Search

Introduction: Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is a second-generation corticosteroid that uses novel drug technologies to ensure colonic targeting and potentially reducing systemic corticosteroid concentrations. It is approved for treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) who do not respond to mesalazine. The gut-selective mechanism of action has the potential to improve the safety profile of BDP compared with other conventional corticosteroids. Areas covered: We reviewed the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of BDP in the treatment of UC. The positioning of BDP in management algorithms is also discussed. Expert opinion: The highly selective mechanism of action of BDP restricts the steroid-related side effects. BDP is efficacious in the treatment of active UC. Topical formulation is the first choice in distal UC, while oral formulation is used in patients with an extensive involvement of the colon. The rates of adverse events (AE), serious AEs, and steroid-related side-effects are similar to placebo and mesalamine and slightly inferior to traditional corticosteroids.

Background & Aims: High fecal levels of calprotectin indicate mucosal inflammation and have been shown to predict relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), the major component of n-3 fish oil, has anti-inflammatory properties in patients with chronic inflammatory disorders. We performed a placebo-controlled trial of patients with UC at risk of relapse to determine the ability of the free fatty acid form of EPA (EPA-FFA) to reduce intestinal inflammation, using fecal level of calprotectin as a marker., Methods: From June 2014 to May 2016, 60 patients with UC with a partial Mayo score < 2 and fecal calprotectin ≥150 μg/g, in stable therapy for at least the 3 previous months, were randomly assigned to groups (1:1) given either EPA-FFA (500 mg, twice daily) or placebo for 6 months. A colonoscopy was performed at baseline. Clinical assessments and measurements of fecal calprotectin were made at baseline, at study months 3 and 6, or the time of clinical relapse. Patients with a relapse of UC underwent a second colonoscopy. The primary end point was a 100-point reduction in fecal levels of calprotectin at 6 months from the baseline value; the secondary end point was maintenance of clinical remission at 6 months., Results: The primary end point was achieved by 19 of 30 patients (63.3%) in the EPA-FFA group vs 4 of 30 patients (13.3%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 12.0; 95% CI, 3.12-46.24; P < .001). The secondary end point was achieved by 23 of 30 patients (76.7%) in the EPA-FFA group vs 15 of 30 (50%) patients in the placebo group (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.08-9.95; P = .035). No serious adverse events were observed., Conclusions: In a placebo-controlled trial of 60 patients with UC, we found 6 months' administration of EPA-FFA to reduce fecal levels of calprotectin with no serious adverse events. This agent might be used to induce and maintain symptom-free remission in patients with UC. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02179372., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety and depression, has been found in people with Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis compared to the general population. Nowadays, international guidelines advocate psychotherapy and psycho-pharmacological treatments as playing an important role in IBD care. The main goal of this systematic literature review was summarize the evidence on the utilization and effectiveness of treatments for depression and anxiety in persons with IBD., Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using three different electronic databases: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and EMBASE to identify studies reporting the prevalence and efficacy of psycho-pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments for IBD. A quality appraisal was conducted using several scales as appropriate for each study design. A narrative synthesis was also performed., Results: Forty-three studies were included. Although a high rate of psychoactive drug use was found in people with IBD, a low proportion of IBD patients have access to psychiatric referral. 1/3 of the studies found that psychotherapy was effective for improving the quality of life, perception of stress, anxiety and depression as well as disease. Antidepressants proved effective in reducing disease activity, gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression., Conclusion: Our results suggest that psychiatric treatment should be implemented in IBD care. However, further studies are needed to confirm the findings of our systematic review., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder associated with high perceived psychological stress. The attachment theory provides a psychodynamic perspective to investigate the relationship between close interpersonal relationships and stress in UC. Researchers have hypothesized that the chronic illness might affect personality trait as the attachment style of patients. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: UC patients exhibit a more pronounced attachment insecurity that, in turn, resulted as a determinant of psychological stress. This study suggests that UC could determine a shift towards insecurity in the attachment style that, in turn, promotes psychological stress and increases the risk of psychopathologies. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The more accurate knowledge of attachment insecurity in patients with chronic disorders such as UC may help the nurses to face with often dysfunctional patients' styles of manifesting distress, patterns of help seeking and expectations of health professionals. The knowledge of psychopathological mechanisms in patients with UC could improve the prevention and treatment of psychological disorders in affected patients., Abstract: Introduction Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disorder characterized by recurrent intestinal symptoms. The attachment theory provides a psychodynamic perspective to investigate the relationship between interpersonal relationships and stress in UC. Aim The aim of this study was to compare the attachment dimensions between UC patients and controls and to evaluate the impact of these dimensions on perceived stress in patients. Method In all, 101 patients with UC completed the attachment style questionnaire and the perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ). Clinical and psychometric parameters were added as predictor variables in a regression with the PSQ score as dependent variable. One hundred and five healthy subjects took part in the study as controls. Results Compared to controls, UC patients exhibited greater scores in relationships as secondary, need for approval and preoccupation with relationships. In UC, disease activity, confidence and preoccupation with relationships resulted predictors of perceived stress. Discussion Compared to healthy controls, UC patients exhibited more pronounced attachment insecurity that, in turn, was a significant predictor of the perceived stress. Implications for practice The knowledge of attachment insecurity may help the nurses and all health care providers to face with dysfunctional patients' styles of manifesting distress, help seeking and expectations of health professionals., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Traditional corticosteroids represent a well-established and effective treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the severity of their systemic side effects, led in recent years to look for new steroid molecules that could reduce them, maximizing the anti-inflammatory activity. Budesonide has been one of the most studied steroid compounds and it has been approved for the treatment of mild to moderate active Crohn's disease (CD). In order to extend the release until the distally located inflammation, budesonide has been coupled with a controlled delivery system, called Multi-Matrix system (MMX), already successfully tested with oral mesalazine for the treatment of distal UC. After in vitro and in vivo models, the efficacy of Budesonide-MMX has been investigated in active UC with a first small phase II study, and partially encouraging results. This article will review the evidences on the use of budesonide in inflammatory bowel diseases and will discuss the role of Budesonide-MMX in active UC nowadays.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with psychological stress and poor emotional functioning. The neural emotional processing involves the complex integration of several cortical and subcortical brain structures. The amygdala plays a fundamental role in the neural processing of emotional stimuli and is a core structure of the brain-gut axis (BGA) that represents the anatomo-functional substrate for the bidirectional influences between emotions and gastrointestinal functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the brain emotional processing in UC patients compared to healthy people., Methods: Ten UC patients in remission and 10 matched healthy controls underwent a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan while performing a task involving emotional visual stimuli. A set of negative, positive, and neutral pictures were used to study brain-related emotional responses., Results: A significantly reduced blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in UC patients relative to controls was found in the amygdala, thalamic regions, and cerebellar areas (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons). The group-related differences were detected in the brain activity in response to positive emotional stimuli., Conclusions: UC is associated with an emotional dysfunction characterized by decreased sensitivity to emotions with a positive content. The previous intestinal inflammatory activity in UC patients might have contributed to determine the functional changes of the amygdala that we found. On the other hand, the dysfunction of the amygdala may influence the course of the disease., (Copyright © 2010 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America, Inc.)

