Search

We describe a rare case of acute mania in the setting of autoimmune adrenalitis. A 41-year-old male with no previous psychiatric diagnoses presented with impulsivity, grandiosity, delusions of telepathy, and hyperreligiosity following a previous hospitalization for an acute adrenal crisis and 2 subsequent days of low-dose corticosteroid treatment. Workups for encephalopathy and lupus cerebritis were negative, raising concern that this presentation might represent steroid-induced psychosis. However, discontinuation of corticosteroids for 5 days did not resolve the patient's manic episode, suggesting that his clinical presentation was more likely new onset of a primary mood disorder or a psychiatric manifestation of adrenal insufficiency itself. The decision was made to restart corticosteroid treatment for the patient's primary adrenal insufficiency (formerly known as Addison disease), coupled with administration of both risperidone and valproate for mania and psychosis. Over the following 2 weeks, the patient's manic symptoms resolved, and he was discharged home. His final diagnosis was acute mania secondary to autoimmune adrenalitis. Although acute mania in adrenal insufficiency is quite rare, clinicians should be aware of the range of psychiatric manifestations associated with Addison disease so that they can pursue the optimal course of both medical and psychiatric treatment for these patients.

PurposePrimary spinal infections (PSIs) are a group of infectious diseases characterized by inflammation of the end plate-disk unit or its surroundings. PSI is considered more prevalent and aggressive among patients with chronic immunocompromised states. Association of PSIs, immunocompromising cancers, and hemoglobinopathies has not been systematically analyzed. We conducted a systematic review to study characteristics, clinical presentation, and mortality of patients with PSI in the setting of hematologic disease.MethodsA systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted in April 2022 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included retrospective case series and individual case reports.ResultsOn careful review, 28 articles published between 1970 and 2022 were selected. These studies featured 29 patients who met inclusion criteria (mean age 29 years, age range 1.5 to 67 years; 63.3% male). Lumbar infection was the most common location (65.5%), with Salmonella (24.1%) as the main causative microorganism. Neurologic compromise was present in 41% of patients, and surgical intervention occurred in 48.3%. Average antibiotic duration was 13 weeks. The postoperative complication rate was 21.4%, with a mortality of 6.9%.ConclusionPSI in patients with hematologic disease, while having shorter periods to diagnosis, presents increased rates of neurologic deficit, surgical intervention, and complications.

BackgroundChronic back pain (CBP) is a condition that places a considerable burden on society, with several million people affected in the United States alone. Treatment options to address this problem and relieve CBP are constantly evolving, and one of the most promising treatment modalities for CBP that is refractory to conservative treatment options is endoscopic rhizotomy (ER).MethodsA thorough search of the PubMed (MEDLINE) database was conducted to assess the full progression of ER from its earliest uses to present day in a historical narrative review of ER, with treatment of facetogenic pain as a model pathology.ResultsER allows for direct visualization and ablation of sensory branches of the dorsal ramus to provide pain relief in up to 80% of patients faced with refractory CBP. This technique has been built upon since the early 20th century, and the novel endoscopic approach continues to gain popularity among physicians. Benefits of ER include superior postoperative median pain-free duration compared with traditional percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, as well as direct visualization of regional anatomy. Patient selection criteria for the procedure and a modest list of contraindications allow the use of ER as a viable treatment option for a significant population of patients suffering from CBP. Potential barriers to ER include high cost of the procedure, longer intraoperative time, and expensive proprietary equipment.ConclusionsER is an effective treatment for refractory CBP with notable advantages. As the technology and popularity of this procedure progress, improvements in the cost, training, and intraoperative time may make it a favorable alternative to the current standard of care.

BackgroundAs evidence continues to accumulate regarding the multi-organ dysfunction associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), it is still unclear as to whether PD increases the risk of hematological pathology. In this study, the authors investigate the association between PD and hematological pathology risk factors.MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using 8 years of the National Readmission Database. All individuals diagnosed with PD were queried at the time of primary admission. Readmissions, complications, and risk factors were analyzed at 30-, 90-, 180-, and 300-day intervals. Statistical analysis included multivariate Gaussian-fitted modeling using age, sex, comorbidities, and discharge weights as covariates. Coefficients of model variables were exponentiated and interpreted as odds ratios.ResultsThe database query yielded 1,765,800 PD patients (mean age: 76.3 ± 10.4; 44.1% female). Rates of percutaneous blood transfusion in readmitted patients at 30, 90, 180, and 300 days were found to be 8.7%, 8.6%, 8.3%, and 8.3% respectively. Those with anti-parkinsonism medication side effects at the primary admission had increased rates of gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.03, p

