Search

Aims and Objectives: To report primary healthcare providers' perspectives on elimination of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C)., Background: Eradication of FGM/C by 2030 is one of the United Nations Sustainable Development goals. World Health Organization recognises the unique role of nurses and other primary healthcare providers. However, their voices on the current legislative approach are underreported. These voices are important in informing directions that can expedite achievement of the global goal., Design: Qualitative interpretivist phenomenology., Methods: This qualitative study used purposive sampling approach and involved 19 individual interviews conducted face to face or by telephone with Australian primary healthcare providers. Data collected between October and December 2019 were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Three themes exploring Australian healthcare providers' perspectives on elimination of FGM/C were identified, namely understanding Australian laws against FGM/C; perspectives on culturally sensitive education; and exploring public awareness raising activities in Australia. This study was guided by Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research, the checklist for qualitative studies., Results: "Understanding Australian laws against FGM/C" identified participants' knowledge that FGM/C is illegal in Australia and that mandatory reporting applies if a child is or at risk of being taken oversees for the procedure. Through "Perspectives on culturally sensitive education," the participants argued that education is the key to questioning the practice of FGM/C. "Exploring public awareness-raising activities in Australia" described the need for collective action germane to FGM/C eradication., Conclusions: This study emphasised that laws and legislation prohibiting FGM/C need to be complemented with culturally sensitive education and public awareness-raising activities, to produce optimal outcome for the elimination of FGM/C in Australia., Relevance to Clinical Practice: Voices of these healthcare providers are crucial for FGM/C to be eradicated. Listening and acting on these voices are important in achieving the global sustainable development goal of eradicating FGM/C., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Western countries working toward eradication of female genital mutilation require better inclusion of women originally from countries where the practice is prevalent. However, few authors have examined the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of circumcised African migrant women in western countries. Our findings from 40 responses from self-reported survey and five in-depth interviews show that the participating African migrant women know the reasons behind female genital circumcision (FGC), are living with the negative consequences of FGC, and have a zero tolerance attitude toward the practice. Circumcised women are in the best position to define their health needs and champion global efforts to eradicate FGC.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) or female circumcision is a global health issue with increasing international migration of affected women and girls to countries unfamiliar with the practice. Western health care providers are unfamiliar with FGM, and managing obstetric care presents challenges to midwives who are in the forefront of care provision for the women. The participants in this Heideggerian qualitative interpretive study elucidated the strategies they used in overcoming the particular physical, emotional, and gynecological health issues with which mutilated women present. Ongoing emphases on women-centered, culturally competent maternity care are germane to optimal maternity care of circumcised women.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a women's health and human rights issue attracting global interest. My purpose in this qualitative study was to report the knowledge and attitudes of Australian midwives toward FGM. Verbatim transcription and thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with 11 midwives resulted in these themes: knowledge of female genital mutilation and attitude toward female genital mutilation. Significant gaps in knowledge about FGM featured prominently. The midwives expressed anger toward FGM and empathy for affected women. Recommendations include increased information on FGM and associated legislation among midwives and other health providers in countries where FGM may be encountered.