Search

Objective: It was the aim of this study to document the risks of symptomatic patients with angina in placebo-controlled, anti-anginal drug development trials in which symptom-limited exercise testing was used as the primary endpoint. Patients and Methods: The original case report forms submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration in support of approval of new or supplemental new drug applications between 1973 and 2001 were identified and subjected to a by-patient meta-analysis, utilizing both a maximum likelihood analysis and classical Mantel-Haenszel methods. Results: There were 63 placebo-controlled, clinical trials that randomized 10,865 patients, with 1,047 patient-years of observation time. The trials involved 21 different chemical entities from 4 different drug classes. The relative risk (RR) for withdrawal (placebo compared to drug-treated patients) was not increased [RR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.08; p = 0.28]. Of interest, a RR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.26-1.04; p < 0.068) for irreversible harm (a combination of cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction and death) and a RR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.61-1.30; p = 0.56) for serious cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents) both non-statistically significantly favored being randomized to placebo. Conclusions: For the development of current or future drugs for the treatment of angina, there is no obvious contraindication to the use of placebo controls and exercise tolerance testing. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This publication describes uniform definitions for cardiovascular and stroke outcomes developed by the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA established the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative in 2009 to simplify the design and conduct of clinical trials intended to support marketing applications. The writing committee recognizes that these definitions may be used in other types of clinical trials and clinical care processes where appropriate. Use of these definitions at the FDA has enhanced the ability to aggregate data within and across medical product development programs, conduct meta-analyses to evaluate cardiovascular safety, integrate data from multiple trials, and compare effectiveness of drugs and devices. Further study is needed to determine whether prospective data collection using these common definitions improves the design, conduct, and interpretability of the results of clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on clinical data standards which intends to contribute to the infrastructure needed to accomplish the American Heart Association's mission of fostering optimal cardiovascular care. It states other goals which include the need to establish a universal, consistent, and interoperable clinical vocabulary as a foundation for both clinical care and clinical research. Other topics discussed include the definition and categorization of the types of myocardial infarction.