Search

Objectives: The objective of this paper was to describe primary care prescribers' perspectives on electronic prescribing drug alerts at the point of prescribing.Design: We used a mixed-method study which included clinician surveys (web-based and paper) and focus groups with prescribers and staff.Participants: Prescribers (n = 157) working in one of 64 practices using 1 of 6 e-prescribing technologies in 6 US states completed the quantitative survey and 276 prescribers and staff participated in focus groups.Measurements: The study measures self-reported frequency of overriding of drug alerts; open-ended responses to: "What do you think of the drug alerts your software generates for you?"Results: More than 40% of prescribers indicated they override drug-drug interactions most of the time or always (range by e-prescribing system, 25% to 50%). Participants indicated that the software and the interaction alerts were beneficial to patient safety and valued seeing drug-drug interactions for medications prescribed by others. However, they noted that alerts are too sensitive and often unnecessary. Participant suggestions included: (1) run drug alerts on an active medication list and (2) allow prescribers to set the threshold for severity of alerts.Conclusions: Primary care prescribers recognize the patient safety value of drug prescribing alerts embedded within electronic prescribing software. Improvements to increase specificity and reduce alert overload are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aims: The aim of this paper is to explore the potential value of questionnaires in routine clinical practice to assess female sexual dysfunction (FSD), and to identify if this could increase the competence of a physician in the initial management of women with these problems. The rationale to encourage Health Care Professionals (HCPs) to engage women in dialogue about their sexual health is that it may enhance a woman''s quality of life (which may lead to improved general health) and might lead to timely interventions and possible preventative measures for certain diseases. Method: A short literature review of the most relevant publications was undertaken evaluating current practice. Results: FSD can have a negative impact on women''s well-being and can also be an early symptom of underlying disease. Many HCPs do not broach the subject, consequently women do not get the opportunity either to voice their sexual concerns or access appropriate services. Review of currently available FSD questionnaires suggests that many but not all are generally inappropriate for use in routine clinical practice. Kriston et al.’s STEFFI-2 may be an appropriate starting point. Evidence suggests that this would facilitate discussion of sexual matters between the HCP and the women, and increase the likelihood of FSD being diagnosed. Conclusions: Following this review of the literature, the authors strongly recommend that HCPs include FSD questionnaires as part of their routine engagement with women. However, the questionnaire would need to be used as part of the overall assessment and cannot replace a detailed case history and examination, which should lead to effective treatment and management of FSD. The authors recommend further research in the following areas: [•] Effective training for HCPs. [•] FSD as an early presentation of sub-clinical disease. [•] The cost-benefit of early treatment of FSD. [•] A standardised, validated FSD screening tool. [•] Benefits of using FSD screener in routine clinical practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

While collaborative, team-based care has the potential to improve medication use and reduce adverse drug events and cost, less attention is paid to understanding the processes of well functioning teams. This paper presents the findings from key informant interviews and reflective journaling from pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners participating in a multicentre, controlled clinical trial of team-based pharmacist care in hospitalized medical patients. A phenomenological approach guided the data analysis and content analysis was the primary tool for unitizing, categorizing and identifying emerging themes. Pharmacists experienced highs (developing trusting relationships and making positive contributions to patient care) and lows (struggling with documentation and workload) during integration into the medical care team. From the perspective of the participating pharmacists, nurse practitioners and physicians, the integration of pharmacists into the teams was felt to have facilitated positive patient outcomes by improving team drug-therapy decision-making, continuity of care and patient safety. Additionally, the study increased the awareness of all team members' potential roles so that pharmacists, nurses and physicians could play a part in and benefit from working together as a team. Focussed attention on how practice is structured, team process and ongoing support would enable successful implementation of team-based care in a larger context. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00351676) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]