Search

Abstract: Results of an earlier study suggest that sea ice drift in climate models is unrealistic, and this has undermined confidence in model projections of “long‐term” (i.e., secular) Arctic sea ice loss. We revisit this by analyzing 22 models participating in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). It is shown that, when consistent temporal sampling is applied, sea ice drift speed in models and observations come into closer agreement than previously suggested. There is still considerable intermodel scatter in climatological drift speed, and we show that much of this likely relates to prescribed parameters in the sea ice models. Since 1979, observations show a long‐term positive trend of annual mean Arctic average sea ice drift speed resulting primarily from sea ice thinning, and most of the CMIP5 models qualitatively reproduce this. The simulated annual mean drift speed trends reflect strong cancellation between winter trends (which are positive in most models and in good agreement with observations) and summer trends (which are negative in most models and in poor agreement with observations). Positive Arctic average drift speed trends do not consistently coincide with positive trends of Fram Strait outflow. The simulated regional relationship between sea ice strength and drift speed changes dramatically as the Arctic transitions from full to partial ice cover, and this “sea ice extent effect” likely influences simulated summer drift speed trends. Altogether, these results highlight aspects in which models show encouraging agreement with observations, while pinpointing aspects in which models require improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the sensitivity of the North Atlantic storm track to future changes in local and global sea surface temperature (SST) and highlights the role of SST changes remote to the North Atlantic. Results are based on three related coupled climate models: the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4), the Community Earth System Model, version 1 (Community Atmosphere Model, version 5) [CESM1(CAM5)], and the Norwegian Earth System Model, version 1 (intermediate resolution) (NorESM1-M). Analysis reveals noticeable intermodel differences in projected storm-track changes from the coupled simulations [i.e., the difference in 200-hPa eddy activity between the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) and historical scenarios]. In the CCSM4 coupled simulations, the North Atlantic storm track undergoes a poleward shift and eastward extension. In CESM1(CAM5), the storm-track change is dominated by an intensification and eastward extension. In NorESM1-M, the storm-track change is characterized by a weaker intensification and slight eastward extension. Atmospheric experiments driven only by projected local (North Atlantic) SST changes from the coupled models fail to reproduce the magnitude and structure of the projected changes in eddy activity aloft and zonal wind from the coupled simulations. Atmospheric experiments driven by global SST and sea ice changes do, however, reproduce the eastward extension. Additional experiments suggest that increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations do not directly influence storm-track changes in the coupled simulations, although they do through GHG-induced changes in SST. The eastward extension of the North Atlantic storm track is hypothesized to be linked to western Pacific SST changes that influence tropically forced Rossby wave trains, but further studies are needed to isolate this mechanism from other dynamical adjustments to global warming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]