Search

Purpose: Conventional minimally invasive surgery requires mini-laparotomy to extract the pathological specimen. However, by using a natural orifice as the delivery route, natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery avoids the need for a large incision. This study analyzed the short-term outcome of NOSE compared with conventional mini-laparotomy (CL) for colorectal cancer surgery., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,189 patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer between the cecum and upper rectum. Propensity score analyses were applied to the NOSE and CL groups in a 1:1 matched cohort., Results: After propensity score matching, each group included 201 patients. The NOSE group and CL group did not differ significantly in terms of baseline characteristics. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Compared with the CL group, the NOSE group experienced a shorter time to first flatus (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.0 ± 1.2 days, p < 0.001), first stool (2.7 ± 1.5 vs. 4.1 ± 1.9, p < 0.001), liquid diet (2.3 ± 1.3 vs. 3.6 ± 1.8 days, p < 0.001), soft diet (3.9 ± 2.0 vs. 5.2 ± 1.9 days, p < 0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (5.1 ± 3.5 vs. 7.4 ± 4.8 days, p < 0.001). The NOSE group exhibited lower mean pain intensity and lower highest pain intensity on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3., Conclusion: NOSE has several advantages over conventional mini-laparotomy following minimally invasive surgery for colon cancer. These advantages include reduced time to oral intake, shorter hospital stays, and less postoperative pain. NOSE can be adopted and applied to highly selective patients without additional risk of short-term complications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Although minimally invasive colorectal surgery has been proven to have a shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications than open surgery, the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis have not been validated. This study compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic approaches in these patients., Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2020, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 hemodialysis patients who underwent curative-intent, elective colorectal surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: open and laparoscopic., Results: Postoperative morbidity (p = 0.480) and mortality (p = 0.598) rates and length of hospital stay (28.8 vs. 27.5 days, p = 0.830) were similar between the groups. However, laparoscopic surgery patients had a shorter return to clear liquid, full liquid, or soft food time than open surgery patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p = 0.002, respectively). Disease-free survival and long-term cancer-specific survival rates were also similar between the two groups (p = 0.353 and p = 0.201, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that intraoperative blood transfusion was a risk factor for severe complications and mortality (OR 6.055; p = 0.046), and the odds ratio (OR) of laparoscopic surgery was not significantly greater than that of open surgery (OR = 0.537, p = 0.337)., Conclusion: Although laparoscopic surgery did not result in hemodialysis patients having a shorter postoperative hospital stay, our results suggest that the laparoscopic approach is as safe as open surgery for hemodialysis patients and may be beneficial for shortening the return time to food intake., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The standard initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains debated. This study investigated whether upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) or upfront systemic therapy (ST) provides better survival outcomes for patients with mCRC., Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for studies published at any time from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) utilizing propensity score matching (PSM) or inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were included. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and short-term (60-day) mortality in these studies., Results: After reviewing 3,626 articles, we identified 10 studies including a total of 48,696 patients. OS differed significantly between the upfront PTR and upfront ST arms (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% CI: 0.57-0.68; p < 0.001). However, a subgroup analysis identified no significant difference in OS in RCTs (HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.7-1.34; p = 0.83), whereas significant difference in OS occurred between the treatment arms in RCSs with PSM or IPTW (HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.54-0.64; p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was analyzed in three RCTs, and 60-day mortality differed significantly between the treatment arms (risk ratio [RR] 3.52; 95% CI: 1.23-10.10; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: In RCTs, upfront PTR for mCRC did not improve OS and enhanced the risk of 60-day mortality. However, upfront PTR seemed to increase OS in RCSs with PSM or IPTW. Therefore, whether upfront PTR should be used for mCRC remains unclear. Further large RCTs are required., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer are initially diagnosed with stage IV disease. This study aims to examine the role of regional lymph node (LN) status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with respect to clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes., Methods: We investigated 1147 patients diagnosed with mCRC and had undergone surgical resection of the primary CRC. A total of 167 patients were placed in the LN-negative (LN-) group and another 980 in the LN-positive (LN+) group., Results: LN+ patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of T4 tumors (p = 0.008), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (p < 0.001) than those in the LN- group. LN- patients had a significantly higher rate of lung metastasis (p < 0.001), whereas the rate of peritoneal seeding (p < 0.001) and systemic node metastasis (p < 0.001) was both significantly higher in the LN+ group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the LN+ group was significantly poorer than that in the LN- group (LN- vs. LN+ 23.2% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.040). In patients with curative resection, the 5-year OS rate has no significant difference between the two groups (LN- vs. LN+ 19.5% vs. 24.3%; p = 0.890)., Conclusions: Metastatic CRC patients with LN+ who underwent primary tumor resection may present with more high-risk pathological features, more peritoneal seeding, and systemic node metastasis, but less lung metastasis than LN- patients. LN+ patients had poorer long-term outcomes compared with that in LN- patients. Nevertheless, with curative resection, LN+ patients could have similar survival outcomes as LN- patients.

