Search

The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate whether primary rhinoplasty shows aesthetic and psychosocial advantages for children with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. The second aim was to determine the satisfaction levels concerning the dentofacial appearance. Group A corresponded to patients from a center specialised in primary cheilo-rhinoplasty with 20 years' experience and Group B to patients who did not benefit from primary rhinoplasty. Children and their parents filled in a custom-designed satisfaction questionnaire on dentofacial appearance and its psychosocial impact. The variables studied were the main criterion (the nose) and secondary criteria (the upper lip, the smile, the profile and the face as a whole). 56 families consented to be involved in the study. The children did not rate statistically differently their social relationships if they had primary rhinoplasty or not. Parents however expressed very different views. They considered the nasal appearance of the children who had primary rhinoplasty as statistically more attractive and evaluated their psychosocial experience as significantly better. For the other parts of the face, in both groups, satisfaction levels of dentofacial appearance and psychosocial comfort were good (scores above 80/100). Yet, 44% of the families would go for further interventions, especially concerning the nose (13% of whom were in Group A and 42% in Group B). Within the limitations of this study, primary rhinoplasty seems to improve the patient's well-being and social life and, therefore, should be considered whenever appropriate., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Cleft surgery is marked by all the controversies and the multiplication of protocols, as it has been shown by the Eurocleft study. The objective of this pilot study is to start a comparison and analyzing procedure between primary surgical protocols in French centers., Methods: Four French centers with different primary surgical protocols for cleft lip and palate repair, have accepted to be involved in this retrospective study. In each center, 20 consecutive patients with complete cleft lip and palate (10 UCLP, 10 BCLP per center), non syndromic, have been evaluated at a mean age of 5 [range, 4-6]. In this second part, maxillary growth and palatine morphology were assessed on clinical examination and on dental casts (Goslon score). Speech was also evaluated clinically (Borel-maisonny classification) and by Aerophonoscope., Results: Veau-Wardill-Killner palatoplasty involves a higher rate of transversal maxillary deficiency and retromaxillary. The fistula rate is statistically lower with tibial periosteum graft hard palate closure but this technique seems to give retromaxillary. Malek and Talmant two-stage-palatoplasty techniques reach Goslon scores of 1 or 2. Considering speech, Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty got higher outcomes., Conclusions: Primary results. Extension to other centers required. The two-stage palatoplasty, including a Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty seems to have the less negative impact on maxillary growth, and to give good speech outcomes., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study. Level III/retrospective multicenter comparative study., (Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Cleft surgery is marked by all the controversies and the multiplication of protocols, as it has been shown by the Eurocleft study. The objective of this pilot study is to start a comparison and analyzing procedure between primary surgical protocols in French centers., Methods: Four French centers with different primary surgical protocols for cleft lip and palate repair, have accepted to be involved in this retrospective study. In each center, 20 consecutive patients with complete cleft lip and palate (10 UCLP and 10 BCLP per center), non syndromic, have been evaluated at a mean age of 5 [4,6]. In this first part, the aesthetic results of nose and lip repair were assessed based on the scale established by Mortier et al. (1997)., Results: Considering nose outcome, primary cleft repair surgery including a nasal dissection gives a statistically significant benefit in terms of septum deviation. Considering lip result, muscular dehiscence rate is significantly higher in BCLP patients with a two-stage lip closure. The centers using Millard one-stage lip closure do not have uniform results. For UCLP patients, the quality of scar is not statistically different between Skoog and Millard techniques., Conclusions: Primary results based on a simple, reproducible evaluation protocol. Extension to other centers required., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study. Level III/retrospective multicenter comparative study., (Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Maxillary hypoplasia is a common sequela of cleft lip and palate. Its surgical treatment consists in a maxillary advancement by distraction or by conventional orthognathic surgery but morphological results are unpredictable. Our goal in this study was to see if the esthetical results (on the lip and the nose) of maxillary advancement were correlated to the preservation of lateral incisor space of the cleft side., Patients and Method: This retrospective study included 38 patients operated between 2002 and 2013. Unilateral clefts were studied independently from bilateral clefts. Profile aesthetics was evaluated independently and subjectively by two surgeons and scored on an 8-point scale. The result was classified as "good" if the score was superior or equal to 6. The score was correlated to the following parameters: amount of maxillary advancement, upper incisor axis, preservation of the missing lateral incisor space., Results: In the "good result" group, the space of the lateral incisor was less often preserved. The nasolabial angle was more open and the upper central incisor axis more vertical. These results were more pronounced in bilateral clefts, but also found in unilateral clefts., Discussion: Under reservation of the subjective evaluation and of the small number of patients, it seemed that lateral incisor space closure improved the profile of patients treated by maxillary advancement for cleft lip and palate sequelae., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients often present with a class III malocclusion in connection with a three dimensional maxillary hypoplasia. Twenty-five to 60% of these patients need maxillary advancement. Two solutions are possible: orthognathic surgery and maxillary distraction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications of maxillary distraction in CLP patients., Patients and Methods: Data was collected from the records of patients treated in our surgery unit between 2000 and 2007. Among the eight patients (four male and four female), five presented with a bilateral CLP, two with a unilateral CLP, and one with a unilateral cleft lip associated to a soft palate cleft. The average age at surgery was 17 years. All underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy with a pterygomaxillary disjunction. An external distractor was used for the first two patients and an internal distractor for the six following patients. After a seven-day latency, activation was implemented at a rate of 1mm twice a day. The average period of consolidation was four months. Maxillary advancement ranged between 7 and 19mm, with an average of 12.6mm. The average follow-up was four years., Results: Complications were noted in seven patients: one intra-operative hemorrhage, one avulsion of a tooth anchored at the pterygoid process during osteotomy, three cases of device dysfunction, two cases of significant pain during activation, one loosening of the orthodontic arch in an external system, two cases of labial ulceration, and one maxillary sinusitis due to migration of a wisdom tooth., Discussion: Complications of maxillary distraction in CLP patients were very frequent. Most were related to the device and did not interfere with the final result. This must be taken into account when indicating distraction and choosing the device. Two types of complications can occur during distraction: those related to the osteotomy and those related to the device. The complications related to the osteotomy are linked to the cicatricial ground of previous surgery. They are not specific to distraction. The comfort of the internal device is undeniable, but the design of some models must be reviewed to improve their tolerance., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients often present with a class III malocclusion in connection with a three dimensional maxillary hypoplasia. Twenty-five to 60% of these patients require a maxillary advancement. Two solutions are possible: orthognathic surgery and maxillary distraction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications of the maxillary distraction in CLP patients., Materials and Methods: Data was collected from the records of patients treated at our Surgery Unit between 2000 and 2007. Among the eight patients (four male and four female), five presented a bilateral CLP, two a unilateral CLP and one a unilateral cleft lip associated to a soft palate cleft. The average age at surgery was 17 years old. All had a Le Fort I osteotomy with a pterygomaxillary disjunction. The first two patients had external distractors and the six following internal ones. After a seven-day latency, activation was led to the rate of 1mm per day twice. The period of consolidation was four months on average. The maxillary advancement varied between 7 and 19 mm with an average of 12.6mm. The average follow-up was four years., Results: We encountered difficulties and/or complications in seven patients: one intraoperatively haemorrhage, one avulsion of a tooth fixed at the pterygoid process during the osteotomy, three device failures, two cases of significant pains during activation, one dissociation of the dental anchorage of an external system, two labial ulcerations and one maxillary sinusitis by migration of the 18., Discussion: Difficulties of maxillary distraction in CLP patients are very frequent. The majority is related to the distractors and did not interfere with the final result. But this frequency must be taken into account in the indication and in the choice of the material. Two types of complications can occur during distraction: those related to the osteotomy and those related to the material. The complications related to the osteotomy are in connection with the cicatricial ground of the CLP. They are not specific of the distraction. We especially managed complications related to the material. The social benefit of the internal distractors is undeniable, but the design of certain models must be reexamined to improve their tolerance.

