Search

Objectives: The 22‐question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) assesses chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) severity. We aimed to identify predictors of SNOT‐22 score improvement following highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) initiation and to corroborate the SNOT‐22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods: Prospective observational data was pooled from four studies across 10 US centers investigating people with CF (PwCF) and CRS. Three studies evaluated HEMT's impact on CRS. For participants enrolled prior to HEMT initiation, SNOT‐22 scores were obtained at baseline and after 3–6 months of HEMT. Multivariate regression identified predictors of improvement. Cronbach's alpha and four distribution‐based methods were used to assess internal consistency and calculate the MCID of the SNOT‐22. Results: A total of 184 PwCF participated with mean baseline SNOT‐22 scores ranging from 18.1 to 56.7. Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.90 across sites. Participants at sites with pre‐ and post‐HEMT data reported improvement in SNOT‐22 scores after initiating HEMT (all p < 0.05). Worse baseline SNOT‐22 score (odds ratio (OR): 1.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.02–1.08), F508del homozygosity (OR: 4.30, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.14–18.99), and absence of prior modulator therapy (OR: 4.99, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.39–20.11) were associated with greater SNOT‐22 improvement. The mean MCID calculated via distribution‐based methods was 8.5. Conclusion: Worse baseline sinonasal symptoms, F508del homozygosity, and absence of prior modulator therapy predicted greater improvement after HEMT initiation. The mean MCID for SNOT‐22 in PwCF is 8.5 points, similar to non‐CF individuals with CRS, and provides a threshold specifically for PwCF. The SNOT‐22 has strong internal consistency in PwCF. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3965–3973, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Appropriate management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is important in improving quality of life. Otolaryngologists play a critical role in reducing CRS symptom burden. This study seeks to evaluate the role of patient-reported quality-of-life measures in guiding interventions for CF-related sinus disease. Methods: We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of 105 patients presenting to a CF-accredited clinic between July and September 2018. Demographic data and sinus surgery history were collected, in addition to Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD-NS) scores. Statistical analysis was conducted using correlation and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Baseline well-care visits accounted for 71.4% of all clinical evaluations. Prior otolaryngology intervention was noted in 69 (66%) patients, where the majority of these patients (63/69; 91%) underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Patients with a history of otolaryngology intervention had an average SNOT-22 score of 33.2 (SD = 20.6) compared to 24.9 (SD = 18.5) for patients without prior intervention (P =.048). The average QOD-NS score was 5.5 (SD = 6.4) among patients referred to otolaryngologists and 3.1 (SD = 5.7) for non-referred patients (P =.012). SNOT-22 and QOD-NS scores were modestly correlated (R of.43). Conclusion: CF patients with symptoms resulting in worse quality-of-life assessments were more likely to have established coordinated care with an otolaryngologist. Further validation of the utility of SNOT-22 and QOD-NS questionnaires as care coordination metrics is necessary in the CF population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a validated instrument that evaluates olfactory‐specific quality‐of‐life. The QOD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and factors associated with olfactory improvement after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor have not been determined for PwCF. Methods: Prospective observational data were pooled from three studies that enrolled adult PwCF with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). QOD scores and disease characteristics were assessed. To evaluate internal consistency and calculate the QOD MCID, Cronbach's alpha and four distribution‐based methods were employed. For participants who enrolled prior to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD scores were obtained at baseline and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with QOD improvement. Results: Of 129 PwCF included, 65 had QOD scores before and 3–6 months after starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Mean baseline QOD score was 6.5 ± 7.9. Mean Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.85. The MCID estimates were as follows: Cohen's effect size = 1.6, standard error of measurement = 2.5, ½ baseline standard deviation = 4.0, and minimal detectable change = 6.9. Mean MCID was 3.7. Of those with pre/post elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor QOD scores, the mean change in QOD was −1.3 ± 5.4. After elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD improvement surpassed the MCID in 22% of participants (14/65). Worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps were associated with improved QOD scores after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (both p < 0.04). Conclusion: The QOD MCID in PwCF was estimated to be 3.7. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor led to qualitative but not clinically meaningful improvements in QOD score for most PwCF; PwCF with worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps improved in a clinically significant manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In cystic fibrosis (CF), the relationship between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and pulmonary disease is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between scores on the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) and CF Questionnaire―revised for adolescents and adults over 14 (CFQ‐R 14+), and pulmonary function tests in 2 cohorts of CF patients: those at their baseline health and those with a pulmonary exacerbation. Methods: Patients >18 years old seen in a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation‒accredited clinic completed the SNOT‐22 and CFQ‐R 14+ instruments. Patients presenting for routine care represented the baseline cohort. Patients diagnosed with a pulmonary exacerbation represented the exacerbation cohort. Average SNOT‐22 and CFQ‐R 14+ scores for both groups were compared using a 2‐sample t test, and correlation coefficient was calculated. Results: One hundred three patients were enrolled over 3 months (30 exacerbations and 73 baseline). Patients' mean age was 32 years (56% female and 44% male). Average SNOT‐22 and CFQ‐R 14+ scores were significantly worse for exacerbation patients (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0003, respectively). Percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were both higher for baseline patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). Average SNOT‐22 score for all patients was worse than the average score for non‐CF, non‐CRS patients. Conclusion: CF patients with pulmonary exacerbations have worse SNOT‐22 and CFQ‐R 14+ scores than CF patients at their baseline health. This finding suggests a temporal relationship between sinonasal and pulmonary quality of life, and that worsening of both is associated with reduced pulmonary function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is a highly effective modulator that improves function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, resulting in improved pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We hypothesize that improvements in lung function are associated with improvements in health‐related quality of life and sinonasal health. The aim of this study is to measure the effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on patient‐reported sinonasal and overall quality of life, and to determine the relationship between changes in these 2 outcome measures. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at an accredited adult CF care center. Participants completed the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) and the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire–Revised (CFQ‐R), a validated patient‐reported outcome metric for CF patients, at baseline and at 3 months after initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Results: Forty‐three individuals completed the study. There was significant improvement in nearly all domains of the SNOT‐22 and CFQ‐R after 3 months of therapy. SNOT‐22 improved from 34.8 to 24.4 (p = 0.000003). Mean baseline FEV‐1 improved from 65% to 76% predicted (p = 0.0000005). The greatest effect was seen in those participants previously taking modulator therapy. Linear regression between the change in SNOT‐22 individual domains and the CFQ‐R respiratory domain revealed the strongest correlation between the extranasal domain score and the respiratory domain of the CFQ‐R (R2 = 0.24). Conclusion: CF patients taking elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor experience a significant improvement in both sinonasal and health‐related quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]