Search

Background: Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas have a very poor prognosis. To improve the efficacy and tolerance of the ECF regimen (epirubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2, cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] at a dose of 200 mg/m2 per day by continuous infusion), the authors designed a novel approach that combined locoregional and systemic chemotherapy with the same agents at the same dosages., Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tumors were treated with epirubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 administered as a bolus in the hepatic artery on Day 1, combined with systemic continuous infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 200 mg/m2 per day, from Day 1 to Day 14, every 3 weeks., Results: Tumor sites were the intrahepatic bile ducts in 25 patients and the gallbladder in 5 patients. The overall response rate was 40% (12 of 30 patients), including 1 complete response and 11 partial responses. Stable disease was observed in 12 of 30 patients (40%) and progressive disease in 6 of 30 patients (20%). The median progression-free and overall survival periods were 7.1 and 13.2 months, respectively, and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 54% and 20%, respectively. Performance status improved in 9 of 30 patients (30%) and a weight gain of > 7% was observed in 4 of 30 patients (13%). The treatment was well tolerated with minimal hematologic toxicity. The major clinical problem was the deep venous thrombosis related to the central venous catheter, which occurred in 5 patients (17%)., Conclusions: This novel combined locoregional and systemic chemotherapeutic regimen was found to be active and safe for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma., (Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.)

Background:The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G).Methods:A total of 433 stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine-vinorelbine, gemcitabine-ifosfamide-cisplatin or gemcitabine-ifosfamide-vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets.Results:For N- vs P-containing regimens, adjusted overall survival was 9.7 vs 11.3 months (P=0.044), progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 6.4 months (P=0.020) and response rate was 24% vs 31% (P=0.124), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between doublets and triplets. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in P-containing therapy; grade 3-4 leucopenia was significantly more common in triplets. Concerning non-haematological toxicity, grade 3-4 nausea-vomiting was significantly increased in P-containing regimens.Conclusions:This trial provides evidence of a slight survival superiority of GP-containing regimens over platinum-free N-containing chemotherapy. This trial also confirms that the addition of a third chemotherapy agent (I) to a standard G-based doublet does not improve treatment outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]