Search

Objective: Over the last decade there has been a trend toward observation for small nongrowing vestibular schwannoma (VS). Even without tumor growth, patients commonly experience ipsilateral hearing decline, and hearing rehabilitation remains challenging. This study analyzes hearing and speech performance outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in observed VS., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Methods: Chart review was used to include patients with observed VS who had undergone ipsilateral CI, pre- and postimplantation audiometry, and speech performance. Tumor size pre- and postimplantation was measured with volumetric analysis., Results: Seven patients with ipsilateral VS and CI were identified. Preimplantation tumor volume was 0.11 to 1.02 cm 3 . Five subjects were implanted with a straight electrode and two with a perimodiolar electrode. The average preimplant pure tone average was 91.3 dB (range, 80-117 dB) and 61.2 dB (range, 12-118 dB) for the implanted and nonimplanted ears, respectively. In all subjects with at least 1 year of listening experience (n = 6), consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores improved at 6 months and 1 year in the CI-alone and bimodal listening conditions. AzBio scores in quiet also improved at 6 months and 1 year. Of subjects with serial pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, volumetric analysis demonstrated no tumor growth., Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that CI is a successful option for subjects with small nongrowing VS. All subjects had improved performance postimplantation. VS may continue to be observed with serial magnetic resonance imaging given increasing conditionality among CI manufacturers and ability to assess cerebellopontine angle extension despite implant artifact.

Introduction: Translocation of precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrodes reduces hearing outcomes, but it is not known whether it is possible to correct scalar translocation such that all electrodes reside fully in the scala tympani (ST)., Methods: Six cadaveric temporal bones were scanned with CT and segmented to delineate intracochlear anatomy. Mastoidectomy with facial recess was performed. Precurved CI electrodes (CI532; Cochlear Limited) were implanted until scalar translocation was confirmed with postoperative CT. Then, electrodes were removed and replaced. CT scan was repeated to assess for translocation correction. Scalar position of electrode contacts, angular insertion depth (AID) of the electrode array, and M- (average distance between each electrode contact and the modiolus) were measured. An in vivo case is reported in which intraoperative translocation detection led to removal and replacement of the electrode., Results: Five of 6 cadaveric translocations (83%) were corrected with 1 attempt, resulting in full ST insertions. AID averaged 285 ± 77° for translocated electrodes compared to 344 ± 28° for nontranslocated electrodes (p = 0.109). M- averaged 0.75 ± 0.18 mm for translocated electrodes and 0.45 ± 0.11 mm for nontranslocated electrodes (p = 0.016). Reduction in M- with translocation correction averaged 38%. In the in vivo case, translocation was successfully corrected in a single attempt., Conclusion: Scalar translocation of precurved CI electrodes can be corrected by removal and reinsertion. This significantly improves the perimodiolar positioning of these electrodes. There was a high rate of success (83%) in this cadaveric model as well as a successful in vivo attempt., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: Encourage adaptation of a standardized format for reporting hearing preservation outcomes in cochlear implantation (CI)., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Patients: One hundred seventy-eight postlingually deafened adults with bilateral SNHL and a preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) 80 dB HL or better at 125, 250, and 500 Hz in the ear to be implanted., Interventions: Subjects underwent unilateral CI from 2013 to 2019 at a large referral center. Pre- versus postoperative LPFTA was used to generate a scattergram., Main Outcomes Measures: Pre- versus postoperative activation LPFTA, percentage of patients fit with electric and acoustic stimulation, scattergram plot., Results: Average postoperative LFPTA was 68.6 dB HL (range 18-68) compared with 48.7 dB (range 5-80), preoperatively. At activation, the average LFPTA shift at CI activation was 20.5 dB HL (range 0-60) and 83.5% (n = 137) patients had hearing preserved, of whom 41.6% were fit with electric and acoustic stimulation throughout the study period. The scattergram successfully illustrates the distribution and number of patients with their respective audiometric outcomes., Conclusions: The scattergram developed for reporting hearing outcomes in clinical trials is highly adaptable to reporting hearing preservation results in cochlear implant surgery. It represents a transparent and accessible option for reporting outcomes that can be used as a consistent format to allow for interstudy comparison and future meta-analysis., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)