Search

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term “Context of Use – COU”); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and, critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/Oral & Multispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9 & CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCR & Vaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparabil ity & Cut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 10 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Challenges for data storage during drug development have become increasingly complex as the pharmaceutical industry expands in an environment that requires on-demand availability of data and resources for users across the globe. While the efficiency and relative low cost of cloud services have become increasingly attractive, hesitancy toward the use of cloud services has decreased and there has been a significant shift toward real-world implementation. Within GxP laboratories, the considerations for cloud storage of data include data integrity and security, as well as access control and usage for users around the globe. In this review, challenges and considerations when using cloud storage options for the storage of laboratory-based GxP data are discussed and best practices are defined.

Increasingly diverse large molecule modalities have driven the need for complex bioanalysis and biotransformation assessment involving both traditional ligand-binding assays (LBA) and more recent hybrid immunoaffinity LC–MS platforms. Given the scientific expertise in LBA and LC–MS typically resides in different functions within the industry, this has presented operational challenges for an integrated approach for bioanalysis and biotransformation assessment. Encouragingly, over time, the industry has recognized the complementary value of the two platforms. This has not been an easy transition as organizational structures vary widely within the industry. However, there are tremendous benefits in adopting fully integrated strategies for biopharma. This IQ consortium paper presents current perspectives across the biopharma industry. It highlights the technical and operational challenges in current large molecule bioanalysis, the value of collaborations across LBA and LC–MS, and scientific expertise for fully integrated strategies for bioanalysis and biotransformation.

Background: Antibody biotherapeutic measurement from pharmacokinetic studies has not been traditionally based on intact molecular mass as is the case for small molecules. However, recent advancements in protein capture and mass spectrometer technology have enabled intact mass detection and quantitation for dosed biotherapeutics. A bioanalytical method validation is part of the regulatory requirement for sample analysis to determine drug concentration from in-life study samples. Results/methodology: Here, an intact protein LC–MS assay is subjected to mock bioanalytical method validation, and unknown samples are compared between intact protein LC–MS and established bioanalytical assay formats: Ligand-binding assay and peptide LC–MS/MS. Discussion/conclusion: Results are presented from the intact and traditional bioanalytical method evaluations, where the in-life sample concentrations were comparable across method types with associated data analyses presented. Furthermore, for intact protein LC–MS, modification monitoring and evaluation of data processing parameters is demonstrated.

Biotherapeutic drugs have emerged in quantity in pharmaceutical pipelines, and increasingly diverse biomolecules are progressed through preclinical and clinical development. As purification, separation, mass spectrometer detection and data processing capabilities improve, there is opportunity to monitor drug concentration by traditional ligand-binding assay or MS measurement and to monitor metabolism, catabolism or other biomolecular mass variants present in circulation. This review highlights approaches and examples of monitoring biotransformation of biotherapeutics by MS as these techniques are poised to add value to drug development in years to come. The increased use of such approaches, and the successful quantitation of biotherapeutic structural modifications, will provide insightful data for the benefit of both researchers and patients.

Background: For quantitative bioanalysis utilizing MS, the instrument of choice is typically a triple quadruple mass spectrometer. However, advances in high-resolution MS have allowed sensitivity and dynamic ranges to approach that of triple quadrupole instruments. Results: A matrix-free protein digest, a digested therapeutic protein and the intact peptide therapeutic liraglutide were each analyzed on high-resolution and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers with data compared. Samples from a mouse PK study with liraglutide were analyzed using the two different instruments, and equivalent PK exposure data were demonstrated. Conclusion: High-resolution and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers can generate data resulting in identical PK parameters from an in-life sample set, thus giving confidence in either technique in support of biotherapeutic PK exposure studies.

Aim: GSKA is a compound that was in development in clinical trials. A bioanalysis method to quantify GSKA using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) was developed and hematocrit (HCT) related assay bias was investigated. Methodology: After accurate sampling of 10 μl blood, VAMS tips were air dried approximately 18 h and desorbed by an aqueous solution containing internal standard. The recovered blood underwent liquid–liquid extraction in ethyl acetate to minimize matrix suppression. Assay accuracy, precision, linearity, carryover, selectivity, recovery, matrix effects, HCT effects and long-term quality control stability were evaluated. Conclusion: HCT-related assay bias was minimized in 30–60% blood HCT range, and all validation parameters met acceptance criteria. The method is suitable for quantitative analysis of GSKA in human blood.

Aim: Typically, quantitation of biotherapeutics from biological matrices by LC–MS is based on a surrogate peptide approach to determine molecule concentration. Recent efforts have focused on quantitation of the intact protein molecules or larger mass subunits of monoclonal antibodies. To date, there has been limited guidance for large or intact protein mass quantitation for quantitative bioanalysis. Methodology: Intact- and subunit-level analyses of biotherapeutics from biological matrices are performed at 12–25 kDa mass range with quantitation data presented. Results: Linearity, bias and other metrics are presented along with recommendations made on the viability of existing quantitation approaches. Conclusion: This communication is intended to start a discussion around intact protein data analysis and processing, recognizing that other published contributions will be required.

Aim: Large-molecule biotherapeutic quantitation in vivo by LC–MS has traditionally relied on enzymatic digestion followed by quantitation of a ‘surrogate peptide’ to infer whole-molecule concentration. MS methods presented here measure the whole molecule and provide a platform to better understand the various circulating drug forms by allowing for variant quantitation. Results: An immunocapture LC–MS method for quantitation of a biotherapeutic monoclonal antibody from human plasma is presented. Sensitivity, precision and accuracy for each molecular portion are presented along with an example of glycoform variant quantitation. Conclusion: The method is presented as a basic platform to be further developed for Good Practice (GxP) applications, critical quality attribute analysis or general understanding of molecular forms present as required for the wide range of drug development processes.

Immunocapture is poised to play an increasingly vital role in therapeutic protein quantitation. In recent years, MS has emerged as an alternative to immunoassay for quantitative work. MS analysis can be achieved with or without an immunocapture step; however, the inherent selectivity of the technique typically affords LLOQ coupling immunocapture-MS methods [1]. With an ever-growing need to develop high-sensitivity assays while retaining selectivity, immunocapture followed by digestion before analysis by MS is a viable approach for protein quantitation [2,3]. Here, a brief summary on the status and challenges of protein quantitation by immunocapture followed by MS are discussed.