Search

Objective: The current study investigates whether, during a Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery, conditioning (i.e. applying short bursts of electrical stimulation) within a saline solution can have positive effects on subsequent intra-operative measurements. We hypothesize that, based on previous research, the impedance values will be reduced, and that the reproducibility of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs) is improved as a result of conditioning., Methods: We conditioned half of the electrode contacts, within a saline solution, before CI insertion, using 23 MED-EL implants. Impedance was measured for both the conditioned and non-conditioned groups at five time points. Repeated ECAP recordings were measured and compared between the conditioned and non-conditioned groups., Results: Impedance of the electrode contacts were reduced by 31% after conditioning in saline solution; however, there were no clinically relevant differences after the implantation of the electrode array. The hypothesis that measurement reproducibility would be increased after conditioning could not be confirmed with our data. Within the saline solution, we observed that 44% of the electrode contacts were covered with air bubbles, which most disappeared after implantation. However, these air bubbles limited the effectiveness of the conditioning within the saline solution. Lastly, the effect of conditioning on the reference electrode stimulation was approximately 16% of the total reduction in impedance., Conclusion: Our data does not suggest that intraoperative conditioning is clinically required for cochlear implantation with MED-EL implants. Additionally, an in-vivo ECAP recording can be considered as a method of conditioning the electrode contacts., Significance: We confirm that the common clinical practice does not need to be changed.

Background: For severe hearing loss and even profound deafness, cochlear implants (CIs) have become the treatment of choice. For establishment of the CI indication, the preoperative Freiburger monosyllabic word recognition (EV) at 65 dB SPL in free field with a hearing aid (EV HG 65) and the maximal understanding (mEV) without a hearing aid with headphones results are important. The goal of this retrospective study was to analyse the correlation of word recognition with a hearing aid at 80 dB SPL (EV HG 80) and mEV. This represents an extension to measuring EV HG 65 compared to mEV and to pure-tone audiometry (4FPTA)., Methods: In this study, word recognition with and without a hearing aid was retrospectively analysed for 661 ears. Inclusion criterium was CI implantation at a later date., Results: During preoperative CI diagnostics, an mEV of 0% was found in 334 ears. The EV HG 65 for 485 ears and the EV HG 80 for 335 ears were also 0%. The EV with hearing aid was found to worsen with increasing 4FPTA at both sound pressure levels, although this effect was smaller at 80 dB SPL than at 65 dB SPL. Including only ears with mEV > 0 % (N = 260 ears), a stronger correlation between EV HG 80 and mEV with a difference of (-4.0 ± 16.4%) in comparison to EV HG 65 and mEV with a difference of (-18.3 ± 16.7%) is seen. This shows a significant difference between mEV and EV HG 80 compared to mEV and EV HG 65., Conclusion: At a sound pressure level of 65 dB SPL, EV with hearing aid often does not show the accordance with mEV specified by hearing aid and CI guidelines. The EV HG 80 correlates better with mEV than EV HG 65. For clinical diagnosis it is rational to measure speech discrimination with hearing aid at levels higher than 65 dB SPL., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Thresholds of electrically evoked compound action potentials (TECAP) may serve as starting points for electrophysiologically based fitting of cochlear implants. Absent TECAP data at single electrodes reduces the number of data points available for fitting and can be substituted by interpolation of measured data points., Aim: To compare complete TECAP profiles with interpolated TECAP profiles of 5/22 (∼22.7%) and 11/22 (50%) electrode contacts., Material and Methods: Single-centre, retrospective, observational study of data from 624 ears implanted with a Slim Modiolar (CI ×32) or Contour Advance (CI ×12, CI24RE(CA)) electrode array (Cochlear Ltd). The deviation of the complete measured TECAP profile from the same profile with missing and therefore interpolated TECAP values was quantified., Results: Interpolated TECAP profiles significantly differ from complete measured profiles especially at the basal and apical electrodes. Reference data for Slim Modiolar and Contour Advance electrodes mean profiles are provided., Conclusions and Significance: Reducing the number of measured TECAP electrodes has to be weighted against losses in the TECAP accuracy of interpolated values. A clinically acceptable compromise may be a reduction from 22 to 11 even non-equidistant data points. While reducing ECAP measurement time, it is accompanied by a minimal loss of accuracy of the TECAP threshold profile.

Spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) facilitation properties can be recorded utilizing electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). While intracochlear variation of the ECAP threshold in relation to its electrode channel is reported, no study investigated its impact on facilitation. In this study, we quantified intracochlear variation of the facilitation properties in cochlear implants (CI) using ECAPs. We hypothesized that the facilitation effect is dependent on the electrode channel and its ECAP threshold. Therefore, ECAPs were recorded in 23 CI subjects. For each subject, five default (channel-derived) and up to two additional (threshold-derived) stimulation sites were defined. Facilitation was quantified by the paradigm introduced by (Hey et al., 2017) with optimized parameter settings. For each channel the maximum facilitated amplitude was determined by a series of ECAP measurements. A linear mixed-effects model was used to investigate the impact of the electrode channel and ECAP threshold on the maximum facilitated amplitude. The maximum facilitated amplitude was found to be dependent on the ECAP threshold and independent on the electrode channel. We conclude that the facilitation paradigm is a useful and feasible tool to gain local information on the SGNs temporal processing patterns., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: A manual evaluation of the CI electrode position from CT and DVT scans may be affected by diagnostic errors due to cognitive biases. The aim of this study was to compare the CI electrode localization using an automated method (image-guided cochlear implant programming, IGCIP) with the clinically established manual method., Methods: This prospective experimental study was conducted on a dataset comprising N=50 subjects undergoing cochlear implantation with a Nucleus® CI532 or CI632 Slim Modiolar electrode. Scalar localization, electrode-to-modiolar axis distances (EMD) and angular insertion depth (aDOI) were compared between the automated IGCIP tool and the manual method. Two raters made the manual measurements, and the interrater reliability (±1.96·SD) was determined as the reference for the method comparison. The method comparison was performed using a correlation analysis and a Bland-Altman analysis., Results: Concerning the scalar localization, all electrodes were localized both manually and automatically in the scala tympani. The interrater differences ranged between ±0.2 mm (EMD) and ±10° (aDOI). There was a bias between the automatic and manual method in measuring both localization parameters, which on the one hand was smaller than the interrater variations. On the other hand, this bias depended on the magnitude of the EMD respectively aDOI. A post-hoc analysis revealed that the deviations between the methods were likely due to a different selection of mid-modiolar axis., Conclusions: The IGCIP is a promising tool for automated processing of CT and DVT scans and has useful functionality such as being able to segment the cochlear using post-operative scans. When measuring EMD, the IGCIP tool is superior to the manual method because the smallest possible distance to the axis is determined depending on the cochlear turn, whereas the manual method selects the helicotrema as the reference point rigidly. Functionality to deal with motion artifacts and measurements of aDOI according to the consensus approach are necessary, otherwise the IGCIP is not unrestrictedly ready for clinical use., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Nowadays, cochlear implant (CI) patients mostly show good to very good speech comprehension in quiet, but there are known problems with communication in everyday noisy situations. There is thus a need for ecologically valid measurements of speech comprehension in real-life listening situations for hearing-impaired patients. The additional methodological effort must be balanced with clinical human and spatial resources. This study investigates possible simplifications of a complex measurement setup., Methods: The study included 20 adults from long-term follow-up after CI fitting with postlingual onset of hearing impairment. The complexity of the investigated listening situations was influenced by changing the spatiality of the noise sources and the temporal characteristics of the noise. To compare different measurement setups, speech reception thresholds (SRT) were measured unilaterally with different CI processors and settings. Ten normal-hearing subjects served as reference., Results: In a complex listening situation with four loudspeakers, differences in SRT from CI subjects to the control group of up to 8 dB were found. For CI subjects, this SRT correlated with the situation with frontal speech signal and fluctuating interference signal from the side with R 2  = 0.69. For conditions with stationary interfering signals, R 2 values <0.2 were found., Conclusion: There is no universal solution for all audiometric questions with respect to the spatiality and temporal characteristics of noise sources. In the investigated context, simplification of the complex spatial audiometric setting while using fluctuating competing signals was possible., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study compared two different versions of an electrophysiology-based software-guided cochlear implant fitting method with a procedure employing standard clinical software. The two versions used electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds for either five or all twenty-two electrodes to determine sound processor stimulation level profiles. Objective and subjective performance results were compared between software-guided and clinical fittings., Design: Prospective, double-blind, single-subject repeated-measures with permuted ABCA sequences., Study Sample: 48 post linguistically deafened adults with ≤15 years of severe-to-profound deafness who were newly unilaterally implanted with a Nucleus device., Results: Speech recognition in noise and quiet was not significantly different between software- guided and standard methods, but there was a visit/learning-effect. However, the 5-electrode method gave scores on the SSQ speech subscale 0.5 points lower than the standard method. Clinicians judged usability for all methods as acceptable, as did subjects for comfort. Analysis of stimulation levels and ECAP thresholds suggested that the 5-electrode method could be refined., Conclusions: Speech recognition was not inferior using either version of the electrophysiology-based software-guided fitting method compared with the standard method. Subject-reported speech perception was slightly inferior with the five-electrode method. Software-guided methods saved about 10 min of clinician's time versus standard fittings.

