Search

The article offers information on the philosophy of science which was a small discipline before the 1970s. It mentions that Post-Kuhnians claims that philosophy of science needs to attend to the historical practices of the scientists while Naturalists argues that scientific activities needs to be based on the cognitive science results. It adds that the relevance of philosophy of science to broader audience could be increased through more sustained study of general issues.

The paper starts with an analysis of similarities and differences between experimentation and technological production. It is argued that both imply an active intervention in nature and society, but that the cognitive and social aspects of experiment and technology may display considerable differences. The theoretical analysis is illustrated by means of examples taken, in particular, from the technology of nuclear energy production. Next, it is shown that, from the viewpoint of this paper, the technology conception prevailing in public debates on technology and in technology policy is inadequate; again, the case of nuclear energy serves as an example. Finally, it is concluded that scientific or technological knowledge and social power are intrinsically connected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]