Search

Archaeological data repositories usually integrate excavation data archives as single data collections with restricted capacities to accommodate excavation data interoperability at the sub-collection level. This is largely due to the complexity of excavation data archives that are compiled with different tools and methodologies, use distinct conceptual descriptions at variable granularities, can often be unfinished or open-ended and may be linked to all sorts of digital data types, each with its own complicated production workflow. In the past decades, several attempts to adapt CIDOC-CRM in order to provide more explicit descriptions of the excavation domain have resulted in several model extensions (e.g. CRMarchaeo, CRMsc, CRMba). Each focuses on corresponding aspects of the excavation research process, while their combined usage holds an already demonstrated potential to support expressive data mappings at the sub-collection level. As part of the ongoing ARIADNEplus project, several CIDOC-CRM developers and domain experts have been working as a group and engaging in conceptual mapping exercises to address the practicalities of bringing excavation data descriptions together. In this presentation we will consider several issues that may be affecting the applicability of existing solutions and link these to our overall expectations/aspirations in terms of excavation data discoverability and reusability.

International audience

The present report outlines and summarises the activity of the Archaeological Excavation Modelling Working Group, a sub-group that was formed within WP 4.4.12. The group has been active since June 2020. The group was formed to investigate the potential of developing an Application Profile for excavation data, explore the current state of excavation data modelling and propose a roadmap for further activities. During the ARIADNEplus project, group participants have convened eight times, organised a virtual workshop on excavation data modelling and prepared two presentations, one at an ARIADNEplus meeting and another targeting wider audiences (EAA2022). The entire work of the group is summarised in the present report and attached annexes., {"references":["Bekiari, C., Bruseker, G., Doerr, M., Ore, C.-E., Stead, S. & Velios, A. June 2022. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Version 7.1.2. CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/cidoc_crm_version_7.1.2.pdf.","Doerr, M. & Theodoridou, M. 2014. CRMdig. An extension of CIDOC-CRM to support provenance metadata. Version 3.2. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crmdig/sites/default/files/CRMdig3.2.pdf.","Doerr, M. et al. 2019. Definition of the CRMarchaeo. An extension of CIDOC-CRM to support the archaeological excavation process. Version 1.4.8. PIN, University of Florence, Italy. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crmarchaeo/sites/default/files/CRMarchaeo_v1.4.8.pdf.","Doerr, M. et al. 2020. Definition of the CRMsci. An Extension of CIDOC-CRM to support scientific observation. Version 1.2.8. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crmsci/sites/default/files/CRMsci%20v.1.2.8.pdf.","Felicetti, A., Meghini, C., Richards, J., Theodoridou, M. 2021. Towards the AO-Cat Ontology. Version: 1.1.","Hiebel, G., Doerr, M., Eide, Ø. Theodoridou, M. et al. 2015 (September). CRMgeo: a Spatiotemporal Model An Extension of CIDOC-CRM to link the CIDOC CRM to GeoSPARQL through a Spatiotemporal Refinement. Proposal for approval by CIDOC CRM-SIG Version 1.2. https://cidoc-crm.org/crmgeo/sites/default/files/CRMgeo1_2.pdf.","Katsianis, M., & Styliaras, G. (eds) 2022. Virtual Workshop on Semantic mapping of archaeological excavation data (1.0), with contributions by Bruseker, G., Derudas, P., Hiebel, G., Hivert, F., Katsianis, M., Kritsotakis, V., Marlet, O., Nenova, D., Nurra, F., Styliaras, G., Ore, C. E., Theodoridou, M.. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7112918.","Nenova, D., Bruseker, G., Derudas, P., Hiebel, G., Hivert, F., Katsianis, M., Marlet, O., Opitz, R., Ore, C.-E., & Uleberg, E., 2022 (September 27). Bringing Excavation Data Together. Are We There Yet and Where is That?. 28th EAA Annual Meeting (EAA 2022), Budapest, Hungary. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7117049.","Paveprime and collaborators 2018. CRMinf: the Argumentation Model. An extension of CIDOC-CRM to support argumentation. Version 0.10. https://cidoc-crm.org/crminf/sites/default/files/CRMinf%20ver%2010.1.pdf.","Ronzino, P., Niccolucci, F., Felicetti, A., Doerr, M. et al. 2014 (December). Definition of the CRMba An extension of CIDOC CRM to support buildings archaeology documentation. Proposal for approval by CIDOC CRM-SIG. Version 1.4. PIN S.c.r.l. https://cidoc-crm.org/crmba/sites/default/files/2016-12-3%23CRMba_v1.4.1_UR.pdf."]}