Background: Nowadays, cochlear implant (CI) patients mostly show good to very good speech comprehension in quiet, but there are known problems with communication in everyday noisy situations. There is thus a need for ecologically valid measurements of speech comprehension in real-life listening situations for hearing-impaired patients. The additional methodological effort must be balanced with clinical human and spatial resources. This study investigates possible simplifications of a complex measurement setup., Methods: The study included 20 adults from long-term follow-up after CI fitting with postlingual onset of hearing impairment. The complexity of the investigated listening situations was influenced by changing the spatiality of the noise sources and the temporal characteristics of the noise. To compare different measurement setups, speech reception thresholds (SRT) were measured unilaterally with different CI processors and settings. Ten normal-hearing subjects served as reference., Results: In a complex listening situation with four loudspeakers, differences in SRT from CI subjects to the control group of up to 8 dB were found. For CI subjects, this SRT correlated with the situation with frontal speech signal and fluctuating interference signal from the side with R 2  = 0.69. For conditions with stationary interfering signals, R 2 values <0.2 were found., Conclusion: There is no universal solution for all audiometric questions with respect to the spatiality and temporal characteristics of noise sources. In the investigated context, simplification of the complex spatial audiometric setting while using fluctuating competing signals was possible., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of an approach in training predoctoral medical students, to enable them to measure electrode-to-modiolus distances (EMDs) and insertion-depth angles (aDOIs) in cochlear implant (CI) imaging at the performance level of a single senior rater., Methods: This prospective experimental study was conducted on a clinical training dataset comprising patients undergoing cochlear implantation with a Nucleus® CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode (N = 20) or a CI512 Contour Advance electrode (N = 10). To assess the learning curves of a single medical student in measuring EMD and aDOI, interrater differences (senior-student) were compared with the intrarater differences of a single senior rater (test-retest). The interrater and intrarater range were both calculated as the distance between the 0.1th and 99.9th percentiles. A "deliberate practice" training approach was used to teach knowledge and skills, while correctives were applied to minimize faulty data-gathering and data synthesis., Results: Intrarater differences of the senior rater ranged from - 0.5 to 0.5 mm for EMD and - 14° to 16° for aDOI (respective medians: 0 mm and 0°). Use of the training approach led to interrater differences that matched this after the 4th (EMD) and 3rd (aDOI) feedback/measurement series had been provided to the student., Conclusions: The training approach enabled the student to evaluate the CI electrode position at the performance level of a senior rater. This finding may offer a basis for ongoing clinical quality assurance for the assessment of CI electrode position., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Transimpedance measurements from cochlear implant electrodes have the potential to identify anomalous electrode array placement, such as tip fold-over (TFO) or fold-back, basal electrode kinking, or buckling. Analysing transimpedance may thus replace intraoperative or post-operative radiological imaging to detect any potential misplacements. A transimpedance algorithm was previously developed to detect deviations from a normal electrode position with the aim of intraoperatively detecting TFO. The algorithm had been calibrated on 35 forced, tip folded electrode arrays in six temporal bones to determine the threshold criterion required to achieve a sensitivity of 100%. Our primary objective here was to estimate the specificity of this TFO algorithm in patients, in a prospective study, for a series of electrode arrays shown to be normally inserted by post-operative imaging., Methods: Intracochlear voltages were intraoperatively recorded for 157 ears, using Cochlear's Custom Sound™ EP 5 electrophysiological software (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia), for both Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays. The algorithm analysed the recorded 22 × 22 transimpedance matrix (TIM) and results were displayed as a heatmap intraoperatively, only visible to the technician in the operating theatre. After all clinical data were collected, the algorithm was evaluated on the bench. The algorithm measures the transimpedance gradients and corresponding phase angles (θ) throughout the TIM and calculates the gradient phase range. If this was greater than the predetermined threshold, the algorithm classified the electrode array insertion as having a TFO., Results: Five ears had no intraoperative TIM and four anomalous matrices were identified from heatmaps and removed from the specificity analysis. Using the 148 remaining data sets (n = 103 CI532 and n = 45 CI512), the algorithm had an average specificity of 98.6% (95.80%-99.75%)., Conclusion: The algorithm was found to be an effective screening tool for the identification of TFOs. Its specificity was within acceptable levels and resulted in a positive predictive value of 76%, with an estimated incidence of fold-over of 4% in perimodiolar arrays. This would mean 3 out of 4 cases flagged as a fold-over would be correctly identified by the algorithm, with the other being a false positive. The measurements were applied easily in theatre allowing it to be used as a routine clinical tool for confirming correct electrode placement., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Despite using the soft-surgery technique, cochlear implantation may increase the damage of the intracochlear structures due to a scalar translocation of the electrode. The aim of this work was to investigate the incidence as well as the audiological and electrophysiological outcome for electrode translocations and complete scala tympani insertions of perimodiolar electrodes within a large group of patients., Material and Methods: The investigations were performed retrospectively on 255 adult subjects with a Nucleus Contour Advance or Slim Modiolar electrode (Cochlear Ltd.). The scalar position was assessed by postoperative rotational tomography. Intraoperative and one year after CI activation measured ECAP thresholds were examined as well as the postoperative speech recognition in quiet using the Freiburg monosyllable word test., Results: The incidence of a translocation was significantly lower with the Slim Modiolar than with the Contour Advance electrode (5.1% versus 32.3%; p<0.05). With a scala tympani placement the median speech recognition score was 75% (range: 20- 100%) with the Contour Advance and 72.5% (range: 27.5-95%) with the Slim Modiolar electrode. In cases with an electrode translocation, speech recognition scores show a median of 75% (range: 45-100%) and 73.8% (range: 40-80%), respectively. No significant differences in speech recognition were found between translocations and scala tympani insertions with both electrodes. Compared to scala tympani insertions, electrode translocations yielded higher ECAP thresholds at apical and medial electrode contacts (p<0.05)., Conclusion: The incidence of an electrode translocation is determined for both perimodiolar electrode types analyzed in this work. ECAP measurements provide additional information for detecting translocations compared to radiological imaging. However, the postoperative speech recognition in quiet was not affected by the scalar position in the electrodes examined here., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Background: The perimodiolar CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode has been designed to bring the electrode contacts close to auditory nerve while reducing cochlear trauma during its insertion. It is currently unknown to what extent the electrode position and electrophysiological outcomes of the Slim Modiolar electrode differ from other perimodiolar electrodes., Objectives: The objective was to compare the electrode position and electrophysiological outcomes between the CI532 Slim Modiolar and CI512 Contour Advance electrode., Method: Forty-six adult patients received a Slim Modiolar or Contour Advance electrode. Electrode types were compared using intraoperative electrode impedances, evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and stapedius reflex thresholds, as well as position parameters from postoperative computed tomography or digital volume tomography images (medial-lateral position, electrode-to-modiolus distance, insertion angle)., Results: The medial-lateral position indicates a closer modiolar placement of the Slim Modiolar compared with the Contour Advance. Individual electrode contact measurements, however, showed significantly larger electrode-to-modiolus distances and higher ECAP thresholds for the Slim Modiolar in the basal region. On contacts E20-22 the Slim Modiolar is slightly closer to the modiolus compared with the Contour Advance, but this did not result in lower ECAP thresholds., Conclusions: Perimodiolar electrodes can vary in their intracochlear position, leading to divergent electrophysiological outcomes. To detect these differences, investigations must be done for each electrode contact rather than using a global factor for the whole electrode array. While the electrode dislocation rate is lower with the Slim Modiolar than with the Contour Advance, electrode-to-modiolus proximity is smaller and ECAP thresholds are lower with the Contour Advance in the basal cochlear region.