Background: 5-ASA-MMX (1.2 g/tablet) is a 5-aminosalicylic acid formulation, designed for once-daily dosing in the treatment of ulcerative colitis., Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-ASA-MMX (2.4 g/day, once daily), compared with Asacol (2.4 g/day, twice daily) in the maintenance of left-sided UC, through a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, comparator study., Methods: In all, 331 patients with UC were randomized to receive either 5-ASA-MMX 2.4 g/day, once daily, or Asacol 2.4 g/day, twice daily, for 12 months. All patients were in remission for >or=1 month prior to the trial, with >or=1 documented relapse in the previous year. The co-primary endpoints of this study were the proportion of patients in clinical, and clinical and endoscopic remission following 12 months' treatment., Results: In the intent-to-treat population, excluding those with major protocol deviations, 68.0 and 65.9% patients in the 5-ASA-MMX and Asacol groups, respectively, were in clinical remission (P = 0.69), and 60.9 and 61.7% of patients, respectively, were in clinical and endoscopic remission (P = 0.89). Diary card data revealed statistically significant treatment differences favouring 5-ASA-MMX. Both treatments were similarly tolerated., Conclusions: Once-daily 5-ASA-MMX is similarly effective with a comparable safety profile to Asacol administered twice daily, for the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Severe colitis is a life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis. Early recognition of the severity of the colitis and intensive treatment and monitoring have all contributed to improved outcome. Since their introduction in the 1950s, corticosteroids are the first line therapy for severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). Several prognostic parameters (such as stools movement per day, C-reactive protein, increased amount of intestinal gas or small bowel dilation, hypoalbuminemia, fever, etc.) help the physician to quickly introduce infliximab or cyclosporine or to refer the patient to the surgeon. This decision requires a careful evaluation of the patient and a medical/surgical team.

Hypo and hyperactivity of the autonomic nervous system have been associated with chronic bowel inflammation diseases. We investigated the autonomic function in 11 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) and 17 healthy controls by means of cardiovascular autonomic tests and heart rate variability. Autonomic responses were normal in patients and controls. At rest, LF/HF ratios were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in chronic UC patients (2.4 +/- 1.6) compared to controls (1.2 +/- 1.0). Our results suggest a higher sympathetic tone at rest in patients with chronic UC.

Background: Pouchitis is a common long-term complication after ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Chronic refractory pouchitis is a treatment-resistant condition that affects 5-15% of patients., Aim: To test the hypothesis of a small bowel involvement using wireless capsule endoscopy., Material and Methods: This is a single-blind, prospective, cohort study. Twenty-four patients: 16 were patients with chronic refractory pouchitis and eight, with a macroscopically and histologically normal ileal pouch, were considered as control subjects. Diagnosis of pouchitis was confirmed using the pouchitis disease activity index. All subjects were submitted to wireless capsule endoscopy procedure. Within 2 weeks before wireless capsule endoscopy, patients underwent a pouch endoscopy and a small bowel follow-through. Re-examination of the colonic surgical and histological specimens was also performed., Results: One patient with chronic pouchitis was excluded because of incomplete bowel cleaning. At small bowel follow-through of 16 patients, two subjects (13%) showed only a focal ectasia of the middle ileum and a substenosis of the pouch. At wireless capsule endoscopy all the 15 evaluable patients with chronic pouchitis (100%) showed diffuse lesions from duodenum to ileum consisting of aphthae, erosions, erythema, atrophy, cobblestone, deep/fissural ulcers., Conclusions: This enteropathy needs further research, and wireless capsule endoscopy could be useful to show involvement of small bowel in patients with chronic pouchitis.

Background: Topical beclomethasone diproprionate has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis., Aim: To assess, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, the tolerability and safety of topical beclomethasone diproprionate (3mg) enema and foam versus mesalazine (2g) enema and foam in mild-moderate distal ulcerative colitis., Patients: In 15 referral gastrointestinal units, 99 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were enrolled. This number was lower than planned according to the statistical analysis, due to a low recruitment rate., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to random preparations (beclomethasone diproprionate enema, beclomethasone diproprionate foam, mesalazine enema, mesalazine foam) once nightly for 8 weeks, with clinical and endoscopical assessment (Disease Activity Index score) at baseline (T0), 4 (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Results were expressed as median and range (95% confidence interval). The efficacy was assessed by comparing the Disease Activity Index value at T4 and T8 by using the Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test., Results: Efficacy was comparable in the beclomethasone diproprionate or mesalazine groups at both T4 and T8 (response at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 78% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8] versus mesalazine 79% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8]; T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 84% [95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9] versus mesalazine 90% [95% confidence interval 0.7-1.0]; p=n.s.; remission at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 24% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3] versus mesalazine 28% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3]; remission at T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 36% [95% confidence interval 0.2-0.5] versus mesalazine 52% [95% confidence interval 0.3-0.6]; p=n.s.). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T4 and T8 versus T0 in the four groups (T4 versus T0: beclomethasone diproprionate foam Disease Activity Index 2 versus 6 p<0.0001; beclomethasone diproprionate enema 4 versus 6, mesalazine enema 3 versus 6, mesalazine foam 3.5 versus 7, p<0.001 for all three groups; T8 versus T0: p<0.01). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T8 versus T4 in the beclomethasone diproprionate enema and foam (Disease Activity Index: 2 versus 4 and 1 versus 4, respectively; p<0.05) and in the mesalazine enema (Disease Activity Index: 1.5, range 0-4 versus 3, range 0-12; p<0.01), but not in the mesalazine foam group (Disease Activity Index: 1, range 0-9 versus 3.5, range 0-8; p=n.s.). The safety profile was favourable for all groups., Conclusions: Beclomethasone diproprionate and mesalazine enema and foam show a comparable tolerability and efficacy in mild active distal ulcerative colitis.

