Search

Purpose: Inadequate initial differentiation between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease may lead to a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis. Construction of an ileoanal pouch in these patients may result in significant morbidity and pouch failure when the ultimate diagnosis is Crohn's disease., Method: We prospectively studied 543 patients with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease to determine whether a patient's pathologic diagnosis changed with time and how it affected outcome., Results: Preoperative diagnosis was ulcerative colitis in 499 patients, indeterminate colitis in 42 patients, and Crohn's disease in 2 patients. Prior colectomy was performed in 58 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis and in all patients with indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease. Postoperatively, the diagnosis changed in 20 patients with ulcerative colitis (13 to indeterminate colitis, 7 to Crohn's disease). Another two patients with indeterminate colitis showed evidence of Crohn's disease in the resected rectal specimen. As patients were followed up, an additional 13 patients were found to have Crohn's disease (5 indeterminate colitis, 8 ulcerative colitis). With the current diagnosis, perineal complications and pouch failure occurred, respectively, in 23 and in 2 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis, in 44 and in 12 percent of patients with indeterminate colitis, and in 63 and in 37 percent of patients with Crohn's disease. Pathologic diagnosis was altered in 35 patients (6 percent) overall, with a 12-fold increase in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Only 3 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis compared with 13 percent of patients with indeterminate colitis had a change in diagnosis to Crohn's disease (P = 0.006; Fisher's exact test)., Conclusion: Pouch-related complications, eventual pouch failure, and discovery of underlying Crohn's disease occurred in a significant number of patients with a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis. Until more accurate diagnostic differentiation is available, caution is advised in recommending the ileoanal pouch procedure to patients with indeterminate colitis.

Purpose: The physiologic changes that occur when the small bowel is used as a reservoir, as in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, are poorly understood. Alterations in bowel permeability, which may lead to bacterial translocation that could result in illness or dysfunction of the pouch, may be one such consequence of the pouch procedure., Methods: Whole-bowel permeability was evaluated in patients with and without the pouch through the use of an orally consumed nonmetabolizable sugar clearance technique. Patients in whom the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed for ulcerative colitis (17 patients) and patients with familial polyposis (7 patients) were compared with normal healthy volunteers (10 patients) and patients with ulcerative colitis with and without curative colectomy and ileostomy (6 and 5 patients, respectively)., Results: Measured by this technique, no differences were noted in bowel permeability between the volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis, even after colectomy and ileostomy (1.7 +/- 0.4 in normal healthy volunteers, 1.8 +/- 0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis without stoma, and 1.4 +/- 0.2 in patients with ulcerative colitis with ileostomy). The group of patients with an ileal reservoir, however, had a significantly increased index of measured bowel permeability (3.5 +/- 0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis and 5.1 +/- 0.7 in patients with familial polyposis; P < 0.05 by analysis of variance compared with normal healthy volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis with or without ileostomy)., Conclusion: The exact site, cause, and consequence of this possible alteration of bowel permeability are unclear but appear to be related to the presence of the pouch and are not caused by the underlying pathologic diagnosis.

Of 362 patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 12 (five with chronic ulcerative colitis and seven with familial adenomatous polyposis) had 16 associated carcinomas. Incidental carcinoma was found in four patients who had undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, six patients had known carcinoma, and carcinoma was suspected in two patients with high-grade dysplasia. No tumor was Stage C or D. After a median observation period of 24 months, no evidence of recurrence was documented. Data suggest that patients with carcinoma complicating chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis can safely undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; however, it may be prudent to perform resection and later ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after a period of observation and appropriate adjuvant therapy because of the difficulty in intraoperative staging.

Three types of colitis are now recognized. In the late 1950's and early 1960's, 51 per cent of our patients having colectomy had classic chronic ulcerative colitis. Of our patients operated on at that time, 39 per cent had Crohn's colitis and 10 per cent had colitis of indeterminate type. These three types of colitis should be differentiated because of the high risk of cancer of the colon in patients with long-standing chronic ulcerative colitis. We have not seen an increased risk of carcinoma associated with Crohn's colitis. We performed resection with anastomosis in approximately one third of patients with Crohn's colitis, but recurrent disease developed in two thirds. In contrast, recurrent Crohn's disease developed in only 5.7 per cent of patients having colectomy with ileostomy. Toxic megacolon associated with Crohn's colitis has been seen only in the early clinical stage of the disease. From the standpoint of management and prognosis, attempts to differentiate between the two major types of colitis are appropriate. We have outlined some of the basic clinical and pathologic differences between these two types of colitis.

Although total proctocolectomy with permanent ileostomy is regarded as the definitive therapy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis, psychologic and physical complications with this operation have stimulated the development of the operation of total abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, ileal reservoir, and ileoanal anastomosis as an alternative surgical procedure. Since 1980, 104 of these operative procedures have been completed with no operative mortality; experience has been gained with both the J- and S-type reservoirs. Despite an appreciable number of postoperative complications, satisfactory function of the reservoir has been achieved in 86 of 91 patients followed up for at least three months after closure of the ileostomy. The remaining five patients have required reinstitution of fecal diversion. Functional results have not differed between two-limbed and three-limbed reservoirs. This operation must be considered a viable alternative in patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.

During 1964 through 1973, 76 men underwent abdominoperineal resection as part of or subsequent to resection for inflammatory bowel disease. No instance of permanent impotence was found. Proctectomy should not be deferred because of the risk of impotence.

As long as surgeons have performed total proctocolectomy with permanent ileostomy, efforts have been made to avoid the necessity for a permanent stoma. Preservation of sphincter function can now be achieved by more liberal application of the operation of abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in carefully selected patients, and knowledge of the progression from dysplasia to cancer can be applied in a prospective fashion to those persons potentially at risk who have retained rectal mucosa. Individuals who are incapable of dealing with conventional permanent ileostomy and who lack the potential use of their own sphincters can be offered the alternative of a continent ileostomy. The advantages of both of these procedures can be combined by greater application of the operation of total abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal reservoir with ileoanal anastomosis. Although enthusiasm exists for all of these procedures, their results should be compared with the results of what must still be considered the "gold standard" operation, that is, proctocolectomy and conventional ileostomy. Nevertheless, the alternative procedures represent a considerable advance in the overall care of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.