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has achieved significant results in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in patients with CRC aged above 75 years at a single tertiary medical center., Methods: We analyzed 967 patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis between January 2009 and December 2015, in a single institution. Of the enrolled patients, 305 underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 662 received open laparotomy surgery., Results: Compared to the patients who underwent open surgery, those who received laparoscopic surgery had significantly shorter postoperative stay (10.3 vs. 13.5 days p < 0.001) and similar postoperative morbidity (p = 0.354) and mortality (p = 0.082). In the laparoscopy cohort, six of 305 patients were converted to open surgery and one died. The long-term overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence rate were similar between both cohorts in each stage., Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is suitable for elderly patients owing to shorter postoperative stay, similar long-term outcomes with open surgery, and acceptable low conversion rates. For long-term overall and oncological outcomes, the results of laparoscopic surgery were similar to that of open surgery in each TNM stage.

Background: Physical activity might be directly or indirectly linked to the risk of colorectal cancer and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer., Objective: This study aimed to elucidate whether preoperative physical activity plays a role in reducing short-term postoperative complications and improving long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer., Design: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data., Settings: This study was conducted at a department of colorectal surgery in a tertiary teaching hospital between January 1995 and December 2016., Patients: Patients who underwent curative resection for stage I to III primary colorectal cancer were enrolled. According to the preoperative leisure-time weekly metabolic equivalent of task values, patients were divided into 2 groups: the metabolic equivalent of task <12 group and the metabolic equivalent of task ≥12 group. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to reduce imbalance and selection biases based on 6 covariates, namely, age, sex, BMI, tumor location, tumor stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy administration., Main Outcome Measures: χ tests were used to analyze short-term postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate disease-free survival and overall survival., Results: In the matched cohort patients, significant differences in overall postoperative complications and mortality were observed in favor of the metabolic equivalent of task ≥12 group, although there was no difference in any single item of postoperative morbidity. The results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated a significant survival benefit in the metabolic equivalent of task ≥12 group compared with the metabolic equivalent of task <12 group both for disease-free and overall survival., Limitations: This study is limited by its retrospective nature., Conclusions: This single-institute study provides evidence of the association of preoperative leisure-time physical activity with short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B189. ASOCIACIÓN DE ACTIVIDAD FÍSICA DE TIEMPO LIBRE PREOPERATORIA CON RESULTADOS A CORTO Y LARGO PLAZO DE PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A RESECCIÓN CURATIVA POR CÁNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO I-III: UN ANÁLISIS DE COINCIDENCIA DE PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIÓN ANTECEDENTES: LA ACTIVIDAD FíSICA PUEDE ESTAR DIRECTA O INDIRECTAMENTE RELACIONADA CON EL RIESGO DE CÁNCER COLORRECTAL Y EL PRONÓSTICO DE LOS PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL.: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo dilucidar si la actividad física preoperatoria desempeña un papel en la reducción de las complicaciones postoperatorias a corto plazo y en mejorar la supervivencia a largo plazo de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal.Este fue un análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente.Este estudio se realizó en un departamento de cirugía colorrectal en un hospital universitario terciario entre Enero de 1995 y Diciembre de 2016.Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a resección curativa por cáncer colorrectal primario en estadio I-III. De acuerdo con el equivalente metabólico semanal en el tiempo libre de los valores de la tarea preoperatorio, los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos: el equivalente metabólico del grupo de tarea <12 y el equivalente metabólico del grupo de tarea ≥ 12. Se utilizó una coincidencia de puntaje de propensión 1: 1 para reducir los desequilibrios y los sesgos de selección basados en seis covariables, principalmente, edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, ubicación del tumor, estadio del tumor y administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.Las pruebas de Chi-cuadrado se utilizaron para analizar las complicaciones postoperatorias a corto plazo. Los análisis de Kaplan-Meier se utilizaron para evaluar la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia general.en los pacientes de la cohorte emparejada, se observaron diferencias significativas en las complicaciones postoperatorias generales y la mortalidad a favor del equivalente metabólico del grupo de tareas ≥ 12, aunque no hubo diferencias en ningún elemento único de morbilidad postoperatoria. Los resultados del análisis de Kaplan-Meier y la prueba de log-rank demostraron un beneficio de supervivencia significativo en el equivalente metabólico del grupo tarea ≥ 12 en comparación con el equivalente metabólico del grupo tarea <12 tanto para la supervivencia libre de enfermedad como para la supervivencia general.Este estudio está limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva.Este estudio de instituto único proporciona evidencia de la asociación de la actividad física preoperatoria en el tiempo libre con la morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias a corto plazo, así como la supervivencia a largo plazo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B189. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Kahlil).

