Search

Aim: Restorative surgery after (procto)colectomy with ileo-neorectal anastomosis (INRA) or restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (RPC) combines cure of ulcerative colitis (UC) with restoration of intestinal continuity. This study aimed to evaluate these two operations., Method: Patients having INRA and RPC were matched according to sex, age at onset of UC, age at restorative surgery and duration of follow-up. Patients were included if they were over 18 years of age, had UC confirmed histopathologically and had undergone either operation. Long-term function, anal and neorectal physiology, complications, quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) were determined., Results: Seventy-one consecutive patients underwent surgery with the intention of having an INRA procedure. This was successfully carried out in 50, and 21 underwent intra-operative conversion to RPC. Median defaecation frequency was 6/24 h. In 11/71 patients reservoir failure occurred and 13/71 developed pouchitis. QoL and HS were comparable to the healthy population. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. These patients were matched with 71 patients who underwent RPC. RPC was successful in all patients. Median defaecation frequency was 8/24 h. Failure occurred in 7/71 patients and 13/71 developed pouchitis. QoL and HS were comparable with the healthy population. Median follow-up was 6.9 years., Conclusion: Comparison of INRA and RPC on an intention to treat basis was not considered to be realistic due to the high intra-operative conversion rate and the failures in the INRA group. RPC remains the procedure of choice for restoring intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy for UC., (Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Aim: There are numerous studies on quality of life (QoL), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and health status (HS) in patients undergoing surgery for ulcerative colitis. A systematic review of published literature was conducted to establish the quality of these studies and to determine QoL, HRQoL, and HS in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis., Method: All published studies describing QoL, HRQoL, and HS in adult patients in combination with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were reviewed systematically. No time or language limitations were applied. Relevance was established on the basis of three pre-specified selection criteria: 1) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed for ulcerative colitis, 2) QoL, HRQoL, and HS were reported as outcome of the study and 3) studies reported a minimum follow-up after surgery for 12 months. Outcome variables were results of QoL, HRQoL, and HS, characteristics of the study population, pouch construction, duration of follow-up, and time of assessment in months before and after restorative surgery. Descriptive data synthesis was performed by tabulation displaying the methodological quality, study characteristics and conclusions on QoL, HRQoL, and HS measurements in the studies., Results: The review included 33 studies comprising 4790 patients. Three were graded to be of high quality, 23 of moderate quality and seven of low quality. All reported improved HS and the majority reported improved HRQoL. However, none of the studies reported on QoL., Conclusion: The HRQoL and HS of patients with ulcerative colitis improved 12 months after restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and were indistinguishable from the HRQoL and HS of the normal healthy population., (© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis. Quality of life (QoL) and health status are the most important patient-related outcomes. Studies investigating QoL are often cross-sectional and focus on health status. This longitudinal study evaluated QoL and health status after IPAA for ulcerative colitis and compared these with reference data from a healthy population., Methods: Patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent a pouch operation between 2003 and 2008 completed validated questionnaires for QoL and health status. Questionnaires were completed before pouch surgery, and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after operation. The effect of IPAA on QoL and health status was analysed, and data were compared with reference values from the healthy Dutch population., Results: Data were obtained for 30 of the 32 patients. Six months after IPAA, QoL was at least comparable with that of the reference population in four of six domains. Twelve months after IPAA, overall QoL had improved, supported by findings in three QoL domains. Six months after IPAA, health status was comparable to that of the reference population in three of eight dimensions, and after 3 years it was at least comparable in five dimensions., Conclusion: QoL and health status increased after IPAA and reached levels comparable with those of the healthy reference population in a majority of domains and dimensions. QoL was restored first after IPAA, followed by health status., (Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)