Search

Background and Aim: Elderly patients are at increased risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Frailty, comorbidities and low body weight have emerged as conditioning the prognostic impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic impact of body mass index (BMI) on clinical outcome among patients included in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial, a randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study comparing low-dose (5 mg) prasugrel vs clopidogrel among elderly patients with ACS., Methods and Results: Our population is represented by 1408 patients enrolled in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial. BMI was calculated at admission. The primary endpoint of this analysis was cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, recurrent MI, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or 3 bleeding, and re-hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons or stent thrombosis within 12 months after index admission. Patients were grouped according to median values of BMI (

Background Elderly patients have high ischemic and bleeding rates after acute coronary syndrome; however, the occurrence of these complications over time has never been studied. This study sought to characterize average daily ischemic rates ( ADIRs ) and average daily bleeding rates ( ADBRs ) over 1 year in patients aged >74 years with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who were randomized in the Elderly ACS 2 trial, comparing low-dose prasugrel (5 mg daily) with clopidogrel (75 mg daily). Methods and Results ADIRs and ADBRs were calculated as the total number of events, including recurrent events, divided by the number of patient-days of follow-up and assessed within different clinical phases: acute (0-3 days), subacute (4-30 days), and late (31-365 days). Generalized estimating equations were used to test the least squares mean differences for the pairwise comparisons of ADIRs and ADBRs and the pairwise comparison of clopidogrel versus prasugrel effects. Globally, ADIRs were 2.6 times (95% CI, 2.4-2.9) higher than ADBRs . ADIRs were significantly higher in the clopidogrel arm than in the low-dose prasugrel arm in the subacute phase ( P adj <0.001) without a difference in ADBRs ( P adj =0.35). In the late phase, ADIRs remained significantly higher with clopidogrel ( P adj <0.001), whereas ADBRs were significantly higher with low-dose prasugrel ( P adj <0.001). Conclusions Ischemic burden was greater than bleeding burden in all clinical phases of 1-year follow-up of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Low-dose prasugrel reduced ischemic events in the subacute and chronic phases compared with clopidogrel, whereas bleeding burden was lower with clopidogrel in the late phase. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01777503.

Background: Elderly patients are at elevated risk of both ischemic and bleeding complications after an acute coronary syndrome and display higher on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity compared with younger patients. Prasugrel 5 mg provides more predictable platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel in the elderly, suggesting the possibility of reducing ischemic events without increasing bleeding., Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial, we compared a once-daily maintenance dose of prasugrel 5 mg with the standard clopidogrel 75 mg in patients >74 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes or bleeding within 1 year. The study was designed to demonstrate superiority of prasugrel 5 mg over clopidogrel 75 mg., Results: Enrollment was interrupted, according to prespecified criteria, after a planned interim analysis, when 1443 patients (40% women; mean age, 80 years) had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 12 months, because of futility for efficacy. The primary end point occurred in 121 patients (17%) with prasugrel and 121 (16.6%) with clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.007; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.30; P =0.955). Definite/probable stent thrombosis rates were 0.7% with prasugrel versus 1.9% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.00; P =0.06). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2 and greater rates were 4.1% with prasugrel versus 2.7% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.16; P =0.18)., Conclusions: The present study in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes showed no difference in the primary end point between reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel. However, the study should be interpreted in light of the premature termination of the trial., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01777503., (© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Abstract Aims To describe the contemporary management by cardiologists of patients after an episode of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods The EYESHOT Post-MI was a prospective, observational, nationwide study aimed to evaluate the management of patients referring to cardiologists 1 to 3 years from the last MI event. Results Over a 3-month period, 1633 consecutive patients [median 22 (IQR 15–28) months from MI] were enrolled: 1028 (63.0%) at the second and 605 (37.0%) at the third year from MI. During the 12 months prior to enrolment, the majority of patients received a transthoracic echocardiogram (60% and 54%), followed by coronary angiography (24% and 16%, in the second and third year from MI groups, respectively). At the time of enrolment, the majority of patients were prescribed on statins (93%) and beta-blockers (82%), without significant differences between the 2 groups. A dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was used more frequently among patients presenting during the second compared to the third year from MI (40% vs 24%; p < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, the time interval from last MI (2 vs 3 years: OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.79–2.88; p < 0.0001) and a previous percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stents (OR 3.46; 95% CI 2.19–5.47; p < 0.0001) resulted as the major independent predictors of DAPT persistence at the time of enrolment. Conclusions This contemporary registry provides unique insights into the current management of post-MI patients and represents an opportunity to further improve the long-term treatment of this high-risk population. Highlights • The EYESHOT Post-MI evaluated the management of patients referring to cardiologists 1 to 3 years from the last MI event. • Over a 3-month period, 1633 patients were enrolled: 1028 (63.0%) at the second and 605 (37.0%) at the third year from MI. • During the 12 months prior to enrolment, the majority of patients received a transthoracic echocardiogram, followed by coronary angiography. • A dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was used more frequently among patients presenting during the second compared to the third year from MI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]