Probiotic administration may exert a protective effect in colitis by preventing mucosal barrier disruption and influencing the extent of mucosal injury.

Background and Aims: Intestinal bacteria have been implicated in the initiation and perpetuation of IBD; in contrast, "probiotic bacteria" have properties possibly effective in treating and preventing relapse of IBD. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of VSL#3 and the components, and the composition of the biopsy-associated microbiota in patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)., Methods: Thirty-four ambulatory patients with active UC received open label VSL#3, 3,600 billion bacteria daily in two divided doses for 6 wk. The presence of biopsy-associated bacteria was detected using a nucleic acid-based method and the presence of VSL#3 species confirmed by DNA sequencing of 16S rRNA., Results: Thirty-two patients completed 6 wk of VSL#3 treatment and 2 patients did not have the final endoscopic assessment. Intent to treat analysis demonstrated remission (UCDAI < or = 2) in 53% (n = 18); response (decrease in UCDAI > or = 3, but final score > or =3) in 24% (n = 8); no response in 9% (n = 3); worsening in 9% (n = 3); and failure to complete the final sigmoidoscopy assessment in 5% (n = 2). There were no biochemical or clinical adverse events related to VSL#3. Two of the components of VSL#3 were detected by PCR/DGGE in biopsies collected from 3 patients in remission., Conclusion: Treatment of patients with mild to moderate UC, not responding to conventional therapy, with VSL#3 resulted in a combined induction of remission/response rate of 77% with no adverse events. At least some of the bacterial species incorporated in the probiotic product reached the target site in amounts that could be detected.

Background: Multi-matrix (MMx), a new delivery system for mesalazine, seems to release 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) preferentially in the sigmoid colon. This study had 2 objectives: (1) to evaluate the therapeutic response to MMx in patients with active left-sided disease and (2) to gain additional insights as to how the therapy would compare with topical 5-ASA., Methods: Patients received either 1.2 g of 5-ASA MMx three times per day plus placebo enema or 4 g of 5-ASA enema plus placebo tablets for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (clinical activity index < or =4) at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints were endoscopic and histologic remissions., Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled. Clinical remission rates at 4 and 8 weeks were 57.5% and 60.0% for patients treated with MMx and 68.4% and 50.0% for patients randomized to 5-ASA enemas, respectively (95% confidence interval for the difference at 8 weeks, -12 to +32). Endoscopic remission was achieved by 45.0% of patients on 5-ASA MMx and by 36.8% of those on enema, whereas 15.0% and 8% of patients, respectively, showed histologic remission. Compliance was 97.0% for oral and 87.5% for topical therapy. In the enema group, compliance was 88.0% for the patients in remission and 65.5% for those with active disease., Conclusions: Preliminary studies suggest that similar rates for induction of remission can be expected from 5-ASA enemas and MMx for patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis.

Goals: Therapy for active ulcerative colitis (UC) usually involves rectal formulations of corticosteroids (CS), which are characterized by the risk of systemic steroid-related adverse effects., Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of the topically acting CS beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) versus mesalamine (5-ASA) in the treatment of active UC., Study: Patients with mild to moderate distal active UC were randomized to a 6-week treatment with BDP 3 mg enema o.d. or 5-ASA 1 g enema daily in a single-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, controlled study. The primary efficacy variable was the decrease in Disease Activity Index (DAI) score. Safety variables were adrenal function, monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory parameters., Results: A total of 217 patients were enrolled and treated with BDP (n = 111) or 5-ASA (n = 106). A significant decrease in the DAI score (P < 0.05) was observed in both treatment groups, with a clinical remission rate of 36.7% in the BDP group and of 29.2% in the 5-ASA group. Both treatments were well tolerated. No changes from baseline in morning cortisol levels were observed in the BDP group., Conclusions: BDP administered as a rectal enema over a 6-week treatment period was efficacious and safe in patients with active UC, without interference with pituitary adrenal axis.

An increasing number of both clinical and laboratory-derived observations support the importance of luminal components in driving the inflammatory response in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Although its role is unclear, antibiotic therapy is commonly used in clinical practice for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Metronidazole and/or ciprofloxacin are currently employed in active Crohn's disease, particularly in patients with colonic involvement and with perianal disease. Rifaximin, a rifamycin-derived antibiotic, is characterized by a wide range of antibacterial activity and a very low systemic absorption. Some preliminary data show its efficacy in severe active ulcerative colitis, pouchitis and prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

About two-thirds of patients with ulcerative colitis have an inflammatory involvement distal to the splenic flexure, and therefore may be effectively treated with topical treatment, allowing the delivery of the active drug directly to the site of inflammation and limiting systemic absorption and potential side-effects. Topical aminosalicylate therapy is the most effective approach, and most patients will benefit hugely, provided that the formulation reaches the upper extent of the disease. Therefore, the choice of topical preparation should be based on the proximal extent of the disease and on patient preference. Oral aminosalicylates are less effective than topical therapies; however, a combination of oral and topical aminosalicylates can be successful in refractory patients. Alternatives to aminosalicylates are the new glucocorticoids, budesonide and beclometasone dipropionate, either as enemas or oral formulations (only beclometasone dipropionate). A combination of oral or rectal new glucocorticoids with rectal aminosalicylates should be considered in patients refractory to either approach. When these measures fail, treatment with oral glucocorticoids is necessary. An intensive intravenous steroid regimen is also helpful for patients refractory to oral steroids. Alternative treatments include short-chain fatty acid enemas, nicotine enemas and patches, acetarsol suppositories, ciclosporin enemas and epidermal growth factor enemas. Several factors potentially having a negative impact on therapeutic response include concurrent enteric pathogens, coexistent irritable bowel syndrome, patient nonadherence to therapy, inadequate dosing and duration of therapy, and proximal progression of the disease. Surgical colectomy may be required in those rare patients refractory or intolerant to pharmacotherapy.

