Search

Background: With increasing public reporting of outcomes and bundled payments, hospitals and providers are scrutinized for morbidity and mortality. The impact of patient transfer before colorectal surgery has not been well characterized in a risk-adjusted fashion., Objective: We hypothesized that hospital-to-hospital transfer would independently predict morbidity and mortality beyond traditional predictor variables., Design: We constructed a retrospective cohort of 158,446 patients who underwent colorectal surgery using the 2009-2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database., Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital., Patients: All of the patients who underwent colorectal surgery during the study period were included. Patients were excluded for unknown transfer status or transfer from a chronic care facility., Main Outcome Measures: Baseline characteristics were compared by transfer status. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of transfer on major complications and mortality., Results: A total of 7259 operations (4.6%) were performed after transfer. Transferred patients had higher rates of complications (p < 0.0001) with significant differences in unplanned endotracheal reintubation, bleeding, organ-space surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, postoperative sepsis, cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, deep venous thrombosis, and myocardial infarction. Transferred patients also had longer hospital stays (9 vs 6 days; p < 0.0001) and a higher risk of death (13.2% vs 2.6%; p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, transferred patients had higher mortality rates despite risk adjustment (OR = 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02-1.25); p = 0.019) and were also more likely to have serious complications (OR = 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06-1.19); p < 0.001)., Limitations: We were unable to analyze outcomes beyond 30 days, and we did not have information on preoperative evaluation or the reason for patient transfer., Conclusions: Hospital-to-hospital transfer independently contributed to patient morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The impact of hospital transfer must be considered when evaluating surgeon and hospital performance, because the increased risk of serious complications or death is not fully accounted for by traditional methods.

Background: The aim of this retrospective, case-matched controlled study was to determine the benefit of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LC) for the elderly (>75 years of age) and the young (<75 years of age) compared to an open colectomy (OC) control group., Methods: A retrospective review of 39 patients older than 75 years of age and 38 patients younger than 75 years of age who underwent LC for colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1999 was performed. LC patients were matched with an open control group for procedure, age, gender, year of procedure, and surgeon. Procedures included right and left colectomy, anterior resection of the rectosigmoid, and abdominoperineal resection. Measured intraoperative variables included anesthesia time, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Postoperative parameters consisted of duration of intravenous or epidural narcotic usage, return of bowel function (RBF), length of stay, and independence at discharge. These variables were compared in the entire group of 154 patients., Results: Mean ages were 81.4 and 81.8 years for LC and OC age >75 and 62.9 and 62.7 for LC and OC age <75. Mean anesthesia time and operative time were significantly longer (p < 0.05) for LC compared to OC (46.8 vs 39.3 and 159.3 vs 111.7 min, respectively) for age >75 and for age <75 (47.1 vs 40.3 and 182.8 vs 135.5 min, respectively). LC achieved faster recovery in both age groups: RBF (3.9 vs 4.9 days for age >75; 6.7 vs 7.7 days for age <75) (p < 0.05). Narcotic usage was shorter for the LC group age <75 (3.3 vs 4.4 days; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in independence at discharge between LC and OC in either age group. Faster recovery was seen with left LC in age >75 and right LC in age <75 compared to OC., Conclusion: The advantages of LC over OC are the same for the elderly and the young. There may be a selective benefit of laparoscopic left colectomy in the elderly and laparoscopic right colectomy in the young.