Search

Background: Early predictors of postoperative complications can risk-stratify patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. However, conventional regression models have limited power to identify complex nonlinear relationships among a large set of variables. We developed artificial neural network models to optimize the prediction of major postoperative complications and risk of readmission in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery., Objective: This study aimed to develop an artificial neural network model to predict postoperative complications using postoperative laboratory values and compare the accuracy of models to standard regression methods., Design: This retrospective study included patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer resection between January 1, 2016, and July 31, 2021. Clinical data, cancer stage, and laboratory data from postoperative days 1 to 3 were collected. Complications and readmission risk models were created using multivariable logistic regression and single-layer neural networks., Setting: National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center., Patients: Adult patients with colorectal cancer., Main Outcome Measures: The accuracy of predicting postoperative major complications, readmissions, and anastomotic leaks using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve., Results: Neural networks had larger areas under the curve for predicting major complications compared to regression models (neural network 0.811; regression model 0.724, p < 0.001). Neural networks also showed an advantage in predicting anastomotic leak ( p = 0.036) and readmission using postoperative day 1 to 2 values ( p = 0.014)., Limitations: Single-center, retrospective design limited to cancer operations., Conclusions: In this study, we generated a set of models for the early prediction of complications after colorectal surgery. The neural network models provided greater discrimination than the models based on traditional logistic regression. These models may allow for early detection of postoperative complications as early as postoperative day 2. See the Video Abstract ., Prediccin Post Operatoria Temprana De Complicaciones Y Reingreso Despus De La Ciruga De Cncer Colorrectal Mediante Una Red Neuronal Artificial: ANTECEDENTES:Los predictores tempranos de complicaciones postoperatorias pueden estratificar el riesgo de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer colorrectal. Sin embargo, los modelos de regresión convencionales tienen un poder limitado para identificar relaciones no lineales complejas entre un gran conjunto de variables. Desarrollamos modelos de redes neuronales artificiales para optimizar la predicción de complicaciones postoperatorias importantes y riesgo de reingreso en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar un modelo de red neuronal artificial para predecir complicaciones postoperatorias utilizando valores de laboratorio postoperatorios y comparar la precisión de estos modelos con los métodos de regresión estándar.DISEÑO:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó a pacientes que se sometieron a resección electiva de cáncer colorrectal entre el 1 de enero de 2016 y el 31 de julio de 2021. Se recopilaron datos clínicos, estadio del cáncer y datos de laboratorio del día 1 al 3 posoperatorio. Se crearon modelos de complicaciones y riesgo de reingreso mediante regresión logística multivariable y redes neuronales de una sola capa.AJUSTE:Instituto Nacional del Cáncer designado Centro Oncológico Integral.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos con cáncer colorrectal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Precisión de la predicción de complicaciones mayores postoperatorias, reingreso y fuga anastomótica utilizando el área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor.RESULTADOS:Las redes neuronales tuvieron áreas bajo la curva más grandes para predecir complicaciones importantes en comparación con los modelos de regresión (red neuronal 0,811; modelo de regresión 0,724, p < 0,001). Las redes neuronales también mostraron una ventaja en la predicción de la fuga anastomótica ( p = 0,036) y el reingreso utilizando los valores del día 1-2 postoperatorio ( p = 0,014).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo de un solo centro limitado a operaciones de cáncer.CONCLUSIONES:En este estudio, generamos un conjunto de modelos para la predicción temprana de complicaciones después de la cirugía colorrectal. Los modelos de redes neuronales proporcionaron una mayor discriminación que los modelos basados en regresión logística tradicional. Estos modelos pueden permitir la detección temprana de complicaciones posoperatorias tan pronto como el segundo día posoperatorio. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.)