Background and Aims: Pouchitis is the major long-term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients operated on for ulcerative colitis. The cause is unknown, but both the history of ulcerative colitis and increased bacterial concentration are important factors. Chemokines are mediators for the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the site of inflammation. This study examined the tissue expression of a panel of specific chemokines and the corresponding recruitment of inflammatory cells in IPAA tissue with and without inflammation and after antibiotic treatment., Patients and Methods: Biopsy specimens postoperatively from ulcerative colitis patients with IPAA were obtained by endoscopy. Biopsies were taken from 8 patients with noninflamed IPAA and from 14 patients with an episode of acute pouchitis, before and after antibiotic treatment. Biopsies were stained for CD68, CD3, elastase, eotaxin, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-3, and IL-8 and analyzed by NIH Image analyzer., Results: Expression of IL-8, MCP-1, MCP-3, and IP-10 was significantly higher in pouchitis than normal pouch. The expression of MCP-1, MCP-3 and IP-10 were significantly lower after antibiotic treatment., Conclusion: These data support the importance of chemokines for the leukocyte recruitment in pouch tissue during acute pouchitis.

Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of the topically acting steroid beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) in an oral controlled release formulation in the treatment of extensive or left-sided ulcerative colitis., Methods: In a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, single-blind study, patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis were randomised to a 4-week treatment with BDP 5 mg/day o.d. vs. 5-ASA 0.8 g t.d.s. The primary efficacy variable was the decrease of Disease Activity Index (DAI) (clinical symptoms and endoscopic appearance of mucosa). Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, haematochemical parameters and adrenal function., Results: One hundred and seventy-seven patients were enrolled and randomly treated with BDP (n = 90) or 5-ASA (n = 87). Mean DAI score decreased in both treatments groups (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline for both groups). Clinical remission was achieved in 63.0% of patients in the BDP group vs. 62.5% in the 5-ASA group. A significant DAI score improvement (P < 0.05) in favour of BDP was observed in patients with extensive disease. Both treatments were well tolerated. Mean plasma cortisol levels were significantly reduced vs. baseline in BDP recipients, but without signs of pituitary-adrenal function depletion., Conclusion: Oral BDP gave an overall treatment result in patients with active ulcerative colitis without signs of systemic side-effects.

Severe colitis is a life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis. Early recognition of the severity of the colitis and intensive treatment and monitoring have all contributed to improved outcome. Since their introduction in 1950s, corticosteroids are the first line therapy for severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). Several prognostic parameters (such as stools movement per day, C-reactive protein, increased amount of intestinal gas or small bowel dilation, hypoalbuminemia, fever etc) help the physician to quickly introduce cyclosporin or to refer the patient to the surgeon. This decision requires a careful evaluation of the patient and a medical /surgical team. Infliximab seems to be a promising drug but more controlled trial are needed.

Background & Aims: We have recently documented the efficacy of a highly concentrated probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in the prevention of flare-up in patients with chronic pouchitis. The aim of this study was to compare probiotic therapy with VSL#3 versus placebo in the ability to prevent the onset of acute pouchitis during the first year after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis., Methods: Forty consecutive patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either VSL#3 (1 packet containing 900 billion bacteria/day) (n = 20) or an identical placebo (n = 20) immediately after ileostomy closure for 1 year. The patients were assessed clinically, endoscopically, and histologically after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire., Results: Two of the 20 patients (10%) treated with VSL#3 had an episode of acute pouchitis compared with 8 of the 20 patients (40%) treated with placebo (log-rank test, z = 2.273; P < 0.05). Treatment with VSL#3 determined a significant improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, whereas this was not the case with placebo., Conclusions: Treatment with VSL#3 is effective in the prevention of the onset of acute pouchitis and improves quality of life of patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammation of the colon which may present with a range of mild to severe symptoms. The disease may be localized to the rectum or can be more extensive and involve the left side of the colon or the whole colon. Treatment in UC is directed towards inducing and maintaining remission of symptoms and mucosal inflammation. The key parameters to be assessed for the most appropriate treatment are the severity and extent of the inflammation. Meta-analyses of published trials have shown that topical treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the treatment of choice in active distal mild-to-moderate UC. Oral aminosalicylates are effective in both distal and extensive mild-to-moderate disease, but in distal disease, the rates of remission are lower than those obtained with topical 5-ASA. New steroids, such as budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), administered as enemas, constitute an alternative to 5-ASA therapy. In some studies, these have been shown to be as effective as conventional steroids but with significantly lower inhibition of plasma cortisol levels. Patients with unresponsive disease or those with more severe presentation will require oral corticosteroids and sometimes intravenous therapy. Approximately 10% of patients with unresponsive UC have severe attacks requiring hospitalization. Patients with severe disease should be managed jointly by a medical and surgical team, and intensive intravenous treatment should be started with high-dose steroids. Early recognition of failure of therapy will allow the introduction of immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous cyclosporine. Patients who respond are shifted to oral cyclosporine associated with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, whereas those who fail will require proctocolectomy. Oral aminosalicylates are the first-line therapy in maintenance of remission. Topical 5-ASA may play a role in distal disease. Patients who are steroid dependent can be started on azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine although it may take up to 3 months for the treatment to become effective. They may have reversible immediate side effects, such as pancreatitis or bone marrow suppression, which disappear upon discontinuation of therapy. Close monitoring of these hematologic and biochemical parameters will improve safety. The use of biologic therapy with infliximab in more severe disease has not been established., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The monitoring of patients with ulcerative colitis is easier than in patients with Crohn's disease for several reasons: the severity of symptoms and activity of inflammation tend to run parallel in ulcerative colitis when involvement of the large bowel is more extensive. The easy accessibility of the colonic mucosa by endoscopic and histologic examination provides further information concerning the degree of inflammation. In severe attacks, the patient must be admitted to hospital and monitored carefully. Clinical and laboratory parameters (such as daily stools, CRP, fever, haemoglobin, albumin, etc.) and plain abdominal X-ray are useful in monitoring the activity of the disease and to predict the outcome. In mild to moderate attacks, endoscopic and histologic evaluation are the best methods for choosing the appropriate treatment and for assessing response.

