Search

Objectives/hypothesis: Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation., Study Design: Systematic review., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold-over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers., Results: We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold-over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X 2  = 6.8, P < .01)., Conclusions: Scalar translocation and tip fold-overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358-1368, 2021., (© 2020 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

The position of the cochlear electrode array within the scala tympani is essential for optimal hearing benefit. An intraoperative neural response telemetry ratio (NRT ratio; a threshold ratio of pairs of apical and basal electrodes) has been established, which can provide information about the intracochlear electrode array position. Out of a previous collective of 85 patients, the 6-month follow-up electrophysiological NRT data of 37 patients have been included in this study. Comparing the intraoperatively estimated NRT ratio with the 6-month follow-up NRT ratio, it remained unchanged intraindividually in 92% of cases. Within this group the NRT ratio and the intracochlear position of the electrode array matched in all cases. There were two newly occurring mismatches and one new match was observed. After a period of 6 months the NRT ratio remained unchanged in most cases and showed a good correlation with the intracochlear position of the electrode array., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of the intracochlear electrode position on the residual hearing and VNG- and cVEMP responses., Design: Prospective pilot study., Study Sample: Thirteen adult patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant surgery were examined with high-resolution rotational tomography after cochlear implantation. All subjects were also tested with VNG, and 12 of the subjects were tested with cVEMP and audiometry before and after surgery., Results: We found that although the electrode was originally planned to be positioned inside the scala tympani, only 8 of 13 had full insertion into the scala tympani. Loss of cVEMP response occurred to the same extent in the group with full scala tympani positioning and the group with scala vestibuli involvement. There was a non-significant difference in the loss of caloric response and residual hearing between the two groups. Interscalar dislocation of the electrode inside the cochlea was observed in two patients. A higher loss of residual hearing could be seen in the group with electrode dislocation between the scalae., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that intracochlear electrode dislocation is a possible cause to loss of residual hearing during cochlear implantation but cannot be the sole cause of postoperative vestibular loss.

Intracochlear scarring is a well-described sequela of cochlear implantation. We developed a mathematical model of passive cochlear mechanics to predict the impact that this might have upon residual acoustical hearing after implantation. The cochlea was modeled using lumped impedance terms for scala vestibuli (SV), scala tympani (ST), and the cochlear partition (CP). The damping of ST and CP was increased in the basal one half of the cochlea to simulate the effect of scar tissue. We found that increasing the damping of the ST predominantly reduced basilar membrane vibrations in the apex of the cochlea while increasing the damping of the CP predominantly reduced basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the cochlea. As long as intracochlear scarring continues to occur with cochlear implantation, there will be limitations on hearing preservation. Newer surgical techniques and electrode technologies that do not result in as much scar tissue formation will permit improved hearing preservation.

Numerical estimation of pitch was performed by 8 adult subjects implanted with cochlear prostheses manufactured by Cochlear Limited. The electrode arrays had been inserted into the scale tympani to between one and one and a half turns of the cochlea. Using bipolar stimulation, the pitch estimates for each subjects showed an overall reduction with insertion depth of the stimulated electrode. However, for several subjects, after decreasing regularly for the more basal electrodes, pitch estimates showed an abrupt decrease, followed in some cases by a region of low pitch. Two of the subjects, implanted with a modified electrode array, the '20 + 2' which allowed monopolar in addition to bipolar stimulation, exhibited an abrupt decrease in pitch estimate with bipolar but not with monopolar stimulation. In these two subjects, for stimulating electrodes inserted more deeply than about three quarters of a turn, bipolar stimuli produced lower pitch sensations, and presumably more apical neural excitation patterns, than monopolar stimuli.

Results for forward masking and numerical estimation of pitch were compared in a group of 6 adult subjects implanted with cochlear prostheses manufactured by Cochlear Limited. Data were collected for bipolar + 1 stimulation in all subjects, and for stimulation in one other mode, either common ground or monopolar, for all subjects but one. The pitch data show various irregularities and in each case can be seen to be broadly consistent with the corresponding forward masking data. It is shown that a 'centre of gravity' of the forward masking distribution varies with masker electrode in a manner that is qualitatively very similar to the variation of pitch estimate. It is suggested that, while pitch estimation results are consistent with those from forward masking, the latter contain more detailed information that may be useful in understanding intersubject variations in speech comprehension.