Search

Background: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is an important dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy. However, evidence suggests that the occurrence of CIN may be predictive of treatment outcome. Indeed, studies have revealed that the onset of CIN is associated with a good chemotherapeutic response., Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the onset of CIN and overall survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who received a combination regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC)., Methods: Medical records from 56 patients with unresectable or metastatic UC who were treated with a combination GC regimen between December 2005 and May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the association between CIN development and survival., Results: The median duration of survival was 521 days (95% CI = 147-193 days) for patients with severe CIN and 287 days for patients without CIN. Additional multivariate analysis revealed that both the presence of severe CIN (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.399; 95% CI = 0.180-0.880, P = 0.023) and baseline hemoglobin (HR = 2.167; 95% CI = 1.170-4.014, P = 0.014) represented independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic UC receiving GC treatment. Conclusion and Relevance: CIN onset was associated with longer survival in patients receiving GC therapy for unresectable or metastatic UC, suggesting that neutropenia monitoring during GC chemotherapy may be predictive of treatment efficacy.

Purpose: The triplet antiemetic regimen is recommended for cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy, in the current guidelines for antiemetic prophylaxis. Although risk factors related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) have been identified by several prior studies, there are only few studies evaluating risk factors associated with the prophylactic triplet antiemetic therapy, particularly in palonosetron use. The present study aimed to reveal the risk factors related to CINV development in patients receiving cisplatin and to compare CINV risk factors between palonosetron and granisetron use., Methods: In total, 825 patients in a phase III trial receiving palonosetron with graniestron were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict risk factors associated with CINV development. Additionally, risk factors associated with CINV development were separately evaluated in each treatment group., Results: Multivariate analysis of the entire study group revealed that sex, age, cisplatin dose, and granisetron use were significant and independent factors affecting CINV development in the overall phase. Similarly, sex and age were risk factors for CINV in both treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier curves classified by each treatment group showed no significant difference between the groups among patients without any risk factors for CINV (P = 0.353). Conversely, complete response rates for patients with at least one risk factor were higher in patients receiving palonosetron (P = 0.049)., Conclusions: This analysis revealed the importance of previously reported CINV risk factors when using triplet antiemetics. Palonosetron might be preferred for patients with at least one risk factor.

Purpose: Younger age and female sex have already been well-known risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and 30-50% of cancer patients still suffer from CINV. Genetic polymorphisms are suggested to influence antiemetic treatment response., Methods: This study included a subset of patients previously enrolled in a randomised controlled trial; 156 patients were evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the role of pharmacogenomic polymorphisms relevant to antiemetic response in patients with cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The study's efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete response (CR). The study endpoint was evaluated separately in the acute (CR 0-24 ) and delayed (CR 24-120 ) phases. Thirteen polymorphisms were genotyped, and the association of these genotypes with the efficacy of prophylactic antiemetics was then investigated. Confounding variables for the CR were identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Age and sex were included as independent variables by the forced-entry method, and the stepwise method was used to select the pharmacogenomic factors for inclusion as independent variables., Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the ERCC1 8092AA (odds ratio [OR] = 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-72.71; p = 0.011) and female sex (OR = 3.63; 95% CI 1.14-11.58; p = 0.029) were significant predictors of CR 0-24 . No significant association of CR 24-120 with pharmacogenomic polymorphisms was found via multivariate logistic regression analysis., Conclusions: ERCC1 polymorphism influenced the extent of CINV control in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy., Trial Registration: Clinical trial information: UMIN 000009335.

Summary: Dexamethasone is one of the key antiemetic agents and is widely used even now. However, dexamethasone has been associated with several adverse reactions even after short-term administration. Therefore, developing a steroid-free antiemetic regimen is an important issue to consider. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of palonosetron, aprepitant, and olanzapine in a multi-institutional phase II study. Chemotherapy-naive patients scheduled to receive cisplatin were enrolled and evaluated for the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during 120 h after chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study was total control (TC) in the overall phase. The key secondary endpoint was complete response (CR), which was assessed in the acute, delayed, and overall phase, respectively. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Eighty-five patients were enrolled from 8 centers in Japan, of which 83 were evaluable for analyses. The percentage of patients who achieved TC during the overall phase was 31.3%. CR was achieved in 61.4%, 84.3%, and 65.1% of patients during the overall, acute, and delayed phases, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse event was anorexia. The primary endpoint was below the threshold and we could not find benefit in the dexamethasone-free regimen, but CR during the overall phase was similar to that of the conventional three-drug regimen. This antiemetic regimen without dexamethasone might be an option for patients for whom corticosteroids should not be an active application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Purpose. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) have high response rates, but severe neutropenia is frequently observed. The occurrence of neutropenia is associated with high histological response in solid tumors, and it might be associated with tumor shrinkage after DCF therapy. This study aimed to determine the genetic polymorphisms involved in the clinical response to preoperative DCF therapy in esophageal cancer patients. Methods. We included 56 patients with measurable lesions who received preoperative DCF therapy for esophageal cancer. Twenty-one genetic polymorphisms were analyzed, and univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between genetic polymorphisms and tumor shrinkage. A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for T category and tumor location and a univariate analysis for potential genetic factors with P values < 0.05 were performed to explore the predictive factors and to estimate odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. Results. No patient achieved a complete response, whereas 20 patients achieved a partial response, 31 patients had stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. Although no association was found between pharmacokinetic-related gene polymorphisms, XRCC3 rs17997944 was extracted as the only genetic factor that affected tumor shrinkage (P = 0.033) by univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis adjusted for T category and tumor site also showed that XRCC3 rs1799794: AA was a predictive factor that affected tumor shrinkage (odds ratio, 0.243; 95% confidence interval, 0.065–0.914; P = 0.036). Conlusions. XRCC3 rs1799794, which is involved in homologous recombination, is a genetic factor that affects clinical responses to DCF therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is a newly developed chemotherapy regimen for esophageal cancer. Severe neutropenia is dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel and it is well known to be frequently occurred during DCF chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between severe neutropenia and genetic polymorphisms in patients treated with preoperative DCF chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 158 patients were investigated for their absolute neutrophil count (ANC) within the first cycle of DCF chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center (NCC) Hospital East. DNA samples obtained from the NCC Biobank Registry were used for the analysis of nine genetic polymorphisms related to docetaxel pharmacokinetics. These genotypes were evaluated for their association with severe neutropenia, and further their risk factors were examined using a multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total 81 (51.3%) patients developed severe neutropenia. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 1.054; CI 1.008–1.102, P = 0.022), baseline ANC (OR 1.019; CI 1.002–1.037, P = 0.030), ABCB1 3435C>T (OR 2.191; CI 1.087–4.417, P = 0.028) and ABCC2 *+9383C>G (OR 2.342; CI 1.108–4.948, P = 0.026) were significant risk factors for severe neutropenia development. The results from this study showed that age, ANC, ABCB1 3435C>T, and ABCC2 *+9383 G>C increased the incidence of severe neutropenia with the number of identified risk factors. Conclusions: In addition to age and baseline ANC, ABCB1 3435C>T and ABCC2 *+9383C>G were identified as independent predictors for severe neutropenia in esophageal cancer patients treated with DCF chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]