The meta-analyses of published trials have shown topical therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) to be the treatment of choice in active distal ulcerative colitis. Oral aminosalicylates are effective for both distal and extensive ulcerative colitis, but in distal colitis the rates of improvement and remission are usually lower than those reported for rectal 5-ASA therapy. An alternative to 5-ASA therapy is represented by the new steroids; budesonide and beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) enemas, the most extensively studied, have been shown to be as effective as conventional steroids but with a significantly lower inhibition of plasma cortisol. Patients who do not respond to 5-ASA or new steroids should be treated with oral steroids. Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine may be effective in patients who do not respond or cannot be weaned off steroids. Treatment of pouchitis is largely empirical and few controlled studies have been carried-out. Antibiotics are the treatment of choice and most patients make a good response to metronidazole or ciprofloxacin. Chronic refractory pouchitis may benefit from a prolonged course of a combination of antibiotics. Highly concentrated probiotics (VSL#3) are effective both for the prevention of pouchitis onset and the prevention of relapses.

Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of oral beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) when added to 5-ASA in the treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis., Methods: In a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients with extensive or left-sided mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive oral 5-ASA (3.2 g/day) plus BDP (5 mg/day) or placebo. Clinical, endoscopic and histologic features, and haematochemical parameters were recorded at baseline and at the end of the study., Results: One hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled and randomly treated with BDP plus 5-ASA (n = 58) or placebo plus 5-ASA (n = 61). Both treatment groups showed a statistically significant decrease of disease activity index (DAI) and histology score at the end of treatment (P = 0.001, each). DAI score was lower in the BDP group than in the placebo group (P = 0.014), with more patients in clinical remission in the BDP group (58.6% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.008). Serum cortisol levels significantly decreased in BDP group vs. baseline (P = 0.002), but without signs of pituitary-adrenal function depletion. A low incidence of adverse events was observed in both groups., Conclusions: Oral BDP in combination with oral 5-ASA is significantly more effective than 5-ASA alone in the treatment of patients with extensive or left-sided active ulcerative colitis.

Although new salicylates are now available for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, sulphasazaline still has an important therapeutic role. The role of salicylates in Crohn's disease is limited to the mild activity phase; further data are required to clarify its role in maintenance on remission. New steroids are a real alternative to traditional steroids in active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Systemic glucocorticosteroids have demonstrated efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) but cause undesired systemic side effects. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has potent topical activity and is extensively metabolized. This randomized double-blind study investigated an oral gastroresistant controlled-release preparation of BDP in 57 patients with mild to moderately severe extensive or left-sided UC. Patients were assigned to receive BDP 5 or 10 mg/d; a third group took a clinically inactive dose (1.6 g/d) of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). Both BDP doses displayed excellent efficacy confirmed by results of endoscopy, biopsy, and clinical evaluation. Significant improvement from baseline occurred in most signs and symptoms of UC, particularly stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and mucus in the stool (P<.01). Tolerability was good in both BDP groups. Morning plasma cortisol levels decreased significantly from baseline with BDP 10 mg, but no significant changes in vital signs were observed at the end of treatment. Despite a small sample size and the open comparison with 5-ASA, this multicenter study showed the therapeutic equivalence of BDP 5 and 10 mg/d in alleviating clinical symptoms and improving endoscopic and biopsy scores in patients with mild to moderate UC. BDP 5 mg/d displayed better general tolerability and less reduction of plasma cortisol levels, however, and may be preferable to the higher dose in this indication.

Objective: Previous studies have reported genetic anticipation, genomic imprinting, and phenotypic concordance of some clinical features in familial cases of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of our study was to investigate the phenotypic features of affected members in a large sample of CD and UC Italian families., Methods: In a multicenter study, CD and UC families were recruited. Affected members were questioned about date of birth, gender, age at onset of symptoms and at diagnosis, location and extension of disease, occurrence of extraintestinal manifestations, use of steroids and/or of immunosuppressive drugs, need for resective surgery, and number of relapses per year (< 1 yr or > or = 1 yr). Statistical analysis was performed with chi2, Fisher's, Mann-Whitney U, and binomial probability tests, when appropriate., Results: A total of 128 families with 270 affected members were studied: 35 were CD, 64 UC, and 29 mixed families (when UC and CD affected different members). In 99 of 128 families (77%), the diagnosis was concordant. In CD families, a high concordance for localization (46%), extraintestinal manifestations (67%), need for steroids (77%), need for immunosuppressive drugs (100%), need for surgery (29%), and relapse rate (36%) was found. In UC families, a high concordance for disease extension (33%), need for steroids (47%), and relapse rate (34%) was disclosed. A higher than expected concordance for ileal localization (p < 0.4) in CD families and extensive colitis (p < 0.05) in UC families was demonstrated. A generation difference of 15-20 yr in mean ages at onset of symptoms and at diagnosis was recorded. No features of more aggressive disease in subsequent generations and no differences in gender of transmitting parents and relatives were found., Conclusions: Our study shows a high rate of concordance for diagnosis and clinical features in UC and, especially, CD families. The disease occurred 15-20 yr earlier than in previous generations without features of increased severity.

Background: High doses of mesalazine usually result in an inconvenient dosage schedule and reduced compliance. The goal of this trial was to compare the effects of mesalazine 4 g daily given as prolonged-release granules in packets of 1 g with that of prolonged-release tablets of 0.5 g., Methods: Two hundred twenty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized to treatment with two packets twice daily (Gr-b.i.d.), 1 packet four times daily (Gr-q.i.d.) or 2 tablets four times daily (Ta-q.i.d.) for 8 weeks. A disease activity index (ulcerative colitis disease activity index: UC-DAI) was calculated, and the granules were defined as noninferior to the tablets if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the differences was more than -1 UC-DAI score unit., Results: Noninferiority of the granules compared with the tablets was demonstrated. The mean improvement in the UC-DAI in the treatment groups Gr-b.i.d., Gr-q.i.d., and Ta-q.i.d. were 3.2, 2.9, and 2.4, respectively; the proportion of complete responders in the three groups 39%, 37%, and 31%, respectively. There were no differences in side effects., Conclusion: Mesalazine 4 g daily given as prolonged-release granules twice and four times daily is at least as effective as prolonged-release tablets four times daily in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The patients preferred the twice daily dosing.