Introduction: In colorectal cancer, the presence of para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) indicates extraregional disease. Appropriately selecting patients for whom PALN dissection will provide oncologic benefit remains challenging. This study identified factors to predict survival among patients undergoing PALN dissection for colorectal cancer., Methods: An institutional database was queried for patients who underwent curative-intent resection of clinically positive PALN for colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2020. Preoperative radiologic images were reviewed, and patients who did and did not have positive PALN on final pathology were compared. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of pathologically positive PALN on recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Of 74 patients who underwent PALN dissection, 51 had PALN metastasis at the time of primary tumor diagnosis, whereas 23 had metachronous PALN disease. Preoperative chemotherapy ± radiotherapy was given in 60 cases (81.1%), and 28 (37.8%) had pathologically positive PALN. Independent factors associated with positive PALN pathology included metachronous PALN disease and pretreatment and posttreatment radiographically abnormal PALN. On multivariable analysis, pathologically positive PALN was significantly associated with decreased RFS (hazard ratio 3.90) and OS (HR 4.49). Among patients with pathologically positive PALN, well/moderately differentiated histology was associated with better OS, and metachronous disease trended toward an association with better OS., Conclusions: Pathologically positive PALN are associated with poorer RFS and OS after PALN dissection for colorectal cancer. Clinicopathologic factors may predict pathologic PALN positivity. Curative-intent surgery may provide benefit, especially in patients with well-to-moderately differentiated primary tumors and possibly metachronous PALN disease., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The identification of tumor deposits (TD) currently plays a limited role in staging for colorectal cancer (CRC) aside from N1c lymph node designation. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic impact, beyond American Joint Committee on Cancer N1c designation, of TDs among patients with primary CRC., Methods: Patients who had resected stage I-III primary CRC diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) stratified by TD status and lymph node (N) status was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses., Results: In total, 147,783 patients with primary CRC were identified. TDs were present in 15,444 patients (10.5%). The presence of TDs was significantly associated with adverse tumor characteristics, including advanced pathologic stage, nodal status, and metastasis status. The presence of TDs was associated with worse CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.02-3.22), as it was for each given N category (e.g., N2a and TD-negative [HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 2.37-2.64] vs. N2a and TD-positive [HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 3.49-4.03]). The presence of multiple TDs was also associated with decreased CSS for each given N category compared with a single TD (e.g. N2a with one TD [HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.65-3.61] vs. N2a with two or more TDs [HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 3.87-4.82])., Conclusions: TDs were identified as an independent predictor of a worse outcome in patients with CRC. The presence of TDs confers distinctly different CSS and provides important prognostic information among patients with CRC and warrants further investigation as a unique variable in future iterations of CRC staging., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Aim: As multidisciplinary treatment strategies for colorectal cancer have improved, aggressive surgical resection has become commonplace. Multivisceral and extended resections offer curative-intent resection with significant survival benefit. However, limited data exist regarding the feasibility and oncological efficacy of performing extended resection via a minimally invasive approach. The aim of this study was to determine the perioperative and long-term outcomes following robotic extended resection for colorectal cancer., Method: We describe the population of patients undergoing robotic multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer at our single institution. We evaluated perioperative details and investigated short- and long-term outcomes, using the Kaplan-Meier method to analyse overall and recurrence-free survival., Results: Among the 86 patients most tumours were T3 (47%) or T4 (47%) lesions in the rectum (78%). Most resections involved the anterior compartment (72%): bladder (n = 13), seminal vesicle/vas deferens (n = 27), ureter (n = 6), prostate (n = 15) and uterus/vagina/adnexa (n = 27). Three cases required conversion to open surgery; 10 patients had grade 3 complications. