1. Operative Approach Does Not Impact Radial Margin Positivity in Distal Rectal Cancer
- Author
-
Brian D. Lo, Miloslawa Stem, Rebecca Sahyoun, Bashar Safar, Jonathan E. Efron, Chady Atallah, George Q. Zhang, and Ashwani Rajput
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Proctectomy ,animal structures ,Rectal Neoplasms ,Colorectal cancer ,business.industry ,Abdominoperineal resection ,Retrospective cohort study ,Vascular surgery ,medicine.disease ,Cardiac surgery ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Robotic Surgical Procedures ,Cardiothoracic surgery ,medicine ,Humans ,Laparoscopy ,Stage (cooking) ,business ,Retrospective Studies ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Robotic surgery is attractive for resection of low rectal cancer due to greater dexterity and visualization, but its benefit is poorly understood. We aimed to determine if operative approach impacts radial margin positivity (RMP) and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR). This was a retrospective cohort study of patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent APR for low rectal cancer from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified by operative approach: robotic, laparoscopic, and open APR (R-APR, L-APR, and O-APR). Emergent cases were excluded. The primary outcome was RMP. 30-day postoperative outcomes were also evaluated, using logistic regression analysis. Among 1,807 patients, 452 (25.0%) underwent R-APR, 474 (26.2%) L-APR, and 881 (48.8%) O-APR. No differences regarding RMP (13.5% R-APR vs. 10.8% L-APR vs. 12.3% O-APR, p = 0.44), distal margin positivity, positive nodes, readmission, or operative time were observed between operative approaches. Adjusted analysis confirmed that operative approach did not predict RMP (p > 0.05 for all). Risk factors for RMP included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III (ASA I-II ref; OR 1.46, p = 0.039), pT3-4 stage (T0-2 ref, OR 4.02, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF