Search

Managing organic waste streams is a major challenge for the agricultural industry. Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic wastes is a preferred option in the waste management hierarchy, as this process can generate renewable energy, reduce emissions from waste storage, and produce fertiliser material. However, Nitrate Vulnerable Zone legislation and seasonal restrictions can limit the use of digestate on agricultural land. In this paper we demonstrate the potential of cultivating microalgae on digestate as a feedstock, either directly after dilution, or indirectly from effluent remaining after biofertiliser extraction. Resultant microalgal biomass can then be used to produce livestock feed, biofuel or for higher value bio-products. The approach could mitigate for possible regional excesses, and substitute conventional high-impact products with bio-resources, enhancing sustainability within a circular economy. Recycling nutrients from digestate with algal technology is at an early stage. We present and discuss challenges and opportunities associated with developing this new technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• TSP fertilizer mixed with MB produced an environmentally friendly fertilizer; • The addition of 12% of MB in the TSP had a positive effect on plant growth; • The addition of 30% of MB in the TSP impaired phosphorus diffusion. The cultivation of microalgae in wastewater allows to obtain a biomass concentrated in nutrients and organic material. This biomass added to phosphate fertilizers can promote a slow release of the nutrient and consequently a higher absorption of phosphorus (P). The objective of this study was to investigate P uptake by plants subjected to triple superphosphate (TSP) fertilization, added with microalgae biomass (MB) grown in wastewater. TSP was added with different MB proportions in order to verify if there would be a different behaviour in P release for millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) plants. With the proportion that maximized P accumulation in plants, a second experiment was carried out to investigate whether MB exerts influence of P diffusion in the soil. Finally, a third trial was conducted in a greenhouse, where TSP and TSP + 12% MB were applied to the soil under different phosphorus doses in corn (Zea mays L.). The proportion of MB in TSP that maximized the increase of P content and concentration in plants was approximately 12% MB. From this proportion, a reduction in the values of the variables analysed in the plant with the increase of the proportion of MB in the biofertilizer was observed. Similar behaviour was observed when evaluating P diffusion in sandy and clay soils. Fertilizers TSP and TSP + 12% MB showed no difference in P diffusion in the soil, while the ratio of 30% MB clearly impaired P diffusion. In a greenhouse, the P content presented significant difference for the tests carried out with TSP and TSP + 12% MB fertilizer, in which the latter provided higher P recovery rate by plants. Therefore, MB added to TSP had a positive influence on plant development and its P recovery capacity when applied in a proportion of 12% MB to the fertilizer mass. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]