Search

• 4300 km long transects were established in the ecologically fragile areas of China. • Soil C:N:P stoichiometry in ecologically fragile areas was well-constrained. • C:N:P stoichiometry differed among the areas in response to environmental changes. • Climate and vegetation factors were the key drivers of soil C:N:P stoichiometry. Researchers are paying increasing attention to soil stoichiometry (carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) ratios) in efforts to explore biogeochemical cycles, but little is known about the spatial pattern, implications, and driving factors of this stoichiometry in large, ecologically fragile areas. To explore these factors, we established three transects that covered a total length of about 4300 km in ecologically fragile areas of China, and sampled at intervals of about 25 km. These transects covered the karst area and the agro-pastoral ecotone of southwestern China, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the Loess Plateau, and the forest-grassland ecotone. We collected 312 soil samples to a depth of 30 cm from 156 plots. The soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) in the ecologically fragile areas showed strong coupling relationships. Soil C:N:P was 51:4:1 to a depth of 30 cm, which is lower than the average global C:N:P (111:8:1). SOC and TN concentrations at 0 to 20 cm were significantly higher than that at 20 to 30 cm, but TP did not differ significantly among depths. SOC, TN, and TP concentrations were highest in the agro-pastoral ecotone, and were lowest in the Loess Plateau. C:N, C:P, and N:P were highest in the karst area. C:N were lowest in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and C:P and N:P were lowest in the Loess Plateau. The spatial pattern of C, N, and P stoichiometry along environmental gradients was variable. The contributions to explaining the soil stoichiometry were highest for climate (21.7%), vegetation (8.9%), soil properties (6.4%), and topography (0.6%) to a depth of 20 cm, versus vegetation (35.9%), climate (5.3%), soil properties (3.3%), and topography (2.1%) at 20 to 30 cm. The results provide new insights into the biogeochemical cycles of C, N, and P and guidance for their impacts on ecological restoration in ecologically fragile areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Grassland plants contribute to carbon fixation through photosynthesis, which can in turn produce plant biomass. Previous studies have demonstrated that vegetation productivity is enhanced by improved soil nutrient status in humid environments and is influenced by climate in arid environments. However, the responses of biomass productivity to different patterns of climate-plant-soil in different natural grassland ecosystems have not been clearly and comprehensively analyzed. In this study, we systematically explore the functional patterns of different grasslands, as well as the underlying mechanisms in the response to key climatic, soil, and plant factors. The survey range covered broad environmental gradients from humid, semi-arid, to arid environments in Tibetan and Inner Mongolian Plateaus. We found that the above- and belowground biomass production gradually decreased from humid, semi-arid, to arid environments. Biomass production was sensitive to climatic factors in different environments. However, compared to soil and plant factors, climate was always the most important factor determining biomass production in all grassland types. Furthermore, biomass production was regulated mainly by climate and soil characteristics in humid environments, but by climate in arid environments. Specifically, the corresponding limiting factors of each factor largely dominated the effects of the corresponding factors on different grasslands. For instance, the climate dominated by temperature negatively influenced the soil nutrient availability and then influenced the aboveground biomass production in alpine humid grasslands. These findings enhance our understanding of the heterogeneity of mechanisms of different grasslands along broad environmental gradients, which are crucial for predicting the effects and consequences of environmental change on terrestrial ecosystem functioning. • Plant communities were surveyed along two broad environmental gradients. • Climatic factors had different effects on grasslands in different environments. • Climate was invariably the dominant factor on grasslands in different environments. • The auxiliary promoting effect of soil was enhanced in more humid environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]