Search

Background: Sedation for heart catheterization has been a cause for concern. Benzodiazepines, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists and opioids are used for this purpose. However, each drug has advantages and disadvantages., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of sufentanil and clonidine as sedative in patients undergoing heart catheterization, observing their impact on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, the presence of side effects and satisfaction of the patient and interventional cardiologist with the examination., Methods: This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial involving 60 patients who received 0.1 µg/kg of sufentanil or 0.5 µg/kg of clonidine before heart catheterization. The score of sedation according to the Ramsay scale, the need for use of midazolam, side effects and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recorded, with the data being analyzed at 06 different moments., Results: The behavior of blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate was similar in both groups, but, at moment 2, the patients in the sufentanil group (Group S) had a lower sedation score on the Ramsay scale, and the peripheral oxyhemoglobin saturation was lower than in the clonidine group (Group C) at time 6. Patients in Group S had higher incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery than patients in Group C. Patient satisfaction was higher in the clonidine group. The interventional cardiologists were satisfied in both groups., Conclusion: Sufentanil and clonidine were effective as sedative in patients undergoing heart catheterization.

Background: Sedation during coronary angiography has been rarely studied, and it is important to know which drug is the best to sedate these patients., Objective: To evaluate the quality of sedation and the effects of midazolam and diazepam alone or combined with clonidine on the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) of patients with suspected coronary artery disease., Methods: This is a controlled, randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical study of 160 patients divided into five groups of 32 patients each, according to the drug used: group C (clonidine 0.5 microg/kg); group M (midazolam 40 microg/kg); group MC (combination of midazolam 40 microg/kg and clonidine 0.5 microg/kg); group D (diazepam 40 microg/kg); and group DC (combination of diazepam 40 microg/kg and clonidine 0.5 microg/kg). Sedation was evaluated based on the Ramsay scale and on the use of meperidine 0.04 mg.kg-1. Invasive BP monitoring, HR and the sedation score were analyzed every five minutes at four different time points., Results: Patients who received midazolam presented higher sedation scores as well as HR and BP variation (p < 0.05). Those who received diazepam or clonidine had lower sedation scores, which were more satisfactory for the performance of the procedure, and presented a lower BP and HR variation (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: Midazolam was associated with a greater sedative and cardiovascular effect, whereas for diazepam these effects were less intense. Clonidine and diazepam had similar effects on BP, HR and sedation.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of clonidine on heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) as well as its sedative effect on patients submitted to a cineangiocardiography., Methods: A randomized, controlled, double blind, prospective clinical trial was conducted on 62 patients submitted to an elective cineangiocardiography. The patients were divided in two groups: the clonidine group, that were administered a 0.8 microg/kg dose of this drug and the control group, that were administered a 0.9% saline solution. Sedation was evaluated based on the Ramsay Scale and the administration of a 0.04 mg/kg dose of meperidine that was given to the patients who were agitated or anxious during the procedure. The invasive BP, HR and sedation score based on the Ramsay Scale were analyzed every 5 minutes and four different intervals were considered for the assessment: I1- start of the test; I2- 5 minutes after the start of the test; I3- median time of the test and I4- end of the test., Results: The clonidine group presented better BP and HR stability and sedation efficacy while the control group presented a higher intake of meperidine (p<0.05). In the statistical analysis, the inference of the continuous variables was calculated using the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test and the chi2 or Fisher Exact Probability test was used for the categorical variables., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that clonidine was an efficient means to control BP and HR and provided a conscious sedation for patients submitted to a cineangiocardiography.