Search

PurposeTo report early clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate interstitial image-guided brachytherapy (BT) in the definitive management of locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 31 locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and April 2013. About 88% had advanced disease based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics guidelines, and 87% received concurrent chemotherapy. All patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy to a median dose of 45 Gy (range, 39.6-58 Gy) before receiving BT. High-dose-rate BT was delivered in a single implant to a median dose of 6 Gy × five fractions to a CT-defined volume. Median total equivalent 2-Gy dose, dose covered by 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90), and HR-CTV were 84, 87.4, and 49.9 cc, respectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used for actuarial survival analysis, and toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.ResultsMedian followup was 19.3 months. Two-year actuarial local control, regional control, and distant metastasis (DM) were 90%, 93%, and 23.6%, respectively. Two-year disease-free survival was 55%. Genitourinary, gastrointestinal, or gynecologic Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 5 patients (3 T4a and 2 T3b) for crude rates of 13%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. Stratifying HR-CTV by 30 cc and then by HR-CTV D90 of 90 Gy showed that 100% of the local failures, regional failures, DM, and G3 toxicity occurred in >30 cc group. The rate of DM was also significantly higher in the >30 cc group (p = 0.036).ConclusionsAn interstitial approach can achieve excellent outcomes in cases where intracavitary and/or hybrid approaches are either not suitable or not available.

PurposeTo report early clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate interstitial image-guided brachytherapy (BT) in the definitive management of locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 31 locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and April 2013. About 88% had advanced disease based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics guidelines, and 87% received concurrent chemotherapy. All patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy to a median dose of 45 Gy (range, 39.6-58 Gy) before receiving BT. High-dose-rate BT was delivered in a single implant to a median dose of 6 Gy × five fractions to a CT-defined volume. Median total equivalent 2-Gy dose, dose covered by 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90), and HR-CTV were 84, 87.4, and 49.9 cc, respectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used for actuarial survival analysis, and toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.ResultsMedian followup was 19.3 months. Two-year actuarial local control, regional control, and distant metastasis (DM) were 90%, 93%, and 23.6%, respectively. Two-year disease-free survival was 55%. Genitourinary, gastrointestinal, or gynecologic Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 5 patients (3 T4a and 2 T3b) for crude rates of 13%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. Stratifying HR-CTV by 30 cc and then by HR-CTV D90 of 90 Gy showed that 100% of the local failures, regional failures, DM, and G3 toxicity occurred in >30 cc group. The rate of DM was also significantly higher in the >30 cc group (p = 0.036).ConclusionsAn interstitial approach can achieve excellent outcomes in cases where intracavitary and/or hybrid approaches are either not suitable or not available.

PurposeWe compared the dosimetry of brachyablation (BA) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of liver metastases.Methods and materialsTreatment plans for 10 consecutive liver metastasis patients, treated with SABR, were replanned for BA. BA treatment was planned using five 12 Gy fractions to the same planning target volume (PTV) used for SABR. Dosimetric parameters were compared using a Student's paired t test.Results and conclusionsBA and SABR plans had similar mean volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (94.1% vs. 93.9% of PTV, p = 0.8). Mean volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose for BA was 63.6%, whereas for SABR it was 0. The minimum dose to the PTV was 65.8% for BA, whereas for SABR it was 87.4% (p = 0.0002). Liver volume receiving ≥15 Gy was similar for BA and SABR (278 vs. 256 cc, p = 0.3). Small bowel mean dose, as percent prescription dose, was higher for BA (10.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.006). Stomach mean dose was similar (4.9% vs. 4.8% of prescription dose, p = 0.98). Right kidney mean dose was greater for BA (6.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.07). BA leads to a higher target dose, similar dose to organs at risk, but potentially with lower target coverage compared with SABR. Further work is needed to determine ideal suitability for mono vs. combination therapy with this approach.