Purpose: Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores., Methods: Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively., Results: There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels., Conclusions: In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.

Objective: To clinically evaluate ForwardFocus in noise with experienced Nucleus ® cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Design: Listening performance with ForwardFocus was compared against the best in class directional microphone program (BEAM ® ). Speech comprehension was tested with the Oldenburg sentence test with competing signals (stationary, three, six and 18-talker babble) in both co-located and spatially-separated listening environments. Additionally, normal hearing participants were tested monaurally in the same listening environments as a reference and to promote cross-study comparisons between CI clinical study outcomes. Study sample: Post-lingually deaf adult CI recipients ( n  = 20) who were experienced users of the Nucleus sound processor (Cochlear Limited). Results: Improved speech comprehension was found with the ForwardFocus program compared to the BEAM program in a co-located frontal listening environment for both stationary and fluctuating competing signals. In spatially-separated environments ForwardFocus provided significant speech reception threshold (SRT) improvements of 5.8 dB for three-talker competing signals, respectively. Conclusions: ForwardFocus was shown to significantly improve speech comprehension in a wide range of listening environments. This technology is likely to provide significant improvements in real-world listening for CI recipients, given the clinically relevant performance outcomes in challenging dynamic noise environments, bringing their performance closer to their normal hearing peers.

Introduction: Novel cochlear implant speech processors are capable of storing data logs. With the help of this information a more individualized patient care can be provided. However, standard data are missing to a greater extent to the individual usage behavior., Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, the use data of 2687 patients were evaluated. All patients had the Nucleus 6 system from Cochlear Ltd., Results: The data allow a normal range to be defined for the duration of use of cochlear implant speech processors. Likewise, the identification of conspicuous usage behavior is possible., Competing Interests: T.Hocke ist Mitarbeiter der Fa. Cochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: As part of postoperative cochlear implant (CI) diagnostics, speech comprehension tests are performed to monitor audiological outcome. In recent years, a trend toward improved suprathreshold speech intelligibility in quiet and an extension of intelligibility to softer sounds has been observed. Parallel to audiometric data, analysis of the patients' acoustic environment can take place by means of data logging in modern CI systems., Objectives: Which test levels reflect the individual listening environment in a relevant manner and how can these be reflected in a clinical audiometric setting?, Patients and Methods: In a retrospective analysis, data logs of 263 adult CI patients were evaluated for sound level and the listening situation (quiet, speech in quiet, noise, speech in noise, music, and wind). Additionally, monosyllabic word comprehension in quiet was analyzed in experienced CI users at presentation levels of 40-80 dB., Results: For the sound level in the acoustic environment of postlingually deafened adult CI users, data logging shows a maximum occurrence of speech signals in the range 50-59 dB. This demonstrates the relevance of everyday speech comprehension at levels below 60 dB., Conclusions: Individual optimization of speech intelligibility with a CI speech processor should not be performed in the range of 65-70 dB only, but also at lower levels. Measurements at 50 dB currently seem to be a useful addition.

In this study we aim to resolve the contributions of facilitation and refractoriness at very short pulse intervals. Measurements of the refractory properties of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant (CI) users at inter pulse intervals below 300 μs are influenced by facilitation and recovery effects. ECAPs were recorded using masker pulses with a wide range of current levels relative to the probe pulse levels, for three suprathreshold probe levels and pulse intervals from 13 to 200 μs. Evoked potentials were measured for 21 CI patients by using the masked response extraction artifact cancellation procedure. During analysis of the measurements the stimulation current was not used as absolute value, but in relation to the patient's individual ECAP threshold. This enabled a more general approach to describe facilitation as a probe level independent effect. Maximum facilitation was found for all tested inter pulse intervals at masker levels near patient's individual ECAP threshold, independent from probe level. For short inter pulse intervals an increased N 1 P 1 amplitude was measured for subthreshold masker levels down to 120 CL below patient's individual ECAP threshold in contrast to the recreated state. ECAPs recorded with inter pulse intervals up to 200 μs are influenced by facilitation and recovery. Facilitation effects are most pronounced for masker levels at or below ECAP threshold, while recovery effects increase with higher masker levels above ECAP threshold. The local maximum of the ECAP amplitude for masker levels around ECAP threshold can be explained by the mutual influence of maximum facilitation and minimal refractoriness., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Individual speech intelligibility was measured in quiet and noise for cochlear Implant recipients upgrading from the Freedom to the CP900 series sound processor. The postlingually deafened participants (n = 23) used either Nucleus CI24RE or CI512 cochlear implant, and currently wore a Freedom sound processor. A significant group mean improvement in speech intelligibility was found in quiet (Freiburg monosyllabic words at 50 dB SPL ) and in noise (adaptive Oldenburger sentences in noise) for the two CP900 series SmartSound programs compared to the Freedom program. Further analysis was carried out on individual's speech intelligibility outcomes in quiet and in noise. Results showed a significant improvement or decrement for some recipients when upgrading to the new programs. To further increase speech intelligibility outcomes when upgrading, an enhanced upgrade procedure is proposed that includes additional testing with different signal-processing schemes. Implications of this research are that future automated scene analysis and switching technologies could provide additional performance improvements by introducing individualized scene-dependent settings., Competing Interests: This study was supported by Cochlear Europe Ltd. Thomas Hocke is an employee of Cochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co KG and Stefan Mauger is an employee of Cochlear Limited, Melbourne, Australia. The authors report no other potential or actual conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper. Ethical approval The study was conducted according to the guidelines established by the Declaration of Helsinki (Seoul, 2008) and appropriate local ethical committee approval was obtained (D 488/14).

Background: The Freiburg monosyllable word test represents a central tool of postoperative cochlear implant (CI) diagnostics., Objectives: The objective of this study is to test the equivalence of different word lists by analysing word comprehension. For patients whose CI has been implanted for more than 5 years, the distribution of suprathreshold speech intelligibility outcomes will also be analysed., Patients and Methods: In a retrospective data analysis, speech understanding for 626 CI users word correct scores were evaluated using a total of 5211 lists with 20 words each., Results: The analysis of word comprehension within each list shows differences in mean and in the kind of distribution function. There are lists which show a significant difference of their mean word recognition to the overall mean. The Freiburg monosyllable word test is easy to administer at suprathreshold speech level for CI recipients, and typically has a saturation level above 80 %., Conclusion: The Freiburg monosyllable word test can be performed successfully by the majority of CI patients. The limited balance of the test lists elicits the conclusion that an adaptive test procedure with the Freiburg monosyllable test does not make sense. The Freiburg monosyllable test can be restructured by resorting all words across lists, or by omitting individual words of a test list to increase the reliability of the test. The results show that speech intelligibility in quiet should also be investigated in CI recipients al levels below 70 dB.

Objective: To describe the principles and operation of a new telemetry-based function test for the Nucleus® cochlear implant, known as the CS19 Intra-Cochlear Impedance Matrix (IIM) and to present results from a multicentre clinical study to establish reproducibility (test-retest reliability) and normative ranges., Method: The IIM test measures bipolar impedances between all electrode pairs and employs a normalization procedure based on common ground impedances in order to identify abnormal current paths among electrodes. Six European clinics collected IIM data from a total of 192 devices., Results: Reproducibility was high between initial and repeat measurements. The normative analysis demonstrated narrow ranges among devices after normalization of impedance data. The IIM is able to identify abnormal current paths that are not evident from standard impedance telemetry and may otherwise only be found utilising average electrode voltage measurements (AEV)., Conclusions: The IIM test was found to be straightforward to perform clinically and demonstrated reproducible data with narrow ranges in normally-functioning devices. Because this test uses a very low stimulation level the IIM test is well suited for children or multiply handicapped CI users who cannot reliably report on their auditory percepts. The new algorithms show potential to improve implant integrity testing capabilities if implemented in future clinical software.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe common properties (reproducibility, discrimination function, and its steepness) of matrix tests used for cochlear implant (CI) users and to obtain data for the German-language version matrix test, the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA), presented in noise., Design: The speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise were measured by means of an adaptive test procedure, and by measurement at various signal-to-noise ratios to determine the course of the entire discrimination function per subject., Study Sample: The measurements were performed on 38 CI users fitted with a Cochlear(™) Freedom(®) or a Cochlear(™) Nucleus(®) 5 CI system., Results: The test-retest reproducibility showed a significant dependence on the SRT in noise. For the better performers, the test-retest difference was found to be smaller, while for the poorer performers the difference increased. For the better performers, the slope of the discrimination function at SRT (s50) was comparable to that for individuals with normal hearing, while for the poorer performers the s50 tended to be significantly reduced., Conclusions: As the CI users differed significantly in their SRT and their s50, a unified discrimination function for CI users must not be used. Further tailoring of the procedure may be required, especially for poorer CI performers.