Background: Oral and topical mesalazine formulations are effective in active ulcerative colitis, but little is known on the efficacy of combined treatment., Aim: To compare the efficacy of oral mesalazine vs. combined oral and topical mesalazine in mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis., Methods: Patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (Clinical Activity Index, CAI 4-12) were identified at 15 participating centres. They were randomized to receive either mesalazine 4 g orally plus placebo enema, or mesalazine 2 g orally plus mesalazine 2 g rectally as a liquid enema for 6 weeks. The rate of clinical remission (CAI < 4) or clinical remission/improvement (reduction of CAI of 50% from baseline) at 6 weeks and time to clinical remission/improvement were primary end-points; the rate of endoscopic remission was a secondary end-point., Results: 67 patients were assigned to oral treatment and 63 to combined treatment. One patient in the oral group and 2 in the combined group discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. Following an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of clinical remission was 82% for oral treatment and 87% for combined treatment (P=0.56); the mean time to remission 22.2 and 20.2 days, respectively (P=0.29); the rate of clinical remission/improvement and the rate of endoscopic remission were 85% and 91% (P=0.503) and 58% and 71% (P=0.21), respectively., Conclusions: In patients with mild active ulcerative colitis, mesalazine 4 g orally and 2 g orally plus 2 g enema are equally effective in inducing disease remission.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis is the first choice procedure for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The introduction of the stapled technique has shortened the duration of the procedure and reduced the complication rates. Data on 335 consecutive patients undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (277 pts), Indeterminate colitis (20 pts) and familial adenomatous polyposis (38 pts) between 1984 and 1998 were prospectively collected. Parameters evaluated included diagnosis, surgical technique, functional outcome, early and late complications and their management and results. Twenty-nine patients (8.6%) presented with pelvic sepsis. Twelve patients (3.5%) experienced late perianal fistulas. The pouch failure rate was 3.4%. Six patients required a re-do pouch procedure, with 75.9% preservation of sphincter function. No correlation was found between complication rates and diagnosis. The mean number of stools was 5.2/24 h. The study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. In particular, morbidity rates are comparable to those of major abdominal procedures and the long-term functional results are satisfactory. However, a number of technical aspects, such as the anastomosis technique, the need for temporary ileostomy and the treatment of indeterminate colitis, still remain controversial.

Objective: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a newly described neutrophil lipocalin that may bind the proinflammatory bacterial tripeptide N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical studies have shown a strong NGAL expression in colonocytes and neutrophils in ulcerative colitis (UC). Because NGAL is highly protease resistant, it should be ideal for in vivo fecal and dialysate studies. Our aim was to investigate the potential of NGAL as a disease activity marker in UC and to compare it with IL-8 and TNF-alpha., Methods: Twenty-three patients with UC, 14 with Crohn's disease (CD), 19 patients with acute infectious enterocolitis, and 20 healthy controls were included. The disease activity of UC and CD was scored semiquantitatively. Concentrations of NGAL, IL-8, and TNF-alpha were determined in rectal dialysis fluid, feces, and serum using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The total protein concentration in feces and dialysate fluid was measured, and the amount of markers was expressed as ng/mg protein., Results: In healthy controls and non-IBD (irritable bowel disease) colitis, the median values for NGAL in feces were 183 ng/mg protein and 546 ng/mg protein (p < 0.01), respectively. When separating UC into clinical activity groups (remission, mild/moderate, and severe disease activity) the corresponding values of NGAL were 442 ng/mg (p > 0.05), 605 ng/mg (p < 0.02), and 3646 ng/mg (p < 0.001, compared with controls), respectively, and in quiescent colonic CD 368 ng/mg (p > 0.05) and in active stages 751 ng/mg (p < 0.01). NGAL levels in dialysis fluid listed in the same order were: 11 ng/mg for controls, 71 ng/mg (p > 0.05) for non-IBD colitis, 100 ng/mg (p < 0.02), 179 ng/mg (p < 0.01), and 2053 ng/mg (p < 0.001) for UC, and 14 ng/mg (p > 0.05) and 121 ng/mg (p < 0.02) for CD, respectively. Serum NGAL concentrations did not differ between UC and CD in quiescent versus active stages. A significant increase of NGAL in both feces and dialysate with increasing disease activity of UC was found (p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively)., Conclusions: The NGAL content in rectal dialysate and particularly in feces seems to be a reliable marker for severe disease activity in UC, whereas serum NGAL concentrations do not reflect disease activity.

Chemokines are thought to be important for the recruitment of granulocytes and mononuclear cells and thus for the maintenance of inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC). We have studied the expression of interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MCP-3, and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha in UC patients and control individuals to assess the role of these chemokines in disease progression. Colonic biopsies were taken endoscopically from patients and controls, frozen immediately and subsequently stained for IP-10, IL-8, MCP-1, MCP-3, and MIP-1alpha in serial sections. Cells infiltrating the lamina propria but not epithelial cells express the analyzed chemokines. They were differentiated and counted, and chemokine-expressing cells were quantified by image analysis. The percentage of cells expressing IP-10, IL-8, MCP-1, and MCP-3 was significantly enhanced in all UC samples as compared to controls. Expression in the controls was borderline, except for IP-10. No expression of MIP-1alpha was found in controls and UC. IP-10 was also markedly expressed in the mucosa of control biopsies and therefore could have a role in activated T lymphocytes' recruitment into the healthy mucosa.

Background: Although 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) oral compounds are the standard maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis in remission, some patients cannot use them because of side-effects. Clinical and experimental observations have suggested the potential role of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease therapy., Aim: To evaluate the effects on intestinal microflora and the clinical efficacy of a new probiotic preparation in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission., Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with ulcerative colitis, intolerant or allergic to 5-ASA, have been treated with a new probiotic preparation (VSL#3, CSL, Milan, Italy) containing 5x10(11) cells/g of 3 strains of bifidobacteria, 4 strains of lactobacilli and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus. Two doses of 3 g were administered o.d. for 12 months. Faecal samples for stool culture were obtained from the patients at the beginning of the trial and after 10, 20, 40, 60, 75, 90 days, 12 months and at 15 days after the end of the treatment. The following bacterial groups have been evaluated in the faeces: total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, enterococci, Streptococcus thermophilus, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, clostridia, coliforms. Patients were assessed clinically every two months, and assessed endoscopically at 6 and 12 months or in relapse., Results: Faecal concentrations of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus, lactobacilli and bifidobacteria increased significantly in all patients, compared to their basal level, from the 20th day of treatment (P<0.05) and remained stable throughout the study. Concentrations of Bacteroides, clostridia, coliforms, total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria did not change significantly during treatment (P = N.S.). Fifteen of 20 treated patients remained in remission during the study, one patient was lost to follow up, while the remaining relapsed. No significant side-effects have been reported., Conclusions: These results show that this probiotic preparation is able to colonize the intestine, and suggest that it may be useful in maintaining the remission in ulcerative colitis patients intolerant or allergic to 5-ASA. Controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary results.