Introduction and importanceDegenerative lumbar scoliosis is a prominent cause of adult spinal deformity with an increasing prevalence as the population ages. This pathology is associated with debilitating symptoms, including radicular back pain and lower extremity claudication. Surgical realignment of the spine and restoration of sagittal imbalance can reduce low back pain. Chronic sacroiliac dysfunction commonly causes low back radicular pain. We present a complicated case where stereotactic navigation facilitated an extensive fusion and decompression procedure for adult spinal deformity in an obese patient with multiple prior surgeries for scoliosis and sacroiliac joint pathology.Case presentationA 69-year-old, obese female with scoliosis refractory to multiple interventions presented with severe, radicular lower back pain. On examination of the right lower extremity (RLE), she had mild weakness (3/5 strength) and reduced sensation to light touch over its anterolateral aspect (dermatome L4). She was unable to perform single leg stance or tandem walk. Imaging revealed moderate mid-lumbar levoscoliosis, severe degenerative disc disease and facet hypertrophy changes in the setting of prior multilevel lumbar fusion, and consecutive nerve root impingement between L1 and L5 (worst at L3-4). DEXA scan was consistent with osteoporosis. The patient underwent lumbar laminectomy with posterior fusion of T10-ilium, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, osteotomy, and decompression using stereotactic navigation. The presence of SI titanium dowels from her previous SI fusion procedure posed a challenge with respect to achieving pelvic fixation.Clinical discussionIliac screw placement is a critical adjunctive to lumbosacral fusion, notably for prevention of pseudoarthrosis; however, patients with prior SI fusion may present a biomechanical challenge to surgeons due to obstruction of the surgical site. The O-arm neuronavigation system was successfully used to bypass this obstruction and provide sacroiliac fixation in this procedure.ConclusionStereotactic navigation (The O-arm Surgical Imaging System) can effectively be used to circumvent prior SI fusion in osteoporotic bone.

BackgroundPrimary spinal infections (PSIs) are a group of uncommon but serious infectious diseases that are characterized by inflammation of the endplate-disc unit. Pediatric spinal infection is rare and challenging to diagnose due to vague presenting symptoms. Most cases are conservatively managed with surgery rarely indicated. The authors performed a systematic review to study the baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of pediatric patients with PSIs who underwent surgical treatment.ObservationsPSI in pediatric patients might behave differently in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes when compared with nonpediatric patients. Overall, PSI ultimately managed surgically in pediatric patients is associated with a high rate of localized pain, neurological compromise, and treatment failure when compared with nonsurgically managed pediatric spinal infections.LessonsPSIs managed surgically in the pediatric population were found to be caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 74.4% of cases and were associated with higher rates of localized pain, neurological compromise, and treatment failure than nonsurgically managed pediatric spinal infections. Thoracic involvement (71.8%) in the spinal infection was reported most commonly in our review. When omitting the cases involving M. tuberculosis infection, it was revealed that 50% of the pediatric cases involved infection in the cervical region, suggesting increased severity and disease course of cervical spinal infections in the pediatric population. Surgical treatment is indicated only in cases of severe neurological compromise and treatment failure.

BackgroundPrimary spinal infections (PSIs) are a group of uncommon but serious infectious diseases considered more prevalent and aggressive among patients with chronic immunocompromised states. Association of PSI and solid organ transplant has not been systematically analyzed. The authors performed a systematic review analyzing clinical presentation and mortality of patients with PSI in the setting of solid organ transplant.ObservationsPSIs in patients with immunosuppressive therapy, such as those with solid organ transplant, may behave differently in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes compared with nonimmunosuppressed patients. Overall PSI in solid organ transplant patients is associated with a high rate of neurological compromise, postoperative complications, and mortality.LessonsAccurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of PSI require a multidisciplinary effort. Localized pain is the most frequently reported symptom associated with PSI. As opposed to PSI in patients without transplant, inflammatory and infectious markers such as white blood cells and C-reactive protein are often not elevated. Furthermore, the causative microorganism profile varies significantly when compared to pyogenic spinal infection in patients without transplant. Aspergillus species was responsible for spondylodiscitis in transplant patients in more than 50% of cases, and the incidence of Aspergillus infection is projected to rise in the coming years.

BackgroundSurgical treatment of scoliosis includes long and invasive multi-level instrumentation and correction which may result in high rates of postoperative complications, especially in elderly patients with osteopenia or multiple comorbidities. Minimally invasive surgical options may benefit these patients.Case descriptionA 73-year-old female patient with a history of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, L4-5 pseudarthrosis, and resulting L5-S1 adjacent segment following prior unsuccessful lateral L4-5 interbody fusion presented to the clinic with severe lower back pain and lower extremity radiculopathy. The decision was made to proceed with surgical correction via a robotic-guided prone transpsoas (PTP) approach, which is a novel approach similar to lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with the patient in a prone decubitus position. Excellent spinal alignment was achieved with no complications. On two-month follow-up, imaging revealed pedicle screws at the L3, L4, L5 levels and at the sacrum without change and continued interbody cages position with no signs or symptoms of infection.DiscussionMinimally invasive procedures have demonstrated benefit in spine surgery especially for at risk populations. The LLIF procedure has been well established for use in a wide range of spinal pathologies given its noted benefits in increasing spinal column stability through posterior fixation and indirect decompression. However, only marginal improvements in segmental lordosis are expected and there are reports of neurological complications. The PTP procedure has emerged as an alternative to LLIF for the treatment of spinopelvic pathologies. This approach enables greater improvements to spinal lordosis through single-position surgery while simultaneously reducing intraoperative repositioning and providing the known benefits of lateral interbody surgery.ConclusionOur experience suggests that the PTP approach is safe and effective because it does not require patient repositioning, easily interfaces with robotic guidance, and achieves increased lordosis gains via the prone positional effect compared to LLIF and comparable approaches.

The history of academic research on ependymoma is expansive. This review summarizes its history with a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on ependymoma. In March 2020, we queried the Web of Science database to identify the most cited articles on ependymoma using the terms "ependymoma" or "ependymal tumors," yielding 3145 publications. Results were arranged by the number of times each article was cited in descending order. The top 100 articles spanned across nearly a century; the oldest article was published in 1924, while the most recent was in 2017. These articles were published in 35 unique journals, including a mix of basic science and clinical journals. The three institutions with the most papers in the top 100 were St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (16%), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (6%), and the German Cancer Research Center (5%). We analyzed the publications that may be considered the most influential in the understanding and treatment management of ependymoma. Studies focused on the molecular classification of ependymomas were well-represented among the most cited articles, reflecting the field's current area of focus and its future directions. Additionally, this article also offers a reference for further studies in the ependymoma field.

BackgroundAnkylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory disease of the spine and SI joints. Diagnostic criteria and treatments have continued to evolve, necessitating a historical compendium of AS and its management. This paper aims to review the historical context underlying the discovery of AS, as well as the major diagnostic and therapeutic discoveries in the last two centuries.MethodsA scoping review of the literature pertaining to AS was performed via the Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Future directions of AS treatments were assessed by querying the clinicaltrials.gov website.ResultsThe history of AS can be traced as far back as ancient Egypt (as evidenced by the discovery of its presence in ancient Egyptian mummies) to the late 20th century, when the inherited nature of AS was linked to a genetic factor, HLA-B27. Each discovery made throughout the years led to further investigations into the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of AS. The criteria to differentiate AS from rheumatoid arthritis were first reported in 1893. Since then, diagnostic criteria for AS have undergone a series of changes before the present-day diagnostic criteria for AS were ultimately determined in 2009 by the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society.ConclusionAs the pathophysiology of AS is better understood, healthcare providers are able to diagnose and treat the condition more effectively. In particular, earlier diagnosis and multiple treatment options have facilitated efficient and more effective treatment.