Custom Sound EP™ (CSEP) is an advanced flexible software tool dedicated to recording of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in Nucleus® recipients using Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™). European multi-centre studies of the Freedom™ cochlear implant system confirmed that CSEP offers tools to effectively record ECAP thresholds, amplitude growth functions, recovery functions, spread of excitation functions, and rate adaptation functions and an automated algorithm (AutoNRT™) to measure threshold profiles. This paper reports on rate adaptation measurements. Rate adaptation of ECAP amplitudes can successfully be measured up to rates of 495 pulses per second (pps) by repeating conventional ECAP measurements and over a wide range of rates up to 8000 pps using the masked response extraction technique. Rate adaptation did not show a predictable relationship with speech perception and coding strategy channel rate preference. The masked response extraction method offers opportunities to study long-term rate adaptation with well-defined and controlled stimulation paradigms.

Efficacy of the SPEAK and ACE coding strategies was compared with that of a new strategy, MP3000™, by 37 European implant centers including 221 subjects. The SPEAK and ACE strategies are based on selection of 8-10 spectral components with the highest levels, while MP3000 is based on the selection of only 4-6 components, with the highest levels relative to an estimate of the spread of masking. The pulse rate per component was fixed. No significant difference was found for the speech scores and for coding preference between the SPEAK/ACE and MP3000 strategies. Battery life was 24% longer for the MP3000 strategy. With MP3000 the best results were found for a selection of six components. In addition, the best results were found for a masking function with a low-frequency slope of 50 dB/Bark and a high-frequency slope of 37 dB/Bark (50/37) as compared to the other combinations examined of 40/30 and 20/15 dB/Bark. The best results found for the steepest slopes do not seem to agree with current estimates of the spread of masking in electrical stimulation. Future research might reveal if performance with respect to SPEAK/ACE can be enhanced by increasing the number of channels in MP3000 beyond 4-6 and it should shed more light on the optimum steepness of the slopes of the masking functions applied in MP3000.

The Nucleus CI24RE ‘Freedom' device offers higher stimulation rates and lower noise levels in action potential measurements (ECAPs) than previous devices. A study including ten European implant teams showed that the effect of changes in rate from 250 to 3500 pulses per second on tilt and curvature of the T and C profiles is insignificant. When changing rate one may change the levels at all electrodes by the same amount. Using an automated procedure ECAPs could be measured quickly and reliably at a noise level of only 1 microV, this did not result in improved correlations between the tilt and curvature parameters of the ECAP profiles and those of the T and C profiles. Average C levels appear to differ markedly among implant centers; a better assessment protocol is required. When increasing stimulus rate one should take into account that this requires higher pulse charges per second and more power consumption.

Background: At school we find two major acoustic situations: (first) the "teacher is talking" being disturbed by the pupils making noise and (second) another "pupil is talking" disturbed by other pupils. The understanding of words and sentences in hearing impaired patients with a cochlear implant (CI) in a noisy situation can be improved by using a FM system. The aim of this study is to test speech understanding depending on mixing ratios between FM input and microphone input to the speech processor in different circumstances., Methods: Speech understanding was evaluated using the adaptive Oldenburger sentence test (OLSA) in background noise. CI patients used the FM system Microlink for Freedom CIs together with a Campus transmitter (Phonak AG)., Patients: 17 postlingually deafened adults were tested, using unilateral Freedom cochlear implant systems (Cochlear Ltd). A group of eight normally hearing adults was used as a control group in the same setup., Results: We found that the median value of L (50)=1.6 dB in CI patients without a FM system is higher than the median value of L(50)=-13 dB in normally hearing subjects. The sentence recognition in CI patients with FM system increased with increasing mixing ratio. The benefit using the FM system to understand the teacher is of high advantage in any mixing ratio. The difference between the L(50) values in situations with or without a FM-system is 15 dB for the mixing ratio 3:1 (FM to microphone). If we take into account an increase of 15% per dB in the OLSA (at L(50)) in CI patients, the difference of 15 dB means a calculated advantage of 225%. The speech understanding during the second condition ("pupil is talking") however remained nearly the same in all used mixing ratios. The calculations showed no statistical difference between these situations with and without a FM system., Conclusion: The speaker comprehension for the two investigated listening conditions showed different results. Understanding in the "teacher is talking" situation increased with increasing mixing ratio (FM to microphone) and in the "pupil is talking" situation remained on the same level. We could not find an optimal FM setting for both listening conditions. This leads to different suggestions for different listening conditions. All patients showed an increased speech understanding in noisy environments. This result strongly encourages the use of a FM-system in a classroom.

