes toward, and barriers to CRC and screening tests in different cultural and sociopolitical contexts., Methods: Person-to-person interviews by using a standardized survey instrument were conducted with subjects from 14 Asia-Pacific countries/regions to assess the prevailing screening participation rates, knowledge of and attitudes toward and barriers to CRC and screening tests, intent to participate, and cues to action. Independent predictors of the primary endpoint, screening participation was determined from subanalyses performed for high-, medium-, and low-participation countries., Results: A total of 7915 subjects (49% male, 37.8% aged 50 years and older) were recruited. Of the respondents aged 50 years and older, 809 (27%) had undergone previous CRC testing; the Philippines (69%), Australia (48%), and Japan (38%) had the highest participation rates, whereas India (1.5%), Malaysia (3%), Indonesia (3%), Pakistan (7.5%), and Brunei (13.7%) had the lowest rates. Physician recommendation and knowledge of screening tests were significant predictors of CRC test uptake. In countries with low-test participation, lower perceived access barriers and higher perceived severity were independent predictors of participation. Respondents from low-participation countries had the least knowledge of symptoms, risk factors, and tests and reported the lowest physician recommendation rates. "Intent to undergo screening" and "perceived need for screening" was positively correlated in most countries; however, this was offset by financial and access barriers., Limitations: Ethnic heterogeneity may exist in each country that was not addressed. In addition, the participation tests and physician recommendation recalls were self-reported., Conclusions: In the Asia-Pacific region, considerable differences were evident in the participation of CRC tests, physician recommendations, and knowledge of, attitudes toward, and barriers to CRC screening. Physician recommendation was the uniform predictor of screening behavior in all countries. Before implementing mass screening programs, improving awareness of CRC and promoting the physicians' role are necessary to increase the screening participation rates., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening improves survival and requires appropriate recommendation by general practitioners (GPs). Screening practises may be influenced by barriers related to ethnicity and training., Methods: A mail survey assessed GPs' practises and the barriers towards CRC screening. The association of screening practises and demography, including GP ethnicity, medical training and practise characteristics, were evaluated., Results: Of 212 GPs (median age 54 years, 73% men, 27% Caucasian, 38% foreign graduates), 87% agreed that fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening improved survival in the average-risk patient. Considerable variations existed in the starting age (40-49 years: 31%; 50 years: 65%) and frequency (1-2 years: 77%; 3-5 years: 22%) of screening. FOBT was used for indications other than screening: anemia (59%), altered bowel habits (54%), abdominal pain (24%), and rectal bleeding (23%), and these were significantly more frequent in Asian GPs independent of medical training. GPs were less likely to recommend screening to immigrants, and most reported that immigrants were less likely to participate. More Asian and Middle Eastern GPs reported a major barrier with FOBT inaccuracy compared with Caucasian GPs (22% vs 9%, P = 0.03; and 27% vs 9%, P = 0.03, respectively)., Conclusions: Considerable differences existed in GPs' CRC screening practises. Indications for use of FOBT and the subsequent investigation of a positive FOBT also varied according to GPs' ethnicity, independent of medical training. Patient's ethnicity and associated language and cultural barriers may affect screening uptake, which may negatively affect the health of immigrants. Resources and culture-specific interventions are recommended to improve overall screening participation., (© 2011 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening improves survival and its success depends on the participation of the at-risk population. Few studies have adequately assessed screening knowledge, perception and participation according to birthplace. This study assesses the knowledge and perception of CRC in an ethnically diverse population, and evaluates the association with screening participation and intention. Identification of specific predictors of screening may aid the development of interventions to improve overall CRC screening., Methods: An interview-based survey, conducted on subjects aged 30-70 years, assessed knowledge and perception towards CRC and screening tests. Primary endpoints were screening participation and intent. Statistical methods used were Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and logistic regression., Results: A total of 543 subjects (43% males, 53% Australian-born (AB), 63% aged 50 years and above) were recruited. Compared with AB, non-Australian-born (NAB) respondents had poorer knowledge, and NAB background predicted for poorer knowledge independent of sex, education, media and familiarity with CRC patient. Compared with AB respondents aged 50 years and above, NAB respondents had lower screening participation (17.4% vs. 31.8%; P=0.01), lesser intention (75.8% vs. 90.5%; P<0.001), and had received fewer doctors' screening recommendations (16.5% vs. 27.1%; P=0.04). In multivariate analysis, doctors' recommendation, media and improved perception independently predicted screening participation; knowledge and media exposure predicted intent., Conclusions: The knowledge of CRC and screening is significantly poorer in the immigrant population. Knowledge predicts for greater screening intent. Therefore, implementing language- and culture-specific educational programs involving medical practitioners and media are necessary to improve CRC screening participation rates., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Sex significantly influences the clinical and pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC). These include differences in incidence and mortality rates, clinical presentations including age, emergency surgery for complications from CRC, screening participation rates, site, stage and treatment utilization, histopathology and survival. Environmental, behavioral and biological factors contribute to the differential risk. Recent advances in the molecular biology of CRC, specifically in microsatellite status, estrogen hormone and estrogen receptor beta, have led to greater understanding of the effect of estrogen in colorectal carcinogenesis. Estrogen may preferentially protect against microsatellite unstable cancers through its effect on selected molecular targets; however, the exact pathways have not been elucidated. Recognition of important sex disparities in these areas may lead to the implementation of specific measures to diminish these differences and facilitate equitable distribution of health resources. Identifying specific molecular targets on CRC that interact with estrogen may stimulate research to improve the overall outcomes of all patients with CRC.