Although hypothermia has shown to protect against ischemic and traumatic neuronal death, its potential role in neurologic recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) remains incompletely understood. Herein, we systematically review the safety and efficacy of hypothermia therapy for TSCI. The English medical literature was reviewed using PRISMA guidelines to identify preclinical and clinical studies examining the safety and efficacy of hypothermia following TSCI. Fifty-seven articles met full-text review criteria, of which twenty-eight were included. The main outcomes of interest were neurological recovery and postoperative complications. Among the 24 preclinical studies, both systemic and local hypothermia significantly improved neurologic recovery. In aggregate, the 4 clinical studies enrolled 60 patients for treatment, with 35 receiving systemic hypothermia and 25 local hypothermia. The most frequent complications were respiratory in nature. No patients suffered neurologic deterioration because of hypothermia treatment. Rates of American Spinal Injury Association (AIS) grade conversion after systemic hypothermia (35.5%) were higher when compared to multiple SCI database control studies (26.1%). However, no statistical conclusions could be drawn regarding the efficacy of hypothermia in humans. These limited clinical trials show promise and suggest therapeutic hypothermia to be safe in TSCI patients, though its effect on neurological recovery remains unclear. The preclinical literature supports the efficacy of hypothermia after TSCI. Further clinical trials are warranted to conclusively determine the effects of hypothermia on neurological recovery as well as the ideal means of administration necessary for achieving efficacy in TSCI.

At the time of writing of this article, there have been over 110 million cases and 2.4 million deaths worldwide since the start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, postponing millions of non-urgent surgeries. Existing literature explores the complexities of rationing medical care. However, implications of non-urgent surgery postponement during the COVID-19 pandemic have not yet been analyzed within the context of the four pillars of medical ethics. The objective of this review is to discuss the ethics of elective surgery cancellation during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy. This review hypothesizes that a more equitable decision-making algorithm can be formulated by analyzing the ethical dilemmas of elective surgical care during the pandemic through the lens of these four pillars. This paper's analysis shows that non-urgent surgeries treat conditions that can become urgent if left untreated. Postponement of these surgeries can cause cumulative harm downstream. An improved algorithm can address these issues of beneficence by weighing local pandemic stressors within predictive algorithms to appropriately increase surgeries. Additionally, the potential harms of performing non-urgent surgeries extend beyond the patient. Non-maleficence is maintained through using enhanced screening protocols and modifying surgical techniques to reduce risks to patients and clinicians. This model proposes a system to transfer patients from areas of high to low burden, addressing the challenge of justice by considering facility burden rather than value judgments concerning the nature of a particular surgery, such as cosmetic surgeries. Autonomy can be respected by giving patients the option to cancel or postpone non-urgent surgeries. However, in the context of limited resources in a global pandemic, autonomy is not absolute. Non-urgent surgeries can ethically be postponed in opposition to the patient's preference. The proposed algorithm attempts to uphold the four principles of medical ethics in rationing non-urgent surgical care by building upon existing decision models, using additional measures of resource burden and surgical safety to increase health care access and decrease long-term harm as much as possible. The next global health crisis will undoubtedly present its own unique challenges. This model may serve as a comprehensive starting point in determining future guidelines for non-urgent surgical care.

BackgroundIncidental or intentional durotomy in spine surgery is associated with a risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and reoperation. Several strategies have been introduced, but the incomplete closure is still relatively frequent and troublesome. In this study, we review current evidence on spinal dural repair strategies and evaluate their efficacy.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were used to search primary studies about the repair of the spinal dura with different techniques. Of 265 articles found, 11 studies, which specified repair techniques and postoperative outcomes, were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The primary outcomes were CSF leakage and postoperative infection.ResultsThe outcomes of different dural repair techniques were available in 776 cases. Pooled analysis of 11 studies demonstrated that the most commonly used technique was a combination of primary closure, patch or graft, and sealant (22.7%, 176/776). A combination of primary closure and patch or graft resulted in the lowest rate of CSF leakage (5.5%, 7/128). In this study, sealants as an adjunct to primary closure (13.7%, 18/131) did not significantly reduce the rate of CSF leakage compared with primary closure alone (17.6%, 18/102). The rates of infection and postoperative neurologic deficit were similar regardless of the repair techniques.ConclusionsAlthough the use of sealants has become prevalent, available sealants as an adjunct to primary closure did not reduce the rate of CSF leakage compared with primary closure. The combination of primary closure and patches or grafts could be effective in decreasing postoperative CSF leakage.