Background: A new mesalazine rectal gel preparation (without propellant gas) has been recently developed to improve topical treatment in distal ulcerative colitis., Aim: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient tolerability of mesalazine gel enema compared with mesalazine foam enema in the treatment of patients with acute left-sided ulcerative colitis., Methods: In a randomized multicentre investigator-blind parallel group trial, 103 patients with mild to moderate left-sided colitis or proctosigmoiditis were randomly allocated to mesalazine 2 g gel enema (n = 50 evaluable patients) and mesalazine 2 g foam enema (n = 53 evaluable patients) for 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms, endoscopic and histological findings were assessed at entry, 2 and 4 weeks. Patients' evaluation of treatment tolerability and acceptability was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks., Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, clinical remission was achieved by 76% of mesalazine gel enema-treated patients and 69% of patients treated with mesalazine foam enema (P = 0.608). Endoscopic remission rates at week 4 were 51 and 52% for the mesalazine gel and foam enemas, respectively (P = 0.925). Histological remission was achieved by 30% of patients in both groups. Patients reported that the new mesalazine gel preparation was significantly better tolerated than the foam enema. Patients in the foam group had significantly more difficulty in retention (25% vs. 6%, P < 0.05), abdominal bloating (50% vs. 26%, P < 0.005) and discomfort during administration (48% vs. 26%, P < 0.05)., Conclusion: The new mesalazine gel enema is efficacious and significantly better tolerated than the mesalazine foam enema.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate a) the role of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) as a possible antigen determining perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (p-ANCA) reactivity in ulcerative colitis and b) the prevalence and clinical correlates of anti-BPI antibodies in patients with ulcerative colitis on the basis of their p-ANCA status., Methods: p-ANCA and anti-BPI antibodies were evaluated by means of indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods in a group of 112 ulcerative colitis patients (including 42 patients subjected to proctocolectomy) well defined as far as their clinical features and p-ANCA status., Results: Anti-BPI antibodies were detected in 24% of non-operated patients and were significantly more frequent in p-ANCA-positive patients (32% versus 5% in p-ANCA-negative patients; P < 0.015). The prevalence of anti-BPI antibodies was similar in non-operated and operated patients and was high in men, in patients with an extensive and aggressive disease, and in patients developing pouchitis after surgery., Conclusions: These data indicate that BPI is a neutrophil antigen frequently recognized by p-ANCA-positive ulcerative colitis sera. The presence of anti-BPI antibodies appears to identify further immunologic and clinical heterogeneity in ulcerative colitis.

Aim: To compare beclomethasone dipropionate 3 mg/60 mL enema (BDP) and prednisolone sodium phosphate 30 mg/60 mL enema (PP) once daily in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis., Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled in a multicentre, 4-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks., Results: Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement of clinical activity after 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopy and biopsy showed a reduction in the activity score at the end of the treatment period in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups. After 4 weeks, 29% of patients in the BDP group and 25% in the PP group were considered to be in clinical remission; an improvement was observed in 40% of patients on BDP and in 47% on PP. Mean morning plasma cortisol levels showed a slight but significant reduction in the PP group, while the ACTH test showed that neither drug interfered with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. No significant changes were observed in the laboratory tests. Finally, there was a low incidence of adverse events in both groups., Conclusions: It is concluded that, in the topical treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis, BDP 3 mg enemas are as efficacious as PP 30 mg enemas, without interference with the HPA axis.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral mesalazine with mesalazine suppositories in patients with active ulcerative proctitis., Patients and Methods: A four-week, randomized, single-blind trial was performed in 58 patients with active, histologically confirmed ulcerative proctitis (< or = 15 cm) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral 800-mg mesalazine tablets taken three times per day (n = 29) compared with 400 mg of mesalazine suppositories administered three times per day (n = 29). Patients were evaluated at study entry and after two and four weeks. Efficacy evaluations included a disease activity index, which represents a score with four variables: stools frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance, and physician's assessment of disease severity. Histologic activity was also assessed at study entry and after two and four weeks in accordance with the criteria by Truelove and Richard. Safety assessment included clinical laboratory parameters and adverse event reports., Results: There were no significant differences with regard to baseline comparisons of demographics and severity between the two treatment groups. Improvement in mean disease activity index score was significantly greater with suppositories compared with oral mesalazine, both at two-week and four-week visits (mean disease activity index scores at baseline, two, and four weeks: suppositories = 7.7, 2.59, and 1.48; tablets = 7.42, 5.72, and 3.48, respectively (P < 0.001)). The rate of histologic remission was significantly greater with suppositories compared with tablets both at two and four weeks (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in adverse events or clinical laboratory results between treatment groups., Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that treatment with mesalazine suppositories produces earlier and significantly better results than oral mesalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis.

Background: Rectal treatment with mesalazine enemas is the first-line therapy for distal ulcerative colitis. In order to improve the benefits of rectal therapy, a new 60 mL 5-ASA rectal gel enema preparation has been developed using a device which excludes direct contact of the inert propellant gas with the active drug. The purpose of the present study was to assess by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of this new mesalazine rectal gel enema., Methods: Twelve patients with active ulcerative colitis were administered 4 g of the mesalazine rectal enema labelled with 100 MBq technetium sulphur colloid (99mTc-SC). Anterior scans of the abdomen were acquired at intervals for 4 h. Scans were analysed to evaluate the extent of retrograde flow and homogeneity of distribution of the radiolabelled enema in the rectum, sigmoid, descending and transverse colon. In addition, plasma levels of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were measured for 6 h., Results: All patients retained the entire rectal gel throughout the course of the study without reporting adverse events. In 11 out of 12 patients (92%) the gel had spread homogeneously beyond the sigmoid colon and had reached the upper limit of disease in all cases. The maximum spread (splenic flexure) was observed in 6 out of 12 patients (50%) within the first 2 h. The systemic absorption of mesalazine and its metabolite Ac-5-ASA was low., Conclusions: The new mesalazine enema represents an adequate alternative and a further technological improvement in the topical treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.