Objectives: There is a significant unmet need for a blood test with adequate sensitivity to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomas. We describe a novel circulating tumor cell (CTC) platform to capture colorectal epithelial cells associated with CRC and adenomas., Methods: Blood was collected from 667 Taiwanese adults from 2012 to 2018 before a colonoscopy. The study population included healthy control subjects, patients with adenomas, and those with stage I-IV CRC. CTCs were isolated from the blood using the CellMax platform. The isolated cells were enumerated, and an algorithm was used to determine the likelihood of detecting adenoma or CRC. Nominal and ordinal logistic regression demonstrated that CTC counts could identify adenomas and CRC, including CRC stage., Results: The CellMax test demonstrated a significant association between CTC counts and worsening disease status (Cuzick's P value < 0.0001) with respect to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. The test showed high specificity (86%) and sensitivity across all CRC stages (95%) and adenomatous lesions (79%). The area under the curve was 0.940 and 0.868 for the detection of CRC and adenomas, respectively., Discussion: The blood-based CTC platform demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting adenomas and CRC, as well as reasonable specificity in an enriched symptomatic patient population., Translational Impact: If these results are reproduced in an average risk population, this test has the potential to prevent CRC by improving patient compliance and detecting precancerous adenomas, eventually reducing CRC mortality.

Background: Impaired kidney function is associated with different diseases. However, its impact on colorectal cancer has not been clarified. In order to understand the effect of preoperative kidney function on the outcome of patients with cancer, we analyzed colorectal cancer patients with localized or regional diseases., Materials and Methods: In total, 3731 stage I to III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were analyzed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was used for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for kidney function cut-off value; Chi-square method, independent t test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) method for clinicopathological factors; Kaplan-Meier method for disease-free survival (DFS); Cox proportional hazard model for multivariate analysis., Results: Among colon cancer patients, low eGFR (MDRD <70) was associated with more male patients, T2 stage, patients without adjuvant chemotherapy, and patients with elevated creatinine level. Low eGFR is a significant risk factor only for stage III colon cancer (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28-2.26; P < 0.001). Furthermore, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly increase 5-year DFS for both high and low eGFR groups in stage II patients (5 yrs DFS, 94.8% vs. 84.1%, P = 0.098 for high eGFR subgroup; and 75.0% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.379 for low eGFR subgroup). However, significant improvement of 5-yrs DFS after chemotherapy was found in low eGFR stage III colon cancer patients (64.7% vs. 39.4%, P < 0.001 for low eGFR subgroup). In contrast, no significant DFS difference was caused by chemotherapy for high eGFR stage III subgroup (70.5% vs. 63.9%, P = 0.110)., Conclusions: Although low eGFR is an independent risk factor for stage III colon cancer. However, the adjuvant chemotherapy impacts on stage III colon cancer patients differently according to eGFR status., Competing Interests: None

Background: Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has yet to be used as a prognostic or adjuvant chemotherapy factor for colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all stage I-III CRC patients with different preoperative serum CEA levels (≤ 5, 5-10, and > 10 ng/ml) at a single center between 1995 and 2010. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio between the two elevated CEA groups (5-10 ng/ml and > 10 ng/ml) and in a 1:2 ratio between the elevated and non-elevated groups (≤ 5 ng/ml), with a caliper of 0.05., Results: After exclusion and matching, 3857 patients had preoperative CEA levels ≤ 5 ng/ml, 1121 patients had CEA levels between 5 and 10 ng/ml, and 1121 patients had CEA levels > 10 ng/ml. Elevated preoperative CEA showed an increased risk of overall survival (5-10 ng/ml: hazard ratio [HR] 1.376; > 10 ng/ml: HR 1.523; both p < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (5-10 ng/ml: HR 1.404; > 10 ng/ml: HR 1.712; both p < 0.001), and recurrence free interval (5-10 ng/ml: HR 1.190; > 10 ng/ml: HR 1.468; both p < 0.05). Patients with negative lymph node staging (LNs) and CEA > 10 ng/ml, as well as those with positive LNs and CEA ≤ 5 ng/ml, showed similar overall survival (5-year survival: 72% vs. 69%; p = 0.542) and recurrence free intervals (19.9 vs. 21.72 months; p = 0.662)., Conclusions: A preoperative CEA level can be an independent prognostic factor for stage I-III CRC after curative resection. Patients with negative LNs and preoperative CEA level > 10 ng/ml should be considered for intensive follow-up or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Purpose: The rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality is reportedly high in patients aged ≥ 75 years with colorectal cancer (CRC). In such patients, a comparison of the short-term outcome between open method and laparoscopy has not been clearly defined in Taiwan. We aimed to compare postoperative morbidity and mortality parameters after open method and laparoscopy in CRC patients aged ≥ 75 years., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent surgery for CRC from February 2009 to September 2015 at the Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan and analyzed their clinicopathological factors. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed for evaluating if laparoscopic surgery offers more favorable outcomes than open surgery in the elderly., Results: A total of 1133 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this study; they were divided into two groups (open method vs. laparoscopy = 797 vs. 336). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher in the laparoscopy group than in the open method group (3.3 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.003). Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates showed no significant difference between these two groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the open method group (10.4 ± 8.7 vs. 13.8 ± 13.5 days, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our results suggest that laparoscopy in patients aged ≥ 75 years with CRC had higher anastomosis leakage rate compared with open surgery but is acceptable and offers the benefit of a shorter hospital stay over open surgery.

Backgrounds: Clinicopathologic factors relating to developing metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) have been reported. However, the effects of different diagnostic intervals on these risk factors required further analysis., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study comprised 14,481 patients diagnosed from January 1995 to December 2012. Metachronous CRC was defined as the occurrence of a second colorectal cancer at least 1 year post-operatively., Results: A total of 153 (1.06%) patients developed metachronous CRCs during the follow-up. Significantly higher rates of developing metachronous cancer occurred in male patients (1.2 vs 0.9%), patients with synchronous CRC (2.0 vs 1.0%), and patients with a positive family history of CRC (1.4 vs 0.9%). Pertaining to diagnostic intervals related to clinicopathological features, more severe staging was significant in the diagnostic interval between 2 and 3 years (35 vs 7.7%, 20.6%, 17.5%, P = .01) compared with other intervals. Male patients were more frequently detected to have CRC within 3 years compared with females (53.1 vs 29.1%, P = .005). For a diagnostic interval ≧ 5 years, a significantly higher rate of metachronous CRC located at the right colon was observed than that located at the left colon (36.6 vs 19.7%, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: We evinced that a diagnostic interval between 2 and 3 years was a key time for metachronous CRC diagnosis with worse staging distribution. Based on current findings, we recommend the stratification of metachronous CRCs into diagnostic intervals of 1-2, 2-3, and ≧ 3 years, as they exhibit significantly different characteristics.

Purpose: Purpose To assess preoperative serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in colon adenocarcinomapatients with various clinical features and determine its prognostic value., Methods: Between 2000 and 2013, 10,800 stage I-IV colon cancer patients who underwent surgery wereretrospectively enrolled. The relationship between ALP level and variables, including age, gender,carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) levels, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, bilirubin level, tumor size,liver cirrhosis, hepatitis, albumin level, histological type, and TNM-stage, were evaluated. The impact of ALP level elevation on survival was evaluated., Results: Significant elevations in ALP level were found in patients with CEA ≥5 ng/ml (p<0.001); AST |≥43 U/L (p<0.001); total bilirubin ≥1.5 U/L (p<0.001); liver cirrhosis (p<0.001); albumin; <3.5g/dL (p <0.001); and stage IV disease (p=0.03).Patients with elevated ALP levels had significantly worse 5-year overall survival (OS) for colon (5-year OSrate: 71.5% vs. 78.3%, p<0.001; Fig. 1a) and rectal (5-year OS rate: 64.5% vs. 72.3%, p<0.001; Fig. 1b)cancer than patients with normal ALP levels., Conclusions: Elevated preoperative ALP levels was not only associated with liver disease, but it was alsorelated with advanced tumor status, and indicated a poor survival in colon and rectal cancer patients.

