Search

Bevacizumab plays an important role in the first and second line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). And induction of hypoxia and the tumors response to it plays an important role in determining the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy while the connection between them remains unclear. Here, we found that lactate accumulated in the tumor environment of CRC and acted as substrates for histone lactylation, and this process was further induced by cellular enhanced glycolysis in hypoxia. We determined that CRC patients resistant to bevacizumab treatment presented with elevated levels of histone lactylation and inhibition of histone lactylation efficiently suppressed CRC tumorigenesis, progression and survival in hypoxia. Histone lactylation promoted the transcription of RUBCNL/Pacer, facilitating autophagosome maturation through interacting with BECN1 (beclin 1) and mediating the recruitment and function of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex, which had a crucial role in hypoxic cancer cells proliferation and survival. Moreover, combining inhibition of histone lactylation and macroautophagy/autophagy with bevacizumab treatment demonstrated remarkable treatment efficacy in bevacizumab-resistance patients-derived pre-clinical models. These findings delivered a new exploration and important supplement of metabolic reprogramming-epigenetic regulation, and provided a new strategy for improving clinical efficacy of bevacizumab in CRC by inhibition of histone lactylation. Abbreviations: 2-DG: 2-deoxy-D-glucose; BECN1: beclin 1; CQ: chloroquine; CRC: colorectal cancer; DMOG: dimethyloxalylglycine; H3K18la: histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation; MAP1LC3B/LC3B: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta; Nala: sodium lactate; PDO: patient-derived orgnoid; PDX: patient-derived xenograft; RUBCNL/Pacer: rubicon like autophagy enhancer; SQSTM1/p62: sequestosome 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nav1.5, encoded by SCN5A, has been associated with metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we investigated the mechanism by which Nav1.5 regulates tumor progression and whether Nav1.5 influences chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in CRCs. CRC cases were evaluated for Nav1.5 expression. Elevated Nav1.5 expression was associated with poor prognosis in CRCs, whereas stage II/III patients with upregulated SCN5A expression could have better survival after receiving 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. In CRC cells, SCN5A knockdown reduced the proliferation, migration and invasion. According to RNA sequencing, SCN5A knockdown inhibited both the cell cycle and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In addition, Nav1.5 stabilized the KRas-calmodulin complex to modulate Ras signaling, promoting Ca2+ influx through the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger and Ca2+ release-activated calcium channel. Meanwhile, SCN5A knockdown increased the 50% inhibitory concentration to 5-FU by upregulating 5-FU-stimulated apoptosis in CRCs. In conclusion, Nav1.5 could progress to proliferation and metastasis through Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent Ras signaling in CRC, and it could also enhance 5-FU-stimulated apoptosis. Clinically, patients with stage II/III CRCs with elevated SCN5A expression demonstrated poor prognosis, yet those patients could benefit more from 5-FU-based chemotherapy than patients with lower SCN5A expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent studies have suggested that the lymph node ratio (LNR) is a prognostic indicator for various malignancies. However, LNR has not been evaluated in colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of LNR in patients with CRLM after curative resection. Patients and methods: We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathologic features of 154 CRLM patients who underwent curative resection between 2005 and 2015. We classified patients into low and high groups based on their LNR by using the X-tile software. Survival curves were plotted through Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The patients were divided into two groups in which 124 patients were identified as LNR ≤0.33 and 30 patients as LNR >0.33. Compared to low LNR, high LNR was significantly associated with poor 3-year RFS (47.2% vs 16.7%, P=0.001) and OS (72.8% vs 45.3%, P=0.003) rates. Multivariate analysis indicated that the LNR was an independent predictor for 3-year RFS (hazard ratio, 2.124; 95% CI, 1.339–3.368; P=0.001) and OS (HR, 2.287; 95% CI, 1.282–4.079; P=0.005). However, the node (N) stage and lymph node distribution were not significantly associated with the 3-year RFS (P=0.071, P=0.226) or OS (P=0.452, P=0.791) in patients with CRLM. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that LNR was an independent predictor for 3-year RFS and OS in patients with CRLM who underwent curative resection and that its prognostic value was superior to that of N stage and lymph node distribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Oligometastatic disease can potentially be cured when an optimal approach is performed. Early recurrence after liver resection is an intractable problem, and the clinical implications remain unknown in colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) patients. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognosis related to early recurrence in these patients.Methods: A total of 307 consecutive patients with CLOM undergoing curative liver resection were retrospectively reviewed between September 1999 and June 2016. Early recurrence was defined as any recurrence or death from CLOM that occurred within 6 months of liver resection.Results: With a median follow-up time of 31.7 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival rates were 68.7 and 42.5%, respectively. Forty-nine (16.0%) patients developed early recurrence and showed a poorer 3-year OS than those with non-early recurrence (22.3 vs. 75.8%, P < 0.001) or later recurrence (22.3 vs. 52.8 vs. 63.2%, P < 0.001). Moreover, early recurrence was identified as an independent predictor of 3-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) 6.282; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.980–9.915, P < 0.001]. In multivariate analysis, a node-positive primary tumor [odds ratio (OR) 2.316; 95% CI 1.097–4.892, P = 0.028) and metastatic diameter > 3 cm (OR 2.560; 95% CI 1.290–5.078; P = 0.007) were shown to be risk factors for early recurrence. The salvage liver resection rate for patients with early recurrence was significantly lower than that for patients with later recurrence (4.1 vs. 19.7%, P = 0.010).Conclusions: Early recurrence should be investigated in routine clinical practice, even in patients with CLOM after curative liver resection. Detailed preoperative comprehensive measurements might help stratify high-risk patients, and a non-surgical treatment for early recurrence might represent an effective alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is little evidence regarding the optimal surgical sequence for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients undergoing colorectal resection with simultaneous liver metastasis resection.Methods: CRLM patients from five centers were retrospectively evaluated. The short-term outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Postoperative complications were measured according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Grade I to II complications were defined as minor postoperative complications. The long-term outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to overcome the selection bias between colorectal resection first and liver resection first.Results: A total of 1255 CRLM patients were included. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a body mass index (BMI) < 24 kg/m2, primary site in the left hemicolon, non-bilobar distribution of liver metastases and no preoperative chemotherapy were significantly associated with the likelihood of colorectal resection first. After 1:1 PSM, there was no significant difference between the colorectal resection first group and the liver resection first group. Compared with patients with colorectal resection first, patients with liver resection first had a comparable postoperative infection rate (15.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.735), a longer operation time (305.0 [231.3-416.0] vs. 300.0 [225.0-374.0], P = 0.033), more intraoperative blood loss (200.0 [150.0-400.0] vs. 100.0 [100.0-300.0], P < 0.001), a higher postoperative minor complication rate (28.7% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.023) and a higher postoperative ICU rate (14.7% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.022). IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients who underwent colorectal resection first had a similar PFS (P = 0.702, median: 20.6 months vs. 16.6 months) and unfavourable OS (P = 0.014, median: 48.5 months vs. 67.0 months) compared with patients who underwent liver resection first. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, colorectal resection first was an unfavourable risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.301, 95% CI 1.048-1.616, P = 0.017) and was not an independent predictor for PFS (HR = 0.986, 95% CI 0.831-1.170, P = 0.874). IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, including postoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative chemotherapy, produced consistent results.Conclusion: Although violating the "sterility principle", patients who underwent colorectal resection first did not have an increased postoperative infection rate and had some better short-term outcomes and comparable PFS than those who underwent liver resection first. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]