Search

Objectives To investigate the potential beneficial effects of posterior pericardial drainage in patients undergoing heart surgery. Methods Multiple online databases and relevant congress proceedings were screened for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of posterior pericardial drainage, defined as posterior pericardiotomy incision, chest tube to posterior pericardium, or both. Primary endpoint was in-hospital/30 days' cardiac tamponade. Secondary endpoints comprised death or cardiac arrest, early and late pericardial effusion, postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications, and length of hospital stay. Results Nineteen randomized controlled trials that enrolled 3425 patients were included. Posterior pericardial drainage was associated with a significant 90% reduction of the odds of cardiac tamponade compared with the control group: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.13 (0.07-0.25); P < .001. The corresponding event rates were 0.42% versus 4.95%. The odds of early and late pericardial effusion were reduced significantly in the intervention arm: 0.20 (0.11-0.36); P < .001 and 0.05 (0.02-0.10); P < .001, respectively. Posterior pericardial drainage significantly reduced the odds of POAF by 58% ( P < .001) and was associated with significantly shortened (by nearly 1 day) overall length of hospital stay ( P < .001). Reductions in postoperative complications translated into significantly reduced odds of death or cardiac arrest ( P = .03) and numerically lower odds of acute kidney injury ( P = .08). Conclusions Posterior pericardial drainage is safe and simple technique that significantly reduces not only the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and POAF but also late pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. These benefits, in turn, translate into improved survival after heart surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the benefits and risks of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to investigate the relationship between outcomes and patient risk profile. Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings databases were searched for RCTs comparing OPCAB and CABG and reporting short-term (≤30 days) outcomes. Endpoints assessed were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebral stroke. Results The meta-analysis included 100 studies, with a total of 19,192 subjects. There was no difference between the 2 techniques with respect to all-cause mortality and MI (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.09; P = .25; I 2 = 0% and OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.05; P = .19; I 2 = 0%, respectively). OPCAB was associated with a significant 28% reduction in the odds of cerebral stroke (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009; I 2 = 0%). A significant relationship between patient risk profile and benefits from OPCAB was found in terms of all-cause mortality ( P < .01), MI ( P < .01), and cerebral stroke ( P < .01). Conclusions OPCAB is associated with a significant reduction in the odds of cerebral stroke compared with conventional CABG. In addition, benefits of OPCAB in terms of death, MI, and cerebral stroke are significantly related to patient risk profile, suggesting that OPCAB should be strongly considered in high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Sternal wound infections are serious postoperative complications that increase the length of hospital stay and healthcare costs. The benefit of implantable gentamicin-collagen sponges in reducing sternal wound infections has been questioned in a recent multicenter trial. We aimed to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies assessing the efficacy of implantable gentamicin-collagen sponges in sternal wound infection prevention. Methods Multiple databases were screened for studies assessing the efficacy of implantable gentamicin-collagen sponges after heart surgery. The primary end point was sternal wound infection, and secondary end points were the occurrence of deep sternal wound infection, superficial sternal wound infection, mediastinitis, and mortality. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were analyzed separately. By means of meta-regression, we examined the correlation between sternal wound infection and extent to which the bilateral internal thoracic artery was harvested. Results A total of 14 studies (N = 22,135, among them 4 randomized controlled trials [N = 4672]) were included in the analysis. Implantable gentamicin-collagen sponges significantly reduced the risk of sternal wound infection by approximately 40% when compared with control (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.98; P = .04 for randomized controlled trials and RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89; P = .01 for observational studies). A similar, significant benefit was demonstrated for deep sternal wound infection (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; P = .008) and superficial sternal wound infection (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83; P = .002). The overall analysis revealed a reduced risk of mediastinitis (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91; P = .01). The risk of death was unchanged. A significant positive linear correlation ( P = .05) was found between the log RR of sternal wound infection and the percentage of patients receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Conclusions Implantable gentamicin-collagen sponges significantly reduce the risk of sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery, with evidence consistent in randomized and observational-level data. However, the extent of this benefit might be attenuated in patients receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]