Search

Study design:This is a survey-based study.Objective:To investigate the practice of spinal cord injury (SCI) core data collection by Chinese physicians to measure the extent and accuracy of routine collection of elements contained in the International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (ISCICDS).Setting:This study was conducted in a workshop in Peking University, China.Methods:During an SCI workshop, a survey questionnaire was administered to 48 physicians from 20 provinces of China. The questions were developed on the basis of the data elements within the ISCICDS including the following issues: date of birth, injury, acute admission and inpatient discharge, total hospitalized days, gender, injury etiology, vertebral injury, associated injury, spinal surgery, ventilatory assistance and place of discharge. In addition, data collection practice on neurologic examinations including date, neurological level, injury severity and frequency of examination were involved.Results:The self-reported practice of data collection regarding date of birth, acute admission and inpatient discharge, gender, vertebral injury, associated injury, spinal surgery and frequency of neurological examination are consistent with the information in the ISCICDS among the majority (⩾76%) of physicians. However, only gender, vertebral injury, associated injury and spinal surgery are completely consistent. The consistency percentages of other data elements ranged from 39.5 to 66.8%.Conclusion:Apart from four data elements, which were collected consistently with the intention in the ISCICDS, the collection of other core data elements need to be documented according to the guidelines included in the ISCICDS to ensure consistency of practice among Chinese physicians and to support worldwide comparison of SCI data.Suggestion:Only four data elements are collected in complete accordance with the ISCICDS by Chinese physicians. ISCICDS guidelines for the remaining elements need to be more rigorously adhered to in order to promote consistency and comparability of data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design:Interventional training sessions.Objectives:To examine the effectiveness of training medical students in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI).Setting:A Peking University teaching hospital.Methods:A total of 46 medical students were involved in the study. First, they had a 2-h self-study session with the ISNCSCI booklet, followed by a 10-item questionnaire. The booklet was allowed for use as a reference during this assessment. Two days later, the questionnaire was repeated without the use of reference. Students then had a session with case discussion, followed by a final questionnaire.Results:After the initial self-study session, the mean score (max. 10) on the questionnaire was 7.67±1.49. Two days later, the mean score of the second test was 7.96±1.15. All key points of the ISNCSCI were supplemented during the second session with case presentations. The mean score of the final test increased significantly to 9.61±0.88 (P<0.01) in comparison with the previous tests. The overall correct response rates by students in determining sensory level, motor level and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale of the training case were 89.1%, 84.8% and 91.3%, respectively.Conclusion:The training effectiveness of ISNCSCI through self-study is reliable. The correct answers to key points could remain for at least 2 days without the need to use a reference. However, some specialized knowledge could not be transmitted without more detailed discussions and case presentations. Utilization of cases is a valuable method in training ISNCSCI and can improve the overall training effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]