The quantitative relationship between serum albumin level and surgical outcomes has not been clearly established. This study included 3732 patients with colon cancer who underwent a potentially curative colectomy. Post-operative mortality and morbidity were analysed according to the patients' demographic data, pre-operative comorbidities, and tumour-related factors. Age, asthma, renal impairment, and albumin level were significantly associated with post-operative morbidity and mortality in the multivariate analyses. Logistic regression analysis revealed linear relationships of post-operative morbidity and mortality with albumin level. The morbidity and mortality rates decreased by 7.3% and 15.6%, respectively, for each 0.1 g/dL increase in albumin level. This finding remained significant in the hypoalbuminaemia subgroup but not in the normoalbuminaemia subgroup. That is, the morbidity and mortality rates significantly decreased by 8.7% and 17.7%, respectively (both P < 0.001), in the former group and decreased by 2.7% (P = 0.112) and 11.6% (P = 0.092), respectively, in the latter group. This study demonstrated that serum albumin level linearly predicted the post-operative morbidity and mortality among the colorectal cancer patients. Pre-operative serum albumin level may therefore be used as a continuous rather than a categorical marker of disease severity, especially among patients with hypoalbuminaemia., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been proven as a prognostic marker for metastatic colorectal cancer (m-CRC) patients. However, the currently available techniques for capturing and enumerating CTCs lack of required sensitivity to be applicable as a prognostic marker for non-metastatic patients as CTCs are even more rare. We have developed a microfluidic device utilizing antibody-conjugated non-fouling coating to eliminate nonspecific binding and to promote the multivalent binding of target cells. We then established the correlation of CTC counts and neoplasm progression through applying this platform to capture and enumerate CTCs in 2 mL of peripheral blood from healthy (n = 27), benign (n = 21), non-metastatic (n = 95), and m-CRC (n = 15) patients. The results showed that the CTC counts progressed from 0, 1, 5, to 36. Importantly, after 2-year follow-up on the non-metastatic CRC patients, we found that those who had ≥5 CTCs were 8 times more likely to develop distant metastasis within one year after curable surgery than those who had <5. In conclusion, by employing a sensitive device, CTC counts show good correlation with colorectal neoplasm, thus CTC may be as a simple, independent prognostic marker for the non-metastatic CRC patients who are at high risk of early recurrence.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with distinct morphological patterns. It has been shown that polypoid and ulcerative CRC displays different genetic alterations. In the present study, we aimed to investigate genes with differential expression patterns between ulcerative and polypoid CRC. cDNA microarray analysis was performed to compare the gene expression profiles in samples of ulcerative and polypoid CRC with paired normal mucosa samples. Potential candidate genes were further validated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. The epigenetic regulation of gene expression was investigated using methylation-specific PCR (MSP). cDNA microarray analysis identified 11 upregulated and 14 downregulated genes which were differentially expressed in samples from both tumor types compared to the matched normal mucosa samples. Among these, S100P was the only upregulated gene preferentially associated with polypoid CRC (P=0.032). The samples of polypoid CRC displayed significantly higher S100P protein and mRNA expression levels than the samples of ulcerative CRC (P<0.05, respectively). Using semi-quantitative immunohistochemical analyses, S100P overexpression was found to be preferentially associated with polypoid CRC (24/30 vs. 14/40, P<0.001). The relative methylation level determined by MSP did not differ significantly between the samples of polypoid and ulcerative CRC (43.36 vs. 49.10%, P=0.168), indicating that promoter hypomethylation was not directly related to the upregulation of S100P mRNA. Our results demonstrate that the upregulation of S100P mRNA and protein expression is a predominant characteristic in polypoid CRC, whereas ulcerative CRC presents with a wide range of expression levels, indicating that S100P overexpression is not a key determinant in conferring invasion properties. The clinicopathological significance of S100P in CRC requires further investigation in well-controlled studies.

Background: The cancer cell secretome has been recognized as a valuable reservoir for identifying novel serum/plasma biomarkers for different cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to verify four CRC cell-secreted proteins (tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2/trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TACSTD2/TROP2), tetraspanin-6 (TSPAN6), bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST2), and tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 16 (NGFR)) as potential plasma CRC biomarkers., Methods: The study population comprises 152 CRC patients and 152 controls. Target protein levels in plasma and tissue samples were assessed by ELISA and immunohistochemistry, respectively., Results: Among the four candidate proteins examined by ELISA in a small sample set, only BST2 showed significantly elevated plasma levels in CRC patients versus controls. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed the overexpression of BST2 in CRC tissues, and higher BST2 expression levels correlated with poorer 5-year survival (46.47% versus 65.57%; p = 0.044). Further verification confirmed the elevated plasma BST2 levels in CRC patients (2.35 ± 0.13 ng/mL) versus controls (1.04 ± 0.03 ng/mL) (p < 0.01), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) being 0.858 comparable to that of CEA (0.867)., Conclusion: BST2, a membrane protein selectively detected in CRC cell secretome, may be a novel plasma biomarker and prognosticator for CRC.

Background: This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic factors of chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection., Methods: From 1996 to 2001, 1,054 patients with primary single colorectal cancer underwent curative resection. Seven hundred sixteen patients received various 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, including oral and intravenous treatments. The chemotherapy-related parameters examined included therapeutic duration, frequency, route of administration, composition of combination therapies, and postoperative time interval from the operation to the start of chemotherapy., Results: The therapeutic duration and postoperative time interval of starting therapy were independent prognostic factors, in addition to clinicopathological factors. The 8-year cancer-specific/overall survival rates in patients who received chemotherapy for >4 months (63.0/58.6%) were significantly higher than the rates in patients who received no chemotherapy (56.7/37.7%, P < 0.01) and those who remained on chemotherapy for 1-4 months (49.4/41.9%, P < 0.05). The 8-year cancer-specific/overall survival rates in patients who waited 1-5 weeks after surgery to receive chemotherapy (62.9/58.5%) were significantly higher versus rates in those who did not receive chemotherapy (56.7/37.7%) and those who did not receive chemotherapy until >5 weeks after surgery (52.3/45.9%) (both P < 0.05). Survival rates did not differ between patients who did not undergo chemotherapy, those for whom chemotherapy lasted 1-4 months, and patients who did not receive chemotherapy until >5 weeks after surgery., Conclusions: The appropriate duration of therapy and early chemotherapy after surgery were 2 of the most important factors in eradicating occult cancer and effecting long-term survival benefits in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Backgrounds and Aims: To elucidate the survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy by decreasing incidence or by delaying time of tumor recurrence, we reported the long-term results of a nonrandomized prospective study comparing the adjuvant chemotherapy to no chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer., Patients: From 1991 to 1995, 463 patients with stage III colorectal cancer were divided to three groups which were no chemotherapy, weekly chemotherapy, and monthly chemotherapy (5-FU plus levamisole)., Results: The recurrent incidence was significantly decreased in patients with chemotherapy (47.8% vs. 63.9% of no chemotherapy, P = 0.001), resulting into better survival. The 10-year cancer-specific and overall survival rates of patients with chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy were 52.1% vs. 37.8% and 46.9% vs. 29.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Weekly chemotherapy had better survival than monthly chemotherapy (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrent time or types between the patients with and without chemotherapy. The percentages of patients with recurrence happened within 3 years were 85.2% and 84.6% of those with and without chemotherapy, respectively. Patients with advanced stage of T4b invasion depth, N2, and central node invasion had no significant survival benefits by adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusions: Long-term survival benefits achieved by adjuvant chemotherapy is through decreasing recurrent incidence, not through postponing tumor recurrent time. That means adjuvant chemotherapy indeed cures some patients by eradicating occult tumor. In adjuvant setting, more powerful regimen for eradicating occult tumor is the keystone to improve long-term survival of stage III colorectal cancer.

Unlabelled: BACKGROUND /AIMS: The aim of this study was to calculate the prevalence of elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA levels in them., Methodology: Between 1995 and 2005, 8,861 consecutive patients were enrolled from a prospective database. CEA =5ng/mL was defined as elevated CEA., Results: In the multivariate analysis, elevated preoperative CEA correlated with higher ages, circumferential tumors, colon tumors, large tumors, liver metastasis and high-stage (AJCC) tumors. After a 44-month median follow-up, elevated CEA was found to be an independent prognostic factor (odds ratio = 1.61) for overall survival in all 4 stages of the disease. The survival among patients with stage I tumors and elevated CEA (5-year survival rate = 74.7%) was not greater than that among patients with stage II tumors and no CEA elevation (5-year survival rate = 80.8%)., Conclusions: Elevated preoperative CEA correlated with a higher age, circumferential tumors, colon tumors, large tumors, liver metastasis, and high-stage (AJCC) tumors. Elevated preoperative CEA indicates a potential poor prognosis even in early stage tumors. This poorer prognosis in the patients with stage I tumors and elevated preoperative CEA was not cancer specific.