Background: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) from patients with vasculitidis can induce neutrophils to release oxygen radicals in vitro. ANCAs with a perinuclear pattern of immunofluorescence are found in most patients with ulcerative colitis, but several findings are against ANCAs having a pathogenetic role in this disease., Aims: To evaluate the influence of ANCAs associated with ulcerative colitis on the respiratory burst activity of neutrophils., Patients: Serum samples were obtained from 14 patients with ulcerative colitis, seven of whom showed positivity for p-ANCAs, three patients with vasculitidis, two with positivity for p-ANCAs, and one for c-ANCAs, and seven healthy volunteers., Methods: A positive ANCA serology was determined with a standard indirect immunofluorescence assay. Purified immunoglobulins (IgGs) were prepared from serum samples by DEAE-Affigel blue chromatography. Human neutrophils were prepared by dextran-Ficoll-Hypaque separation. Superoxide anion (O2-.) generation was measured by following the superoxide dismutase inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome., Results: There were no significant differences among samples from ulcerative colitis IgG p-ANCA positive, ulcerative colitis IgG p-ANCA negative patients, and controls on O2-. production, whereas ANCA positive IgG from vasculitidis significantly enhanced O2-. release (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: p-ANCAs associated with ulcerative colitis have no effect on the respiratory burst activity of normal human neutrophils in vitro. These results reinforce the hypotheses that ANCAs are unlikely to contribute to the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.

Objectives: The prognosis of attacks of ulcerative colitis is clearly linked to the extent and activity of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of high resolution ultrasonography in assessing both the extent and activity of severe ulcerative colitis and its response to medical treatment., Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive patients affected by a severe (32 patients) or moderately severe (25 patients) attack of ulcerative colitis underwent ultrasonographic examination. The ultrasonographic extent of the disease was evaluated in 32 patients by comparing ultrasonography and scintigraphy., Results: Compared with scintigraphy, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of ultrasonographic extent were 89%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. These results were also confirmed in a subgroup of patients submitted to surgery, comparing ultrasonographic and scintigraphic data versus specimens. Using the ultrasonographic score of activity, it was possible to discriminate severe and moderately severe attacks with a specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy of 96%, 90.3%, and 92.9% respectively. A close correlation was also found between ultrasonographic and scintigraphic activity (r = 0.78; p < 0.001). After 10 days of intensive treatment, the ultrasonographic activity significantly decreased in severe and moderate groups (p < 0.001) and in both subgroups of nonoperated patients (p < 0.001) but not in operated patients (p = NS)., Conclusions: High resolution ultrasonography can be useful in assessing both extent and activity of severe ulcerative colitis, in monitoring the patient's condition, and in objectively evaluating the response to medical therapy.

Aims: An oral multiparticulate coated formulation of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA: mesalazine) has been developed to provide a controlled release of the drug, in a pH-dependent fashion, in the distal ileum and colon. The purpose of the present study was to assess the systemic availability of the drug and its metabolite, acetyl-5-ASA, following single (800 mg) and multiple (2400 mg for 56 days) oral dose administration., Methods: Three groups were investigated: six healthy volunteers, six patients with ulcerative colitis, and nine patients with Crohn's disease in remission. In the single oral dose study (800 mg) all three groups participated, whereas in the multiple oral dose study (2400 mg/day for 56 days) only the patients with inflammatory bowel disease took part. Plasma and urine 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were measured for 48 h., Results: In the single oral dose regimen, systemic absorption of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were low and did not differ between the three groups. Only about 20% of the 5-ASA given was absorbed, with more than 80% of the drug being available in the terminal ileum and colon for therapeutic activity. The multiple oral dose regimen in patients with inflammatory bowel disease produced a significantly higher plasma concentration and urine excretion of both 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA by the end of the treatment, in comparison to the first dose. There was a statistically higher systemic absorption of 5-ASA in patients with ulcerative colitis than in patients with Crohn's disease. After 56 days of dosing, no adverse event was reported and laboratory screening tests remained within normal ranges., Conclusions: The new oral 5-ASA formulation is gradually released throughout the small and large intestine, reflected by a low plasma concentration of the drug and its metabolite, with about 80% of the drug being available for ileum-colon therapeutic activity.

We evaluated the efficacy, tolerance, and acceptance of a new 5-ASA colonic foam versus 5-ASA liquid enema in the short-term treatment of active ulcerative colitis in a three-week prospective, randomized, investigator-blind study, enrolling 233 patients from 12 outpatient clinics in Italy. In arm 1 of the study, 117 patients with mild attacks received 2 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. In arm 2, 116 patients with moderate attacks were given 4 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. End points were defined as complete relief of symptoms, and endoscopic and histological evidence of remission or improvement. In patients with mild relapse, 34 of 63 (54%) treated with foam were in clinical remission after only 10 days compared with 17 of 51 (31%) treated with enemas (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between foam (83%) and enema (74%) after three weeks. In patients with moderate relapse, a higher proportion of patients achieved complete clinical remission in the foam group (63%) compared with enema group (52%) after three weeks (difference 11%, 95% CI -7 to 29). No significant differences were observed in endoscopic and histological evaluation of colonic mucosa between treatment groups in either arm. 5-ASA foam was well tolerated. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Patient evaluation of therapy showed that foam was much better accepted than enema because foam was more comfortable, more practical, easier to retain, and interfered less with daily living.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rectal treatment with enemas, foams, and suppositories is the most efficient method of delivering an adequate quantity of locally active drugs to the distal colon. In a pilot study carried out by colonoscopy in four patients, it was observed that 4 g 5-ASA in 20 ml foam spread up or beyond the splenic flexure and more extensively than 2 g 5-ASA in 10 ml foam. Therefore we have undertaken a study in order to compare by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of 4 g 5-ASA foam versus 4 g 5-ASA in 100 ml liquid enemas in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis using a crossover randomized design. Both preparations were labeled with 100 MBq [99mTc]sulfur colloid before administration. Anterior scans were taken at intervals for 4 hr. Activity, expressed as a percentage of total radioactivity, was measured in the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon. Six patients had the same extent of spread with the two formulations; in three patients with foam and in one patient with enema a greater spread was observed. The foam reached the upper limit of disease in all cases, while enema failed in two cases. The maximum spread with foam was observed within 30 min in nine of 10 patients compared with seven of 10 after enema. Compared to enema, foam distributes more uniformly and seems to persist longer in the descending and sigmoid colon. The 5-ASA colonic foam shows some more favorable characteristics than enema for the local treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis.