Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to provide an updated European narrative review spanning the last decade, focusing on the cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants (CIs) for adults with severe to profound post-lingual hearing loss., Methods: This review encompasses both prospective and retrospective approaches, as well as cross-sectional and longitudinal trials conducted on CIs in adults. All studies related to European countries (Austria, Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and Poland) were conducted in English and were published between 2012 and June 2023., Results: Nine studies were included in the analysis. The patients' ages ranged from 18 years to over 67 years, with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 100 patients; two of these studies were focused on single-sided deafness in adults. The Markov model was identified as the most commonly utilized analysis method., Conclusions: This review identified a general consensus on CI cost-effectiveness, despite substantial variability among countries in factors such as observation time horizons, cost-effectiveness thresholds, methods of cost collection, discount rates, CI eligibility criteria and country-specific health systems. Generally, CIs yield positive societal benefits for working-age individuals, potentially less for seniors. Early unilateral CI enhances cost-effectiveness, highlighting the importance of prompt candidate identification. A consistent undersupply of CIs relative to the percentage of potential recipients emerged across countries. Therefore, further investigation into subcategories such as single-sided deafness is warranted, along with country-specific cost analyses. Emphasizing the significance of detailed information on health systems and associated costs and benefits is crucial for facilitating comparisons across different settings., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Extrusion of electrodes outside the cochlea and tip fold overs may lead to suboptimal outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Intraoperative measures such as Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements may enable clinicians to identify electrode malposition and direct surgeons to correctly place the electrode array during surgery., Objectives: To assess the current literature on the effectiveness of TIM measurements in identifying extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs., Methods: A scoping review of studies on TIM-based measurements were carried out using the Databases-Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Eleven full texts articles met the inclusion criteria. Only human studies pertaining to TIM as a tool used in CI were included in the review. Further, patient characteristics, electrode design, and TIM measurement outcomes were reported., Results: TIM measurements were available for 550 implanted ears with the subjects age ranged between 9 months to 89 years. Abnormal TIM measurements were reported for 6.55% (36). Tip fold over was detected in 3.64% (20) of the cases, extracochlear electrodes in 1.45% (8), and 1.45% (8) were reported as buckling. Slim-modiolar electrode array designs were more common (54.71%) than pre-curved (23.34%) or lateral wall (21.95%) electrode array. Abnormal cochlear anatomy was reported for five ears (0.89%), with normal cochlear anatomy for all other patients., Conclusion: TIM measurement is a promising tool for the intraoperative detection of electrode malposition. TIM measurement has a potential to replace intraoperative imaging in future. Though, TIM measurement is in its early stages of clinical utility, intuitive normative data sets coupled with standardised criteria for detection of abnormal electrode positioning would enhance its sensitivity., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Ayas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: This study aims to estimate the rate of postoperative meningitis (both immediate and long-term) in patients following cochlear implants (CIs). It aims to do so through a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies tracking complications after CIs., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library., Review Methods: This review was performed in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies tracking complications following CIs in patients were included. Exclusion criteria included non-English language studies and case series reporting <10 patients. Bias risk was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models., Results: A total of 116/1931 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there were 112 cases of meningitis in 58,940 patients after CIs. Meta-analysis estimated an overall rate of postoperative meningitis of 0.07% (95% confidence interval [CIs], 0.03%-0.1%; I 2  = 55%). Subgroup meta-analysis showed this rate had 95% CIs crossing 0% in implanted patients who received the pneumococcal vaccine, antibiotic prophylaxis, those with postoperative acute otitis media (AOM), and those implanted less than 5 years., Conclusion: Meningitis is a rare complication following CIs. Our estimated rates of meningitis after CIs appear lower than prior estimates based on epidemiological studies in the early 2000s. However, the rate still appears higher than the baseline rate in the general population. The risk was very low in implanted patients who received the pneumococcal vaccine, antibiotic prophylaxis, received unilateral or bilateral implantations, developed AOM, those implanted with a round window or cochleostomy techniques, and those under 5 years., (© 2023 The Authors. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.)

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the rate of postoperative meningitis after cochlear implantation in those with inner ear malformations (IEMs) via meta-analysis., Data Sources: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library., Methods: This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Proportion meta-analysis was conducted through an inverse variance random-effect model based on arcsin transformation and presented as forest plots. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed through the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool., Results: Overall, 38 of 2966 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. There were 10 cases of meningitis after cochlear implantation in 1300 malformed ears. The overall rate of meningitis after cochlear implantation in IEMs was 0.12% (95% confidence interval, 0.006-0.380%; I2 = 0%). Cases occurred in incomplete partition (n = 5), Mondini deformity (n = 2), common cavity (n = 2), and enlarged internal auditory canal (n = 1). Six of 10 cases of postoperative meningitis occurred with an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak., Conclusion: In those with IEMs, the risk of meningitis after cochlear implantation is very low., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of, and risk factors associated with electrode migration (EM) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients., Design: Historical cohort study of all CIs performed between 1 January 2018 and 1 August 2021 in a single tertiary adult and paediatric CI centre in the UK., Main Outcome Measures: The primary aim is to determine the prevalence of electrode migration, comparing intraoperative surgeon report and examination of a routine plain radiograph performed 2 weeks after surgery. EM is defined as the detection of movement of two or more electrodes out of the cochlea from the time of surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate preoperative and intraoperative risk factors that might predispose to migration., Results: Four hundred and sixty-five patients, having 516 distinct surgeries, with 628 implants were analysed. EM occurred following 11.5% of implant operations. Pre-existing cochlear abnormality was an independent associated risk factor for EM (OR: 3.40 ⟨1.20-9.62⟩ p = .021). Demographics, surgical technique, usage of a precurved electrode, CSF leak, surgeon seniority and intraoperative telemetry did not influence risk of migration. There were 5 implants (0.8%) which migrated later than 2 weeks, with a median date of imaging diagnosis (x-ray or CT scan) of 263 days ⟨IQR:198⟩, for which head injury was a common precipitating factor. There were differences in the risk of migration between different lateral wall electrodes., Conclusion: EM in the early postoperative period is a common occurrence and is more likely in implant recipients with obstructed or malformed cochleae., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Electrically evoked compound action-potentials (ECAPs) can be recorded using the electrodes in a cochlear implant (CI) and represent the synchronous responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. ECAPs can be obtained using a forward-masking method that measures the neural response to a probe and masker electrode separately and in combination. The panoramic ECAP (PECAP) analyses measured ECAPs obtained using multiple combinations of masker and probe electrodes and uses a nonlinear optimization algorithm to estimate current spread from each electrode and neural health along the cochlea. However, the measurement of ECAPs from multiple combinations of electrodes is too time consuming for use in clinics. Here, we propose and evaluate SpeedCAP, a speedy method for obtaining the PECAP measurements that minimizes recording time by exploiting redundancies between multiple ECAP measures., Design: In the first study, 11 users of Cochlear Ltd. CIs took part. ECAPs were recorded using the forward-masking artifact-cancelation technique at the most comfortable loudness level (MCL) for every combination of masker and probe electrodes for all active electrodes in the users' MAPs, as per the standard PECAP recording paradigm. The same current levels and recording parameters were then used to collect ECAPs in the same users with the SpeedCAP method. The ECAP amplitudes were then compared between the two conditions, as were the corresponding estimates of neural health and current spread calculated using the PECAP method previously described by Garcia et al. The second study measured SpeedCAP intraoperatively in 8 CI patients and with all maskers and probes presented at the same current level to assess feasibility. ECAPs for the subset of conditions where the masker and probe were presented on the same electrode were compared with those obtained using the slower approach leveraged by the standard clinical software., Results: Data collection time was reduced from ≈45 to ≈8 minutes. There were no significant differences between normalized root mean squared error (RMSE) repeatability metrics for post-operative PECAP and SpeedCAP data, nor for the RMSEs calculated between PECAP and SpeedCAP data. The comparison achieved 80% power to detect effect sizes down to 8.2% RMSE. When between-participant differences were removed, both the neural-health (r = 0.73) and current-spread (r = 0.65) estimates were significantly correlated ( p < 0.0001, df = 218) between SpeedCAP and PECAP conditions across all electrodes, and showed RMSE errors of 12.7 ± 4.7% and 16.8 ± 8.8%, respectively (with the ± margins representing 95% confidence intervals). Valid ECAPs were obtained in all patients in the second study, demonstrating intraoperative feasibility of SpeedCAP. No significant differences in RMSEs were detectable between post- and intra-operative ECAP measurements, with the comparison achieving 80% power to detect effect sizes down to 13.3% RMSE., Conclusions: The improved efficiency of SpeedCAP provides time savings facilitating multi-electrode ECAP recordings in routine clinical practice. SpeedCAP data collection is sufficiently quick to record intraoperatively, and adds no more than 8.2% error to the ECAP amplitudes. Such measurements could thereafter be submitted to models such as PECAP to provide patient-specific patterns of neural activation to inform programming of clinical MAPs and identify causes of poor performance at the electrode-nerve interface of CI users. The speed and accuracy of these measurements also opens up a wide range of additional research questions to be addressed., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: The prevalence of hearing loss and its consequences is increasing as the elderly population grows. As the guidelines for cochlear implantation (CI) expand, the number of elderly CI recipients is also increasing. We report complication rates, survival duration, and audiological outcomes for CI recipients aged 80 years and over and discuss the cost utility of CI in this age group., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all CI recipients (126 cases), aged 80 years and over at the time of their surgery, implanted at our institution (Cambridge University Hospitals) during a period from January 1, 2001, to March 31, 2019. Data on survival at 1, 3, and 5 years post-implantation, post-operative complications and functional hearing outcomes including audiometric and speech discrimination outcomes (Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentence test) have been reported., Results: The mean age at implantation was 84 years. The mean audiometric score improved from 108 dB HL to 28 dB HL post-implantation. The mean Bamford-Kowal-Bench score improved from 14% to 66% and 73% at 2 and 12 months post-implantation, respectively. The complication rate was 15.3%. The survival probability at 1 year post-implantation was 0.95 for females and 0.93 for males, at 3 years was 0.89 for females and 0.81 for males, and at 5 years was 0.74 for females and 0.54 for males., Conclusion: CI is safe and well-tolerated in this age group and elderly patients gain similar audiometric and functional benefit as found for younger age groups., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To determine if cochlear implantation without removal of inner ear schwannomas (IES) is an effective treatment option for Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) patients. To determine how the presence of an intracochlear schwannoma might impact cochlear implant (CI) outcomes and programming parameters., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Tertiary center for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation., Patients: Of 10 NF2 patients with IES, 8 are reported with no previous tumor removal on the implanted ear., Interventions: Cochlear implant without tumor removal., Main Outcome Measures: Performance outcomes with CI at least 1-year post intervention. Programming parameters, including impedances, for patients with IES., Results: All patients had full insertion of the electrode arrays with round window approaches. Performance outcomes ranged from 0 to 100% for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences. Impedance measurements for active electrodes for patients with IES were comparable to those measured in patients without vestibular schwannoma (VS). Only patients who had radiation treatment before receiving their implant had elevated threshold requirements for CI programming compared with CI recipients without VS., Conclusion: Cochlear implantation without tumor removal is an effective option for treating NF2 patients with IES. The presence of an intracochlear tumor did not have an impact on CI performance or programming requirements compared with patients without VS; however, previous treatment with radiation may be related to elevated current requirements in the CI settings., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objective: To review our experience with cochlear implant infections over the past 5 years, the management strategy and to identify predictive factors that led to explantation., Study Design: Retrospective record-base case series of cochlear implant infections., Setting: Tertiary otology and implant center., Patients: All patients who had cochlear implantation over a period of 5 years., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): To identify risk factors, rates and outcomes of cochlear implant infections, and to formulate strategies to develop clearer management protocols to prevent cochlear implant explantation., Results: Of 704 implanted patients, 22 suffered a postoperative soft tissue infection (3%). Fifty-nine percent of these infected patients resulted in explantation, giving an explantation rate of 1.8% over the whole study population. One hundred percent of the infected implants identified as having either Staph. Aureus or Pseudomonas spp. as the single causative organism resulted in explantation., Conclusions: There is a high rate of explantation when infection is detected. Currently there is no clear consensus on medical management, such as choice of antibiotics or length of antibiotic course. A registry of cochlear implants would facilitate standard reporting methods for severity and type of infection, to be able to pool data across centers and form a more robust management protocol for cochlear implant infections.

Introduction: Hearing loss is considered the most common congenital disease and the prevalence of neonatal deafness can be estimated between 1 and 2 cases per 1000 live births. Infant deafness must be diagnosed as early as possible and an effective therapeutic intervention needs to be carried out in order to avoid the serious consequences of hearing deprivation during the evolutionary period: alterations in the development of central auditory pathways and lack of language acquisition. The cochlear implant (CI) has proved to be the best instrument to solve the problem of auditory deprivation. In particular, the bilateral CI gives the patient access to binaural hearing which results in benefits in terms of sound localisation and discrimination. The optimal age of application of the CI is a widely discussed topic in the scientific community and the current guidelines indicate a period between 12 and 24 months of age, even though the supporters of the application before 12 months of age are nowadays increasing., Materials and Methods: The study is observational, retrospective, monocentric. 49 paediatric patients (<18 years) with simultaneous bilateral CIs were included. The audiometric threshold and speech tests were carried out during the follow-up 3, 6 and 12 months after the CIs activation and when the patient reached 2 years of age., Results: The statistical analysis showed that undergoing bilateral implantation surgery before 2 years of age allows a satisfactory audiometric performance, while there are no particular benefits in performing the surgery before 1 year of age. As far as the speech outcome is concerned, the statistical analysis didn't show significant correlation between the earlier age of implantation and better speech performance if the operation is carried out before 2.5 years of age., Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that the optimal age to perform the simultaneous bilateral CIs surgery is between 12 and 24 months, without demonstrating any particular benefit in carrying out the procedure before 1 year of age. This may be clinically relevant in terms of avoiding the risks of diagnostic mistakes and reducing the related surgical risk in children under 1 year of age., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)