Objective: AutoNRT is the completely automatic electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measuring algorithm in the recently released Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. AutoNRT allows clinicians to automatically record T-NRT profiles that in turn can be used as a guide for initial fitting. The algorithm consists of a pattern recognition part that judges if the traces contain an ECAP and an intelligent flow that optimizes the measurement parameters and finds the ECAP threshold (T-NRT). The objective of this study was to determine how accurate, reliable, and fast the automatic measurements are., Design: Data on more than 400 electrodes were collected as part of the multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. T-NRT values determined by the algorithm were compared with T-NRT determinations on the same data by different human observers. Also, the time the measurements took was analyzed., Results: In 90% of the cases, the absolute difference between the AutoNRT and the human observer determined T-NRT was less than 9 CL; the median absolute difference was 3 CL. A second experiment, in which a group of human observers were asked to analyze NRT data, showed high variability in T-NRT; in some cases, two experienced clinicians disagreed by more than 30 current levels. Compared with the group, AutoNRT performed as well as the "average" clinician, with the advantage that the AutoNRT threshold determinations are objective. Analysis of the timing data showed an average intraoperative measurement time of less than 20 sec per electrode with a standard deviation of 5 sec, suggesting that the total array of 22 electrodes can be measured intraoperatively in about 7 minutes on average., Conclusions: AutoNRT provides comparable accuracy to an average clinician but with the added benefit of significant time savings over manual recordings. This makes it a valuable tool for clinical measurement of ECAP threshold in cochlear implant recipients.

The waveforms and parameters of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses, eeABRs, registered in cochlear implant users, were compared with those of acoustically evoked auditory brainstem responses, aeABRs, recorded in normally hearing subjects. The eeABRs, in contrast to the aeABRs, contained dubious Wave IV, while missed Waves VI and VII. The eeABRs possessed also shorter peak-latencies, shorter inter-peak intervals, and greater amplitudes. The revealed differences have been explained by the lack of cochlear mechanisms in cochlear implant recipients. On the other hand, eeABRs and aeABRs exhibited similar stimulus intensity dependence. Both had also lower thresholds, shorter peak-latencies, and greater amplitudes in females than in males.

Objective: To evaluate the benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation for hearing-impaired adult subjects using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant in a multicenter study, and to compare and quantify performance on speech perception measures in quiet and in noise and localization ability for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant use., Design: : Repeated single subject measures were carried out for each subject, with each subject serving as their own control. Assessment of unilateral and bilateral listening conditions for performance on tests of speech comprehension and sound localization were performed. Speech comprehension measures were performed in quiet at 0 degree azimuth and in the presence of background noise simultaneously presented from the same speaker and spatially separated by 90 degrees, at S+45 degrees N45 degrees and at S-45 degrees N+45 degrees . Test materials included Freiburger monosyllabic words, Oldenburger sentences, and the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences. Tests of localization were performed in the horizontal plane with 12 speaker locations 30 degrees apart using a shortened sentence stimulus from the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences at two possible presentation levels of 55 and 70 dB sound pressure level for assessment of directionality. The binaural advantage provided by bilateral stimulation was calculated with respect to each ear separately, classified as either the better or poorer performing ear for each speech material in quiet and in noise test conditions. For localization of sound, the binaural advantage was compared with left and right ears separately. Paired comparisons for performance data in all conditions were carried out by considering measurements for each subject in different conditions as paired observations and applying the Student's t test to determine the statistical difference between the data sets., Setting: Tertiary referral centers with a cochlear implant program., Patients: Thirty-seven profoundly hearing-impaired adults were enrolled in the study, 22 simultaneously and 15 sequentially bilaterally implanted. All patients received the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant and used the Nucleus SPrint or ESPrit 3G speech processor, with the vast majority using the ACE speech coding strategy., Results: For spatially separated speech in noise conditions, an interaural performance advantage for the ear closest to the speech source (i.e., with a superior signal to noise ratio) compared with that for the ear closest to the noise source (i.e., with an inferior signal to noise ratio) is consistently demonstrated regardless of whether it is the better or poorer performing ear closest to the speech signal. This is referred to as a significant binaural head-shadow benefit, resulting in a mean improvement between -10 dB and -11.4 dB in the critical signal to noise ratio required for 50% speech comprehension for the Olden-burger sentences and a mean improvement in the maximum score of 42% to 55% for the ear closest to the speech signal over the ear farthest away for the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences. Bilateral stimulation is always observed to provide a performance advantage over the unilateral listening condition for either ear when ipsilateral to the noise source. In addition, as demonstrated by approximately half the subjects tested in noise with the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences, a performance advantage of bilateral stimulation may be observed over the better ear alone when positioned ipsilateral to the speech signal, which is referred to as a binaural squelch effect. On average, for the group, this resulted in a statistically significant improvement in speech comprehension scores of 8% in the bilateral listening condition compared with the scores for the better ear alone. Through assessment of comprehension of coincidental speech in noise and speech in quiet, a significant benefit of binaural redundancy was noted for the group for Oldenburger sentence scores in noise and in quiet compared with unilateral scores for either ear and for the Freiburger monosyllabic words in quiet in comparison with the better ear alone scores. Binaural stimulation also led to a significant improvement in localization ability over either monaural condition, with the root mean square degrees of error reduced by 38 degrees compared with that observed for unilateral stimulation., Conclusion: Similar to what has been observed for bilateral acoustic stimulation in the past, bilateral electrical stimulation provides the foundation for the potential advantages of the head-shadow effect, providing a binaural head-shadow benefit and binaural auditory processing such as binaural redundancy and binaural squelch effects, all of which combine to lead to improved speech comprehension over unilateral listening conditions. The combination of improved speech comprehension and improved localization ability made available through bilateral electrical stimulation provides the necessary foundation to further assist the hearing-impaired listener to better cope with communication in the everyday listening situation both in noise and in quiet.

