Search

Background/aim: The Controlling Nutritional status (CONUT) score, a valuable tool evaluating the preoperative conditions of patients from a nutritional point of view, has been successfully adopted for a plethora of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, since rectal cancer has characteristics that differ from colon cancer (CC) and because, as of 2024, investigations targeted to surgical CC patients are lacking in the pertinent literature, we decided to assess the predictive role of this scoring system in relation to postoperative course and survival of surgical patients affected only by this malignancy. However, as of 2024, the existing literature on CONUT has typically treated colorectal cancer (CRC) as a single homogeneous entity, often combining results for both colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC). Since CC differs from RC in pathobiology, prognosis and treatment, we preferred to investigate CONUT in patients affected with CC in order to corroborate or refute the current knowledge on this score system when applied to CRC. With this stated aim, we proceeded to assess the predictive role of CONUT in relation to postoperative course and prognosis of patients who underwent CC surgery only., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 341 CC patients who underwent surgery at our Hospital between 2013 and 2018. Starting from serum measurements of lymphocytes, total cholesterol and albumin we used a simplified two-tier CONUT classification in order of increasing severity: high (score ≥3) and low score (scoring <3)., Results: On equal staging class and other clinicopathological terms, compared to their high score counterpart, low CONUT subjects went through postoperative complications (both nonsurgical and surgical ones) less frequently, shorter mean hospital stay (11.2 versus 15 days) and more favorable survival (both overall and disease-free survival) with statistical significance., Conclusion: In the light of our results, we encourage to systematically resort to the CONUT score classification in all CC patients scheduled for a curative surgery. Preoperative correction of CONUT parameters through artificial nutrition or other measures appears mandatory as it can drastically improve the postoperative course as well as the long-term prognosis of these subjects., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The detection of nodal status is based on examination of lymph nodes (LN) after the tumor surgical resection and the current guidelines recommend examining at least 12 regional LN. An inadequate number of examined LN may lead to a lower N stage or to a false-negative nodal disease. To overcome these issues, many authors proposed to consider the metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR). MLNR is the ratio of the number of metastatic LN to the number of examined LN., Methods: Two hundred forty-one colon cancer (CC) specimens from patients who had undergone surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2015 at the General Surgery Unit of Parma University Hospital were analyzed. mLNR, which is defined as the ratio of the number of positive LN to the number of examined LN, was calculated in CCs with LN metastasis. In this study we focused on the following mLRN cutoffs: <0.15, 0.15-0.3 and >3 and we evaluated the prognostic implication of mLNRs., Results: Regarding the impact of examined LN on involved LN in CC, our results showed that the number of involved LN increased with the increasing number of examined LN (P=0.03). We found a significant correlation between OS and RFS rate of patients with CCs and mLNR. Patients with mLNR<0.15 were associated with better OS and RFS rate whereas patients with mLNR>0.3 were associated with worse OS and RFS rate. OS rate for patients with a mLNR<0.15 was 95.24% (89-100%) at 1 year, 83.27% (72.7-95.4%) at 3 years and 68.07% (55.1-84.1%) at 5 years whereas patients with a mLNR>0.3 had an OS rate of 51.7% (34.6-77.3%) at 1 year, 36.55% (20.08-64.3%) at 3 years and 31.33% (16.5-59.4%) at 5 years. RFS rate for patients with a mLNR<0.15 was 100% (100-100%) at 1 year, 92.2% (84-100%) at 3 years and 85.2% (73.8-98.31%) at 5 years whereas patients with a mLNR>0.3 had a RFS of 63.2% (42.8-93.58%) at 1 year and 54.2% (33.1-88.93%) at 3 and 5 years., Conclusions: The prognostic value of pN stage could be more accurate if we consider both the number of LN metastasis and harvested LN. This can be achieved by using the mLNR that can be a useful tool in daily practice to predict the prognosis of patients who undergone surgery for CC.

Background: In the past decades the right colon cancer showed a higher incidence rate than left colon cancer. This trend is known as "proximal shift" or "rightwards shift." We evaluated rightward shift phenomenon in our region., Methods: We collected data from 1101 colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery at Parma University Hospital from 01 January 2004 through 01 January 2018. We divided patients into seven subgroups according to the time of surgery to evaluate epidemiological changes through the years of colon cancer., Results: We found a non-linear rightward shift trend of CRC. The incidence of RCC was the 40% between 2004-2005 and 51% in the biennium 2016-2017 (60% in 2012-2013 and 57% in 2014-2015). The patients with RCC were significantly older than patients with LCC. RCCs have poor differentiated tumors. Metastatic disease showed a similar distribution both in left and right CRCs. Peritoneum was the most common metastasis location from right-sided colon cancer., Conclusions: Data suggest the existence of two different tumor entities in CRC between right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colon cancer. The proximal shift may be a reflection of improved screening programs, diagnostic accuracy and population aging. Ethnicity, gender, diet, environment, and socioeconomic status contribute to CRC incidence and prevalence in different regions.

Unlabelled: We know the significance of adenomas about the risk of neoplastic transformation defined as adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Although the majority of adenomas removed are small, it is well recognized that the risk of malignant transformation increases with an increased adenoma size. The term "malignant polyp" refers to an adenoma that macroscopically appears benign, but in which there is an invasion of malignant neoplastic cells within the submucosa through the muscularis mucosae. Malignant Polyps are substantially adenocarcinomas at an early stage; it is estimated that they represent the 0.75-5.6% of all adenomas removed during endoscopic exams. The management of a malignant polyp, diagnosed after an endoscopic removal, is complicated because the presence of residual malignant cells is a possibility. Also the presence of regional lymph nodes metastasis is different in literature and related to different prognostic factors. In this review we will analyze the incidence, the most appropriate methods of diagnosis, the biological parameters that characterize the various classes of risk of malignant polyps, in order to choice a correct treatment. The goal should be the improvement of the survival rate, decreasing the likelihood of residual disease evaluating the risk of overtreatment., Key Words: Adenoma, Adenoma-carcinoma, "Malignant polyp".