Background and Aims: The role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the early detection of recurrence during the postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer remains unclear. We hypothesize that the tumor with longer lead time of CEA elevation to the definite recurrence may have a better prognosis because of its slower growth rate and closer observation., Materials and Methods: From 1995 to 2003, 4,841 consecutive patients who received curative resection of localized colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled from a prospective database. The patients with persisting CEA elevation after operation had been already excluded. Postoperative follow-up, including physical examination, imaging, and CEA test, were performed according to a surveillance program. A CEA >/=5 ng/mL was defined as elevated. The definition of the CEA lead time was the period between CEA elevation and detection of recurrence. All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS package for Windows (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA)., Results: The postoperative median follow-up time for the 4,841 patients was 68 months. A total of 999 patients (20.6%) had CEA elevation and recurrence. Among these patients, recurrence was confirmed in 727 patients (72.8%)before, at the same time, or within 3 months of CEA elevation and thus had a short lead time of CEA elevation (SLT group). In 272 patients (27.2%), recurrence was confirmed after more than 3 months of CEA elevation and thus had a longer lead time of CEA elevation (LLT group). The recurrence pattern showed similarities in these two groups. A total of 193 patients (193/999, 19.3%) received a second radical operation, and 806 patients (80.7%) were inoperable. The re-resection rate between the SLT group (146 patients, 20.1%) and the LLT group (47 patients, 17.3%) was not significantly different. The overall survival rate after recurrence showed no difference between these two groups (P = 0.123)., Conclusion: Most cases of recurrence were detected at nearly the same time when the CEA level was elevated. Therefore, a more sensitive test is needed for early detection. The relationship between the lead time of CEA and the clinical outcome was not statistically significant. A more aggressive approach to the patient who has CEA elevation and is highly suspect of recurrence may be needed.

Purpose: To compare survival and histologic features of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; Lynch syndrome) cases to well-matched sporadic colon cancers from the same patient population., Experimental Design: Between January 1995 and March 2002, a total of 5,138 consecutive patients underwent resection of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma in a single institution. According to the Amsterdam criteria, 56 HNPCC patients were matched to 147 sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC) with no family history of cancer and with the same gender, tumor location, and age within 3 years. Immunohistochemical analyses were done for MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, and MUC5AC., Results: The HNPCC group had a marginally significantly better long-term outcome than the SCRC group (P = 0.058). The trend disappeared after adjustment by tumor-node-metastasis stage in a Cox model (P = 0.774). We noted a difference of >50% in the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of HNPCC- and SCRC-mucinous groups (92% versus 31%, P = 0.0003). Interaction between mucin and HNPCC and its effects on survival were further confirmed by comparing the Cox models with and without interaction terms (hazard ratio, 0.1; P = 0.034 with adjusting stage). Patients with tumors showing dual expression of mucin and MUC1, which appeared in 11% of those with HNPCC and 50% of those with SCRC, had a lower 5-year cancer-specific survival rate than patients without (30% versus 60%; P = 0.004 by log-rank test; P = 0.039 with adjustment for tumor-node-metastasis stage)., Conclusions: These results suggest that mucin has an inverse effect on survival in patients with HNPCC and SCRC, which might be partly explained by a lower prevalence of MUC1 expression in the mucinous HNPCC group than in the SCRC groups.

Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor and nitric oxide are both related to tumor progression. This study was designed to measure preoperative plasma vascular endothelial growth factor and nitrite levels in patients with colorectal cancer to evaluate their clinical applications as tumor markers., Methods: In total, 279 patients with primary colorectal cancer and 20 patients with hemorrhoids (as a control) were included in this study. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor was measured by quantitative, solid-phase, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems), whereas nitrite was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatographic method., Results: The vascular endothelial growth factor (mean, 220.6 pg/ml, P < 0.005) and nitrite (mean, 29.4 microM, P = 0.043) levels of patients with cancer were significantly higher than those of controls (mean vascular endothelial growth factor, 67 pg/ml; mean nitrite, 23 microM). Preoperative plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels were positively correlated with tumor stage, T class, M class, and tumor size (Spearman correlation, P < 0.01), but were not associated with gender, N class, tumor location, histology type, or grade. There were no statistical differences in nitrite levels among different groups of patients with cancer. Higher vascular endothelial growth factor levels also were correlated with leukocytosis, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen, and a higher platelet count. The positive rates of vascular endothelial growth factor elevation (>148.6 pg/ml) compared with carcinoembryonic antigen elevation were 36.9 to 14.6 percent in Stage I, 60.9 to 33 percent in Stage II, 62.9 to 48.7 percent in Stage III, and 86 to 70.2 percent in Stage IV, respectively. The overall positive rate of vascular endothelial growth factor elevation also was higher than that of carcinoembryonic antigen elevation (63 percent for vascular endothelial growth factor vs. 42.5 percent for carcinoembryonic antigen, P = 0.016). More than one-half of the patients without carcinoembryonic antigen elevation still had elevated vascular endothelial growth factor levels. The combined assessment using vascular endothelial growth factor and carcinoembryonic antigen was superior to individual assessment using vascular endothelial growth factor or carcinoembryonic antigen. In node-negative tumor, the patients with vascular endothelial growth factor elevation had worse disease-free survival than those without vascular endothelial growth factor elevation (P = 0.0367). There was no association of vascular endothelial growth factor elevation with survival in patients with node-positive tumor., Conclusions: Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor is a useful complementary tumor marker; however, synchronous measurement of white blood cells, platelets, and carcinoembryonic antigen is suggested in the clinical application of vascular endothelial growth factor to colorectal cancer.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detecting local recurrence of colorectal cancer., Methods: From January 2000 to December 2004, 434 patients after potentially curative resection for invasive colorectal cancer were followed up for a period ranging from 20 to 55 mo. Eighty of the four hundred and thirty-four patients showing strong clinical evidence for recurring colorectal cancer during the last follow-up were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy on the same day. Any lesions, biopsies, identified during the colonoscopic examination, immediate complications and the duration of the procedure were recorded. The results of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography were evaluated by comparing to those of colonoscopy, surgical finding, and clinical follow-up., Results: Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 83% and an overall accuracy of 94% in detecting local recurrent colorectal cancer., Conclusion: Conventional colonoscopy and contrast-enhanced tomographic colonography can complement each other in detecting local recurrence of colorectal cancer.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with 5-FU-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer., Methods: A total of 39 patients with documented 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled. All 39 patients had previously received weekly high-dose 5-FU/LV (2,600 mg/m(2) 5-FU plus 100 mg/m(2) LV as 24-hour infusion) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was delivered as an intravenous infusion over 2 h on days 1 and 15, while 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)) and LV (20 mg/m(2)) were administered as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8 and 15. One treatment course consisted of 3 consecutive weeks of therapy followed by a 1-week rest., Results: In an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate for the 39 patients was 20.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.2-33.8%). The disease was stable in 19 patients (48.7%), and progressive in 11 (28.2%). The median survival for all 39 patients was 8.9 months. The median time to progression was 5.0 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in only 1 patient (2.6%), and grade 2 and 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 10 (25.6%) and 5 (12.8%) patients, respectively., Conclusion: Oxaliplatin in combination with weekly bolus 5-FU/LV is also active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer where first-line treatment has failed., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered on a biweekly schedule and in combination with fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the toxicity profile and antitumor activity of this regimen for pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A total of 26 patients with documented fluoropyrimidine-resistant, advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled into this phase I study. Fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was delivered as an i.v. infusion over 2 h, followed by LV (20 mg/m2) and 5-FU bolus every 2 weeks. The starting dose of 5-FU was 600 mg/m2, which was then incremented by 100 mg/m2 for each dose level. The DLT was determined for the first two treatment cycles, while toxicity and efficacy were evaluated throughout treatment. Six dose levels were tested. The MTD of 5-FU was deemed to be 1000 mg/m2 since dose-limiting fatigue was noted for three of the five-patient cohort during the first two cycles of chemotherapy at dose level 6. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities during the study were neutropenia, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and neuropathy. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 30.8% (95% confidence interval 11.8-49.8%) for the 26 patients. The combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks is a feasible and effective treatment at the recommended dosages. A phase II study, to more-precisely define activity and toxicity, is ongoing., (Copyright 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)