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Resections were R0 (>1 mm) in 78 and R1 (0 to ≤1 mm) in 8, with none being R2. The average nodal yield was 26 and 48 (55.8%) were pN0. Three-year overall survival was 88% and median progression-free survival was 19.4 months. Local recurrence was 6.1% and distant recurrence was 26.1% at 3 years., Conclusion: Performance of multivisceral and extended resection on the robotic platform allows patients the benefit of minimally invasive surgery while achieving oncologically sound resection of colorectal cancer., (© 2024 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

We aimed to evaluate the practice and the associated outcomes of surgical treatment for young-onset colorectal cancer (YOCRC) patients presenting with synchronous liver metastases. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to surgery date: 131 patients in the early era (EE, 1998-2011) and 179 in the contemporary era (CE, 2012-2020). The CE had a higher rate of node-positive primary tumors, higher carcinoembryonic antigen level, and lower rate of RAS/BRAF mutations. The CE had higher rates of reverse or combined resection, multi-drug prehepatectomy chemotherapy, and two-stage hepatectomy. The median survival was 8.4 years in the CE and 4.3 years in the EE (p = 0.011). On multivariate analysis, hepatectomy in the CE was independently associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.48, p = 0.001). With a combination of perioperative systemic therapy, careful selection of treatment approach, and coordinated resections, durable cure can be achieved in YOCRC patients., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population., Methods: Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors., Results: A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059)., Conclusions: Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Objectives: For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the lung is the most common extra-abdominal site of distant metastasis. However, practices for chest imaging after colorectal resection vary widely. We aimed to identify characteristics that may indicate a need for early follow-up imaging., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent CRC resection, collecting clinicopathologic details and oncologic outcomes. Patients were grouped by timing of pulmonary metastases (PM) development. Analyses were performed to investigate odds ratio (OR) of PM diagnosis within 3 months of CRC resection., Results: Of 1600 patients with resected CRC, 233 (14.6%) developed PM, at a median of 15.4 months following CRC resection. Univariable analyses revealed age, receipt of systemic therapy, lymph node ratio (LNR), lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and KRAS mutation as risk factors for PM. Furthermore, multivariable regression showed neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 2.99, p < 0.001), adjuvant therapy (OR: 6.28, p < 0.001), LNR (OR: 28.91, p < 0.001), and KRAS alteration (OR: 5.19, p < 0.001) to predict PM within 3 months post-resection., Conclusions: We identified clinicopathologic characteristics that predict development of PM within 3 months after primary CRC resection. Early surveillance in such patients should be emphasized to ensure timely identification and treatment of PM., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (IO) is emerging as a therapeutic option for patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) given high pathological response rates. The aim of the study was to characterise imaging and endoscopic response to IO., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with localised dMMR CRC that received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy was conducted. Endoscopy, imaging, and pathological outcomes were reviewed to determine response to treatment according to standardised criteria., Results: Thirty-eight patients had received IO for the treatment of localised CRC (median eight cycles). Among evaluable cases (n = 31 for endoscopy and n = 34 for imaging), the best endoscopic response was complete response (CR) in 45% of cases, and the best radiographic response was CR in 23% of cases. Imaging CR rate after ≤4 cycles of IO (n = 1) was 6% compared to 44% after >4 IO cycles (n = 7). Among 28 patients with imaging and endoscopy available, a discrepancy in best response was noted in 15 (54%) cases. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months from IO start, 18 patients underwent surgical resection of which 11 (61%) had pathological CR (pCR). Despite pCR or no evidence of progression ≥6 months after completion of IO among non-operatively managed patients, 72% and 42% of patients had non-CR on imaging and endoscopy, respectively., Conclusions: Discrepancies between imaging and endoscopy are prevalent, and irregularities identified on these modalities can be identified despite pathological remission. Improved clinical response criteria are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Tsuyoshi Konishi: travel, accommodations, expenses – advent health; Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav: Honoraria - Bayer; Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca; Eisai; Merck; Seagen. Consulting or advisory role – Bayer; Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca; Eisai; Merck; Seagen. Research funding – Abbvie (Inst); Abbvie (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca (Inst); Eisai (Inst); Guardant Health (Inst); HiberCell (Inst); Innovent Biologics (Inst); Janssen (Inst); Merck Serono (Inst); Roche/Genentech (Inst); UCB (Inst); Xencor (Inst). Phillip S. Ge: consulting or advisory role – Alira Health; Boston Scientific; Neptune Medical; Ovesco Endoscopy. Benny Johnson: consulting or advisory role – Gritstone Bio; Incyte; Insmed; Pfizer; Taiho Oncology. Research funding – Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Gateway Foundation (Inst); Syntrix Biosystems (Inst). Van K. Morris: consulting or advisory role – Axiom Healthcare Strategies; Bicara Therapeutics; BioMedical Insights; Boehringer Ingelheim; Incyte. Research funding – Bicara Therapeutics (Inst); BioNTech (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); EMD Serono (Inst); Immatics; Pfizer (Inst). Scott Kopetz: stock and other ownership interests – Frontier Medicines; Iylon; Lutris; Navire; Xilis. Consulting or advisory role – Abbvie; Accademia Nazionale Di Medicina; Amal Therapeutics; Amgen; Astra Zeneca/MedImmune; Bayer Health; Bicara Therapeutics; Black Diamond Therapeutics; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Medarex; Cardiff Oncology; Carina Biotech; CureTeq; EMD Serono; Endeavor BioMedicines; Flame Biosciences; Foundation Medicine; Frontier Medicines; Genentech; Genomic Health; Gilead Sciences; GlaxoSmithKline; HalioDx; Harbinger Oncology, Inc; Holy Stone Healthcare; Inivata; Ipsen; Iylon; Jacobio; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Johnson & Johnson/Janssen; Lilly; Lutris; Merck; Mirati Therapeutics; NeoGenomics Laboratories; Novartis; Numab; Ono Pharmaceutical; Pfizer; Redx Pharma; Repare Therapeutics; Replimune; Servier; Taiho Pharmaceutical; Takeda; Tempus; Xilis; Zentalis. Research funding – Amgen; Array BioPharma; Biocartis; Daiichi Sankyo; EMD Serono; Genentech/Roche; Guardant Health; Lilly; MedImmune; Novartis; Sanofi. George J. Chang: consulting or advisory role – Medicaroid. Kaysia Ludford: research funding – Merck (Inst). Michael J. Overman: consulting or advisory role – 3D Medicines; Array BioPharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Gritstone Bio; Janssen; Janssen; MedImmune; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Pfizer; Promega; Roche/Genentech; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Research funding – Bristol-Myers Squibb; MedImmune; Merck; Roche. The remining authors do not have any disclosures., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Colorectal cancer is being increasingly diagnosed in people younger than 50 years. An inheritable cancer predisposition has been reported in 22% of the young-onset cases. Assessment of germline risk is critical for personalized cancer care., Objective: The study aimed to implement universal germline cancer risk assessment and testing and to define the germline cancer risk profiles of patients presenting with young-onset disease., Design: This is a prospective cohort study., Settings: This study was conducted at a tertiary-referral academic medical center., Patients: This study included newly diagnosed patients presenting to surgical clinics between September 2019 and February 2021 who were treated on a standardized care pathway including the universal germline risk assessment., Interventions: Patients received educational material on young-onset disease, genetic testing, and insurance coverage followed by genetic counseling (either remotely by telegenetics or in person). Consenting patients were assessed on a 47-gene common hereditary cancer panel., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was a proportion of patients with identifiable germline cancer predisposition., Results: Among 500 patients with colorectal cancer, 185 (37%) were 50 years of age or younger (median: 44). A family history was absent for the majority of patients (123; 67%), and in 15 patients, tumors (8.1%) were deficient in DNA mismatch repair. Germline testing was completed in 130 patients (70%); the remainder were pending (7%), deceased (1%), or declined (22%). Pathogenic germline mutations were identified in 25 