Search

Objective: The objective of this article is to introduce the concept of community-based participatory research as a means to understand barriers to cochlear implant access racially minoritized populations., Background: Black adults living in the United States experience unique barriers to cochlear implantation. Community-based research approaches can be used to understand and address these barriers., Application: The Memphis SOUND Project is a community-based research initiative that seeks to address hearing health disparities by examining utilization of hearing healthcare among Black adults. Preliminary findings introduce motivators and barriers related to CI intervention in this population., Conclusion: This Memphis SOUND Project provides valuable insights to the benefits of community-based research in understanding and addressing CI utilization disparities., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the existing literature with the aim of evaluating and consolidating the present understanding of strategies for mitigating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts related to cochlear implants in adult and pediatric patients, covering both in-vivo and ex-vivo investigations., Data Sources: A systematic review of MEDLINE-Ovid, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed from inception through April 2022. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO before commencement of data collection (CRD CRD42022319651)., Review Methods: The data were screened and collected by two authors independently, and eligibility was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recommendations, whereas the quality of the articles was evaluated using the NIH Study Quality Assessment., Results: The search yielded 2,354 potentially relevant articles, of which 27 studies were included in the final review. Twelve studies looked at 1.5-T MRI, four studies looked at 3-T MRI, eight studies looked at both 1.5 and 3 T, one study looked at 0.2 and 1.5 T, and one study looked at 3- and 7.0-T MRI. Nineteen studies focused on MRI sequences as a means of artifact reduction, nine studies focused on implant magnet positioning, two studies focused on head positioning, and one study focused on both magnet and head positioning. In terms of MRI sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging produced larger artifacts compared with other sequences, whereas fast spin echo/turbo spin echo sequences and fat suppression techniques produced smaller artifacts. The position of the magnet was also found to be important, with a magnet position more than 6.5 cm posterior to the external auditory canal producing the best images with the least distortion. The angle at which the magnet is placed also affects visibility of different brain structures., Conclusion: Proper head positioning, magnet placement at a distance of over 6.5 cm from the external auditory canal, use of spin echo sequences, and fat suppression techniques reduce the size and shape of MRI artifacts., (Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives: Describe audiologic outcomes in hearing preservation cochlear implantation (CI) using a precurved electrode array inserted using an external sheath and evaluate association of electrode positioning and preservation of residual hearing., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary otologic center., Patients: Twenty-four adult patients who underwent hearing preservation CI with precurved electrode array., Interventions: CI, intraoperative computed tomography (CT) OUTCOME MEASURES:: Audiologic measures (consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC] words, AzBio sentences, low-frequency pure tone averages [LFPTA]) and electrode location (scalar location, electrode-to-modiolus distance ((Equation is included in full-text article.)), angular insertion depth)., Results: Twenty-four adults with less than 80 dB LFPTA with a precurved electrode array inserted using an external sheath; 16 underwent intraoperative CT. LFPTA was 58.5 dB HL preoperatively, with a 17.3 dB threshold shift at CI activation (p = 0.005). CNC word scores improved from 6% preoperatively to 64% at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). There was one scalar translocation and no tip fold-overs. The average angular insertion depth was 388.2 degrees, and the average (Equation is included in full-text article.)across all electrodes was 0.36 mm. Multivariate regression revealed a significant correlation between CNC scores at 6 months and angular insertion depth (p = 0.0122; r = 0.45, adjusted r = 0.35). Change in LFPTA was not significantly associated with angular insertion depth or (Equation is included in full-text article.)., Conclusions: A low rate of translocation allows a precurved electrode array inserted using an external sheath to maintain hearing preservation rates comparable to straight electrode arrays. With scala tympani insertion, angular insertion depth is a positive marker of improved speech performance postoperatively but may be a confounder variable based on individual cochlear size.

Objective: Characterize differences in adult cochlear implant outcomes and programming parameters for a straight (CI422/522) and a precurved (CI532) electrode array., Setting: Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary otologic center., Patients: Fifty-eight adults were included in the study; 29 were implanted with CI422 or CI522 and 29 were implanted with CI532. Each CI532 recipient was matched to a CI422/522 recipient in terms of age and preoperative hearing thresholds for comparison purposes., Main Outcome Measures: Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words, AzBio sentences, residual audiometric thresholds, and Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire collected 6 months postoperatively were used to characterize outcomes. Pulse duration, maxima, impedances, and overall charge measurements were used to characterize programming parameters., Results: Postoperative unaided low frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) was significantly better for the CI532 group. CNC scores were significantly better for the CI532 group. Impedances and pulse duration were significantly lower for the CI532 group, but there was no difference in overall charge between the groups., Conclusion: The CI532 group showed either similar or statistically superior results on all measures when compared with the CI422/522 suggesting that the CI532 electrode may be an advantageous substitute for the CI522.

Objective: To describe histologic and radiographic findings associated with insertion of a new lateral wall electrode in human temporal bones, as well as quantify the ease of insertion as characterized by multiple cochlear implant surgeons., Setting: Multi-institutional cadaveric study., Methods: The Slim J electrode was inserted in cadaveric temporal bones via a standard mastoidectomy and facial recess approach. Insertion was performed by five cochlear implant surgeons with no previous experience with the Slim J electrode array. Electrode array insertion was performed via a round window, an extended round window, or a cochleostomy approach. Intracochlear trauma, and angular insertion depth was assessed histologically and radiologically, respectively, after placement of the Slim J electrode array., Results: Scala tympani insertion was accomplished in all 40 specimens. Thirty-eight specimens (95%) showed minimal trauma (Esrhaghi grade 0 or 1). One patient had rupture of basilar membrane (grade 2 trauma) at 380 degrees. One patient had grade 4 trauma with scalar translocation beginning at 210 degrees. The mean angular insertion depth was 416.4 degrees (range: 338.7-509.2 degrees, SD 44 degrees). Surgical handling was described as easy in 38 cases (95%)., Conclusion: In a human cadaveric model the lateral wall Slim J electrode produced minimal intracochlear trauma that was positioned completely within the scala tympani in 97.5% of cases.

Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a complex and heterogeneous disorder associated with altered neural synchrony with respect to auditory stimuli. Patients have characteristic auditory findings including normal otoacoustic emissions in the setting of abnormal auditory brainstem response. Patients with ANSD have a high incidence of comorbid developmental delay that may impact speech outcomes. Treatment options for ANSD include hearing amplification and cochlear implantation. The article highlights issues and controversies with the diagnosis and treatment of this complex disorder., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Determine the effect of cochleostomy and facial recess packing on cochlear implant electrode distance from the modiolus., Materials and Methods: Two otolaryngology residents (PGY5 and PGY6) and one attending ear surgeon performed electrode insertions on a human cochlea model using perimodiolar (Cochlear® Slim Modiolar 532™, CI532) and lateral wall electrodes (Cochlear® Slim Straight 522™, CI522) via a cochleostomy. Packing material was simulated using cotton and placed in the cochleostomy and facial recess under the following conditions: 1) inferior to the electrode, 2) superior, 3) both inferior and superior, and 4) no packing. Distance of the electrode from the modiolus at the proximal, middle, and distal basal turn of the cochlea were measured by photomicrograph analysis., Results: Packing superior to the CI532 resulted in a significant decrease in distance from the modiolus at the middle and distal basal turn compared to the inferior condition, with the largest effect in the middle basal turn (0.25 mm vs. 1.92 mm, respectively, p < 0.001). For the CI522, packing superior similarly resulted in decreased distance to the modiolus when compared to the inferior packing condition at the middle and distal basal turn regions, with the largest effect in the middle basal turn (1.25 mm vs. 1.75 mm, respectively, p = 0.002)., Conclusions: Packing of the cochleostomy site and facial recess has a significant effect on electrode distance from the modiolus in the middle and distal basal turn using a model of a human cochlea. Effects were more pronounced when using the perimodiolar (CI532) electrode., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe a case of bifid intratemporal facial nerves without associated middle or inner ear abnormalities encountered on computed tomography (CT) imaging during preoperative preparation for unilateral cochlear implant placement in an adult male with profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Methods: A rare case of bilateral bifid intratemporal facial nerves in an adult male is presented. The finding's impact on approach to safe cochlear implantation is discussed. Results: Bifurcation of the intratemporal facial nerve is rarely seen and is usually associated with congenital middle or inner ear anomalies. A unique case of bilateral bifid intratemporal facial nerves without other middle or inner ear abnormalities was encountered incidentally on CT imaging during preparation for unilateral cochlear implant placement in an adult male with profound SNHL. The nerve was bifid along the mastoid segment with a nerve branch traversing through the facial recess precluding safe traditional approach to cochlear implant placement. Accessory stylomastoid foramina were noted bilaterally. Unilateral subtotal petrosectomy was performed with successful implantation and excellent hearing outcome. No additional clinical or radiographic otologic abnormalities were noted. Conclusion: Abnormal bifurcation of the facial nerve may occur in adults without other middle or inner ear anomalies. This case highlights the importance of independent imaging review by the surgeon and vigilance to potential rare anatomic aberrations of the facial nerve during cochlear implantation. Level of Evidence: IV [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In current practice, the status of residual low-frequency acoustic hearing in hearing preservation cochlear implantation (CI) is unknown until activation two to three weeks postoperatively. The intraoperatively measured electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), a synchronous response from electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers, is one of the first markers of auditory nerve function after cochlear implant surgery and such may provide information regarding the status of residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between intraoperative ECAP at the time of CI and presence of preoperative and postoperative low-frequency acoustic hearing. Research Design: A retrospective case review. Study Sample: Two hundred seventeen adult ears receiving CI (42 Advanced Bionics, 82 Cochlear, and 93 MED-EL implants). Interventions: Intraoperative ECAP and CI. Data Collection and Analysis: ECAP measurements were obtained intraoperatively, whereas residual hearing data were obtained from postoperative CI activation audiogram. A linear mixed model test revealed no interaction effects for the following variables: manufacturer, electrode location (basal, middle, and apical), preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA), and postoperative LFPTA. The postoperative residual low-frequency hearing status was defined as preservation of unaided air conduction thresholds ≥90 dB at 250 Hz. Electrode location and hearing preservation data were analyzed individually for both the ECAP threshold and ECAP maximum amplitude using multiple t-tests, without assuming a consistent standard deviation between the groups, and with alpha correction. Results: The maximum amplitude, in microvolts, was significantly higher throughout apical and middle regions of the cochlea in patients who had preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing as compared with those who did not have preserved hearing (p=0.0001 and p=0.0088, respectively). ECAP threshold, in microamperes, was significantly lower throughout the apical region of the cochlea in patients with preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing as compared with those without preserved hearing (p 5 0.0099). Basal electrode maximum amplitudes and middle and basal electrode thresholds were not significantly correlated with postoperative low-frequency hearing. Conclusions: Apical and middle electrode maximum amplitudes and apical electrode thresholds detected through intraoperative ECAP measurements are significantly correlated with preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing. This association may represent a potential immediate feedback mechanism for postoperative outcomes that can be applied to all CIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]