PurposeWe compared the dosimetry of brachyablation (BA) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of liver metastases.Methods and materialsTreatment plans for 10 consecutive liver metastasis patients, treated with SABR, were replanned for BA. BA treatment was planned using five 12 Gy fractions to the same planning target volume (PTV) used for SABR. Dosimetric parameters were compared using a Student's paired t test.Results and conclusionsBA and SABR plans had similar mean volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (94.1% vs. 93.9% of PTV, p = 0.8). Mean volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose for BA was 63.6%, whereas for SABR it was 0. The minimum dose to the PTV was 65.8% for BA, whereas for SABR it was 87.4% (p = 0.0002). Liver volume receiving ≥15 Gy was similar for BA and SABR (278 vs. 256 cc, p = 0.3). Small bowel mean dose, as percent prescription dose, was higher for BA (10.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.006). Stomach mean dose was similar (4.9% vs. 4.8% of prescription dose, p = 0.98). Right kidney mean dose was greater for BA (6.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.07). BA leads to a higher target dose, similar dose to organs at risk, but potentially with lower target coverage compared with SABR. Further work is needed to determine ideal suitability for mono vs. combination therapy with this approach.

PurposeTo assess the magnitude of dosimetric reductions of a focal and ultra-focal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy treatment strategy relative to standard whole gland (WG) treatment.Methods and materialsHDR brachytherapy plans for five patients treated with WG HDR monotherapy were optimized to assess different treatment strategies. Plans were generated to treat the hemigland (HG), one-third gland (1/3G), and one-sixth gland (1/6G), as well as to assess treating the WG with a boost to one of those sub-volumes (WG + HG, WG + 1/3G, WG + 1/6G). Dosimetric parameters analyzed included Target D90%, V100%, V150%, Bladder (B), Rectal (R), Urethral (U) D0.1, 1 and 2cc, Urethral V75%, and the V50% to the contralateral HG. Two-tailed t tests were used for comparison of means, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsTarget objectives (D90 > 100% and V100 > 97%) were met in all cases. Significant organs at risk dose reductions were achieved for all approaches compared with WG plans. 1/6G vs WG plans resulted in the greatest reduction in dose with a mean bladder D2cc 24.7 vs 64.8%, rectal D2cc 32.8 vs 65.3%, urethral D1cc 52.1 vs 103.8%, and V75 14.5 vs 75% (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).ConclusionSignificant dose reductions to organs at risk can be achieved using HDR focal brachytherapy. The magnitude of the reductions achievable with treating progressively smaller sub-volumes suggests the potential to reduce morbidity, but the clinical impact on morbidity and tumor control remain to be investigated.

PurposeTo assess the magnitude of dosimetric reductions of a focal and ultra-focal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy treatment strategy relative to standard whole gland (WG) treatment.Methods and materialsHDR brachytherapy plans for five patients treated with WG HDR monotherapy were optimized to assess different treatment strategies. Plans were generated to treat the hemigland (HG), one-third gland (1/3G), and one-sixth gland (1/6G), as well as to assess treating the WG with a boost to one of those sub-volumes (WG + HG, WG + 1/3G, WG + 1/6G). Dosimetric parameters analyzed included Target D90%, V100%, V150%, Bladder (B), Rectal (R), Urethral (U) D0.1, 1 and 2cc, Urethral V75%, and the V50% to the contralateral HG. Two-tailed t tests were used for comparison of means, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsTarget objectives (D90 > 100% and V100 > 97%) were met in all cases. Significant organs at risk dose reductions were achieved for all approaches compared with WG plans. 1/6G vs WG plans resulted in the greatest reduction in dose with a mean bladder D2cc 24.7 vs 64.8%, rectal D2cc 32.8 vs 65.3%, urethral D1cc 52.1 vs 103.8%, and V75 14.5 vs 75% (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).ConclusionSignificant dose reductions to organs at risk can be achieved using HDR focal brachytherapy. The magnitude of the reductions achievable with treating progressively smaller sub-volumes suggests the potential to reduce morbidity, but the clinical impact on morbidity and tumor control remain to be investigated.