A study was conducted to compare the new MED-EL TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor with the CIS PRO+ body-worn processor in the COMBI 40/COMBI 40+ implant system. Speech tests were performed in 46 experienced subjects in two test sessions approximately 4 weeks apart. Subjects were switched over from the CIS PRO+ to the TEMPO+ in the first session and used only the TEMPO+ in the time between the two sessions. Speech tests included monosyllabic word tests and sentence tests via the telephone. An adaptive noise method was used to adjust each subject's scores to approximately 50%. Additionally, subjects had to complete a questionnaire based on their 4 weeks of experience with the TEMPO+. The speech test results showed a statistically significant improvement in the monosyllabic word scores with the TEMPO+. In addition, in the second session, subjects showed a significant improvement when using the telephone with the TEMPO+, indicating some learning in this task. In the questionnaire, the vast majority of subjects found that the TEMPO+ allows equal or better speech understanding and rated the sound quality of the TEMPO+ higher. All these objective and subjective results indicate the superiority of the TEMPO+ and are mainly attributed to a new coding strategy called CIS+ and its implementation in the TEMPO+. In other words, based on the results of this study, it appears that after switching over from the CIS PRO+ to the TEMPO+, subjects are able to maintain or even improve their own speech understanding capability., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Objective: We explored the impact that basal medial-lateral electrode position had on threshold (T) and comfortable (C) levels and ECAP thresholds (T-NRT): Medial-lateral position as measured by wrapping factor (WP) indicated that the array was generally positioned close to the modiolus (mean WP=0.62, S.D. 0.05). There was however quite some variation in medial-lateral position of electrodes within the first 180° of the basal turn; mainly dependent on the number of markers inserted in the cochlea opening. Method: Basal medial-lateral position was categorized into "poor", "moderate" and "good" indicating some lateral wall contact, mid-scala position or perimodiolar position. Electro-physiological data and psycho-physical levels were analysed by electrode position group. Results: Across the three groups ECAP thresholds were higher for basal electrode contacts compared to apical ones with ECAP thresholds being consistently low across the three groups for apical electrode contacts. However there were differences in ECAP thresholds between groups for basal electrodes with ECAP thresholds for the "poor", laterally- positioned basal electrode contacts being higher than for the other two groups. A similar trend was seen for T and C levels. Longitudinal ECAP data for a smaller group of patients indicated that ECAP thresholds generally reduced over time; by approximately 20 current level units. Conclusions: ECAP thresholds varied across the electrode array for patients implanted with Nucleus CI532. ECAP thresholds for basal electrode contacts varied according to medial-lateral position, however ECAP thresholds were consistently low for apical electrode contacts. These results reinforce the importance of inserting only to the first position marker of the CI532 to ensure the best perimodiolar position and lowest stimulation levels. However levels generally reduced over time and fitting methods based on objective ECAP threshold measures are compatible with the CI532. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The electrode position of cochlear implants is important for the electrode-auditory nerve interaction. In clinical practice, the position is assessed by radiological imaging, resulting in a radiation exposure to the patient. Electrophysiological characteristics such as electrode impedances as well as ESR and ECAP thresholds proved to be appropriate for the quality control of the electrodeauditory nerve interaction. This work therefore investigated the relationship between spatial and electrophysiological parameters. Material and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively on 55 adult patients, implanted with a Nucleus ® CI532 or CI512 system (Cochlear Ltd.). Intraoperative electrode impedances, ECAP thresholds and ESR thresholds as well as one month after first fitting obtained impedances and ECAP thresholds were compared with spatial parameters as wrapping factor, insertion angle and electrode- modiolus distance. The Electrode position was determined by CT or DVT imaging which had been measured in the first week after surgery. Results: Variations in wrapping factor have no effect on the electrophysiological characteristics for the investigated implants. ECAP and ESR threshold are significantly related to the electrode-modiolus distance and insertion angle. As expected, no significant relation was found between impedances and spatial parameters. Conclusion: Electrophysiological parameters such as ECAP and ESR thresholds are related to the intracochlear position of cochlear implants, but other factors as surviving nerve cells as well as tissue growth around the implant also play a role. Further investigations have therefore to deal with the relationship of these factors to the electrophysiological parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess hearing performance and electrophysiological characteristics based on routine audiological measures for the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant with Slim Modiolar electrode. Changes from pre- to post-CI treatment for a planned number of 150 patients with a CI532 in a German speaking cohort will be demonstrated. Finally benchmark data shall be established. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multi-centric study has been established to systematically assess speech understanding in quiet and in noise, unaided and aided thresholds. In addition medical history and recipient's electrode-specific objective and subjective measures (impedances, T-NRT, T- & C-Levels) and data logging will be evaluated. Data will be acquired pre-operatively as well as 3 and 6 months post-operatively in adult CI532 recipients. Results: CI aided speech understanding in quiet and in noise at 6 months post activation improved over pre-operative baseline data. The proportion of the recipient's cohort examined showing post-operative improvement for test and listening condition is ≥ 80% for the 6 months postoperative visit. The mean T-NRT profile shows increased threshold levels towards the basal part of the cochlea. Conclusion: The outcome presents sufficient evidence to show the effectiveness of the CI532. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]