Search

Introduction: The measurement of β-hydroxybutyrate (βOHB) concentrations is a corner stone of the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and other ketonic states. The aim of this study was to perform a validation of a peripheral blood βOHB assay (Randox) on a Roche cobas c502 analyser and to establish a βOHB reference range for the validated assay. Materials and methods: Precision, linearity and limit of detection and blank (LoD, LoB) were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP05-A3, EP 06-A and EP17-A2 guidelines, using commercial control material and residual patient sample pools. As method comparison, for 190 semi-quantitative measurements of urine ketones we determined the corresponding βOHB blood concentration. The reference range was based on the CLSI C28-A3 guideline, using 304 randomly selected serum samples from population based German National Cohort (GNC) study. Results: Coefficients of variation for the validated assay ranged from 1.5% for high concentrations (3.1 mmol/L) to 6.5% for low concentrations (0.1 mmol/L). Detection capacity was LoB = 0.011 mmol/L and LoD = 0.037 mmol/L. Linearity of the assay ranged from 0.10 to 3.95 mmol/L. The agreement between the semi-quantitative urine ketone test and the βOHB blood test was moderate (Kappa = 0.66). The obtained 95% serum reference range was estimated as 0.02 to 0.28 mmol/l βOHB. Conclusions: The Ranbut βOHB assay showed good precision and analytical performance. Our results confirm that βOHB measurement in peripheral blood is indeed a preferable alternative to the semi-quantitative measurement of urine ketones.

Objective: Validation of the LT-SYS quantitative in vitro copper assay on a Roche Cobas 8000 c502 analyzer and comparison with a BIOMED assay on a Roche Cobas Mira analyzer. Methods: Imprecision and bias were quantified at different concentration levels (serum and plasma) over a 20-day period. Linearity was assessed covering a range from 4.08 µmol/L to 33.8 µmol/L. Limit of blank (LoB) and limit of detection (LoD) were established based on a total of 120 blank and low-level samples. The method comparison was based on 58 plasma samples. Results: Within-run imprecision ranged from 0.7% to 1.2% and within-laboratory imprecision from 1.4% to 3.3%. Relative bias for the 2 serum pools with known target values was less than 2.5%. The assay did not deviate from linearity over the tested measuring range. LoB and LoD were 0.12 µmol/L and 0.23 µmol/L, respectively. The method comparison revealed an average deviation of 11.5% (2.016 µmol/L), and the linear regression fit was y = 1.464 + 0.795x. Conclusions: The LT-SYS copper assay characterized in this study showed a fully acceptable performance with good degrees of imprecision and bias, no deviation from linearity in the relevant measuring rangem, and very low LoB and LoD. * Abbreviations : CLSI : Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute LoA : limit of agreement LoB : limit of blank LoD : limit of detection SD : standard deviation SE : standard error UKH : University Hospital of Halle

Background Laboratory quantification of IgG subclasses (IgGSc) is a well-established second-line tool for differential diagnosis of immune deficiencies. However, so far there is still no internationally approved standard available for IgGSc, and different assays are prone to produce divergent results. In this study, we evaluated the comparability and equivalence of two commercially available IgGSc assays, one being the Siemens IgGSc assay on a BN ProSpec analyzer and the other being The Binding Site (TBS) IgGSc assay on a Roche cobas c502 analyzer. Methods We analyzed a total of 50 patient plasma samples obtained over a 3-month period with both IgGSc assays and compared the resulting data based and the CLSI EP09-A3 method comparison guideline. Results Depending on the analyzed IgGSc type, the average relative differences in IgGSc concentration (g/L) between the two assays were considerable, starting with −13.5% for IgG1 and 11.3% for IgG2, over −47.3% for IgG4, and up to 52.9% for IgG3. Applying the assay-specific reference intervals, the classification agreement (below, within, or above the reference range) ranged from 88% to 90% for the individual subclasses. However, only 68% of samples showed an overall classification agreement. Conclusion The comparability of the two IgGSc assays proved to be limited and might be considered similar at best on the diagnostic level. Laboratory specialists as well as clinicians therefore should be cautious when using and interpreting IgGSc measurements obtained with different assays or analyzers.

Objectives Characterization of an in vitro diagnostic zinc assay (LT-SYS) on a Roche cobas c502 analyzer and evaluation of the influence of pre-analytic factors on zinc concentration measurements. Design and methods Imprecision, bias, linearity, limit of blank (LoB), and limit of detection (LoD) were established and method comparisons were performed based on the respective CLSI guidelines. The influence of time elapsed until analysis, the usage of a pneumatic tube delivery system (PTDS) and of special trace element sample tubes was evaluated as well. Results Estimates of imprecision ranged from 0.9% to 5.0% and bias was low with 1.3% and 1.5% deviation from target value. Linearity was met for the measuring range of 1.15-34.7 μmol/L (7.51-226.9 μg/dL), LoB and LoD were 0.17 μmol/L (1.11 μg/dL) and 0.73 μmol/L (4.77 μg/dL) respectively. The method comparison revealed an average deviation of 8.44% (y=0.542+1.036x). Plasma samples had 7.3% higher zinc values than serum samples on the average. Zinc values of uncentrifuged serum and plasma samples increased 20% in 8 hours, while after centrifugation no significant increase could be detected. Usage of PTDS increased zinc values by 17% and usage of trace element sample tubes showed no advantage over normal ones. Conclusions The LT-SYS zinc assay showed a fully acceptable performance with good degrees of imprecision and bias, no deviation from linearity and both a very low LoB and LoD. Samples for zinc analysis should be centrifuged timely and transport over PTDS should be avoided.