BackgroundAs a growing number of patients seek consultations for increasingly complex and costly spinal surgery, it is of both clinical and economic value to investigate the role for second opinions (SOs). Here, we summarized and focused on the shortcomings of 14 studies regarding the role and value of SOs before proceeding with spine surgery.MethodsUtilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus, we identified 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria that included: English, primary articles, and studies published in the past 20 years.ResultsWe identified the following findings regarding SO for spine surgery: (1) about 40.6% of spine consultations are SO cases; (2) 61.3% of those received a discordant SO; (3) 75% of discordant SOs recommended conservative management; and (4) SO discordance applied to a variety of procedures.ConclusionThe 14 studies reviewed regarding SOs in spine surgery showed that half of the SOs differed from those given in the initial consultation and that SOs in spine surgery can have a substantial impact on patient care. Absent are prospective studies investigating the impact of following a first versus second opinion. These studies are needed to inform the potential benefit of universal implementation of SOs before major spine operations to potentially reduce the frequency and type/extent of surgery.

BackgroundEpendymomas are rare tumors originating from neuroepithelial cells lining the wall of the ventricles or central canal of the spinal cord. While these tumors mainly occur within the central nervous system (CNS), there are occasional reports in children and young adult patients with a primary tumor occurrence outside of the CNS. Ependymomas of the sacrococcygeal region have been infrequently described in the literature with no standard of care established. We present a case report and review of the literature regarding this rare entity.Case descriptionA 24-year-old woman presented with right gluteal pain worsened by sitting and a palpable soft tissue mass of the sacrococcygeal region. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3.7 cm cystic mass centered in the right gluteal region. She underwent a biopsy at an outside institution, with histology revealing myxopapillary ependymoma. The patient was referred to our hospital and underwent an interdisciplinary neurosurgical and orthopedic oncology en bloc resection of the ependymoma, which intraoperatively appeared to originate from the coccygeal nerve.ConclusionIn the present report, the authors demonstrate that a myxopapillary ependymoma may present as an isolated gluteal mass attached to the coccygeal nerve, without frank CNS involvement. Furthermore, an interdisciplinary approach to surgical resection of this lesion appears to represent an effective treatment modality.

BackgroundAchieving functional repair after peripheral nerve injury (PNI) remains problematic despite considerable advances in surgical technique. Therein, questions lie regarding the variable capacity of peripheral nerves to regenerate based on environmental influence. In-depth analyses of multiple therapeutic strategies have ensued to overcome these natural obstacles. Of these candidate therapies, electrical stimulation has emerged a frontrunner. Extensive animal studies have reported the ability of brief intraoperative electrical stimulation (BES) to enhance functional regeneration after PNI. Despite these reports, the exact mechanisms by which BES enhances regeneration and its effects on long nerve lesions are largely unknown. Indeed, clinical translation of this seemingly simple therapeutic has not been so simple, but a few studies performed in humans have yielded highly encouraging results.ObjectiveWe aimed to help bridge this translational gap by presenting the latest clinical trials on electrical stimulation for PNIs in combination with relevant etiologies, treatments and nonclinical findings.MethodsTo do so, a systematic search was performed on PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science databases up to February 2020 using keywords significant to our study. References of each manuscript were screened for additional manuscripts of relevance to our study.ResultsWe found multiple BES clinical studies reporting enhanced functional recovery or increased nerve regeneration. Although improved outcomes were reported, high variability after BES is seen between and within species likely due to injury severity, location and timeline along with other factors.ConclusionFurther clinical studies and introduction of novel delivery platforms are vital to uncover the true regenerative potential of electrical stimulationtherapy.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to identify patient interest in second opinion services online and identify the options patients have in obtaining second opinions from spine surgeons in the United States.MethodsWe utilized Google Trends (i.e., search data since 2010) to ascertain the level of interest in receiving second opinions for spinal surgery. In addition, we contacted the top 30 hospitals for neurology and neurosurgery in the U.S. News rankings by phone to obtain information regarding when/how and at what cost they provide second opinions for spine surgery.ResultsThe cost of the second surgical opinions averaged $493 (±$343) USD (range $90-$1,300); the time to receive a second opinion averaged 20 (±19) days (range 1 day-5 months). Remote or "online second opinion" programs charged an average of $643 (±$259) USD (range $100-$850), and the time to receive an "online second opinion" averaged 14 (±7) days (range 1-4 weeks).ConclusionAlthough second opinions have been shown to be beneficial to patients, ambiguous or high costs and long wait times may serve as barriers for certain groups (i.e., uninsured or underinsured) and potentially diminish the quality of care.