Search

Background: The genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and aspirin are incompletely characterized. Recently, PEAR1 (platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1) rs12041331 polymorphism has been shown to influence the platelet reactivity, but its impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear in patients treated with antiplatelet agents., Methods and Results: In this prospective cohort study, 2439 Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease undergoing coronary stent implantation and receiving clopidogrel and aspirin were consecutively recruited. Their platelet reactivity was determined by light transmission aggregometry at 5 and 30 days after coronary intervention. Genotyping was performed using an improved multiplex ligation detection reaction technique. All patients completed a 30-day follow-up for clinical outcomes. Genotyping for PEAR1 showed 768 (38.3%) GG homozygotes, 941 (46.9%) GA heterozygotes, and 298 (14.8%) AA homozygotes. The 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke were significantly higher in AA homozygotes than in non-AA homozygotes (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.13-6.82; P=0.026), irrespective of CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function polymorphism and known outcome predictors including age, sex, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. The ADP-induced platelet aggregation was significantly lower in AA homozygotes than that in GG homozygotes at both time points, although no significant difference was found for the arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation among the 3 groups., Conclusions: About 15% of Chinese patients undergoing coronary stent implantation were AA homozygotes for PEAR1 rs12041331. These patients had ≈3-fold increase in short-term major adverse cardiovascular events risk compared with non-AA homozygotes, and the adverse clinical outcome is unlikely to be mediated by suboptimal pharmacological response to aspirin or clopidogrel., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01968499.

Purpose: Form II clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix) has been extensively used in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, the efficacy of form I clopidogrel bisulfate (Talcom) was less investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Talcom compared with Plavix., Method: Two hundred and forty-eight patients were recruited after receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants were randomly assigned to Talcom or Plavix group, and administered with Talcom or Plavix 75 mg od respectively in combination with aspirin 100 mg od for 12 months. Primary endpoints were set as levels of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation (PL ADP ) on the 5th day and at 1 month after randomization. Patients were followed-up for 5 years. Bleeding events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and cardiogenic re-admission were recorded., Results: On the 5th day and at 1 month after randomization, the antiplatelet effect of Talcom was non-inferior to that of Plavix [PL ADP (5th day): 30% (22%, 43%) vs. 33% (22%, 44%), p = 0.007; PL ADP (1 month): 29% (19%, 43%) vs. 31% (22%, 43%), p = 0.005]. A total of 208 patients completed the follow-up, the incidences of MACE and bleeding were both comparable, and the MACE-free survival did not differ between the two groups. However, the expenditure was 32% lower for Talcom compared to Plavix during the treatment period., Conclusions: The antiplatelet effect of Talcom is non-inferior to Plavix, and the clinical efficacy and safety of Talcom and Plavix at 5 years were not significantly different in this study.