7 results on '"Platell C"'
Search Results
2. Meat consumption and cooking practices and the risk of colorectal cancer
- Author
-
Tabatabaei, S M, Fritschi, L, Knuiman, M W, Boyle, T, Iacopetta, B J, Platell, C, and Heyworth, J S
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Cancer auditing - how accurate are your data?
- Author
-
Platell, C. and Penter, C.
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer , *MEDICAL databases , *SURGERY , *PATIENTS , *PHYSICIANS - Abstract
Aim Human involvement in the collection and entering of information into a database leads to a degree of error. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between two individuals blinded from each other who independently collected information on the same set of patients and entered it into a colorectal neoplasia database. Method A colorectal research nurse and a surgeon independently maintained an electronic database on all new patients admitted with colorectal neoplasia under the surgeon over a 5-year period. Twenty-three key endpoints were selected from the database in order to determine the agreement between the two observers. The κ statistic (for nominal and ordinal data) and the concordance correlation coefficient (for interval data) were used to determine the level of agreement between the two data sets. Results Both observers recorded 432 new referrals during this period. There was only complete concordance between the two databases with respect to the number of new patients and returns to theatre within 30 days. Nonetheless, there was almost perfect concordance between the two data sets for a majority of the endpoints. The most important areas of variance were in the length of stay (κ = 0.78), the American Society of Anesthesiology grade (κ = 0.41), emergency surgery (κ = 0.36), nodal staging (κ = 0.54) and time to recurrence (κ = 0.77). Conclusion This study highlights a number of important areas of data inaccuracy in a prospective colorectal database. The inaccuracies were due to observer bias, issues of data interpretation, or just difficulty in collecting the information accurately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The influence of a colorectal service on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer.
- Author
-
Platell, C.
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer treatment , *HEALTH outcome assessment - Abstract
Abstract Objective To perform a prospective audit of outcomes and survival of all patients presenting to a colorectal service with colorectal cancer, and to compare these results with an historical control group. Patients and methods At a community based teaching hospital, a prospective audit of outcomes and survival of patients with colorectal cancer was compared with a historical control. The study included all patients referred to a colorectal service with colorectal cancer from 1996 to 2000 (5-year period). The control group was a retrospective review of patients presenting to the same hospital with colorectal cancer from 1989 to 1994 (6-year period). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared the overall survival (all-cause mortality) between the two groups. Results When comparing the study periods 1989–95 (n = 477) to 1996–2000 (n = 323), there has been a significant reduction in postoperative stay (16.2 vs 8.0 days, P < 0.05), and a reduction in postoperative mortality (4.5%vs 2.7%, n.s.). There was a significant increase in the overall 2 years survival for patients with colorectal cancer (62% to 71%, P < 0.01). There was also a significant increase in the overall 2 years survival of patients with rectal cancer (66% to 74%, P < 0.01), patients with ACPS C colon cancers (64% to 83%, P < 0.05), and ACPS C rectal cancers (74% to 85%, P < 0.01). Conclusions There have been significant gains in the survival of patients presenting to a community based teaching hospital with colorectal cancer. These improvements have been most notable in patients with nodal metastases at the time of diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Lifestyle factors associated with survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis
- Author
-
Lin Fritschi, Cameron Platell, Terry Boyle, Jane Heyworth, Boyle, Terry, Fritschi, L, Platell, C, and Heyworth, J
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,obesity ,Colorectal cancer ,Epidemiology ,physical activity ,colorectal cancer ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Overweight ,survival ,smoking ,Body Mass Index ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Epidemiology of cancer ,medicine ,Humans ,Life Style ,030304 developmental biology ,Preventive healthcare ,Aged ,Proportional Hazards Models ,2. Zero hunger ,Gynecology ,0303 health sciences ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Smoking ,Western Australia ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Prognosis ,3. Good health ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Case-Control Studies ,Cohort ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Body mass index - Abstract
Background: Aside from tumour stage and treatment, little is known about potential factors that may influence survival in colorectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between physical activity, obesity and smoking and disease-specific and overall mortality after a colorectal cancer diagnosis. Methods: A cohort of 879 colorectal cancer patients, diagnosed in Western Australia between 2005 and 2007, were followed up to 30 June 2012. Cox's regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) for colorectal cancer-specific and overall mortality associated with self-reported pre-diagnosis physical activity, body mass index (BMI) and smoking.Results:Significantly lower overall and colorectal cancer-specific mortality was seen in females who reported any level of recent physical activity than in females reporting no activity. The colorectal cancer-specific mortality HR for increasing levels of physical activity in females were 0.34 (95% CI=0.15, 0.75), 0.37 (95% CI=0.17, 0.81) and 0.41 (95% CI=0.18, 0.90). Overweight and obese women had almost twice the risk of dying from any cause or colorectal cancer compared with women of normal weight. Females who were current smokers had worse overall and colorectal cancer-specific mortality than never smokers (overall HR=2.64, 95% CI=1.18, 5.93; colorectal cancer-specific HR=2.70, 95% CI=1.16, 6.29). No significant associations were found in males. Conclusion: Physical activity, BMI and smoking may influence survival after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, with more pronounced results found for females than for males. Refereed/Peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2013
