Search

• Medical nutrition therapy by a dietitian is effective for dyslipidemia. • Dietitian interventions led to improved lipid levels and blood pressure. • Benefits also reported when dietitian was part of a multidisciplinary health team. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Many primary risk factors, such as dyslipidemia and blood pressure, are modifiable with diet and lifestyle interventions. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) interventions provided by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDN) or international equivalents, compared to usual care or no MNT, on lipid profile and blood pressure (secondary outcome) in adults with dyslipidemia. The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2005 and July 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model for lipid outcomes (seven RCTs, n =838), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (three RCTs, n =308), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (two RCTs, n =109). Compared to usual care or no intervention, MNT provided by RDNs improved total cholesterol (total-C) [mean difference (95% CI): -20.84 mg/dL (-40.60, -1.07), P =0.04]; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [-11.56 mg/dL (-21.10, -2.03), P =0.02]; triglycerides (TG) [–32.55 mg/dL (-57.78, -7.32), P =0.01];; and SBP [ -8.76 mm Hg (-14.06 lower to -3.45) P <0.01].High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [1.75 mg/dl (-1.43, 4.92), P =0.28] and DBP [-2.9 mm Hg (-7.89 to 2.09), P =0.25] were unchanged. Certainty of evidence was moderate for total-C, LDL-C, and TG, and low for HDL-C, SBP, and DBP. In conclusion, in adults with dyslipidemia, MNT interventions provided by RDNs are effective for improving serum lipids/lipoproteins and SBP levels. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Improving and maintaining cardiometabolic health remains a major focus of health efforts for the pediatric population. Recent research contributes understanding of the systems-level nutrition factors influencing cardiometabolic health in pediatric individuals. This scoping review examines current evidence on interventions and exposures influencing pediatric cardiometabolic health to inform registered dietitian nutritionists working at each systems level, ranging from individual counseling to public policy. A literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, and other databases was conducted to identify evidence-based practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and position statements published in English from January 2017 until April 2020. Included studies addressed nutrition interventions or longitudinal exposures for participants 2 to 17 years of age who were healthy or had cardiometabolic risk factors. Studies were categorized according level of the social-ecological framework addressed. The databases and hand searches identified 2614 individual articles, and 169 articles were included in this scoping review, including 6 evidence-based practice guidelines, 141 systematic reviews, and 22 organization position statements. The highest density of systematic reviews focused on the effects of dietary intake (n = 58) and interventions with an individual child or family through counseling or education (n = 54). The least frequently examined levels of interventions or exposures were at the policy level (n = 12). Registered dietitian nutritionists can leverage this considerable body of recent systematic reviews to inform a systems-level, collaborative approach to prevention and treatment of pediatric cardiometabolic risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dietary sodium intake can increase risk of hypertension, a leading cause of kidney failure in individuals with chronic kidney disease. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effect of sodium-specific medical nutrition therapy provided by a registered dietitian nutritionist or international equivalent on blood pressure and urinary sodium excretion in individuals with chronic kidney disease, stages 2 through 5, receiving maintenance dialysis and posttransplant. Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other databases were searched to identify eligible controlled trials published in the English language from January 2000 until June 2020 that addressed the research question. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool and quality of evidence was examined by outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. Of the 5,642 articles identified, eight studies were included in the final analyses. Six studies targeted clients who were not dialyzed, including one with clients who were posttransplantation, and two studies with clients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Sodium-specific medical nutrition therapy from a registered dietitian nutritionist significantly reduced clinic systolic blood pressure (mean difference –6.7, 95% CI –11.0 to –2.4 mm Hg; I 2 = 51%) and diastolic blood pressure (mean difference –4.8, 95% CI, –7.1 to –2.4 mm Hg; I 2 = 23%) as well as urinary sodium excretion (mean difference –67.6, 95% CI –91.6 to –43.6 mmol/day; I 2 = 84.1%). Efficacy was limited to individuals who were not dialyzed, including posttransplantation, but the intervention did not significantly improve blood pressure in individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Adults with chronic kidney disease should begin to work with registered dietitian nutritionist early in the course of disease to receive individualized, effective counseling to improve risk factors and, ultimately, health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a strong positive association between nutrition status and lung function in cystic fibrosis (CF). Improvements in clinical care have increased longevity for individuals with CF, and it is unknown how cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) modulation therapy affects nutrition status over time. The objective of this systematic review of the literature was to examine anthropometric (height, weight, and body mass index [BMI; calculated as kg/m2]) and body composition outcomes of CFTR modulation therapy. A literature search of Medline (Ovid), Embase, and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials examining the effect of CFTR modulation therapy on anthropometric and body composition parameters, published in peer-reviewed journals from January 2002 until May 2018. Articles were screened, data were synthesized qualitatively, and evidence quality was graded by a team of content experts and systematic review methodologists. Significant weight gain with ivacaftor was noted in children and adults with at least 1 copy of G551D mutation. In adults with at least 1 copy of R117H the effect of ivacaftor on BMI was not significant. Effects on BMI were mixed in adults with class II mutations taking ivacaftor with lumacaftor. There was no significant change in BMI in children homozygous for F508del who took ivacaftor with tezacaftor. Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor increased BMI and body weight in individuals 12 years of age and older who were hetero- or homozygous for the F508del mutation. The effect of CFTR modulation therapy on anthropometric parameters depends on the genetic mutation and the type of modulation therapy used. More research is needed to understand the long-term clinical impact of these drugs on nutritional status, including body composition and the role of dietary intake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, literature examining implementation of nutritional genomics into clinical practice has increased, including publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This systematic review addressed the following question: In children and adults, what is the effect of incorporating results of genetic testing into nutrition counseling and care compared with an alternative intervention or control group, on nutrition-related health outcomes? A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and other databases was conducted for peer-reviewed RCTs published from January 2008 until December 2018. An international workgroup consisting of registered dietitian nutritionists, systematic review methodologists, and evidence analysts screened and reviewed articles, summarized data, conducted meta-analyses, and graded conclusion statements. The second in a two-part series, this article specifically summarizes evidence from RCTs that examined health outcomes (ie, quality of life, disease incidence and prevention of disease progression, or mortality), intermediate health outcomes (ie, anthropometric measures, body composition, or relevant laboratory measures routinely collected in practice), and adverse events as reported by study authors. Analysis of 11 articles from nine RCTs resulted in 16 graded conclusion statements. Among participants with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a diet tailored to genotype resulted in a greater reduction of percent body fat compared with a customary diet for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. However, meta-analyses for the outcomes of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, and weight yielded null results. Heterogeneity between studies and low certainty of evidence precluded development of strong conclusions about the incorporation of genetic information into nutrition practice. Although there are still relatively few well-designed RCTs to inform integration of genetic information into the Nutrition Care Process, the field of nutritional genomics is evolving rapidly, and gaps in the literature identified by this systematic review can inform future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Consumer interest in personalized nutrition based on nutrigenetic testing is growing. Recently, multiple, randomized controlled trials have sought to understand whether incorporating genetic information into dietary counseling alters dietary outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to examine how incorporating genetic information into nutrition counseling and care, compared to an alternative intervention or control group, impacts dietary outcomes. This is the first of a 2-part systematic review series. Part II reports anthropometric, biochemical, and disease-specific outcomes. Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials were identified through a systematic literature search of multiple databases, screened for eligibility, and critically reviewed and synthesized. Conclusion statements were graded to determine quality of evidence for each dietary outcome reported. Reported outcomes include intake of total energy and macronutrients, micronutrients, foods, food groups, food components (added sugar, caffeine, and alcohol), and composite diet scores. Ten articles representing 8 unique randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria. Of 15 conclusion statements (evidence grades: Weak to Moderate), 13 concluded there was no significant effect of incorporating genetic information into nutrition counseling/care on dietary outcomes. Limited data suggested that carriers of higher-risk gene variants were more likely than carriers of low-risk gene variants to significantly reduce intake of sodium and alcohol in response to nutrition counseling that incorporated genetic results. Included studies differed in quality, selected genetic variants, timing and intensity of intervention, sample size, dietary assessment tools, and population characteristics. Therefore, strong conclusions could not be drawn. Collaboration between the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and professional nutrigenetic societies would likely prove valuable in prioritizing which genetic variants and targeted nutrition messages have the most potential to alter dietary outcomes in a given patient subpopulation and, thus, should be the targets of future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity is associated with a multitude of comorbidities and considerable health care costs. The objective of this review was to examine the efficacy of weight management interventions provided by a registered dietitian or international equivalent (referred to as "dietitian"). This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the effect of weight management interventions provided by a dietitian, compared with usual care or no intervention, on several cardiometabolic outcomes and quality of life in adults with overweight or obesity. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL databases were searched for eligible RCTs published between January 2008 and January 2021 in the English language. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's statistics, and heterogeneity was assessed by interpreting I 2 values. Efficacy of intervention components, such as telehealth or group contacts, were explored in sub-group analyses. Version 2 of the risk-of-bias tool for RCTs was used to assess risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method was used to determine certainty of evidence. This systematic review included 62 RCTs. Compared with control conditions, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian resulted in improved body mass index (mean difference [MD] –1.5; 95% CI –1.74 to –1.26; moderate evidence certainty); percent weight loss (MD –4.01%; 95% CI –5.26% to –2.75%; high evidence certainty); waist circumference (MD –3.45 cm; 95% CI –4.39 to –2.51 cm; high evidence certainty); blood pressure (MD –3.04 mm Hg; 95% CI –5.10 to –0.98 mm Hg and MD –1.99 mm Hg; 95% CI –3.02 to –0.96 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; moderate and low evidence certainty); and quality of life using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (MD 5.84; 95% CI 2.27 to 9.41 and 2.39; 95% CI 1.55 to 3.23 for physical and mental quality of life, respectively; low and moderate evidence certainty). For adults with overweight or obesity, weight management interventions provided by a dietitian are efficacious for improving several examined cardiometabolic outcomes and quality of life. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adequate protein intake by very-low-birth-weight preterm infants (≤1,500 g at birth) is essential to optimize growth and development. The estimated needs for this population are the highest of all humans, however, the recommended intake has varied greatly over the past several years. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Central databases to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of prescribed protein intake and identified outcomes. Articles were screened by 2 reviewers, risk of bias was assessed, data were synthesized quantitatively and narratively, and each outcome was separately graded for certainty of evidence. The literature search retrieved 25,384 articles and 2 trials were included in final analysis. No trials were identified that evaluated effect of protein amount on morbidities or mortality. Moderate certainty evidence found a significant difference in weight gain when protein intake of greater than 3.5 g/kg/day from preterm infant formula was compared with lower intakes. Low-certainty evidence found no evidence of effect of protein intake of 2.6 vs 3.1 vs 3.8 g/kg/day on length, head circumference, skinfold measurements, or mid-arm circumference. Low-certainty evidence found some improvement in development measures when higher protein intake of 3.8 vs 3.1 vs 2.6 g/kg/day were compared. Low-certainty evidence found no significant difference in bone mineral content when these protein intakes were compared. No studies were identified that compared protein intake greater than 4.0 g/kg/day. This systematic review found that protein intake between 3.5 and 4.0 g/kg/day promotes weight gain and improved development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cystic fibrosis (CF) increases risk for undernutrition and malabsorption. Individuals with CF traditionally have been counseled to consume a high-fat diet. However, a new era of CF care has increased lifespan and decreased symptoms in many individuals with CF, necessitating a re-examination of the high-fat CF legacy diet. A literature search was conducted of Medline (Ovid), Embase, and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases to identify articles published from January 2002 to May 2018 in the English language examining the relationships between dietary macronutrient distribution and nutrition outcomes in individuals with CF. Articles were screened, risk of bias was assessed, data were synthesized narratively, and each outcome was graded for certainty of evidence. The databases search retrieved 2,519 articles, and 7 cross-sectional articles were included in the final narrative analysis. Three studies examined pediatric participants and 4 examined adults. None of the included studies reported on outcomes of mortality or quality of life. Very low certainty evidence described no apparent relationship between dietary macronutrient distribution and lung function, anthropometric measures, or lipid profile in individuals with CF. The current systematic review demonstrates wide ranges in the dietary macronutrient intakes of individuals with CF with little to no demonstrable relationship between macronutrient distribution and nutrition-related outcomes. No evidence is presented to substantiate an outcomes-related benefit to a higher fat-diet except in the context of achieving higher energy intakes in a lesser volume of food. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both food insecurity and malnutrition are associated with adverse health outcomes in the pediatric population. However, the research on the relationship between these factors has been inconsistent, leading to uncertainty regarding whether or how evaluation of food insecurity should be incorporated into nutrition screening or the nutrition care process. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the association between food insecurity and malnutrition related to undernutrition or overnutrition (defined by anthropometrics) in the pediatric population in the United States. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases for studies published from January 2002 through November 2017. A total of 23 studies (19 cross-sectional and 4 prospective cohort studies) met inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative analysis. In 6 studies, there was no overall relationship between food insecurity and underweight. All included studies examined the relationship between food insecurity status and overweight/obesity and results were mixed, with large cross-sectional studies demonstrating a positive relationship between food insecurity and overweight/obesity. There were no clear patterns according to subpopulation. Evidence quality was graded as fair due to heterogeneity in how food insecurity was measured and populations included as well as inconsistency in results. Use of a 2-item food insecurity screening tool may allow for efficient, effective screening of food insecurity in order to identify potential contributors overweight and obesity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nutrition screening tools are used to identify risk of malnutrition or change in risk of malnutrition. However, it is unclear which tools have demonstrated high validity, reliability, and agreement. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of valid and reliable pediatric nutrition screening tools for identifying malnutrition risk (under- or overnutrition), and to determine whether there are differences in validity and reliability according to users of the tools. A literature search using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases was conducted to identify relevant research published between 1995 and May 2017 examining validity and reliability of nutrition screening tools in the pediatric population. A multidisciplinary workgroup developed eligibility criteria, data were extracted and summarized, risk of bias was assessed, and evidence strength was graded, according to a standard process. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Thirteen pediatric nutrition screening tools designed for various settings were included in the review (seven inpatient/hospital, three outpatient or specialty setting, and three community). The most frequently examined tools were the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (13 studies each), and Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (nine studies). No tools demonstrated high validity. Reliability and agreement were reported infrequently. Nutrition screening tools with good/strong or fair evidence and moderate validity included the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, and Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score in the inpatient setting and Nutrition Risk Screening Tool for Children and Adolescents with Cystic Fibrosis in the specialty setting. No tools in the community setting met these criteria. While differences in validity and reliability measures among tool users were found, the significance of these findings is unclear. Limitations included few studies examining each tool, heterogeneity between studies examining a common tool, and lack of tools that included currently recommended indicators to identify pediatric malnutrition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]