1. Experiences and perspectives of colorectal cancer survivors and general practitioners on the delivery of survivorship care in general practice: a mixed methods study.
- Author
-
Kim, Bora, White, Kate, Tracy, Marguerite, Mahadeva, Janani, Marker, Julie, Ostroff, Cheri, Acret, Louise, Willcock, Simon, and Rutherford, Claudia
- Subjects
CROSS-sectional method ,WEIGHT loss ,QUALITATIVE research ,PSYCHOLOGICAL distress ,RESEARCH funding ,MEDICAL care ,INTERVIEWING ,FATIGUE (Physiology) ,COLORECTAL cancer ,CANCER patients ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,EXPERIENCE ,SURVEYS ,THEMATIC analysis ,SOUND recordings ,RESEARCH methodology ,CANCER patient psychology ,DATA analysis software ,PATIENT monitoring ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,SLEEP disorders ,WEIGHT gain ,ACCESS to information ,EMPLOYEES' workload - Abstract
Background: Many colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience ongoing sequelae from their cancer treatment. Limited evidence exists regarding how CRC survivors and general practitioners (GPs) manage these sequelae in the community. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of CRC survivors and GPs on current approaches to monitoring and managing sequelae of CRC treatment. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using cross-sectional national surveys and qualitative interviews with CRC survivors and GPs to explore: (1) treatment sequelae experienced by CRC survivors, (2) how these were monitored and managed by general practitioners, and (3) suggestions to improve ongoing management of the treatment sequelae. Survey responses were reported descriptively. Qualitative data were thematically analysed using an interpretive descriptive approach. Results: Seventy participants completed surveys: 51 CRC survivors and 19 GPs, and four interviews were conducted with GPs. CRC survivors experienced a range of treatment sequelae, but often did not discuss these with their GPs (experienced vs discussed: 86% vs 47% for fatigue/lack of energy, 78% vs 27% for psychological/emotional concern, 63% vs 22% for impaired sleep, 69% vs 29% for weight loss/gain, 59% vs 16% for sexual and intimacy concerns). GPs reported inadequate information transfer from cancer services and workload as major barriers to optimal care. Conclusions: System-level changes that facilitate adequate information transfer from cancer services to GPs upon CRC treatment completion, as well as addressing time constraint issues essential for comprehensive monitoring and management of CRC treatment sequelae, could enhance the care of CRC survivors in the community setting. Many colorectal cancer survivors face various post-treatment challenges that impact their daily lives. How these are treated within the primary care setting remains poorly understood. This study found that colorectal cancer survivors commonly experienced various challenges after cancer treatment, such as fatigue, changed bowel habits and psychological difficulties, but often did not discuss them with their general practitioners. Potential ways to better identify and address these common post-treatment challenges for colorectal cancer survivors are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF