Search

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have gained increased importance in assessing outcomes after reconstructive surgery. This also applies to the reconstruction of vulvoperineal defects after resection of gynecological or colorectal cancers in women. The objective of this study is to analyze the current state of PROM tool use within this patient population. Methods: By systematic literature searches in Embase, Medline, and Web of Science, English-language studies published after 1980, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series reporting on vulvoperineal defect reconstruction, which were included if they also analyzed quality of life (QoL) and/or PROMs. The PROM tools used by each study were extracted, analyzed, and compared. Results: The primary search yielded 2576 abstracts, of which 395 articles were retrieved in full text. Of these, 50 reported on vulvoperineal defect reconstruction, among which 27 studies analyzing QoL were found. Of those, 17 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. After full-text screening, 14 different PROM tools and 5 individual, non-standardized questionnaires were identified. Only 22% of studies used a validated PROM tool. Conclusion: Far too few studies currently use PROM tools to assess outcomes in oncological vulvoperineal defect reconstruction. Less than half of the used PROMs are validated. No PROM was designed to specifically measure QoL in this patient population. The standardized implementation of a validated PROM tool in the clinical treatment of this patient population is an essential step to improve outcomes, enable the comparison of research, and support evidence-based treatment approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for rectal cancers is associated with significant morbidity. We evaluated the complications related to urinary reconstruction following TPE and factors predicting urologic morbidity. Methods: Retrospective analysis of TPE patients with incontinent urinary diversions between August 2013 and January 2020. Results: One hundred TPE were performed with 96 ileal conduits (IC). Early complications occurred in 10 patients that included uretero-ileal leaks (5%), conduit-related complications (3%), and acute pyelonephritis (3%). Late complications were seen in 26% of patients with uretero-intestinal strictures in 11%. Mortality attributable to urinary complications was seen in 2%. No single factor, including prior radiation, recurrent disease, type of anastomosis, or blood loss, predicted development of urinary morbidity. Conclusion: Conduit urinary diversion following TPE is associated with high urinary morbidity rate but low mortality. It can be safely performed even after previous surgeries and radiation by a dedicated colorectal team. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]