Background & Aims: The influence of birthplace on the clinical and pathologic outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Australia is unknown. Addressing inequalities in health care provision in immigrant groups may improve the overall quality of CRC care., Methods: The South Western Sydney Colorectal Tumour Group registry prospectively collects data on new patients with CRC from a population of 800,000. Survival data were cross-linked with the New South Wales population death registry., Results: From 1997 to 2004 there were 1496 patients (55% males) who were recruited and grouped according to country of birth: Australia, 64%; Southern Europe, 19%; Asia, 12%; and the Middle East, 5%. Significant heterogeneity in CRC characteristics was found, especially in Asians. Compared with Australians, Asians were diagnosed at a younger age (median age, 64 vs 70 y; P < .001, 25.6% were younger than 50 years vs 9.5%; P < .001), had fewer poorly differentiated cancers (8.9% vs 17.7%; P = .004), and fewer metastatic cancers (12.1% vs 21.0%; P = .001). Being Asian-born was associated with improved overall survival independent of age, emergency surgery, grade, and stage (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.93; P = 0.02). CRC screening was especially low among Asian- and Middle Eastern-born patients. Complications and treatment were not affected by birthplace, indicating no differences in the provision or acceptance of care based on birthplace., Conclusions: Despite an equitable distribution of resources, we found significant heterogeneity in presentations and outcomes according to birthplace, with improved survival in Asian-born patients. The lower rates of screen-detected CRC in Asian- and Middle Eastern-born patients and their younger ages at diagnosis indicate that targeted screening strategies may need to be implemented.

Background: Studies have reported the effect of gender in the context of assessing predictors of survival from colorectal cancer (CRC); however, few have specifically addressed the impact of gender on the clinical and pathological outcomes of CRC. Appreciation of gender disparities may assist in the implementation of measures to address these differences, and improve the overall outcomes of patients with CRC., Methods: The South Western Sydney Colorectal Tumour Group registry, which encompasses a population in excess of 800,000, prospectively collects data on new patients with CRC. Data from 1997 to 2004 were collected, including demography, site, grade, histopathology, stage, treatment, and survival., Results: In total, 2,050 consecutive patients (44% women) with CRC were analyzed. Compared to men, women were older (median 69 yr, range 27-95 yr vs 67, range 22-92 yr, P= 0.001), had more emergency surgery for CRC-related complications (18.8%vs 15.1%, P= 0.03), had more proximal cancers (42.2%vs 31.5%, P < 0.001), had more poorly differentiated cancers (16.9%vs 12.9%, P= 0.01), and had fewer radiotherapy treatments for Dukes B and C rectal cancers (36.4%vs 48.1%, P= 0.02). Young women (aged 50 yr and below) had significantly better overall survival compared to young men; in this group, female gender predicted improved overall survival independent of age, emergency surgery, site, grade, and stage (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.86, P= 0.01). Similarly, young women had significantly better cancer-specific survival (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85, P= 0.01). However, older women (aged over 50 yr) had worse survival independent of age, emergency surgery, site, grade, and stage (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68, P= 0.001). There were no gender differences in screening, histopathology, stage, or utilization of chemotherapy., Conclusions: This study demonstrated an opposing effect of gender on overall and cancer-specific survival at either side of the age of 50 yr. The protective effect of estrogen on CRC may be an important factor. Women had a greater proportion of emergency surgery, which was related to the predominance of proximal cancers in this gender. Women also had more proximal cancers, thereby limiting flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening test.