6. Meat consumption and cooking practices and the risk of colorectal cancer
- Author
-
Terry Boyle, Barry Iacopetta, Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei, Matthew Knuiman, Jane Heyworth, Cameron Platell, Lin Fritschi, Tabatabaei, SM, Fritschi, L, Knuiman, MW, Boyle, Terry, Iacopetta, BJ, Platell, C, and Heyworth, JS
- Subjects
cooking methods ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Meat ,Population ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,colorectal cancer ,meat ,Risk Factors ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Environmental health ,Serving size ,case–control ,Odds Ratio ,Humans ,Medicine ,Cooking ,Risk factor ,education ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Cooking Practices ,education.field_of_study ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Case-control study ,food and beverages ,Western Australia ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,Confidence interval ,Diet ,Surgery ,Logistic Models ,Quartile ,Case-Control Studies ,Female ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business - Abstract
Background/Objectives: The association between meat consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been controversial. One of the difficulties in determining this association has been measurement of different attributes of meat consumption, including cooking methods and level of doneness. Subjects/Methods: We investigated the association between meat consumption and cooking practices and the risk of CRC in a population-based case-control study in the Western Australian Bowel Health Study. From July 2005 to February 2007, 567 incident CRC cases and 713 controls, who were frequency matched to cases for age- and sex, completed questionnaires on lifestyle and meat consumption. Estimated odds ratios (ORs) comparing meat consumption quartile groups were obtained from multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The amount of red baked meat consumed had a statistically significant inverse trend of association with CRC (Q4 OR=0.73 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.01). When frequency was multiplied by serving size and by doneness, the as sociation remained protective but was no longer statistically significant. The protective trends for red pan-fried meat were also borderline statistically significant. There were no other statistically significant or meaningful associations with any of the types of meat cooked by any method and the risk of CRC. Conclusions: Our data do not support the hypothesis that meat consumption is a risk factor for CRC. Refereed/Peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2011
7. General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Kelly McGorm, Louis S. Pilotto, Zoe Hammett, Chris Silagy, Cameron Platell, Adrian Esterman, David Weller, David Wattchow, Wattchow, D, Weller, D, Esterman, Adrian Jeffrey, Pilotto, Louis, McGorm, K, Platell, C, and Silagy, C
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,Epidemiology ,Anxiety ,Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ,Rate ratio ,law.invention ,surgery ,Randomized controlled trial ,Quality of life ,law ,Recurrence ,Clinical Studies ,follow-up ,Aged, 80 and over ,general practice ,Depression ,Mortality rate ,Continuity of Patient Care ,Middle Aged ,Survival Rate ,investigations ,Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ,Oncology ,colon cancer ,Patient Satisfaction ,Colonic Neoplasms ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Family Practice ,medicine.medical_specialty ,quality of life ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,colorectal cancer ,Patient satisfaction ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Survival rate ,Aged ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Australia ,Surgery ,General Surgery ,business ,randomised controlled trial ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
This trial examined the optimal setting for follow-up of patients after treatment for colon cancer by either general practitioners or surgeons. In all, 203 consenting patients who had undergone potentially curative treatment for colon cancer were randomised to follow-up by general practitioners or surgeons. Follow-up guidance recommended three monthly clinical review and annual faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) and were identical in both study arms. Primary outcome measures (measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months were (1) quality of life, SF-12; physical and mental component scores, (2) anxiety and depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and (3) patient satisfaction: Patient Visit-Specific Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes (at 24 months) were: investigations, number and timing of recurrences and deaths. In all, 170 patients were available for follow-up at 12 months and 157 at 24 months. At 12 and 24 months there were no differences in scores for quality of life (physical component score, P=0.88 at 12 months; P=0.28 at 24 months: mental component score, P=0.51, P=0.47; adjusted), anxiety (P=0.72; P=0.11) depression (P=0.28; P=0.80) or patient satisfaction (P=0.06, 24 months). General practitioners ordered more FOBTs than surgeons (rate ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.4), whereas more colonoscopies (rate ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–1.0), and ultrasounds (rate ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–1.0) were undertaken in the surgeon-led group. Results suggest similar recurrence, time to detection and death rates in each group. Colon cancer patients with follow-up led by surgeons or general practitioners experience similar outcomes, although patterns of investigation vary.
- Published
- 2006
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.