PurposeTo study the dosimetric differences of various channel combinations of the Capri vaginal applicator.Methods and materialsThe Capri consists of a single central channel (R1), an inner array of 6 channels (R2), and an outer array of 6 channels (R3). Three-dimensional plans were simulated for 6 channel arrangements (R1, R2, R12, R13, R23, and R123). Treatment plans were optimized to the applicator surface or 5-mm depth while minimizing dose to organs at risk (OARs: bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and urethra). The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as a 5-mm circumferential shell extending 4 cm in length around the applicator. Clinical target volume coverage (Dmean, D90, V100, and V150) and OAR doses (D0.1 cm3, D1 cm3, D2 cm3, and Dmean) were compared. A comparison between the Capri (R123) and a conventional single-channel applicator was also done. Statistical significance (P value

PurposeTo study the dosimetric differences of various channel combinations of the Capri vaginal applicator.Methods and materialsThe Capri consists of a single central channel (R1), an inner array of 6 channels (R2), and an outer array of 6 channels (R3). Three-dimensional plans were simulated for 6 channel arrangements (R1, R2, R12, R13, R23, and R123). Treatment plans were optimized to the applicator surface or 5-mm depth while minimizing dose to organs at risk (OARs: bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and urethra). The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as a 5-mm circumferential shell extending 4 cm in length around the applicator. Clinical target volume coverage (Dmean, D90, V100, and V150) and OAR doses (D0.1 cm3, D1 cm3, D2 cm3, and Dmean) were compared. A comparison between the Capri (R123) and a conventional single-channel applicator was also done. Statistical significance (P value

PurposeTo determine the utility of focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer, we investigated the impact on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs) with hemigland (HG) compared with whole-gland (WG) treatment.Methods and materialsA total of 10 WG implants were used to generate 10 WG and 20 HG (left and right) treatment plans optimized with the inverse planning simulation annealing algorithm using Oncentra MasterPlan (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, The Netherlands). The standard distribution of 17-18 catheters designed for WG was used to generate HG plans. The same OARs namely bladder, rectum, and urethra contours and dose constraints were applied for HG and WG plans. The HG contour was a modification of the WG contour whereby the urethra divided the prostate into HGs. The prescription dose was 7.25 Gy×6. Evaluated dose parameters were target dose D90, V100, and V150 and D0.1 cc, D1 cc, and D2 cc to OARs.ResultsThe HG plans had a D90, V100, and V150 to the HG target of 112%, 97.6%, and 33.8%, respectively. The WG plans had a D90, V100, and V150 to the WG target of 108%, 98.8%, and 26.5%, respectively. The OAR D2 cc doses were significantly lower in HG vs. WG plans: rectum (53.1% vs. 64.1%, p

PurposeTo determine the utility of focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer, we investigated the impact on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs) with hemigland (HG) compared with whole-gland (WG) treatment.Methods and materialsA total of 10 WG implants were used to generate 10 WG and 20 HG (left and right) treatment plans optimized with the inverse planning simulation annealing algorithm using Oncentra MasterPlan (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, The Netherlands). The standard distribution of 17-18 catheters designed for WG was used to generate HG plans. The same OARs namely bladder, rectum, and urethra contours and dose constraints were applied for HG and WG plans. The HG contour was a modification of the WG contour whereby the urethra divided the prostate into HGs. The prescription dose was 7.25 Gy×6. Evaluated dose parameters were target dose D90, V100, and V150 and D0.1 cc, D1 cc, and D2 cc to OARs.ResultsThe HG plans had a D90, V100, and V150 to the HG target of 112%, 97.6%, and 33.8%, respectively. The WG plans had a D90, V100, and V150 to the WG target of 108%, 98.8%, and 26.5%, respectively. The OAR D2 cc doses were significantly lower in HG vs. WG plans: rectum (53.1% vs. 64.1%, p