Search

Abstract The purpose of this work was (1) to assess the ability of selected antipsychotic and comparison drugs to induce arrest of movement phenomena during operant responding and (2) to evaluate the capacity of muscarinic anitcholinergics to block such effects. The effects of haloperidol (0.02-0.12 mg/kg, IP, 45 min), raclopride (0.05-0.80 mg/kg, IP, 30 min) eticlopride (0.02-0.16 mg/kg, IP, 45 min), clozapine (1.0-8.0 mg/kg, IP, 60 min) and SCH 23390 (0.01-0.16 mg/kg, IP, 30 min) were administered to rats for 4 weeks in a between-groups dosing design. Operant responses in 15 min and the maximum duration of the rat's muzzle entry into the reinforcement dipper well (the measure of arrest of movement that reflected microcatalepsy) were the quantitative measures of behavior. The D[sub 2] antagonists dose-relatedly decreased operant responding and increased maximum muzzle duration, effects that were significantly reversed by the anticholinergic scopolamine (0.1 mg/kg) or atropine (6.0 mg/kg). Although the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine and the selective D[sub 1] antagonist SCH 23390 both significantly reduced operant responding, these drugs did not produce microcatalepsy. The results suggested that microcatalepsy expressed in the context of ongoing operant behavior may model low-dose extrapyramidal side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the subchronic, low-dose effects of clozapine with those of olanzapine in a learned behavioral task previously shown to distinguish between clozapine and haloperidol with acute and subchronic treatment regimes. Rats were trained to use a single forelimb to press a force-recording operandum and simultaneously to lick water from a dipper that remained available while forelimb force exceeded a modest lower limit. Analysis of the resulting forcetime recordings provided measures of task engagement (time on task - analogous to response rate), lick rhythm, tremor, ballistic (maximum force) and tonic (hold force) forelimb force measures, as well as the durations of the individual responses. In a between-groups dosing design, five separate groups of rats received vehicle, clozapine 1.0 or 5.0 mg/kg, olanzapine 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg daily for 27 days. A 7-day withdrawal period followed. On days 22 and 26 of antipsychotic drug treatment, all rats additionally received 0.3 mg/kg trihexyphenidyl or 1.0 mg/kg quipazine, respectively. The effects of olanzapine and clozapine were similar in that both drugs reduced time on task, increased response duration, and slowed lick rhythm. The two drugs differed in that clozapine reduced the force and tremor measures but olanzapine did not. Both tolerance and withdrawal effects, as reflected by the tremor measure, were observed for clozapine but not for olanzapine. Trihexyphenidyl further increased the duration of responses already lengthened by clozapine; in contrast, trihexyphenidyl decreased the duration lengthening effect of olanzapine. Taken together, the results indicated that olanzapine did not have the antitremor and hypotonic effects displayed by clozapine, and olanzapine did not induce tolerance and withdrawal phenomena as clozapine did. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In order to compare and contrast the behavioral effects of the typical neuroleptic haloperidol with the atypical neuroleptic clozapine, ten daily doses of these drugs were administered to separate groups of rats trained to extend the forelimb through a rectangular hole and to exert downward pressure on a force transducer to gain access to water. Doses were individually titrated daily for each rat in an attempt to achieve a 50% reduction in time on task (analogous to response rate) during 8-min daily sessions. Clozapine-treated rats exhibited dramatic tolerance to the drug's suppressive effect on time on task. In contrast, haloperidol rats displayed little tolerance on this measure. Despite the tolerance reflected by time on task, no tolerance was seen in clozapine's marked slowing of the dominant frequency of oscillations in forelimb force as measured by Fourier analysis of the force-time recordings. Haloperidol did not slow the dominant frequency. No tolerance was seen for clozapine's effects on forelimb force or tremor measures. Haloperidol did not significantly affect forelimb force. Both haloperidol and clozapine produced increases in the duration of long-duration forelimb responses, and no tolerance was seen for either drug on this measure of behavior. For clozapine, the dissociation between the tendency to respond (time on task) and the observed slowing of the dominant frequency may reflect effects peculiar to atypical neuroleptics, while the lengthening of long-duration responses by both drugs may reflect a more general behavioral effect that is characteristic of both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the microbehavioral methods for measuring the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on mice behavior. Guiding principles on the evolution of the methods; Finding on the effects of clozapine in rodents.