of 130 (19%) patients: 12 in mismatch repair genes and 13 in other genes. A variant of uncertain significance was found in 23 (18%) patients. Importantly, a pathogenic germline mutation was identified in 12% of the patients without a family history (versus 32% with; p = 0.015) and in 13% of those with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancers (versus 71% if deficient; p < 0.001)., Limitations: The study is limited by its implementation at a single tertiary academic institution., Conclusions: One in 5 patients with young-onset disease harbored germline cancer predisposition. This detection rate, coupled with a high level of interest and acceptance from patients and feasibility of implementation, supports universal germline cancer risk assessment in this patient population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B925 ., Perfiles De Riesgo De Cncer De Lnea Germinal De Pacientes Con Cncer Colorrectal De Inicio Joven Hallazgos De Un Programa Universal Prospectivo De Pruebas De Lnea Germinal Y Telegentica: ANTECEDENTES:El cáncer colorrectal se diagnostica cada vez más en personas menores de 50 años. Se ha informado una predisposición hereditaria al cáncer en el 22 % de los casos de aparición temprana. La evaluación del riesgo de la línea germinal es fundamental para la atención personalizada del cáncer.OBJETIVO:Implementar la evaluación y las pruebas universales de riesgo de cáncer de línea germinal, y definir los perfiles de riesgo de cáncer de línea germinal de los pacientes que presentan una enfermedad de aparición temprana.DISEÑO:Un estudio de cohorte prospectivo.AJUSTE:Un centro médico académico de referencia terciaria.PACIENTES:Los pacientes recién diagnosticados que se presentaron en clínicas quirúrgicas entre Septiembre de 2019 y Febrero de 2021 fueron tratados en una vía de atención estandarizada que incluye una evaluación de riesgo de línea germinal universal.INTERVENCIÓN:Los pacientes recibieron material educativo sobre enfermedades de aparición temprana, pruebas genéticas y cobertura de seguro, seguido de asesoramiento genético (ya sea a distancia por telegenética o en persona). Los pacientes que dieron su consentimiento fueron evaluados en un panel de cánceres hereditarios comunes de 47 genes.MEDIDA DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:Proporción de pacientes con predisposición identificable al cáncer de línea germinal.RESULTADOS:Entre 500 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal, 185 (37%) tenían 50 años o menos (mediana: 44). No había antecedentes familiares en la mayoría (123, 67%) y 15 tumores (8,1%) eran deficientes en la reparación del desajuste de ácido desoxirribonucleico. La prueba de línea germinal se completó en 130 pacientes (70%); el resto estaban pendientes (7%), fallecidos (1%) o declinados (22%). Se identificaron mutaciones patogénicas de la línea germinal en 25 (de 130, 19%) pacientes: 12 en genes de reparación de errores de emparejamiento y 13 en otros genes. Se encontró una variante de significado incierto en 23 (18%) pacientes. Es importante señalar que se identificó una mutación germinal patogénica en el 12% de los pacientes sin antecedentes familiares (frente al 32% con; p = 0,015) y en el 13% de aquellos con cánceres colorrectales competentes en la reparación de errores de emparejamiento (frente al 71% si eran deficientes; p < 0,001).LIMITACIÓN:Implementado en una sola institución académica terciaria.CONCLUSIÓN:Uno de cada cinco pacientes con enfermedad de inicio joven albergaba predisposición al cáncer de línea germinal. Esta tasa de detección, junto con un alto nivel de interés y aceptación por parte de los pacientes y la viabilidad de la implementación, respaldan la evaluación universal del riesgo de cáncer de línea germinal en esta población de pacientes. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B925 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

Background: Simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and primary colorectal cancers (CRC) is nuanced without firm rules for selection. This study aimed to identify factors associated with morbidity after simultaneous resection., Methods: Using a prospective database, patients undergoing simultaneous CLM-CRC resection from 1/1/2017-7/1/2020 were analyzed. Regression modeling estimated impact of colorectal resection type, Kawaguchi-Gayet (KG) hepatectomy complexity, and perioperative factors on 90-day complications., Results: Overall, 120 patients underwent simultaneous CLM-CRC resection. Grade≥2 complications occurred in 38.3% (n = 46); these patients experienced longer length of stay (median LOS 7.5 vs. 4, p < 0.001) and increased readmission (39% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients with zero or Grade 1 complications. Median OR time was 298 min. Patients within highest operative time quartile (>506 min) had