Primary nasal deformity is characterized by apparent prolabio-columellar skin shortness due to alar cartilage dislocation worsened by lack of muscular support. The secondary deformation retains part of the initial deformity, sometimes even worsened by the primary lip repair. Multiple surgical lengthening techniques were used in nasal defect correction, suggesting both technical complexity and unsatisfactory results. Indeed, columellar insufficiency has more to do with abnormal columello-apical skin distribution due to alar mispositioning than an effective lack of skin. Secondary correction by open rhinoplasty allowing careful cartilage reconstruction of the nose tip seems to be widely accepted. However, the nasal defect can be limited by performing a primary intervention focusing on two principles: columellar lengthening by early alar repositioning and simultaneous lip and nose repair.

Treatment teams that conceive and nourish their ideas in a multi-disciplinary environment are best suited to elaborate therapeutic protocols. Their concepts should be based on consistent evaluation of their treatment results as documented by precise and reproducible records. In the wide array of maxillo-facial anatomical deformities presented clinically, bilateral cleft lips and palates are the rarest (20%), but they are also the most serious because of the inherent disconnection of maxillary structures that accompanies them and because of the grave disturbances they inflict on the development of the middle third of the face. Surgeons have devised an extraordinary gamut of protocols to correct these disorders and then abandoned them because of the problematical and ephemeral results they provided. The authors, after evaluating their own results, modified their therapeutic approach in 1994. They present their current protocol, which calls for an orthopedic phase carried out when the patient is 2 months old and two surgical phases when the patient is 3 and then 7 months old.

Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was double: appreciate the osteogenic and growth capacities of the free tibial periosteal graft concerning the alveolar and hard palate repair in the complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, and evaluate long-term follow-up concerning maxillo-mandibular morphology and palatal air-tight., Material and Method: This retrospective study concerns 51 patients, of more than 13 years of age, treated for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. The treatment included a Skoog type cheiloplasty, a tibial periosteal graft between 4 and 6 months (as described by M. Stricker) and a staphyloraphy between 8 and 18 months. Our documentation was: figures, pictures and precise description of the initial cleft, dental casts, teleradiographies, dental panorams performed at different stages of treatment, orthodontic, orthophonic and otologic follow-up. Growth was evaluated using casts during the first 6 years then by profil teleradiographies after puberty. Ossification was evaluated quantitatively by CT scan in 18 patients., Results: Results confirm an ossification of the periosteal graft in 72% of cases and the advantage of periosteal graft in palatal air-tight. 85% of cases show equilibrated squeletal growth with good occlusion, and 13.7% of cases needed deferral osteotomy., Conclusion: We propose a method for long-term cleft results evaluation, with the use of periosteal graft.

The wide diversity of bilateral facial clefts makes it most difficult to assess surgical success, particularly in terms of long-term outcome. The aim of this work was to examine the rationale for the current protocol used for cleft surgery at the Grenoble University Hospital. In a first group of 28 children, a 3-step surgical protocol was applied. The first two steps were performed between 4 and 8 months with at least 3 months between each procedure. Skoog's unilateral cheilo-rhino-uranoplasty was used, associated with a periosteal tibial graft. The third step, performed between 10 and 12 months, was for staphylorraphy. Outcome was analyzed at 15 years and evidenced the deleterious effect of excessive and asymmetrical premaxillary scars, of the 2-step cheiloplasty and of columella lengthenings from the lip. The frequency of secondary revision of the superior labial vestibule and the medial labial tubercule (43%) was considered to be high; this procedure should be re-examined as should be osteotomy (32% revision). Palatine closure, acquired in 82% of the cases and premaxillary stability, achieved in 86%, would appear to favor use of the periosteal tibial graft. The osteogenic capacity of this graft tissue was less satisfactory after a second harvesting (from the same tibia three months later). These results have led us to modify our protocol, favoring early and total closure of the bony palate and continued use of the periosteal tibial graft. We now use the following operative protocol: premaxillary alignment using an active orthopedic plate at 2 months, lip adhesion associated with staphylorraphy and passive palatine contention plate at 3 months, definitive bilateral cheilo-uranoplasty associated with a single periosteal graft at 7 months. The preliminary results with this protocol in a group of 12 children have shown better quality scars, more harmonious maxillary arches, an excellent occlusion of the deciduous dentition, and preservation of the positive results obtained with the periosteal tibial graft.

Copyright of Revue de Stomatologie & de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale is the property of Masson SPA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revue de Stomatologie & de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale is the property of Masson SPA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was double: appreciate the osteogenic and growth capacities of the free tibial periosteal graft concerning the alveolar and hard palate repair in the complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, and evaluate long-term follow-up concerning maxillo-mandibular morphology and palatal air-tight.Materiel and method: This retrospective study concerns 51 patients, of more than 13 years of age, treated for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. The treatment included a Skoog type cheiloplasty, a tibial periosteal graft between 4 and 6 months (as described by M. Stricker) and a staphyloraphy between 8 and 18 months. Our documentation was: figures, pictures and precise description of the initial cleft, dental casts, teleradiographies, dental panorams performed at differents stages of treatment, orthodontic, orthophonic and otologic follow-up.Growth was evaluated using casts during the first 6 years then by profil teleradiographies after puberty. Ossification was evaluated quantitatively by CT scan in 18 patients.Results: Results confirm an ossification of the periosteal graft in 72 % of cases and the advantage of periosteal graft in palatal air-tight. 85 % of cases show equilibrated squeletal growth with good occlusion, and 13,7 % of cases needed deferal osteotomy.Conclusion: We propose a method for long-term cleft results evaluation, with the use of periosteal graft. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]