higher grade≥2 complications (57%vs. 23%, p = 0.04) and greater than 4-fold increased odds of grade≥2 morbidity (OR 4.3, 95% CI (Confidence Interval) 1.41-13.1, p = 0.01). After adjusting for Pringle time, KG complexity and colorectal resection type, increasing operative time was associated with grade≥2 complications, especially for resections in highest quartile of operative time (OR 7.28, 95% CI 1.73-30.6, p = 0.007)., Conclusion: In patients undergoing simultaneous CLM-CRC resection, prolonged operative time is independently associated with grade≥2 complications. Awareness of cumulative operative time may inform intraoperative decision-making by surgical teams., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignancy that usually occurs in older age individuals. However, CRC cases in young adults are on the rise, and this increase is expected to continue. Young adult CRC requires the healthcare team to familiarize themselves with the unique needs of this population, including concerns about treatment-related infertility. We performed a retrospective review to determine how often our patients, 18-39 years old (yo), had discussions regarding fertility preservation prior to starting stage III CRC treatment., Methods: Our electronic health record was utilized to identify adult patients < 40 yo with a stage III CRC diagnosis during 1/1/2015-9/1/2019. Fertility preservation discussions were determined by searching the patient's EHR chart. Progress notes from the medical oncology, surgery, and/or radiation oncology teams were reviewed. Additionally, notes from our fertility specialist's team were reviewed when consulted., Results: One hundred and three patients met criteria. Patients were 21-39 yo at diagnosis (median age of 34 yo). Fifty-two percent were male while the remaining 48% were female. Forty-six percent had stage III colon cancer while 54% had stage III rectal cancer. Search terms and progress notes were utilized to determine if discussions were documented. Fertility discussions were documented in 73% of cases while 27% of patients lacked documentation regarding fertility., Conclusion: Our results show that most of our young adult stage III CRC population participate in fertility preservation discussions. However, in order to capture all patients, we recognize that a more formal approach is warranted. We additionally recommend these discussions occur with all patients of child-bearing age., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Genomic profiling of colorectal cancer aims to identify actionable somatic mutations but can also discover incidental germline findings., Objective: The purpose of this study was to report the detection of pathogenic germline variants that confer heritable cancer predisposition., Design: This was a retrospective study., Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary-referral institution., Patients: Between 2012 and 2015, 1000 patients with advanced cancer underwent targeted exome sequencing of a 202-gene panel. The subgroup of 151 patients with advanced colorectal cancer who underwent matched tumor-normal (blood) sequencing formed our study cohort., Interventions: Germline variants in 46 genes associated with hereditary cancer predisposition were classified according to a defined algorithm based on in silico predictions of pathogenicity. Patients with presumed pathogenic variants were examined for type of mutation, as well as clinical, pedigree, and clinical genetic testing data., Main Outcome Measures: We measured detection of pathogenic germline variants., Results: A total of 1910 distinct germline variants were observed in 151 patients. After filtering, 15 pathogenic germline variants (9.9%) were found in 15 patients, arising from 9 genes of varying penetrance for colorectal cancer (APC (n = 2; 13%), ATM (n = 1; 6%), BRCA1 (n = 2; 13%), CDH1 (n = 2; 13%), CHEK2 (n = 4; 27%), MSH2 (n = 1; 7%), MSH6 (n = 1; 7%), NF2 (n = 1; 7%), and TP53 (n = 1; 7%)). Patients with pathogenic variants were diagnosed at a younger age than those without (median, 45 vs 52 y; p = 0.03). Of the 15 patients, 7 patients (46.7%) with variants in low/moderate- penetrant genes for colorectal cancer would likely have not been tested based on clinical and pedigree criteria, where 2 harbored clinically actionable variants (CDH1 and NF2, 28.5% of 7)., Limitations: This study was limited by its small sample size and advanced-stage patients., Conclusions: Tumor-normal sequencing can incidentally discover clinically unsuspected germline variants that confer cancer predisposition in 9.9% of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Precision medicine should integrate clinical cancer genetics to inform and interpret the actionability of germline variants and to provide follow-up care to mutation carriers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A906.

Introduction: Definitive treatment of localised colorectal cancer involves surgical resection of the primary tumour. Short-stay colectomies (eg, 23-hours) would have important implications for optimising the efficiency of inpatient care with reduced resource utilisation while improving the overall recovery experience with earlier return to normalcy. It could permit surgical treatment of colorectal cancer in a wider variety of settings, including hospital-based ambulatory surgery environments. While a few studies have shown that discharge within the first 24 hours after minimally invasive colectomy is possible, the safety, feasibility and patient acceptability of a protocol for short-stay colectomy for colorectal cancer have not previously been evaluated in a prospective randomised study. Moreover, given the potential for some patients to experience a delay in recovery of bowel function after colectomy, close outpatient monitoring may be necessary to ensure safe implementation., Methods and Analysis: In order to address this gap, we propose a prospective randomised trial of accelerated enhanced Recover y following M inimally I nvasive colorectal cancer surgery ( RecoverMI ) that leverages the combination of minimally invasive surgery with enhanced recovery protocols and early coordinated outpatient remote televideo conferencing technology ( TeleRecovery ) to improve postoperative patien-provider communication, enhance postoperative treatment navigation and optimise postdischarge care. We hypothesise that RecoverMI can be safely incorporated into multidisciplinary practice to improve patient outcomes and reduce the overall 30-day duration of hospitalisation while preserving the quality of the patient experience. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: RecoverMI has received institutional review board approval and funding from the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons (ASCRS; LPG103). Results from RecoverMI will be published in a peer-reviewed publication and be used to inform a multisite trial., Trial Registration Number: NCT02613728; Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TeleRecovery is facilitated by the exceptional service of our midlevel providers, Kelly R. Maldonado , Brianna L. Whitener, Shanae L Ivey and Erika L Schlette. This study protocol and any subsequent manuscripts will be presented in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Objective: Challenging differential diagnosis Background: Invasive cervical tumors are often seen in clinical practice. However, there are multiple structures within the pelvis, and invasion of the cervix from another site must be included in the differential diagnosis. In such cases, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to define the organ of tumor origin. Ensuring proper staging and histologic analysis are critical for optimal management. Case Report: We present a case of a 68-year-old woman who presented to her gynecologist with painless post-menopausal vaginal bleeding. She was diagnosed with a locally aggressive cervical adenocarcinoma, which was histologically confirmed by an in-office biopsy. She was referred to the gynecologic oncology service at a tertiary care hospital for definitive management, where a thorough clinical workup was performed. Physical exam revealed that the mass had invaded the anterior rectal wall. Through a multidisciplinary approach and a repeat biopsy, she was correctly diagnosed with an invasive rectal adenocarcinoma. She was treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and underwent curative surgery. Had she been incorrectly treated as having a primary cervical adenocarcinoma, there would have been no role for surgery. The change in the organ of primary drastically altered the patient’s management and outcome. She is currently undergoing surveillance with cross-sectional imaging. Conclusions: Cervical masses originating from non-gynecologic organs can be difficult to differentiate on physical exam and histologic analysis. When a mass involves the rectum, an invasive primary rectal adenocarcinoma must be included in the differential. This will have a significant impact on patient management and ultimately on patient survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]